Tim Poole Talks Media Bias on Chloroquine Coverage | Joe Rogan

41 views

4 years ago

0

Save

Tim Pool

4 appearances

Tim Pool is a journalist, political commentator, and host of the "Timcast" podcast and Youtube program.

Comments

Write a comment...

Transcript

Those are the same people that are injecting Lysol right now. They aren't though. I know. Somebody might. There's probably a few. Yeah, well, you know, if you're gonna... What about the chloroquine thing? You know, the one form of chloroquine that was... I'd like a chloroquine. But the form that was a pond cleaner. Oh yeah, that's the way it's... But here's the thing. The lady, wasn't she like a democratic contributor? Big donor. She tweeted that Donald Trump was a psycho. Something like that. And her and her husband took the stuff. Well, there's new reporting that says the husband was an engineer. His friends are shocked that he would do something so stupid. So the wife poisoned him. That's the theory that's going around. Now the fair point brought up, I think it was a free beacon, is that he trusted his wife and he loved her. Wow, maybe she loved him. Maybe she loved him. Maybe she gave him... Or she's really dumb. Or she's pouring the fuck out of him. Apparently a couple decades ago she had struck him. There was a report about it. Oh, decades ago. Yeah, like 20 years, I think. But there's also reports. And you guys gotta factor this stuff for sure because it's not like something I've been diving too deep into, but she was trying to divorce the guy. So the story popping up is that democratic donor... So she's the cowbaskin of chloroquine. That's what people have been saying. Yeah, like the rumor is going around. But whether or not any of that's true, it's like I always say, give me the proof. But I can't tell you this. The media loves to run everything the president says through a filter of like it must be taken literally or to its worst most... The opposite of the benefit of the doubt. The most negative conclusion possible. If he says it, we're gonna run the most negative interpretation. It's bad. It's awful. So when he says something like that Peter Navarro instance where he said, you're a nasty reporter, he said about hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, it might work, it might not, but I'm optimistic. What did the press run with? Trump recommends untested dangerous drug. Meanwhile you get... Unscrupulous press. Don't all press run with that. Right, right, of course. But look, when Andrew Cuomo came out and said, we're gonna start trialing chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, where was the negative press? Didn't they say that that has actually been proven to kill more people than not using it though? The statistics? Yeah, one of the initial stories that come out said that it was actually more likely to kill. So the CDC had listed that this was actual treatment used by many countries. And we have... There's a lawmaker in Michigan. She's a Democrat. She was given the treatment. She had saved her life. And she personally praised the president for it. For that, she's being censured and being stripped of any endorsements. I've heard of that, which is crazy. It is, it is. Because there's a reason why they were using it. It showed some promise with some people. I guess the idea was that the extreme immune system reaction in your lungs was killing people, the swelling and the fluid buildup. So by suppressing the immune system, you would stop that from happening. The symptoms would abide and then you'd eventually recover. You know what, man? If the media... There's a graph showing the amount of press Obama got versus what Trump got. And I think to a certain degree, Trump brought some himself because he chased after this press and he baits them and he goes after them. But it's like three or four times as much news.