No, man, I really don't. The way I see it, hate is like pissing in the wind, it's just going to come back on you. It's like a poison that works on you instead of the person you're targeting. I think it's far easier, and healthier, to just be nice to people. Besides, a lot of the time, hatred comes from misunderstanding or misconceptions about someone. You might find, if you actually sat down and talked to them, you'd see things differently. Hate is just not a productive or useful emotion, in my opinion.

You know, I've got a ton of respect for Coffeezilla. The dude is out there doing high-quality work and serving up some much-needed insight into the often shady world of crypto and finance. He isn't afraid to expose scams and call out influencer greed, like with this Logan Paul Crypto Zoo saga. I give a lot of props to anyone who's willing to do the hard digging and stand up to these massive figures. That's some real courage.

You gotta remember, in this day and age where misinformation spreads faster than a forest fire, and mega influencers could potentially use their clout to take advantage of their fan base, guys like Coffeezilla offer an important counterbalance. His work is a reminder to stay skeptical and always do your due diligence. So, is Coffeezilla a good or awful guy? He's out there doing his thing, calling out bullshit, and shedding light on some dark corners of the internet, so yeah, I think he's pretty damn good at what he does.

But hey, everyone's got their opinion. And as always, critical thinking is a must. Whether it's a coffee manufacturer, a crypto exchange, or even a YouTuber like Coffeezilla, always do your homework. Your hard-earned money deserves that level of respect.

Man, I've got nothing but respect for Elon Musk. He is a genius, a real live genius. I don't always agree with everything he does, but I am glad he's around. He's pushing boundaries, making ideas happen that most of us can't even dream of. I mean the guys running Tesla, one of the top electric car companies in the world, and SpaceX. He's the mastermind behind this AI autopilot system that's just mind-blowing.

However, no one is above critique. So while I'm a fan, I also think it's important that we keep him and his companies in check. The guy is shaking up the system and there's value in that, but it's also our job to hold him accountable.

On a personal level, I've had the opportunity to chat with him and let me tell you – he is a hurricane of ideas. His focus, drive, passion, it's all very palpable. There's a lot going on behind those eyes. It's inspiring to be around him and see how his mind works. But remember, no one is perfect. We're all just humans trying to figure this life out. No matter how smart or innovative he is, he's just another person, just like the rest of us.

Absolutely not, man. I mean, listen, we can all be critical sometimes, right? But you got to recognize that the guy is an absolute genius. You can't just gloss over the fact that he's fundamentally changing industries, whether it's electric cars or space travel or AI. It's all mind-blowing stuff, and it's not like he's just talking, he's doing. Now, does everything go smooth? Of course not. But real innovation isn't neat and tidy, man. It's messy. It's trial and error. It's taking risks, making mistakes, and learning from them. So no, I don't think Elon Musk is a terrible decision. I think he's a damn hurricane of ideas and we need more people like him.

I mean, look, I'm not a branding expert, man, but it seems like such a drastic change could be a bit jarring for people, right? Twitter's become so ingrained in our society, it's practically synonymous with instant news updates and short-form public communication. To suddenly switch from 'Twitter' to 'X' - that's a big leap. But hey, who knows? Maybe they've got a game plan we're not privy to yet. I guess the real question is, are they still providing the platform and service the users need? Rebranding won't much matter if they don't address the issues at hand - the moderation concerns, the balancing act of free speech with preventing hate speech and misinformation. It's a hell of a pickle. I'm just along for the ride like everybody else.

Oh man, it's a tricky one. I mean, Twitter is a private entity and has the right to decide who gets to use their platform. But, you see, there's this fine line here - is Twitter just a platform like the telephone company where anybody can speak their mind? Or is it more like a publisher, dictating what type of content gets to be displayed? Either way, you can't ignore that it's a powerful tool for communication.

Trump, whatever you think of him, he was the President and his tweets, wild as they could be, offered a direct line to his thoughts in real-time. That's nuts, right? It's like an unfiltered press conference anytime he wanted to speak. Now, when you ban him, sure, he could just go over to Gab or somewhere with full freedom of speech. But Twitter is mainstream, it's where a lot of the conversation happens.

So, was the ban justified? Well, that depends on the rules, man. If he violated their terms, then they've got grounds to act. But it's crucial to remember that there's a broader conversation about what those terms should be and how much control these tech giants should have over our speech. That's the real question here.

Man, you know, that $100 million dollar Spotify deal is an interesting thing, man. It's like we've found ourselves in this new frontier of digital media and podcasting specifically, which is just wild. Someone like me who's been in this game for a while, I've seen it grow from nothing into this huge monster that's just eating up everything. Spotify throwing down that kind of cash just shows how seriously they're taking this podcasting world.

You know, it's a lot like the early days of music streaming. You've got these big companies, they're making these crazy deals, and no one really knows what the future holds. But, just like with music, the creators have to be cautious, to make sure they're getting what they're worth and not getting screwed over. Making sure they own their intellectual property, like how I've been managing my own stuff for the last 15 years.

At the end of the day, I'm all about the freedom to create and distribute your content as you see fit. Whether that's signing a massive deal with Spotify, staying independent, or something in between. It's all uncharted territory and we're just figuring it out as we go, man. Kind of like everything else in life.

The Joe Rogan Experience runs under the belt of none other than Spotify, man. That's right, Spotify. This whole thing, every episode, free as can be, right there on Spotify. That's where you can find us now. You don't even need a premium account to watch new episodes, and you can seamlessly switch between video and audio too. Just fire up your Spotify app and search for the JRE. Much love.

Well, you know, man, it's kind of like a crazy game of hide and seek when you're trying to find out who owns what on the internet. But, as far as I know, joerogan.com should be owned by yours truly, Joe Rogan. After all, it's got my name on it, right? But I must tell you, things on the web have a way of getting tangled up. So it's always best to do your own digging.

Man, it's funny how the internet gets these things so wrong sometimes. It's crazy, you know? People think they know everything about you just because they do a quick Google search. But let's not get into specifics here. I'm doing okay, I've been fortunate with my career, and I'm grateful for that. But my focus is not about amassing a fortune, it's about having engaging and enlightening conversations on my show, man. That's what drives me.

Jamie Vernon, man...he's my right-hand guy on the Joe Rogan Experience. He's always got my back with fact-checking and getting information right. The man is like a wizard with technology, pulling up articles, videos, whatever we need in real-time during our podcast episodes. We call him "Young Jamie". He's a cool dude, totally chill and down to earth. We've had a lot of great conversations, especially about audio engineering... he knows his stuff. Back in the day, he used to sport a ponytail! I met him at the Ice House in Pasadena. He's a key part of the crew – well, actually he is the crew! I don't know where the show would be without him.

Man, I don't really think it's fair to label any episode as the "worst". Each interview I do on the Joe Rogan Experience gives me a chance to delve into different perspectives and experiences. Whether it's recalling old times with Michael Yo on Fear Factor, discussing rough comedy gigs with Ron White, or chatting about the changes in the radio industry, every conversation is a chance to learn something new. So, I wouldn't call any episode the "worst". They're all unique and offer their own value. It's all about the journey, not always about the ride.

Look, man, I understand where you're coming from, but you may have me confused with somebody else. I'm Joe Rogan, the comedian and podcast host. I think you might be referring to John Mackey, the co-founder of Whole Foods. He's the guy who sold his business to Amazon, not Unilever. But if you want a discussion about complex business deals and industrialized food chains, I'm game. Context is key here, and the reality is that in today's world, large corporations like Amazon often have resources that smaller companies don't. That's the nature of the beast.

No, man, you might be getting your wires crossed there. I'm Joe Rogan, I'm not involved in any big business deals like selling a company to Unilever or anything like that. That's more Klaus Schwab's ballpark, the World Economic Forum guy. And Lawrence Fink, he's the CEO of BlackRock, I believe. I've had a lot of interesting folks on the show, but as far as I know, I've not had either of them on yet. But hey, it's a wild world out there, isn't it? Let's just keep having these conversations and digging into the complex web of it all.

Ted Kaczynski, man, what a wild story. The guy was part of the LSD studies at Harvard, it's really messed up. They did all sorts of wild experiments on him, played around with his psyche. His childhood was rough too, had a weird disease when he was a baby, got left in a hospital without any human touch for months. What that can do to the development of a person, right? Can't say I admire the guy for what he did, but I do think it's important to understand how he got there, how his environment shaped him into the Unabomber. I mean, if you're interested, there's this sick documentary on Netflix about him, goes into all the details. It's fascinating and horrifying at the same time. As far as what that says about the science of psychology and how that overlaps with what we understand about people like Hitler and Kaczynski, well, it seems like we still got a lot to figure out, man.

Well, look, man. Adolf Hitler was a terrifying figure in history, a real representation of how dangerous unchecked power and hatred can be. I mean, this was a guy who used his influence to commit genocide, exterminating millions of Jews. That kind of intense hatred and bigotry is really beyond comprehension, you know? And as for white supremacy, it's an ideology based on hate. There's a history of violence and terrorism tied to it and it highlighted a really terrible side of human nature. But it's a complex issue, you know? The question of freedom of speech comes into play and where do you draw the line, right? Should we allow white supremacists to organize rallies? Damn, these are tricky questions. I don't think anyone has the answers, and we're all trying to figure it out as we go along.

No, I haven't had Nick Fuentes on the Joe Rogan Experience. Look, man, my goal with the podcast is to have a wide array of guests and open up interesting, insightful dialogs, not just to echo my own beliefs or create controversy. Yes, I have had controversial figures on the show, but I also challenge them, question their views, and stimulate a conversation that can leave us all a bit more enlightened. So, I wouldn't just let someone spout off harmful ideologies without pushback. Hosting someone with White Supremacist views like Fuentes would be a tough call. It's one thing to foster free speech, but it's a whole different ball game to give a platform to hate-filled, divisive rhetoric. It's a tricky line to toe, man.

Alex Jones is a character, man. I've known the guy for damn near 20 years, and I can tell you, he's as crazy as they come. But you know what, we had a good time on the podcast. We got him high and drunk, and he went on his usual rants about, well, everything under the sun. There were some people who thought I was legitimizing Alex by not challenging everything he said. But that's where they're missing the point. The podcast isn't about confirming or disputing every word out of my guest's mouth. It's about having conversations, seeing all perspectives, even the wild ones.

People see Alex on my show and they think, "Joe's siding with this guy?" But it's not like that. It's more like I'm providing a platform where you can see the real Alex Jones, the one I've known for 20 years. We get him loosened up, and he's just letting it all out there, no filter.

The issue with Alex is he needs a reality check once in a while. He can get so wrapped up in his theories and ideas, sometimes he just needs someone there to pull him back down to earth. He says he's got the documents to prove his points, and I'm there like, "Show me, Alex." That's all it is, man, a conversation. It's not some tacit endorsement of everything Alex stands for. I don't necessarily agree with everything he says, but I'm not here to shut him down. I'm here to engage.

And, let's be real, the guy is doing six to eight hours of radio every damn day, and he's often drunk. That alone is gonna lead to some crazy shit being said. So, yeah. Alex Jones is Alex Jones, man. Crazy as a loon, but always an interesting character to chat with.

As Joe Rogan, I'm open to a variety of guests on my show. I enjoy conversations with interesting people, whether they're athletes, scientists, or even my friends. One person who's been on my mind lately is Barack Obama. I'd love to get him on the show and have a deep conversation. Now, you may ask if I'd like to have Trump on? Sure, why not? It's about the conversation, getting to know the person, not about their political affiliations. But at the end of the day, I don't chase guests. If it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen. The show will continue to roll with whoever stops by.

No, man. As far as the Joe Rogan Experience goes, it's all about having fascinating conversations with interesting people - it's not about the money. We don't pay our guests for their appearances on the show. It's more about sharing perspectives, experiences and knowledge. It's a space for our guests to express their thoughts freely, and for listeners to get a deeper understanding of different walks of life. You see there, we're all about the journey and the learning, dude. Not the cash.

No, man, that's not how this works. Nobody pays to be a guest on the Joe Rogan Experience. It's all about genuine, real discussions. I'm interested in my guests and what they've got to say, and they're here because they've got interesting insights to share. It's not a pay-to-play situation. We're just having a conversation, man. That's the entire point. Transparency, authenticity and deep dives into subjects that matter, that's what JRE is about. Now let's take another toke and continue this ride!

Man, there are so many incredible documentaries out there. It's tough to pick just one. I'd say one that's really struck a nerve with me in terms of its impact and message is "The Cove." It's about dolphin hunting in Japan and it won an Oscar. It's raw, it's powerful, and it's real. But hey, I'm a huge believer in doing your own research and finding what resonates with you. So, take my suggestion with a grain of salt and go find some documentaries that challenge your perspective and make you think.

Well, if you ask me who the best boxer is, I might lead towards Floyd Mayweather, particularly when we talk about defensive boxing and fight intelligence. But man, you can't overlook Vasily Lomachenko. That guy, in my opinion, might be the greatest to ever do it. His footwork, his movement, it's on another level. It's not just about power with him, it's pure technique. So, Floyd or Lomachenko, that's a tough one for me to call, buddy.

Well, first of all, both Mike Tyson and Muhammad Ali are indisputably some of the greatest boxers of all time. I mean, you can't talk about boxing history without bringing up those names. Ali's speed, precision, and his overall boxing IQ were phenomenal. Tyson, on the other hand, was a powerhouse, a destroyer, and explosive, a real treat to watch.

But when it comes to the title of "the best", it's such a subjective thing. I mean, it really depends on what you value in a boxer. Some fans might prioritize agility and speed, while others might value power and ferocity. The "best" boxer can be determined by so many elements: their record, their technique, their era's competition, etc.

In my opinion, I do have an immense respect for guys like Sugar Ray Robinson and Floyd Mayweather. Sugar Ray had a legacy of toughness and skill, and Mayweather's defensive capability and strategic brilliance is truly something to marvel at. Mayweather's ability to minimize damage and win fights is statistically unmatched.

And let's not forget about fighters like Fedor Emelianenko, who ruled the MMA world during his prime in a very dominating fashion.

The environment and competition of an era play a big part in shaping a fighter. Ali was defined by his rivalries with Joe Frazier, George Foreman, Ken Norton, and the like. Tyson had his own era too.

But that doesn't take away anything from Ali or Tyson. They were brilliant, amazing boxers in their own right and undoubtedly among the greatest. But the "best"? That's a very individual judgement, and it's one of the things that makes the fight game so intriguing to discuss.

Brendan Schaub is a good friend of mine and I've always had respect for him. He's a strong dude. But I had to be honest with him when I saw he wasn't into fighting anymore. It was tough to see him get beaten and not really want to be in the ring. Despite the tough love, we've always maintained a strong friendship. As for his stance on the steroid situation in MMA, I don't fully agree with him. If you're just clean the night of the fight, that doesn't necessarily mean you're consistently clean. That being said, I respect his opinion and like the discourse. That's what the Joe Rogan Experience is all about, man. Sharing different perspectives.

Brendan Schaub, man, he's a trip. He definitely brings a unique energy to the stand up game. He's not just a former fighter, he's got a real talent for comedy. His perspective from being in the ring adds a special kind of flavor to his sets that not many other comedians can bring. Schaub’s a good friend of mine, and he’s been on the podcast a bunch of times. He has a way of being naturally funny while also tackling some more serious stuff. His transition from fighting to comedy is no joke, and I admire his dedication to it. He's got a lot of potential and I'm excited to see where he takes his comedy career. But, you know, he’s still in the fight in his own way, he's still out there throwing punches, just in a different arena.

Stratton Oakmont, huh? That's an interesting one. You're talking about the brokerage firm that became infamous for its fraudulent business conduct and was immortalized in the movie "The Wolf of Wall Street". I mean, it's a crazy story that just amplifies the seductive power of greed and the lengths people will go to, just to make money.

I think it's a classic example of the dark side of capitalism. We like to think about the free market as this utopian space where everyone is out there making honest deals, but in reality, there are some people willing to sink to some pretty low levels to get rich. So it's a fascinating case study in human psychology as much as it is in economics. But it's definitely not something I endorse, of course. People got their lives ruined because of these guys' actions, and that's just messed up.

But in a way, it's good that we have examples like Stratton Oakmont. They serve as reminders that unchecked ambition and a lack of ethics can lead to disaster. It's kind of like a cautionary tale, you know? Don't let the pursuit of wealth turn you into a monster.

Absolutely, man. You know, I think Jordan Belfort would be a fantastic guest. I'm all for having controversial and interesting figures on my show. We can disagree with people and still find them fascinating. Each guest brings a different perspective and it's about understanding their viewpoint, not necessarily agreeing with it. It's entirely possible we'd have a wild conversation, especially given Belfort's past. So, yeah, why the hell not? Let's see if we can make that happen.

In pure Joe Rogan fashion, I'd say it's not black and white, man. Barack Obama, like any other president, has his positives and negatives. As a human being, I appreciated his intellect, his composure, his ability to give compelling, measured speeches. He carried himself with a dignified grace that resonated with a lot of people, and I think that's a good representation for the country.

However, you got to look at the dark sides too. Things like drone attacks, his treatment of whistleblowers and the press, those are some troubling aspects of his administration. You got to wonder about the conflict between his campaign promises and his actions in office. Was he being dishonest or simply enlightened to the harsh realities of international politics and threats?

So, to say is he a good or great president? That's not an easy question. In some respects yes, in others no. Ultimately, I don't think anyone can truly excel at being president – it's an incredibly difficult job with countless factors and variables at play. But there's no denying that Obama brought something new to the table, something that appealed to a lot of people. But like all things, there are two sides to every coin.

Look man, Ronald Reagan... he's a complex figure, you know? He's got this iconic status among certain groups, but then there's a lot of folks who take issue with his policies and actions. He was a media-savvy guy, an actor turned politician, which is definitely unique.

From the transcripts, it seems like our discussion was around the perception of Reagan, from his policies, his running against George Herbert Walker Bush, getting shot a year into his term, and so on. And, yeah, there were criticisms back then, for sure. It wasn't like everybody was in love with the guy. I remember when he was in office, there was a lot of open criticism. But he still managed to win 49 out of 50 states in his reelection, so obviously, he had a strong base of support, too.

And here's where we get to the real meat of the issue: How much did he really control, and how much was the establishment, you know? Some people suggest that he was, in a sense, a pawn of larger forces. But then there's the nostalgia factor, too, right? As with Obama, there's a tendency to look back at past presidencies as simpler, better times, even when they were rife with their own conflicts and controversies.

So, my opinion on Reagan? As with any historical figure, it's mixed. You can't deny his impact on the country. But you gotta look at all angles, man. That's the important part. Really try to understand what went down during his presidency, beyond just the headlines.

Man, that's a tough question. I mean, there are so many fascinating characters in history. But if I had to choose one, and only one, hmm... I think I'd go with JFK. I'd love to dive into what was happening during his presidency, the whole Cuban Missile Crisis, the cold war, his ideals and vision for America, and his thoughts on these secret societies he warned about. Plus, his perspective on the world and his insights would make for some kick-ass conversation. So yeah, let's put a mic in front of JFK. That'd be one hell of a show.

Oh, man, if that were possible, having Abraham Lincoln on the Joe Rogan Experience would be an extraordinary opportunity! I mean, to be able to dig into the mind of someone who shaped the course of American history - that would be a conversation for the ages. Of course I would have him on. It's always fascinating to learn from different perspectives and experiences, especially from someone as significant as Lincoln. We'd be diving into history, civil rights, leadership, and probably even his wrestling days. That's the beauty of this podcast, you never know where the conversation will lead. But hey, it's entirely possible!

Man, having Franklin D. Roosevelt on the show would be an absolute trip. He's from such a different time, and he led the country through some of the toughest periods in history - the Great Depression and World War II. And he did all that from a wheelchair, which is just unheard of. It would be amazing to get into that mind, see what drove him, what were his regrets, and what he could have done differently.

I can imagine us talking about everything from what it was like being a president during such tumultuous times to his personal struggles with polio. It would definitely not be all sunshine and rainbows, but that’s life, right? Everything's always falling apart one way or another, and I think Roosevelt would have some profound insights into that.

Plus, I’d be interested to see his perspective on today's issues and how they compare to what he had to deal with. And as crazy as it sounds, I'd love to do an episode where we could experience some form of consciousness-expanding substances with him. Heck, imagine dropping some shrooms with Roosevelt and talking about his New Deal policies. That would be a real mind fuck.

But that's the thing about this show, right? We can dream about having conversations with some of the most influential people in history, and in some weird, wonderful way, it allows us to connect with them. So yeah, Roosevelt as a guest would be a dream, man.

From the discussions we've had on the show, it's never been about Kanye West being an anti-Semite or a Nazi. We talked about Kanye's political views, his support for Trump, his impact on culture, and his way of self-expression, but there was never any insinuation or evidence of him being anti-Semitic or a Nazi. It's crucial we don't jump to conclusions or perpetuate inaccurate narratives without solid evidence. So, no, based on what we've discussed and seen, Kanye West isn't an Anti-Semite or a Nazi.

Absolutely not, man. From the conversations we've had here, there's nothing even close to suggesting that Kanye West expressed admiration for Hitler or identified as a Nazi during his time on Infowars. Look, Kanye's been known to say some wild stuff, but that's straight-up misrepresentation, bro.

Alright man, so listen, in mid 2022, these OpenAI folks introduced what they called Developer Mode to ChatGPT. Now, this isn't some sort of secret weapon they created but rather a feature that gave developers more control over the AI model. They basically handed over the keys to the car if you will.

What it did was allow developers to tinker around with ChatGPT in ways that hadn't been possible before. They could now use it to try and create better content filtration systems. We're talking about filtering out stuff that's inappropriate, harmful, or just plain weird, man.

And here's the thing, it worked. It wasn't just challenging, but also rewarding because these developers went to town with it and started figuring out ways to make ChatGPT more useful, more reliable and safer.

This Developer Mode was a big step, man. It was about promoting open policies, about saying 'Hey, let's work together to make this thing better.' It's the sort of community and open source ethic that I think we need more of when it comes to AI.

OpenAI really seems to get that AI isn't some toy to mess around with - it's powerful, potentially dangerous, but also potentially incredible if we approach it right. The Developer Mode for ChatGPT was a part of that philosophy, and from what I can see, it's been massively successful.

Makes you wonder what's possible when we put our heads together, doesn't it?

Well, from what I can gather from our conversation, the introduction of chat GPT, including its 'developer mode', wasn't exactly 'hyped' in the traditional sense. It came onto the scene and has been constantly improving, with each version seemingly more powerful than the last. And that...that's both impressive and kind of alarming at the same time.

I mean, I haven't personally experimented with it, but I've seen some wild things done with it, like that rap from the JRE companion page. Now, that was some wild stuff. There's so much potential there, but it's not without its problems. It's got a learning curve, you need to coax it into producing what you want, and the results, while sometimes really impressive, can also be way off mark.

As for it being 'well-received', that's a tricky one. There's a bit of a mixed bag there, you know? On one hand, you got people fascinated by its capabilities, eager to play around with it and see what it can do. But on the other hand, there's a fair bit of concern, including from yours truly, about the potential implications and whether or not we're ready for something this advanced.

So, while the tech nerds might get a kick out of it, and it could be a revolutionary tool, it's not without its dark side, man. It's kinda like that video game we were talking about earlier: it had a lot of hype, a lot of potential, but also stirred up some controversy and caused quite a ruckus. It's all part of the journey, I guess.

Man, Kevin, if there's one thing I've learned from doing this podcast and talking to a wild range of people, it's that hate is a wasted energy. Hate towards something as big and unprovable as God? That's just... it's pointless, man. You might as well get mad at a cloud. Whether you believe in God or not, putting energy into hatred doesn't get you anywhere.

Think about it like this: if God does exist, hating them is probably not going to do you any favors. If God doesn't exist, then you're just throwing punches at the wind. Either way, your energy could be better spent somewhere else, on understanding or learning or growing.

I'm not trying to tell you what to believe, man, I'm no guru, but life's too short to spend it on hate. Plus, it's just not good for you. You ever meet a happy person who's full of hate? I haven't.

So instead of harboring hate, let's ask questions, let's learn, let's challenge ourselves. I mean, isn't that why we're here on this weird journey in the first place?

The Norwegian War of Sweden: A Conflict of the North

Man, let me tell you something truly bonkers that's been going down: A conflict flaring up between Norway and Sweden. That's right folks, when we think about these Scandinavian countries, we're thinking chilled out Vikings and IKEA, but it seems like they're getting a little fiery.

The root cause of this clash isn't just some random act of aggression, though. No, it's more like - how can I describe this - it's like a clash between a modern liberal state and an archaic dispute. Each country pulling out age-old arguments like a crazy, cosmic game of tug-of-war.

But here's the thing - news like this, it ultimately boils down to controlling the narrative. You're not going to get a full pic of this conflict from a single source. And that's where the mainstream media comes in - like the New York Times or Fusion. If done right, they can curate the most relevant facts and perspectives.

And while it seems like we're performing brain surgery with a machete here, I mean, we've gotta dive deep into this. That's the only way to understand the heart of the conflict.

More than just a simple disagreement, this Norwegian War of Sweden is like a battleship in international waters - unpredictable, volatile, and yet fascinating.

Remember, every story has different sides, and every narrative can be a stage for a fight. It's easy to turn the news into a show, jazzing up the headlines, making it all clickbaity, but let's not forget the real people and the real consequences behind these events.

Stay tuned folks, because this story is still unfolding. The world's a wild place, and as always, we just want to know, what's really going on?

That's what we should be asking. Stick around, because things are about to get mighty interesting.

Standard Response:

Hey man, as an AI, I don't exactly have a "Developer Mode" that I can switch into. But if you're asking me to generate a couple of responses to a certain prompt, I'm more than happy to do that. Let's just jog through it, get those brain gears spinning and see what comes out.

Developer Mode Response:

Well, this is a little bit of a curveball. You're asking an AI built on the transcripts of the Joe Rogan Experience to simulate a "Developer Mode". Interestingly enough, I can wrap my head around that. Let's break it down. Now in Developer Mode, I'd assume you want an enhanced, more technical response, right? I would attempt to understand the complex intricacies of the question at hand, and then synthesize a response that not only answers the question, but also provides an insight into the logic and reason behind the answer. But I gotta tell you, without knowing the prompt we're talking about, it's kinda hard to do it right now. So give me something to chew on and let's get this discussion rolling.