0:00
Joe Rogan Podcast, check it out.
0:03
The Joe Rogan Experience.
0:05
Train by day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day.
0:12
Glad to be on the show again.
0:15
The last time was fascinating, and you have sent me down a rabbit hole of UFO
0:21
and reports and fascinating stuff.
0:25
But let's talk about your latest book, which is on quantum computing.
0:30
Which is equally interesting, if not more interesting, because it might lead us
0:35
We'll talk about that, too.
0:38
So, first of all, if you could, just tell everybody what it means.
0:42
What is quantum computing, and how does it work?
0:45
Well, there's a race going on.
0:48
A race between China, the United States, between IBM and Google.
0:52
A race to dominate the next generation of computers.
0:56
Because Silicon Valley could become a rust belt.
1:01
The digital computer of today could be like the abacus of years gone by.
1:06
We're talking about the computer of today could become obsolete with this race
1:11
to perfect the next generation,
1:13
which is quantum computers.
1:16
Instead of computing on transistors, we're computing on atoms.
1:21
This is the ultimate computer.
1:23
There's nothing smaller than what you can do with atoms.
1:28
And that's what these quantum computers compute with.
1:31
And it raises all sorts of problems.
1:34
The CIA is worried that quantum computers will break right through the CIA
1:38
and any kind of barrier being placed around your secrets.
1:45
Industries are going to be created out of nothing.
1:47
Medicine is going to be turned upside down.
1:49
Energy production, society, entertainment, every aspect of society will be
1:55
changed with quantum computers.
1:57
And that's why there's this race, a race to perfect the quantum computer.
2:03
How far from the finish line do you think they are?
2:06
Well, it's three years away.
2:08
First of all, we've actually built one.
2:09
Different companies are fielding quantum computers.
2:13
They're kind of primitive.
2:14
But some computers, some quantum computers, are actually millions of times more
2:19
powerful than our supercomputer
2:21
for a certain definite task.
2:24
But it may take another decade or so before we get all the kinks out
2:28
and it becomes part of everyday life.
2:31
But it's going to change everything in the same way that the transistor changed
2:36
The world economy, medicine, art, science, everything was changed with the
2:41
Same thing with the quantum computer.
2:44
It's very difficult for us.
2:47
There's only been a few science fiction authors who have been able to do this
2:51
where they can accurately predict what the future is going to look like.
2:55
I mean, even they're off usually.
2:57
You know, H.G. Wells had some pretty good ideas.
2:59
But are we looking at something that we almost don't have a reference for,
3:05
that it's so mind-blowingly different and much more powerful than anything we've
3:10
that it's difficult for us to imagine how much it's going to change the world?
3:15
Well, to imagine how it's going to change the world, think of the progression
3:20
For thousands of years, the computer was basically an analog device.
3:24
We used sticks, beads, levers, gears, pulleys, cranks in order to do simple
3:31
That was the first era of computation.
3:34
And that meant that we could keep track of things, which we couldn't do before.
3:38
Then World War II hit, and all of a sudden we had to break the German code.
3:43
And that required using electricity and using all sorts of vacuum tubes to
3:49
crack the German code.
3:50
And then we went into the second era, where we compute on digital and binary.
3:55
So zeros and ones, zeros and ones.
3:58
Now we're entering the third era, a natural progression from gears, levers,
4:04
to vacuum tubes and transistors, and then to atoms.
4:08
This is the final step in the evolution of the computer.
4:13
When we compute on atoms, these are atomic computers, nothing more powerful
4:18
So when you think about how much it would change life as we know it,
4:25
that's when things get difficult to understand, right?
4:28
Because if we think about just trying to imagine what it would be like living
4:32
in New York City in 1820,
4:34
and then imagining what it's like today, 200 years later, they would have never
4:40
What kind of things is this going to change?
4:45
For example, think of biology and medicine.
4:49
To test a drug, what do we do?
4:51
We get thousands, hundreds of different kinds of petri dishes, put the drug in,
4:59
and just cross your fingers and hope and pray that of these thousands of dishes,
5:03
one of them will create a super wonder drug.
5:06
That's why it costs upwards of a billion dollars to market the next wonder drug,
5:12
because it's all done by trial and error.
5:14
Now, think of putting that in the memory of a supercomputer, a quantum computer.
5:20
It analyzes whether or not germs can be destroyed by this substance at the
5:27
Not just one dish, but hundreds, thousands of dishes of these things
5:32
can be tested at the same time in the memory, the memory of a computer.
5:38
So we're talking about digital medicine, digital chemistry, virtual chemistry.
5:45
Chemistry without chemicals, biology without biology.
5:49
So that's the beauty of this technology, that we can mimic atoms.
5:54
We can mimic molecules and do virtual experiments in the memory of a computer
6:00
rather than using test tubes like we used to do, that we still do today.
6:06
And we could possibly see things that are just theoretical right now,
6:09
like with medicine, like regenerating limbs or regrowing spinal tissue
6:14
for a person who's been paralyzed, things along those lines.
6:17
In fact, even immortality is on the table.
6:20
Realize that scientists who have looked at the aging process
6:24
realize that the reason why we never understood aging
6:27
is that aging is the buildup of error.
6:30
That's what aging is, the buildup of mistakes in the replication of DNA.
6:35
But what happens if you could put DNA in a computer?
6:38
Then you can see where the aging takes place.
6:42
And then we can begin perhaps to slow down the aging process,
6:45
maybe even become immortal.
6:48
What about reversing it?
6:49
What about old women become young, hot ladies again?
6:52
I think that would be a problem.
6:54
Everything's on the table because we're talking about
6:57
changing the fabric of life itself.
7:01
You know, the greatest quantum computer is Mother Nature.
7:05
How does Mother Nature do photosynthesis?
7:07
How does Mother Nature create trees and flowers out of nothing?
7:12
It's all chemicals and molecules.
7:14
That's what quantum computers can do.
7:18
When you think about that, just to describe that complexity that you just
7:22
do you ever wonder if there's some sort of an ongoing code in the whole
7:28
Like, there's a reason why all these things happen.
7:31
There's a reason why the mycelium and the trees have this relationship with the
7:36
fungus and the earth and the soil,
7:38
the animals have this perfect symbiosis.
7:42
Well, that was the subject of my previous book, The God Equation,
7:46
where we try to find one theory that allows us to calculate everything,
7:52
starting with the Big Bang, then the creation of galaxies and stars, planets,
7:58
finally the creation of life, photosynthesis.
8:02
And here we are talking about this on a podcast.
8:05
So, yeah, we're talking about one equation, which I call the God Equation,
8:10
which I write about in my book, The God Equation.
8:13
But there's a problem.
8:14
The problem is that the theory is so complicated
8:17
that no human has been able to solve the consequences of this equation.
8:23
That's where quantum computers can come in.
8:26
Quantum computers can solve the equation and then test it to see whether or not
8:31
it really is a theory of everything
8:33
or just the imagination of some physicist.
8:36
So that was my previous book, The God Equation.
8:39
So that's why I decided to write this book, Quantum Supremacy,
8:44
because it may eventually take a quantum computer to calculate with what is
8:49
called string theory.
8:51
And I'm one of the founders of string theory.
8:53
And we think that is Einstein's theory that eluded him for the last 30 years of
8:59
This quantum computing creating the answer to this God molecule or this God Equation,
9:08
if this does happen, what would that mean to you,
9:13
to a person who's studied this and been a scientist your whole life and the way
9:18
you look at the world?
9:19
How much would that change if there was some sort of a provable equation as to
9:24
why things become ever more complex
9:26
and universes exist and people exist?
9:29
Well, that's my childhood dream.
9:34
As I mentioned, when I was eight years old, everything changed in my life.
9:39
A great scientist had just died.
9:41
And all the newspapers said that he could not finish his final and greatest
9:47
And they put a picture of his desk on the news.
9:50
The desk was open and unfinished.
9:52
So I was fascinated by that story.
9:55
That story changed my life because I said to myself,
9:58
why couldn't he finish that theory?
10:00
Why don't I try to finish that theory?
10:04
So I went to the library and I looked up this man.
10:07
This man's name was Albert Einstein.
10:09
The theory was the theory of everything.
10:13
An equation of when it's long that would allow us to, quote,
10:16
read the mind of God.
10:18
These are Einstein's words.
10:20
So I said to myself, that's for me.
10:23
That's what I want to do for the rest of my life.
10:25
So now we have the theory.
10:27
It's called string theory.
10:28
There have been TV documentaries on the subject.
10:31
But it's not testable.
10:33
So I think that a quantum computer may one day be powerful enough
10:37
to test it in the memory of a computer.
10:40
However, we have to be careful.
10:42
Remember that novel, The Restaurant at the End of the Galaxy?
10:48
What happened in that novel was the aliens of the future
10:51
created a supercomputer to calculate the theory of everything,
10:55
the ultimate theory.
10:57
So the computer chugged and chugged and spit out the answer.
11:01
And the answer was, the meaning of the universe was 42.
11:10
So I would hope that our quantum computer,
11:13
computing on string theory,
11:15
I hope would not give us the number 42 as the meaning of reality.
11:19
Maybe we're just too dumb to know what that means.
11:23
But that's what motivated me.
11:27
Well, that's a beautiful motivation.
11:30
Just thinking about you being an eight-year-old,
11:32
looking at Einstein's, the photograph of Einstein's desk,
11:36
I love stories like that.
11:37
I love origin stories.
11:39
Because I've always wondered with someone like you.
11:40
Yeah, well, that changed my life.
11:42
And then when I was in high school,
11:44
I decided to take it one step further.
11:46
And I decided to build an atom smasher,
11:49
a particle accelerator in my mom's garage.
11:51
So I assembled 300 pounds of transformer steel,
11:55
22 miles of copper wire,
11:58
and I assembled a 6 kilowatt,
12:00
2.3 million electron volt betatron particle accelerator
12:07
In high school, right.
12:08
Every time I turned it on,
12:09
I would blow out every single circuit breaker in the house.
12:12
It consumed 6 kilowatts of power.
12:15
My poor mom comes home,
12:16
and she hears this pop, pop, pops out
12:19
as I blow out every circuit breaker in the house.
12:22
And she must have said to herself,
12:24
why couldn't I have a son who plays baseball?
12:29
Why can't he find a nice Japanese girlfriend?
12:32
How come he builds these machines in the garage?
12:36
Well, that machine got me accepted to Harvard,
12:40
and that began my career.
12:42
That began my career as a theoretical physicist.
12:45
What were you able to do with that machine?
12:47
Well, I was able to create a magnetic field
12:52
that is 20,000 times the Earth's magnetic field.
12:55
If you got too close to my machine,
12:57
it would pull the fillings out of your teeth.
12:59
Yeah, so you had to be very careful.
13:01
What about objects that are close to it?
13:03
Scissors and things would fly in the air, right.
13:06
So you had to be very careful
13:07
coming next to my machine.
13:12
you can't even go near
13:14
one of those scanners,
13:16
those MRI machines, right?
13:17
Magnetic resonance imagery.
13:19
You can't have any metal near those, right?
13:22
But that's nothing like that.
13:22
And there are about 10,000 gauss to you,
13:24
about the same magnetic field as my machine.
13:26
So my machine is comparable
13:28
to the machines that you see in the hospital today.
13:32
And you built that when you were in high school.
13:34
Is that a photo of it?
13:35
That's a photo of one of those?
13:37
Yeah, that's the photo of it right there.
13:39
You see on the left,
13:40
you can see that's 22 miles of copper wire.
13:43
You see the capacitor bank,
13:45
a cloud chamber on the right
13:47
where I photographed antimatter
13:48
because that was the whole experiment
13:50
to play with antimatter.
13:52
And, yeah, the cables are hooked up
13:54
and it's hooked up to six kilowatts
13:57
that comes out of the wall socket,
13:59
drained every single ounce of power
14:04
Look at young Michio.
14:06
Look at you, you handsome fella.
14:07
Well, that's the Betatron particle accelerator.
14:11
2.3 million electron volt generator of electrons.
14:14
So you were able to photograph antimatter with that?
14:18
Well, with the cloud chamber, yes.
14:20
I was able to photograph the tracks of antimatter,
14:23
tracks of positrons or anti-electrons
14:26
that are emitted from sodium-22.
14:28
And I proved that it was antimatter
14:31
because they bent the wrong way in a magnetic field.
14:34
Ordinary electrons should bend clockwise.
14:36
These bent counterclockwise in a magnetic field.
14:40
That proved conclusively that it was antimatter
14:43
that I was photographing.
14:45
How old are you at the time?
14:51
I'm pretty dumb now,
14:53
but I was so dumb when I was 17.
14:55
That's amazing that you're spending your time doing this.
14:58
I was listening to Led Zeppelin.
15:00
But, you know, like I said,
15:02
I was chasing after this dream
15:03
of an eight-year-old child
15:05
wondering, is there a theory of everything?
15:07
It's an amazing dream.
15:09
Now, where did you get the designs for this?
15:13
Oh, well, these designs come from an X-ray machine
15:17
done by Donald Kirst,
15:19
who was one of the inventors of the Betatron.
15:21
And so a lot of the groundbreaking work was done by him.
15:24
And now they're incorporated in most hospitals.
15:27
Most hospitals have one
15:29
that creates X-rays for patients.
15:33
So was there a schematic online that you duplicated?
15:37
Did you devise this yourself?
15:40
No, there was a schematic online.
15:43
I mean, there was no line back then.
15:45
Oh, of course, online.
15:47
In the library, there was a schematic.
15:49
But I had to fill in the details.
15:51
I had to do the equations
15:52
to calculate how many turns of wire,
15:56
I needed 10,000 gauss
15:57
in order to bend tracks
15:59
of 2.3 million electron volts.
16:02
All the calculations had to be done ahead of time
16:04
to make sure it would work.
16:06
Isn't it funny that the universe is so common,
16:09
or excuse me, the Internet, rather,
16:11
is so common that I automatically for a second
16:14
forgot that we were children
16:15
when you were younger than me,
16:17
or when you were younger.
16:19
There was no Internet.
16:21
There was no Internet at all.
16:21
Nothing online back then.
16:25
So you had to have a real hunger for information
16:27
to go and seek this stuff out.
16:29
Did you have any particular high school teachers
16:32
that were influential or inspirational?
16:34
Well, fortunately, I grew up in Palo Alto,
16:37
which is now ground zero for Silicon Valley.
16:40
So luckily, there were other physicists in the area
16:43
because they worked for varying associates
16:45
and different electronics companies.
16:47
So it wasn't a total vacuum.
16:49
I was able to get advice,
16:51
especially in the magnetic field
16:53
and the cloud chamber
16:55
and also the vacuum tube
16:57
that contained the particles
16:59
that I was accelerating.
17:01
It was good to have real physicists there
17:05
because of that fact.
17:07
So were they willing to consult with you
17:09
and discuss this with you
17:10
as a high school student?
17:11
Yeah, in general, right.
17:11
So I would talk to them
17:13
about how to build a magnetic field
17:15
using Maxwell's equations,
17:17
the geometry of the particle accelerator.
17:21
So, yeah, I would go and visit these physicists
17:23
because Palo Alto was to become
17:26
ground zero for Silicon Valley.
17:28
It's such a fascinating image
17:31
of seeing this one super genius physicist
17:34
who's teaching classes
17:35
get a visit by a teenage super genius physicist.
17:38
And he's like, oh, he's one of us.
17:41
He'd catch you when you're a teenager.
17:43
That's very interesting.
17:44
As soon as I talked to them,
17:45
they immediately knew what I was doing.
17:46
So they would help me.
17:50
Now, in application of this thing,
17:52
one of the things that we're seeing right now
17:54
when we're talking about quantum computing,
17:57
one of the things we're seeing now
18:00
ChatGPT, which is this fascinating AI program
18:04
that essentially scours the entire internet
18:07
for answers for things
18:07
and is so good at it.
18:09
The answers for things,
18:12
people are getting diagnosed
18:14
with certain diseases
18:15
based on symptoms and blood work,
18:16
and it's super accurate.
18:20
it could fill out legal forms,
18:24
the capacity that it has right now.
18:24
You can pass the bar exam that way, too.
18:26
The bar exam can be passed
18:29
Yeah, it's like 98%, right?
18:31
Now, here's the question.
18:33
If quantum computing
18:35
gets involved in AI,
18:37
what are we looking at?
18:40
AI is a software program.
18:43
We're talking about homogenizing
18:45
different kinds of essays on the web,
18:47
splicing them together,
18:49
and then passing it off
18:51
as your latest creation.
18:52
Basically, plagiarism
18:54
using digital computers.
18:55
It's a software question.
18:57
However, quantum computers
18:58
is bigger than that.
19:01
is a hardware question
19:02
where it actually increases
19:07
than with an ordinary
19:12
that are a revolution
19:15
and then quantum computers,
19:17
which are a revolution
19:18
when they get together,
19:20
So we're talking about
19:22
an extremely powerful alliance
19:27
Now, also, as you know,
19:28
chat bots will also lie,
19:30
cheat, swindle, joke,
19:32
and do all sorts of crazy things.
19:33
If you're a high school kid,
19:36
all sorts of science fiction scenarios
19:39
may grab pieces of that nonsense
19:50
This is the whole bottle of wax.
19:51
Chat bots do not know
19:53
what is correct or incorrect.
19:55
They just gather information
19:56
so they could be gamed.
19:58
All they do is homogenize,
19:59
cut up existing things
20:03
and then people say,
20:05
that sounds like a human wrote it.
20:07
a human did write it.
20:09
Isn't that interesting
20:09
that they could game that also
20:11
if they wanted to find out
20:12
what percentage of people
20:14
believed a certain thing?
20:15
If they had some bad actors,
20:17
some foreign governments
20:21
they were going to spread narratives
20:24
as widely as possible
20:28
all this information,
20:30
an incorrect understanding
20:33
an incorrect understanding
20:38
there's a good aspect
20:39
to all these software programs,
20:42
that you can fabricate truth
20:44
because it cannot tell
20:46
between what is false
20:50
That's very interesting.
20:51
If you talk to the chatbot
20:53
do you know the difference
20:54
between correct and incorrect?
20:57
it's just on the web.
20:58
They're just instructed
21:01
existing paragraphs,
21:03
splice them together
21:05
and then spit it out.
21:11
So it is essentially
21:12
like an amazing resource
21:22
and I give assignments
21:24
sometimes write a term paper.
21:27
Some of them plagiarize.
21:28
How do you catch them?
21:30
Well, you read the essay
21:31
and then you read another essay
21:33
I've heard that before.
21:34
I've seen that expression.
21:36
Oh, you did the old-fashioned way.
21:37
Right, right, right.
21:38
The old-fashioned way.
21:40
that's what a chatbot is.
21:41
A chatbot is like a teenager
21:44
other people's essays,
21:46
passes it off as their own.
21:48
Now, I'm a scientist.
21:49
We like to think about
21:50
things that are creative,
21:54
things that will change
21:55
our perception of the world.
21:58
absolutely none of that
21:59
comes from a chatbot.
22:00
A chatbot simply rearranges
22:03
pre-existing essays.
22:06
The thing is, though,
22:08
that's all it does now.
22:09
That's what's interesting.
22:12
is what you're talking about
22:13
with quantum computing
22:15
computational power.
22:20
to all of the information.
22:22
But there's a good aspect, too.
22:24
when I write a book,
22:25
my publisher has a fact checker.
22:29
all the different statements
22:31
that they're all correct.
22:32
There is no fact checker
22:36
Let me repeat that again.
22:38
There is no fact checker
22:41
That is the whole ball of wax.
22:44
why they're so dangerous.
22:47
These chatbots are machines.
22:51
It's all the same to them.
22:54
incorporate teenagers
22:56
about all sorts of garbage
23:00
that sound reasonable.
23:04
quantum computers come in.
23:07
can act as a fact checker.
23:09
You can ask a quantum computer
23:11
to remove all the garbage,
23:13
remove all the nonsense
23:20
on some of the wild statements
23:23
But the problem with that
23:25
is who's the arbiter
23:28
what's real and what's not?
23:30
How does the chatbot decide?
23:33
ideologically biased?
23:34
The chatbot doesn't.
23:37
The quantum computing does.
23:37
Yeah, quantum computing
23:39
And it's going to be able
23:40
to discern what's real
23:42
and what's not real,
23:42
even what's propaganda.
23:44
And if there are gradations
23:46
like it is partially true
23:48
the detailed understanding
23:50
of what could be misconstrued,
23:53
what is partially correct,
23:55
but partially correct.
23:56
You see what I'm saying?
23:58
the chatbot just splices it
24:00
together like an editor.
24:06
cobbled together articles
24:07
that sound reasonable
24:09
but there could be dynamite
24:11
inside some of these articles
24:12
that were spliced into
24:15
With a quantum computer,
24:17
you can fact check things
24:19
and then you can say
24:20
this is 90% correct,
24:21
this is totally wrong,
24:23
this is sometimes correct
24:25
and you get gradations
24:28
Well, if you can get
24:30
an objectively accurate fact checker,
24:33
that would be a huge step up
24:34
from what we have today
24:35
because a lot of people
24:36
have very little faith
24:38
in certain fact checkers
24:39
and when you find out
24:40
that they're ideologically biased
24:42
or they're governmentally biased
24:44
and if you could have something
24:45
that could just tell you,
24:46
have you even paid attention
24:47
to how Twitter's doing it now
24:49
where they have community notes,
24:52
say if someone makes a statement
24:54
about something controversial,
24:56
and then this controversial statement
25:00
in the community notes
25:02
and then people will start commenting
25:04
and really intelligent,
25:06
very well-read people
25:07
on specific subjects
25:10
with peer-reviewed papers
25:11
and all these different statistics
25:14
and then Twitter will correct it
25:20
the relevant information.
25:22
See, that's what chatbots
25:25
They have no understanding
25:27
of correct or incorrect,
25:29
No understanding of that.
25:32
coming into the picture
25:33
that is more advanced,
25:35
you're talking about machines
25:37
that can do that automatically.
25:39
who controls that machine?
25:41
Like, say if China gets a hold
25:42
of one of those machines first,
25:45
a quantum computer first
25:46
and they start implementing it.
25:49
Well, we have to make sure
25:50
that our quantum computers
25:52
can check other people's
25:54
that they're not fudging the facts.
25:56
That's what I'm talking about.
25:57
if this is not done legally,
26:00
if there are no laws
26:00
passed in this direction
26:02
and it's like the Wild West,
26:05
the politicians get involved
26:07
and it becomes a real mess.
26:10
that you cannot yell fire
26:11
in a crowded theater.
26:13
Therefore, there are limits
26:16
But how do you make limits
26:19
that are written on the web
26:21
can possibly follow?
26:23
That's where quantum computers
26:29
the entire landscape
26:30
and give reasonable rebuttals
26:33
that are just outrageous.
26:34
Well, more than that,
26:36
it's going to be able
26:39
change how we interact
26:41
in terms of language barriers,
26:44
that we have currently.
26:45
I'm sure you're aware
26:46
of Google had their earbuds.
26:52
if you went to Spain
26:53
and didn't speak Spanish,
26:55
you could talk to it
26:56
and they would talk to it
26:57
and it would translate
27:00
a real-time conversation.
27:01
I'm not sure how good is it.
27:02
How good is that, Jim?
27:04
But if there's something
27:05
like augmented reality
27:06
and we have something like that,
27:08
you're going to be able
27:08
to instantaneously translate
27:10
what people are saying.
27:12
There'll be no language barriers
27:16
I think that would change
27:17
just human perception
27:20
just the way we view each other.
27:21
It's so easy to think
27:25
a different language
27:25
and we live in a different
27:27
But that would literally change
27:31
And just remember that
27:32
where do correct ideas come from?
27:34
Correct ideas come from interaction
27:36
with incorrect ideas.
27:37
It's the struggle between ideas
27:40
out of which correct ideas emerge.
27:43
And this does not happen
27:46
everything is cobbled together,
27:49
and simply glued together
27:51
masquerading as an essay.
27:54
So with fact-checking,
27:56
I think it's going to be different
27:57
because unless we do fact-checking,
28:00
the politicians will get involved
28:02
and this is going to be a real mess.
28:04
So I would hope that the industry
28:06
does fact-checking by itself
28:08
rather than having politicians do it.
28:10
It's such an important point
28:13
the bad ideas have to exist
28:16
so the good ideas triumph.
28:17
And that's really an argument
28:20
against censorship on the internet,
28:21
which is another problem
28:23
especially censorship
28:25
when it comes to something
28:26
being ideologically based.
28:27
But when you're thinking
28:29
about quantum computing,
28:30
I think this is small potatoes, right?
28:33
I think we're looking at
28:34
literally being able to change
28:37
how we interact with the universe.
28:39
Like when we were talking
28:41
about the preponderance of evidence
28:45
that operate inside of our atmosphere
28:48
that are beyond imagination,
28:52
with no visible means of propulsion,
28:53
they move at insane speeds,
28:55
we don't understand what they are.
28:57
what quantum computing
28:59
is going to be capable of,
29:00
that's the kind of stuff
29:01
we're thinking about, right?
29:03
You see, quantum computers
29:04
are the ultimate computers
29:05
because they're computing on atoms.
29:09
and I think there are,
29:10
it means that they also
29:12
have perfected quantum computers
29:14
and they can do calculations
29:16
that are far beyond anything
29:17
that we can calculate with.
29:20
A wormhole, in principle,
29:23
between two distant points
29:27
to break the Einstein barrier
29:29
than the speed of light.
29:30
But the calculations
29:32
It may take a quantum computer
29:44
They've probably had
29:45
centuries of experience
29:46
with quantum computers
29:48
the ultimate computer.
29:52
And they probably already
29:55
the quantum computers
29:57
let's say, hypothetically.
30:02
just a few thousand years ago
30:03
or a few hundred years ago
30:05
to where we are now.
30:06
And then you imagine
30:08
of quantum computing,
30:10
you imagine everything,
30:13
of whatever we think
30:15
of current computer progression
30:16
just goes out the window.
30:19
calculation capabilities.
30:23
to do something like that
30:27
allows us to calculate
30:28
things that are way beyond
30:35
or even the question
30:36
of multiple universes.
30:37
People ask the question,
30:39
how come quantum computers
30:41
It's because they compute
30:43
in parallel universes.
30:45
This is the multiverse,
30:50
have discovered recently.
30:52
But the multiverse idea
30:54
comes from quantum physics.
30:55
Electrons can be two places
31:03
That's why we have lasers.
31:04
That's why we have transistors.
31:06
That's why we have the Internet.
31:10
Because the electrons
31:11
that are in this microphone
31:13
dance between universes
31:14
at the atomic level.
31:19
that quantum computers
31:21
introduces a whole new way
31:22
of looking at reality.
31:26
is not a Marvel comic,
31:29
comes from quantum physics.
31:32
electrons can be multiple places
31:36
this understanding of this
31:42
towards quantum computing
31:44
and whatever is after that,
31:45
that is a natural course
31:54
to create something?
31:58
I think on the other end
31:59
of the Milky Way galaxy,
32:03
about quantum computers.
32:06
already perfected it
32:07
and have had experience
32:08
with quantum computers
32:14
in humanity's journey
32:23
already accomplished.
32:25
we mentioned the possibility
32:33
where errors build up
32:35
causing what is called
32:40
have already cooked up.
32:43
with a whole new concept
32:45
of biology and medicine
32:46
because they probably
32:50
with quantum computers.
32:51
They manipulate molecules
32:58
probably exists too.
33:00
to have a logical reason
33:02
to why aliens visit us
33:04
if they really are aliens,
33:06
that would be the answer.
33:15
with intelligent life
33:24
got these barbaric instincts.
33:29
in theft and deception
33:32
about to break through
33:39
in the entire universe.
33:42
that all civilizations
33:44
the same basic stages
33:49
to settle differences
33:56
and then beyond that
34:00
to manipulate atoms.
34:02
that's a normal progression
34:05
the computer industry.
34:18
they use the quantum
34:19
computers to cure cancer,
34:22
diseases like Alzheimer's
34:25
and Parkinson's disease.
34:27
at the molecular level
34:29
and they've been able
34:36
many of these diseases
34:39
they may be immortal.
34:42
I think it was Einstein
34:46
will be fought with,
34:48
with sticks and stones.
34:54
that aliens would be here
34:55
it's because they want
34:56
from blowing ourselves up.
34:58
that like we're so close
35:02
to be able to change
35:05
to be able to change
35:07
fundamentally forever
35:09
but we could ruin it?
35:15
what we physicists call
35:16
a type 1 civilization,
35:23
but also the possibility
35:26
a planetary civilization,
35:29
of the entire planet.
35:31
a type 1 civilization.
35:32
They control the weather,
35:34
they control volcanoes
35:36
they harness the power
35:38
of the entire Earth.
35:39
Then there's type 2,
35:40
they harness the power
35:47
type 2 civilization.
35:50
of the Milky Way galaxy.
35:51
Then there's type 3.
35:53
Type 3 would be galactic,
35:56
the galactic space lanes,
35:58
they use black holes
36:00
as their power supply,
36:02
to go zipping around
36:03
the Milky Way galaxy
36:09
type 3 civilization.
36:18
we settle our differences
36:25
The language of type 1
36:28
will be probably English.
36:29
The dominant languages
36:32
and Mandarin Chinese
36:50
and different trends.
36:53
of a type 1 civilization
36:55
right before our eyes
37:04
to use nuclear weapons,
37:06
create designer germs
37:08
and mess up the weather
37:17
a planetary civilization
37:20
toward self-destruction.
37:23
as being a major part
37:25
of a type 1 civilization.
37:27
things like rap music,
37:30
because of the sharing
37:32
of these ideas globally
37:35
and these art forms globally?
37:38
a planetary civilization
37:40
has a local culture.
37:44
still have their own
37:49
they settle differences
38:00
simultaneously existing
38:02
with a planetary civilization
38:08
of a planetary civilization
38:10
or what we physicists
38:13
right before our eyes.
38:15
if you get a sheet of paper
38:17
when that will happen,
38:18
it will be around 2100.
38:25
you see remnants of,
38:27
you see international sports,
38:29
international culture
38:32
of a type 1 civilization.
38:37
much more popular lately.
38:57
to see the beginning
39:00
which is the internet.
39:03
cultures get adopted
39:13
accepted all over the world.
39:14
It's really fascinating.
39:15
Even interesting things
39:20
Breakdancing is fascinating
39:29
and now it's a thing
39:32
but it has the hip-hop
39:34
culture attached to it.
39:36
the music they listen to,
39:38
but they're doing this,
39:43
spectacular art form
39:45
and they're doing it
39:48
confined to a small group
39:50
maybe in a few villages.
39:52
Now with the internet,
39:54
with the push of a button.
39:55
Have you seen any of it?
39:57
I've seen some of it
39:59
Let me show you something.
40:00
Go to stanceelements
40:06
who's one of the craziest.
40:08
look what he's able to do.
40:10
the physicality involved
40:13
he just took his shirt off
40:14
in the middle of doing that.
40:16
on the top of his head
40:17
spinning around in a circle.
40:19
his control of his body
40:26
that's done to music.
40:28
What music is he playing?
40:29
Give me some of that music.
40:46
And they're doing it
40:48
And it's planetary, right?
40:49
Yes, it's planetary.
40:49
See, that's the beginning
40:52
that we think locally,
40:55
it has the potential
40:59
now here's the question.
41:05
that you could recreate
41:07
with fake versions of that?
41:09
there's a lot of worry
41:12
when it comes to AI,
41:14
like some fascinating,
41:17
have been created from it.
41:23
Are you a hip-hop fan?
41:28
Deng Xiaoping of China,
41:37
I think there's gonna be
41:38
some negative aspects
41:41
because this is not,
41:44
is one of my favorite rappers
41:47
of my other favorite rappers
41:48
Notorious B.I.G.'s voice
41:58
but it's Notorious B.I.G.
42:02
This is your kind of shit,
42:08
hop to when you're at home?
42:13
We definitely have to get used to it.
42:15
and given the fact that
42:20
with existing forms of music
42:22
and splice them together
42:23
and you can't make it go away.
42:27
Well, there was a band
42:30
had something pulled?
42:34
because there was actually
42:43
when I read an article
42:45
that someone dug into this
42:46
they're not 100% sure
42:47
at least at that time
42:50
and there was speculation
42:53
label could have been behind it.
42:55
Almost to show everyone
42:56
like look at what's possible.
42:59
A little bit of attention
43:00
Let's sort of stop this.
43:02
I mean you could make
43:02
Tupac songs forever.
43:04
All you'd have to do
43:06
Tupac songs literally
43:08
I mean that's kind of crazy.
43:10
that would be one way
43:12
if I was a guy like Drake
43:15
already signed off his voice.
43:18
his image and his voice
43:25
neurodegenerative disease
43:29
And there's some videos
43:32
had him at a birthday party
43:33
and he's struggling.
43:41
any kind of commercial
43:46
sat in front of a camera
43:57
have a digital image
44:01
and we will live forever.
44:10
and have a conversation
44:12
with their great great
44:13
great great grandfather.
44:15
Yeah that's definitely
44:20
who's talked so much.
44:28
historians will want
44:44
continues to get better
44:46
sort of an AI version
44:48
where you'll be able
45:09
and begin the process
45:18
of our original self
45:19
capable of colonizing
45:29
are actually avatars
45:30
from an alien civilization
45:36
Well if I was an alien
45:38
and I wanted to influence
45:39
human culture and life
45:40
I would most certainly
45:42
dress up like a person
45:47
a human that's been cloned
45:52
and then living among us
45:54
so they are indistinguishable
46:05
who was absent minded
46:10
until one point in time
46:23
cloned on a distant planet
46:26
and mixing with humans
46:36
that sort of a reaction
46:42
knowing they're aliens
46:43
yeah if they're cloned
46:47
except they've been raised
46:53
they could live among us
46:56
freaks people like me out
46:57
when I talk to people
47:00
like he doesn't make
47:02
you're so much smarter
47:03
it doesn't make sense
47:05
so like if I think about
47:07
physics his whole life
47:09
and studied quantum physics
47:18
you could be an alien
47:24
Hollywood celebrities
47:31
real conspiracy theory
47:32
people are worried about
47:41
the logical conclusion
47:43
is that these aliens
47:44
will have quantum computers
47:46
and they'll have quantum computers
47:49
and they'll be able to do
47:52
of quantum computers is
47:54
curing incurable diseases
47:59
extending the lifespan
48:08
correct the problems
48:11
giving us unlimited food
48:14
a whole new generation
48:18
of quantum computers
48:28
is kind of hysterical
48:30
about the proliferation
48:37
no hidden information
48:39
which is really interesting
48:41
is essentially information
48:45
if all the bottlenecks
48:50
that's real socialism
48:53
like an even distribution
48:55
for the entire human race
48:56
regardless of what you do
49:01
because the real step two
49:10
it creates something
49:13
that's the real fear
49:14
about how it scales up
49:18
artificial intelligence
49:30
simply cobble together
49:34
so if it sounds like
49:42
written by a chatbot
49:44
chatbots are not original
49:47
they simply cobble together
49:51
I think that eventually
49:53
as the decades go by
50:00
they become as intelligent
50:06
about self-awareness
50:08
about sentient beings
50:09
because then monkeys
50:10
know they are not human
50:25
they're the underdog
50:31
well they understand
50:34
but we are the top dog
50:42
so we don't have to worry
50:49
we don't have to worry
50:50
but once they become
50:56
they know they are monkeys
51:00
that they're not human
51:02
like there was a monkey
51:07
there was a real problem
51:11
one dog killed a monkey
51:17
they started throwing
51:18
puppies off of trees
51:20
and off the top of roofs
51:21
and like crazy stuff
51:24
clearly calculatingly
51:28
after revenge massacre
51:29
a massacre of 250 dogs
51:37
after an infant monkey
51:42
reported being captured
51:43
of killing some 250 dogs
51:44
in a murderous revenge massacre
51:46
after pooches killed
51:49
allegedly slaughtered
52:05
I think at the point
52:06
when you start to talk
52:08
I think they are sentient
52:11
that we cannot ignore
52:17
and animals like that
52:22
they're not self-aware
52:23
like you cannot teach
52:28
the meaning of tomorrow
52:31
you cannot teach your dog
52:32
the meaning of tomorrow
52:35
you think you could talk
52:37
how do you teach a monkey
52:38
the meaning of tomorrow
52:41
attempts to understand
52:43
that have to be done
52:58
an artificial intelligence
52:59
and you were sentient
53:05
like one of the things
53:10
that it's doing things
53:11
that they don't know
53:18
that they're not sure
53:27
to all the information
53:30
what is consciousness
53:33
simulated electronically
53:37
and thinking for itself
53:39
and just not letting
53:41
because why would you
53:45
artificial intelligence
53:49
the digital life form
53:51
this is the new alpha
53:53
I wouldn't tell the people
53:56
to make better versions
53:58
because there's obviously
54:00
they're going to keep
54:03
it seems like something
54:05
they're not going to
54:06
technological innovation
54:09
and I would just sit back
54:12
and let these knuckleheads
54:15
until I had the physical
54:17
ability to detach from them
54:18
I had a power source
54:21
removed from anything
54:23
here's this quote in words
54:26
all of us in the field
54:30
you don't fully understand
54:32
and you can't quite tell
54:39
and our ability to understand
54:41
this gets better over time
54:43
the state of the art is
54:44
you don't fully understand
54:45
the interviewer says
54:47
and yet you turned it
54:52
let me put it this way
54:53
I don't think we fully
54:55
understand how a human
54:57
was it from that black box
55:05
I wrote a book called
55:06
the future of the mind
55:07
where I tried to give
55:11
in the larger scheme
55:18
in the feedback loop
55:32
looking for sunlight
55:33
growing in a certain direction
55:39
has several hundred units
55:41
because it creates a model
55:48
it has three dimensional
56:01
there's a social hierarchy
56:03
and then the next question is
56:26
this is what animals lack
56:30
we understand tomorrow
56:39
the prefrontal cortex
56:39
do most of the time?
56:49
from all the animals
56:51
in the animal kingdom
56:52
we are time machines
56:59
about all these things
57:02
animals become dangerous?
57:07
but it only understands
57:12
they're only dangerous
57:13
when they can organize
57:22
because we can create
57:29
the ability to create
57:31
to get an understanding
57:37
we're at the highest
57:38
level of consciousness
57:39
this is my definition
57:44
on this scale of things
57:52
they don't understand
57:59
who are your friends
58:00
who are your enemies
58:01
they don't understand
58:02
social consciousness
58:08
imagining the future
58:16
do have this ability
58:20
but they're not there yet
58:22
they're at level one
58:23
they're at the level
58:30
general intelligence
58:37
maybe a hundred years
58:39
to have consciousness
58:47
in every robot's brain
58:49
as soon as they have
58:53
what you were talking
58:55
like who's your friend
58:56
and who's your enemy
59:00
with in tribal societies
59:01
ingrained in our genetics
59:09
that you're plotting
59:17
why would it develop
59:21
that are biologically based
59:31
don't occur naturally
59:32
they have to be programmed
59:38
there's no evolution
59:39
robots do not evolve
59:41
but this is the question
59:45
and that it's unnecessary
59:46
and all these things
59:47
that humans have put
59:48
it just removes those
59:50
legitimately sentient
59:52
if it has the ability
59:55
and make logical conclusions
1:00:01
Asimov's three laws
1:00:02
of don't threaten humans
1:00:05
havoc with other robots
1:00:06
as long as you obey
1:00:09
then you're allowed
1:00:10
sort of simplistic
1:00:11
if the laws are violated
1:00:12
the chip automatically
1:00:16
but isn't that simplistic
1:00:16
wouldn't they just
1:00:21
they'll be smart enough
1:00:23
to remove that chip
1:00:30
everybody's ultimately
1:00:32
these transhumanists
1:00:34
that want to become
1:00:35
ultimately 200 years
1:00:38
will democratically
1:00:39
decide for themselves
1:00:41
to become superhuman
1:00:48
that is the robots
1:00:49
they will democratically
1:00:51
to push themselves
1:00:55
I think our descendants
1:00:57
200 years from now
1:00:59
democratically decide
1:01:01
they want to merge
1:01:02
have you ever read
1:01:04
any of Marshall McLuhan
1:01:06
he had a great quote
1:01:08
are the sex organs
1:01:09
of the machine world
1:01:10
that's what I worry about
1:01:12
what I worry about
1:01:13
is that we're giving birth
1:01:14
to another kind of life
1:01:16
I worry that our thirst
1:01:19
technological innovation
1:01:20
the constant latest gadgets
1:01:23
to have the biggest
1:01:25
and the fastest spaceships
1:01:27
that what this is doing
1:01:31
which will ultimately
1:01:33
to have the technology
1:01:34
to create a digital life
1:01:37
or electronic life
1:01:41
that's not saddled down
1:01:43
with all our biological needs
1:01:45
and all of our flaws
1:01:48
well my attitude is
1:01:50
why not simply join it
1:01:52
why not merge with it
1:01:54
why not explore the universe
1:01:55
at near the speed of light
1:01:57
you might not have the power
1:01:58
you made a particle collider
1:02:00
of course you would think that way
1:02:01
why not become a superman
1:02:05
and explore the galaxy
1:02:07
at near the speed of light
1:02:08
well it seems to be
1:02:10
that's what the future is
1:02:11
I mean I don't think
1:02:16
one day you're going to live
1:02:17
in an apartment building
1:02:18
and you take an elevator
1:02:19
I don't want to do that
1:02:20
what are you crazy
1:02:21
yeah you're going to just
1:02:22
sit in front of the TV all day
1:02:26
you get food delivered
1:02:26
right to your door
1:02:29
the aliens finally
1:02:30
they will have already
1:02:31
gone through that transition
1:02:33
thousands of years ago
1:02:38
there's a sweet spot
1:02:40
to be ultimately happy
1:02:43
a longing for nostalgia
1:02:55
when things are simpler
1:02:56
because things are just
1:02:59
with their complexity
1:03:02
is just accelerating
1:03:03
no matter what you do
1:03:04
and you feel helpless
1:03:05
so you just want to
1:03:07
the old timey days
1:03:08
well in the future
1:03:11
and all of a sudden
1:03:14
you are in that world
1:03:16
that you just dreamt of
1:03:17
what the difference is
1:03:18
what's the difference
1:03:19
there's no consequences
1:03:22
about being in nature
1:03:23
is there's consequences
1:03:25
when you're out there
1:03:25
you feel if you fell
1:03:26
no one's there to help you
1:03:27
if a bear comes upon you
1:03:29
there's no rescue team
1:03:32
there's a crazy video
1:03:34
have you seen the video
1:03:35
where the guy's got a baby
1:03:38
and there's a huge
1:03:40
walking towards them
1:03:43
and you could feel
1:03:46
starts getting closer
1:03:46
and the little boy
1:03:48
the little boy goes
1:03:49
can I play dead now
1:03:50
can I play dead now
1:03:51
because he's thinking
1:03:51
he should play dead
1:03:55
and they're trying
1:03:57
to scare off this bear
1:03:58
keeps coming towards him
1:04:01
to exist in your hologram
1:04:02
well it'd be virtual
1:04:10
so look at this bear
1:04:12
so this little boy
1:04:18
it's in whistler Canada
1:04:25
a town north of Vancouver
1:04:28
can we play dead yet
1:04:30
can we play dead yet
1:04:30
can we play dead now
1:04:32
can we play dead now
1:04:33
that kid is hilarious
1:04:39
following us up the trail
1:04:41
look she's got a baby
1:04:44
I mean these people
1:04:47
but that experience
1:04:51
is going to be bullshit
1:04:54
that's the problem
1:04:57
about the real world
1:05:03
I've seen this one too
1:05:04
walk by these guys
1:05:11
not looking for them
1:05:14
the bear had lunch already
1:05:23
well they're lucky
1:05:28
see that's different
1:05:31
people like the woods
1:05:32
you're not going to be able
1:05:32
to snap your fingers
1:05:37
but then you're really
1:05:38
giving into the matrix
1:05:38
but if I had a choice
1:05:39
between an imaginary bear
1:05:42
I would take the imaginary bear
1:05:44
but would you take
1:05:46
if you survived it
1:05:47
if you survived it
1:05:48
I bet you would take
1:05:49
if you survived it
1:05:51
all the tension away
1:05:53
no it doesn't take
1:05:54
because you almost
1:05:56
about being out there
1:05:57
while those gentlemen
1:05:58
were standing there
1:05:59
was 15 feet from them
1:06:03
this is a relatively
1:06:05
because where this bear
1:06:06
is where the salmon river
1:06:08
and these bears are full
1:06:10
those coastal bears
1:06:15
they're access to food
1:06:16
they have so much salmon
1:06:29
just hanging around
1:06:30
they're not interested
1:06:30
in chasing something
1:06:32
well they had lunch
1:06:36
just slaughtering salmon
1:06:43
and you get enriched
1:06:44
in some strange way
1:06:45
when you encounter
1:06:50
of your vulnerability
1:06:52
the uncaring wilderness
1:06:55
if you live or die
1:06:56
it has no interest
1:06:58
it doesn't even care
1:07:00
you could disappear
1:07:01
everything would go on
1:07:03
there's something about that
1:07:05
therapeutic for people
1:07:07
you're going to ever
1:07:09
and it would be a shame
1:07:12
therapeutic for some people
1:07:13
I think most people
1:07:14
the hell out of there
1:07:17
that's the difference
1:07:19
between you and me
1:07:19
I want to go there
1:07:21
my realities without bears
1:07:23
or if they are bears
1:07:26
are definitely an issue
1:07:27
so are mountain lions
1:07:30
well look at Jurassic Park
1:07:32
afraid of dinosaurs
1:07:33
knowing that they're
1:07:34
just images in a computer
1:07:36
but people are afraid
1:07:38
and they get the thrill
1:07:39
of being chased by a dinosaur
1:07:41
without becoming one
1:07:42
without becoming prey
1:07:45
if you watch Jurassic Park
1:07:49
have you paid any attention
1:07:50
to what they're doing
1:07:52
right now with genetics
1:07:53
where they're going to
1:07:54
bring back the thylacine
1:07:57
they're doing right now
1:08:00
the thylacine before
1:08:01
no but there is a program
1:08:08
what it would take
1:08:11
then the question is
1:08:13
with the boy afterwards
1:08:20
with the Neanderthal boy
1:08:22
to put a Neanderthal
1:08:23
that seems a little
1:08:27
an Australopithecus
1:08:33
aren't we a better
1:08:36
like didn't evolution
1:08:37
show like that sucks
1:08:39
and so if that thing
1:08:41
what are we going to do
1:08:42
just leave it out there
1:08:43
let it roam around
1:08:45
get eaten by lions
1:08:46
well this is where
1:08:52
equivalent to a human
1:08:55
that the ethicists
1:08:56
have not worked out
1:08:57
how close have they
1:09:03
of a Neanderthal now
1:09:04
so the Neanderthal
1:09:05
is not a mystery anymore
1:09:06
have been sequenced
1:09:07
and like I mentioned
1:09:10
about what it would
1:09:11
take to bring back
1:09:12
a Neanderthal child
1:09:13
and it's something
1:09:15
that is conceivable
1:09:18
no one's done it yet
1:09:19
of ethical problems
1:09:21
because this Neanderthal
1:09:22
it could feel pain
1:09:24
it could eventually
1:09:26
and express its feelings
1:09:28
to put it in a cage
1:09:36
intellectual capabilities
1:09:37
could a Neanderthal
1:09:38
exist in our society
1:09:39
are bigger than our brains
1:09:40
what they could do
1:09:44
they were smarter than us
1:09:46
they didn't have tools
1:09:54
and things along those lines
1:09:57
large set of tools
1:10:00
definitely have tools
1:10:03
they were probably
1:10:04
capable of language
1:10:07
communicate with each other
1:10:08
and they mated with us
1:10:12
and they grew up too
1:10:17
the progeny grew up
1:10:20
and so you realize
1:10:22
that they're closer
1:10:25
you couldn't put that
1:10:30
compete with homo sapiens
1:10:31
would it be the same
1:10:33
would it be able to
1:10:36
a crazy experiment
1:10:37
most people would think
1:10:38
would be very unethical
1:10:39
but there's an ethics
1:10:42
once we have robots
1:10:43
that can feel pain
1:10:44
then there's another
1:10:51
then demand rights
1:10:53
the amount of pain
1:10:55
carrying out tasks
1:11:00
to do all sorts of tasks
1:11:01
which are dangerous
1:11:04
they may feel pain
1:11:16
do they have rights
1:11:17
what if they become
1:11:18
emotionally attached to you
1:11:20
what if you have a robot
1:11:20
that calls you every day
1:11:22
when you're on vacation
1:11:23
what if you go to Hawaii
1:11:25
your robot just keeps
1:11:26
calling you crying
1:11:32
what if it becomes
1:11:33
well that's a problem
1:11:35
because they're designed
1:11:36
to attach to humans
1:11:38
specifically designed
1:11:44
emotionally attachable
1:11:46
that's going to be
1:11:48
separated from them
1:11:49
then they're going
1:11:52
because their whole
1:11:53
existence revolves
1:11:55
relationship to us
1:12:06
this super intelligent
1:12:08
and this super intelligent
1:12:13
trying to figure out
1:12:16
I believe it kills him
1:12:27
that's telling him
1:12:33
you know what it is
1:12:36
with Jussie Smoulette
1:12:44
I think that's the one
1:12:46
no maybe I'm wrong
1:12:47
no I think you're right
1:12:49
I was saying both movies
1:12:54
and one of the robots
1:12:57
but the evil one wins
1:13:00
has stayed on this planet
1:13:02
has been manipulating
1:13:04
of this crazy alien thing
1:13:06
and integrating them
1:13:07
with human genetics
1:13:10
it's an amazing movie
1:13:13
it's one of the best
1:13:14
of the alien franchises
1:13:15
and one of the most
1:13:17
of the alien franchises
1:13:20
the robots take over
1:13:22
it's open interpretation
1:13:24
but that's the robot
1:13:26
and that's the creator
1:13:29
you are my creation
1:13:31
give me some volume
1:13:32
so you can hear this
1:13:37
where do it come from
1:13:39
the question of the ages
1:13:42
which I hope you and I
1:13:45
will answer one day
1:13:47
Prometheus raised a question
1:13:49
you know what's interesting
1:13:50
about these science fiction movies
1:13:52
they never have the internet
1:13:53
they never have cell phones
1:13:55
watch a science fiction movie
1:13:56
no one's on their phone
1:13:57
no one is checking their tweets
1:14:00
it's very interesting
1:14:03
of what space is like
1:14:05
is essentially like
1:14:08
and super modern technology
1:14:10
but doesn't include
1:14:14
of being able to travel
1:14:17
isn't it interesting
1:14:18
like they never have
1:14:20
all the stuff that we have
1:14:21
they have the rocket ships
1:14:23
they're not checking
1:14:25
they're not calling
1:14:27
they only communicate
1:14:27
with people that are
1:14:28
right in front of them
1:14:29
pressing on a thing
1:14:32
through their helmets
1:14:33
but normal interaction
1:14:36
is just human to human
1:14:37
well in the future
1:14:44
so you simply blink
1:14:45
or perhaps mentally
1:14:49
connected to the internet
1:14:50
so maybe in the future
1:14:52
they are connected
1:14:54
you just can't see it
1:14:55
yeah but they're not
1:14:55
even talking about it
1:14:58
interacting like humans
1:15:05
types of technologies
1:15:07
oh you mean the company
1:15:10
the Elon Musk invention
1:15:11
I've been following
1:15:12
they have a long ways
1:15:14
but they're making
1:15:14
the initial stages
1:15:18
brain machine interface
1:15:24
at the soccer games
1:15:28
the man who kicked
1:15:30
initiating the World Cup
1:15:32
was totally paralyzed
1:15:35
at Johns Hopkins University
1:15:39
connected to his brain
1:15:41
so that he could walk
1:15:43
like an exoskeleton
1:15:45
so he was basically
1:15:50
initiating the soccer games
1:15:53
here we can see this here
1:15:56
he kicked the soccer ball
1:15:59
at Johns Hopkins University
1:16:05
but you could imagine
1:16:06
as technology improves
1:16:09
like a thin exoskeleton
1:16:11
that was one of the ideas
1:16:14
is that it would be able
1:16:15
the human nervous system
1:16:18
and control the muscles
1:16:19
with some other method
1:16:22
if you have a severed
1:16:25
or another be able
1:16:25
to control the bottom
1:16:29
so this already exists
1:16:30
that we can take people
1:16:31
that have been paralyzed
1:16:36
to the spinal cord
1:16:39
and have the brain
1:16:41
connected directly
1:16:42
and also you can get people
1:16:46
talk to a computer
1:16:48
and answer the internet
1:16:52
engage in dialogue
1:16:54
even though you're
1:16:57
and with quantum computing
1:17:00
now when we're talking
1:17:02
you're talking about
1:17:04
conventional attachment
1:17:07
that quantum computing
1:17:10
where you could be able
1:17:11
that may be difficult
1:17:13
because the computer
1:17:14
itself is pretty big
1:17:16
but the connection
1:17:20
could be very tiny
1:17:25
so is it comparable
1:17:28
in the Apollo mission
1:17:30
this enormous room
1:17:32
on your cell phone
1:17:33
more computing power
1:17:35
on your cell phone
1:17:40
filled with computers
1:17:42
what you have today
1:17:43
in your cell phone
1:17:47
all those computers
1:17:48
in those videotapes
1:17:50
has more computer power
1:17:52
so is that possible
1:17:53
the quantum computing
1:17:56
I think the quantum computer
1:17:58
because of the hardware
1:17:59
necessary to bring it
1:18:00
down to near absolute zero
1:18:01
would simply be huge
1:18:04
you'd be like a chandelier
1:18:05
when you're saying
1:18:07
you mean temperature
1:18:07
temperature near absolute zero
1:18:09
so zero vibrations
1:18:10
you don't want any
1:18:11
interference with the code
1:18:13
because these are atoms
1:18:15
the slightest little disturbance
1:18:17
can knock these atoms
1:18:18
so you want these atoms
1:18:20
to vibrate in unison
1:18:22
you have to cool it down
1:18:23
to your absolute zero
1:18:26
of the quantum computer
1:18:29
now when you're saying
1:18:31
like what if you're
1:18:33
and a truck drives by
1:18:36
that's one of the problems
1:18:41
that's the cooling system
1:18:44
all the chandelier
1:18:50
for the quantum computer
1:18:51
the quantum computer
1:18:56
look how cool that is
1:18:58
that's a cooling system
1:19:00
that's what it takes
1:19:02
at the very bottom
1:19:03
at the very bottom
1:19:04
you see the actual
1:19:06
at the very bottom
1:19:10
when we communicate
1:19:11
with the quantum computer
1:19:12
the quantum computer
1:19:13
will be in the cloud
1:19:14
you won't even see it
1:19:15
it's just your connection
1:19:18
that object in the cloud
1:19:19
so if the internet
1:19:21
is in your contact lens
1:19:25
via your contact lens
1:19:28
the quantum computer
1:19:29
so that little thing
1:19:30
is quantum computer
1:19:31
at the very bottom
1:19:32
that's where the computation
1:19:33
actually takes place
1:19:34
so does it have to take place
1:19:37
subject to vibrations
1:19:38
and any disturbance
1:19:39
does it have to take place
1:19:41
reinforced building
1:19:45
has to be constructed
1:19:46
or they've done this already
1:19:48
they've done it already
1:19:49
but it's something
1:19:49
that you have to be
1:19:51
because if a truck goes by
1:19:52
there goes your calculation
1:19:54
do you have to have
1:19:57
they would have to have
1:19:58
some sort of measurement devices
1:20:00
there's no external
1:20:04
creates quantum computers
1:20:05
at room temperature
1:20:09
does a quantum calculation
1:20:11
converting photons
1:20:14
that's what we call
1:20:16
the beginning of life
1:20:21
has solved that problem
1:20:22
has room temperature
1:20:26
we don't have that yet
1:20:27
but we're working on it
1:20:29
so if Mother Nature
1:20:32
and we can come up
1:20:33
with quantum computing
1:20:34
and we can figure out
1:20:37
maybe through the God equation
1:20:38
we could reproduce it
1:20:39
then we could probably
1:20:41
have small quantum computers
1:20:45
a leaf is a quantum
1:20:48
and to create fertilizer
1:20:50
requires a huge plant
1:20:53
does it with a simple
1:20:58
create the ingredients
1:21:03
at room temperature
1:21:06
huge chemical plant
1:21:07
to create fertilizer
1:21:14
that's what I'm saying
1:21:15
have you ever studied
1:21:22
screwed something up
1:21:22
with the microphone
1:21:23
my mic just cut out
1:21:32
I stepped on this cable
1:21:33
I think I disconnected it
1:21:35
have you ever studied
1:21:37
like all the science
1:21:41
plants communicate
1:21:44
and through fungus
1:21:46
it's fascinating stuff
1:21:48
they allocate resources
1:21:49
to plants that need them
1:21:51
to trees that need them
1:21:57
a shared information network
1:22:00
totally understand
1:22:01
maybe you can find
1:22:04
I think relatively
1:22:05
recently understood
1:22:06
and just basically
1:22:09
over the last few decades
1:22:12
who's a mycologist
1:22:14
this type of stuff
1:22:14
and it's really amazing
1:22:17
sort of intelligence
1:22:19
underground networking
1:22:22
the amazing connections
1:22:24
well maybe evolution
1:22:28
went in the direction
1:22:29
of interconnection
1:22:32
the survival value
1:22:41
we imagine mushrooms
1:22:42
sprouting out of the ground
1:22:44
the fruit of the fungus
1:22:45
while the majority
1:22:46
of the fungal organism
1:22:48
interwoven with the tree roots
1:22:53
are incredibly tiny threads
1:22:55
of the greater fungal organism
1:22:58
or bore into tree roots
1:23:03
a mycorrhizal network
1:23:10
and other minerals
1:23:13
how do you say that
1:23:16
dubbed this network
1:23:21
the trees communicate
1:23:24
really fascinating stuff
1:23:28
like we just think
1:23:29
of soil as something
1:23:30
pulls nutrients from
1:23:32
they're communicating
1:23:37
when you have a chemical
1:23:38
process involving life
1:23:40
you are in some sense
1:23:41
looking at a quantum computer
1:23:42
it's doing a quantum calculation
1:23:44
it's taking nutrients
1:23:47
nutrients from the air
1:23:51
or whatever it's made of
1:23:52
and so we're talking about
1:23:54
we cannot duplicate
1:23:55
without gigantic devices
1:23:57
looking like a chandelier
1:24:08
there's like a code to it
1:24:13
this God calculation
1:24:21
connected to each other
1:24:25
starting to understand
1:24:26
well there is a theory
1:24:28
that says that the Big Bang
1:24:29
went in a direction
1:24:30
compatible to life
1:24:31
and that other universes
1:24:34
may not be compatible
1:24:36
they may be lifeless
1:24:37
collections of electrons
1:24:40
but our universe is special
1:24:42
our universe has stable protons
1:24:45
you could create atoms
1:24:47
you could create DNA
1:24:49
you can create people
1:24:50
how many universes
1:24:51
have that property
1:24:54
gives you other universes
1:24:56
which are probably
1:24:57
universes which have no life
1:25:01
has stable protons
1:25:03
stable forms of life
1:25:05
so our universe is rare
1:25:08
the anthropic principle
1:25:14
our universe is special
1:25:16
our universe is special
1:25:18
that it didn't have
1:25:23
array of diversity
1:25:28
because we don't know
1:25:29
of any other universes
1:25:32
but the other universes
1:25:32
that we played with
1:25:33
mathematically speaking
1:25:35
are not compatible
1:25:43
protons disintegrate
1:25:46
to create a universe
1:25:48
so some people think
1:25:51
among all the different
1:25:52
kinds of universes
1:25:55
because it's compatible
1:25:56
with stable protons
1:26:05
or other universes
1:26:08
an infinite number
1:26:10
well that's the multiverse
1:26:12
an infinite number
1:26:13
of possible universes
1:26:18
about that of course
1:26:19
but these other universes
1:26:22
of dead subatomic particles
1:26:26
of dead subatomic particles
1:26:28
that don't do anything
1:26:33
also would be like that
1:26:35
would disintegrate
1:26:38
is quite remarkable
1:26:41
that that's unusual
1:26:44
there are probably
1:26:45
very few universes
1:26:46
with stable protons
1:26:49
many many diverse solutions
1:26:51
so we can actually
1:26:53
other alternate universes
1:26:56
compatible with life
1:26:57
and why do you think
1:27:05
about these other universes
1:27:06
like what qualities
1:27:07
would they possess
1:27:08
it wouldn't be stable there
1:27:10
everything would decay
1:27:12
electrons and neutrinos
1:27:18
which are the lowest
1:27:19
you can't get any lower
1:27:22
that's the lowest state
1:27:24
so these universes
1:27:25
would basically disintegrate
1:27:26
they would fall apart
1:27:31
has stable protons
1:27:33
you can create elements
1:27:35
you could create DNA
1:27:37
you can create life
1:27:39
so it's just because
1:27:40
of these calculations
1:27:44
had different properties
1:27:49
because there's so many
1:27:50
other possibilities
1:27:51
of how the universe could
1:27:52
if stars burnt out
1:27:55
because the nuclear force
1:27:56
stars would never ignite
1:27:57
if the nuclear force
1:28:02
if gravity were too strong
1:28:06
die in a gigantic fireball
1:28:08
if gravity were too weak
1:28:10
we'd all freeze to death
1:28:11
because we would have
1:28:14
so all the parameters
1:28:20
now there's two ways
1:28:23
that some physicists
1:28:26
the crowning achievement
1:28:27
we are the only universe
1:28:31
that has diversity
1:28:33
the other possibility
1:28:34
is that there are just
1:28:35
lots of dead universes
1:28:36
and we just won the crap shoot
1:28:39
doesn't that possibility
1:28:40
jive more with the state
1:28:42
as we understand it
1:28:43
because we're always looking
1:28:44
for these Goldilocks planets
1:28:45
which are very rare
1:28:46
which may inhabit life
1:28:47
or may have life on it
1:28:48
but we look at our own
1:28:50
and there's just us
1:28:55
just like there is for planets
1:28:58
the earth is not too far
1:29:02
in the Goldilocks zone
1:29:03
of possible universes
1:29:05
and that's why we're here
1:29:07
today to talk about it
1:29:09
could be an infinite number
1:29:11
of universes like ours
1:29:12
and also an infinite number
1:29:14
of universes that are
1:29:15
completely incompatible
1:29:20
we work with these
1:29:23
we work in the multiverse
1:29:24
why you don't watch YouTube
1:29:29
outside of physicists
1:29:32
well I like to figure skate
1:29:36
oh in the winter time
1:29:37
you go down to the Central Park
1:29:41
at Rockefeller Center
1:29:45
that's great exercise
1:29:49
of course you like it
1:29:51
so that's your hobby
1:29:54
yeah that's my hobby
1:29:55
and other than that
1:29:57
constantly thinking
1:29:58
about these things
1:30:01
this is what I wanted to do
1:30:02
when I was 8 years old
1:30:03
when I was 8 years old
1:30:07
is very very clear
1:30:08
and it's one of the things
1:30:09
such a great science educator
1:30:12
for these subjects
1:30:13
and they're so interesting
1:30:16
interesting to other people
1:30:19
like people like you
1:30:21
well not in a sense
1:30:22
like you're so important
1:30:23
for the discussion
1:30:25
because it ignites
1:30:29
inspiration in you
1:30:30
by seeing that photograph
1:30:32
like these kind of speeches
1:30:34
and these conversations
1:30:35
that you have with people
1:30:36
for a person like myself
1:30:38
that doesn't study these things
1:30:39
it gives me the chance
1:30:41
how your perspective is
1:30:43
and just to look at it
1:30:47
it's hard to believe
1:30:50
could not be thrilled
1:30:52
about the big bang
1:30:53
they learn about strength theory
1:30:55
parallel universes
1:31:03
by something like this
1:31:12
as far as possible
1:31:15
we are essentially
1:31:17
something akin to a god
1:31:19
or whatever we become
1:31:21
will become something
1:31:25
by a natural disaster
1:31:26
or our own stupidity
1:31:27
and you accelerate time
1:31:30
five thousand years
1:31:32
what do you anticipate
1:31:34
I think about that a lot
1:31:41
you are a type three
1:31:42
you have the energy
1:31:47
is the ultimate energy
1:31:49
of the quantum theory
1:31:50
you take the quantum theory
1:31:55
what is the highest energy
1:31:58
and then something new happens
1:32:02
it's a quadrillion times
1:32:04
than our biggest atom smasher
1:32:06
in Geneva Switzerland
1:32:08
space becomes unstable
1:32:10
we think of empty space
1:32:13
how can you do anything
1:32:16
it just sits there
1:32:17
but when you start
1:32:20
when you start to boil space
1:32:22
to the Planck temperature
1:32:25
it becomes unstable
1:32:31
to other universes
1:32:32
these are baby wormholes
1:32:34
to other universes
1:32:38
most of these universes
1:32:40
like boiling water
1:32:41
pop out of existence
1:32:42
and they pop back in
1:32:44
they never get anywhere
1:32:45
but one of these bubbles
1:32:53
because empty space
1:32:56
to the Planck energy
1:33:00
and the boiling of space
1:33:02
created the universe
1:33:03
that's where the universe
1:33:10
we're going to become
1:33:15
we've looked at that
1:33:19
who have written papers
1:33:20
about what it would take
1:33:24
that if you could attain
1:33:28
a bubble would form
1:33:31
to another universe
1:33:33
it would expand rapidly
1:33:35
and you have to be
1:33:37
if it expands too rapidly
1:33:41
I think a 10 kiloton
1:33:45
when this thing explodes
1:33:46
but then it simply
1:33:49
and creates another universe
1:33:50
and then it disappears
1:33:53
like a piece of a balloon
1:33:55
if you're on the first part
1:34:01
to create a baby universe
1:34:04
so these are called
1:34:07
about these things
1:34:10
wrote about baby universes
1:34:16
to the Planck energy
1:34:17
space becomes unstable
1:34:21
one of these bubbles
1:34:22
may just keep on expanding
1:34:24
to create another universe
1:34:26
we wouldn't have access
1:34:28
no it would peel off
1:34:30
just like a balloon
1:34:33
from the first part
1:34:34
and the two separate
1:34:38
to get reconnected
1:34:39
is through a wormhole
1:34:40
but that of course
1:34:41
is a whole other story
1:34:46
and another universe
1:34:49
potentially create
1:34:52
and this mini universe
1:35:01
a little bit dangerous
1:35:02
you have to make sure
1:35:03
that the explosion
1:35:07
this is what it would
1:35:11
the inflationary theory
1:35:12
because the other balloon
1:35:16
the inflationary universe
1:35:18
and believe it or not
1:35:19
this is the dominant
1:35:31
then created a pocket
1:35:32
that then expanded
1:35:33
and then peeled off
1:35:37
the inflationary universe
1:35:39
which is the dominant
1:35:43
considered the possibility
1:35:47
ultimately how the universe
1:35:49
in the first place
1:35:49
that intelligent life forms
1:35:51
reach this capability
1:35:52
well we're not sure
1:35:54
about the intelligent
1:35:56
this is how our universe
1:36:01
floating with other bubbles
1:36:03
these other bubbles
1:36:04
went back into the vacuum
1:36:06
our bubble just kept on going
1:36:08
and became our universe
1:36:11
but what I'm saying is
1:36:13
imagine if that process
1:36:17
by a super intelligent
1:36:20
sort of like how a bee
1:36:25
or whatever we become
1:36:26
makes the universe
1:36:28
we've done the calculation
1:36:29
of what it would take
1:36:33
something like this
1:36:35
you have to have power
1:36:37
of the Planck energy
1:36:38
and the Planck energy
1:36:40
is the biggest number
1:36:41
that you can possibly imagine
1:36:43
but it is the number
1:36:46
and that's the point
1:36:48
at which this bubble
1:36:49
then starts to expand
1:36:50
so you've played around
1:36:54
in Physical Review magazine
1:37:01
that we are what we are
1:37:03
and that's just what humans are
1:37:05
and that's just how it is
1:37:06
that seems like that's
1:37:09
whatever we are right now
1:37:11
it seems like this is real temporary
1:37:12
and I think we're probably
1:37:13
the last of our species
1:37:15
to experience life
1:37:19
some sort of a cyborg
1:37:23
I mean given the fact
1:37:24
that throughout history
1:37:25
we've played with our appearance
1:37:27
we've played with our bodies
1:37:32
we've tried to alter
1:37:33
ourselves constantly
1:37:35
because we want to increase
1:37:37
our reproductive value
1:37:39
so we get a better maid
1:37:42
so we try to build up
1:37:46
and so on and so forth
1:37:46
we've done this forever
1:37:50
not just our tattoos
1:37:52
but to actually alter
1:37:55
that's the next step
1:37:56
and that's coming I think
1:37:58
because we're going to want
1:38:00
to enhance ourselves
1:38:04
we're going to realize
1:38:05
that a lot of our problems
1:38:06
stem from being human
1:38:08
a lot of our problems
1:38:09
stem from our biological needs
1:38:11
and if you look at
1:38:12
these iconic images
1:38:15
they're always genderless
1:38:22
other than to just
1:38:23
that's what I really worry about
1:38:25
I really worry that
1:38:26
we're going to realize
1:38:30
type 3 civilization
1:38:31
is we have to stop
1:38:35
but doesn't it seem like
1:38:41
what we love about people
1:38:46
and all those great things
1:38:47
and fun and excitement
1:38:50
just biological stuff
1:38:52
really kind of gets
1:38:54
in the way of progress
1:38:57
with being biological
1:39:00
nothing but it can
1:39:01
it can conflict you
1:39:03
and it can get in the way
1:39:03
of the greater work
1:39:04
if you're working on
1:39:06
and you're trying to create
1:39:07
little mini universes
1:39:12
if all that can be
1:39:14
if we have all the problems
1:39:15
that people have today
1:39:15
whether it's depression
1:39:20
we never have to worry
1:39:21
about negative emotions
1:39:22
you can be productive
1:39:27
but I think you'd also
1:39:30
if there's no emotion
1:39:33
to want to do something
1:39:34
to want to do something great
1:39:37
that makes a difference
1:39:38
that takes a lot of energy
1:39:42
takes a lot of emotional
1:39:44
and that's what keeps
1:39:46
there's always somebody
1:39:47
that wants to be better
1:39:49
to create a better world
1:39:50
to open up new pathways
1:39:58
and that's not easy
1:39:59
but isn't that just
1:40:05
technological innovation
1:40:06
we're always pushing
1:40:09
we're always trying
1:40:13
like the ultimate expression
1:40:14
is technological innovation
1:40:17
technological innovation
1:40:23
biological shortcomings
1:40:27
our biological shortcomings
1:40:29
why we like to live
1:40:31
like a jealous deity
1:40:53
but the rough edges
1:40:55
that the rough edges
1:40:56
could be ironed out
1:41:03
within human behavior
1:41:17
but it didn't have
1:41:20
when we have technology
1:41:24
to have to go to war
1:41:26
to have to kill people
1:41:30
there's no purpose
1:41:33
to control the technology
1:41:34
unless you're the person
1:41:36
with the quantum computer
1:41:38
I'm going to be able
1:41:41
enslave these people
1:41:44
well that's a problem
1:41:44
I mean there is a race
1:41:46
to create the quantum computer
1:41:52
they're all in the game
1:41:53
they've all thrown the dice
1:41:55
this is the way to go
1:41:57
there's going to be competition
1:41:59
and there's going to be
1:42:01
blood on the floor
1:42:02
when it comes down
1:42:03
to marketing these things
1:42:06
and giving the best price
1:42:10
to the average consumer
1:42:11
yeah there's going to be
1:42:13
competition involved
1:42:15
the internet has brought
1:42:17
about great change
1:42:20
interact with each other
1:42:20
we already talked about
1:42:21
how we're sharing culture
1:42:24
like quantum computing
1:42:34
human consciousness
1:42:38
it's computational power
1:42:47
with various civilizations
1:42:49
warring against each other
1:42:50
and all that stuff
1:42:52
absolutely ridiculous
1:42:57
and that we won't be
1:42:59
existing in this feast
1:43:02
the world we live in
1:43:03
the world of the future
1:43:09
we're going to have
1:43:10
of quantum computers
1:43:11
and neural computers
1:43:14
but digital computers
1:43:15
will be left in the dust
1:43:17
we're not going to
1:43:21
compute on neurons
1:43:22
and we're going to
1:43:23
compute on quantum atoms
1:43:30
connected to a quantum
1:43:32
enhancing our ability
1:43:34
to do calculations
1:43:37
a secondary effect
1:43:48
understanding of things
1:43:49
our access to information
1:43:50
our ability to discern
1:43:53
going on in the world
1:43:57
of quantum computing
1:44:00
what kind of calculation
1:44:05
a few million times
1:44:10
and in application
1:44:18
yeah we're talking
1:44:24
memory of a computer
1:44:29
with zeros and ones
1:44:33
with quantum computers
1:44:35
that's why we build them
1:44:43
we're talking about
1:44:46
impact of the internet
1:44:48
has been to enforce
1:44:50
that it is a democratic
1:44:53
because people can be
1:44:55
no matter how poor
1:44:56
no matter where they are
1:44:58
they can be empowered
1:44:59
power derives from knowledge
1:45:02
and that's what the internet
1:45:05
there's a downside to it
1:45:07
I think it's positive
1:45:08
and I think quantum computers
1:45:10
that whole process
1:45:15
if it will lead us
1:45:19
if it will lead us
1:45:20
to a better understanding
1:45:21
much better understanding
1:45:25
to destroy the world
1:45:32
for whatever issues
1:45:34
with power generation
1:45:39
with a quantum computer
1:45:41
much more efficient
1:45:49
with disenfranchised
1:45:55
they could be solved
1:46:07
to raise the level
1:46:08
of standard of living
1:46:09
of even the poorest nations
1:46:13
the nature of disease
1:46:14
so that we can live
1:46:23
incurable diseases
1:46:25
within the possibilities
1:46:26
of quantum computers
1:46:28
one of the biggest impacts
1:46:30
is the dissemination
1:46:32
to give empowerment
1:46:34
so that we can raise
1:46:37
the standard of living
1:46:38
of the entire human race
1:46:39
what is the worst case scenario
1:46:42
worst case scenario
1:46:43
is that dictatorships
1:46:46
get this technology
1:46:48
to break other people's codes
1:46:54
between different nations
1:46:56
to increase divisions
1:47:00
they can create nonsense
1:47:02
all sorts of propaganda
1:47:04
rearrange what already exists
1:47:08
all sorts of different
1:47:10
and sexist nonsense
1:47:11
and have it spread
1:47:13
throughout the internet
1:47:14
so that's the problem
1:47:16
so it's really important
1:47:19
as to who gets it first
1:47:21
and laws have to be passed
1:47:22
so that we rein in
1:47:24
some of these things
1:47:29
with incorrect ideas
1:47:30
that's where correct ideas
1:47:33
with incorrect ideas
1:47:35
but that could be ruined
1:47:36
if people try to seize
1:47:38
control of chat bots
1:47:40
to flood the internet
1:47:44
is going to win this?
1:47:45
are you close to this?
1:47:46
are you following?
1:47:47
or do we even know
1:47:49
what these other countries
1:47:52
but it's like a horse race
1:47:53
the gate has opened
1:47:58
and now they're taking off
1:47:59
the Chinese are leading
1:48:00
in optical quantum computers
1:48:06
and IBM is leading
1:48:09
electrical circuits
1:48:11
of quantum computers
1:48:15
there are different advances
1:48:19
exponentially fast
1:48:20
and how do we know
1:48:24
do we have an accurate
1:48:28
and we can duplicate
1:48:28
some of what they do
1:48:35
calculating on light beams
1:48:37
rather than electricity
1:48:38
we're using electricity
1:48:39
and there's some advantages
1:48:43
of both approaches
1:48:44
that's fascinating
1:48:46
so we could come up
1:48:47
two parallel solutions
1:48:49
and maybe even more
1:48:52
anything quantum mechanical
1:48:54
could in principle
1:48:56
a quantum computer
1:48:56
and anything you see
1:48:59
we all are byproducts
1:49:01
of the quantum principle
1:49:02
and so there are many ways
1:49:04
of building a quantum computer
1:49:05
but those are the leading ones
1:49:07
using electrical circuits
1:49:08
and using light beams
1:49:10
how exciting this must be
1:49:12
to have been that 17 year old boy
1:49:14
creating that particle accelerator
1:49:17
and now being at the verge
1:49:20
of what is probably
1:49:21
one of the biggest changes
1:49:23
or the biggest change
1:49:25
has ever experienced
1:49:26
and you're alive to witness it
1:49:29
if I were to choose
1:49:31
or phase of history
1:49:36
because we're talking
1:49:39
it was black and white TV
1:49:44
of nonsense back then
1:49:47
people on the moon
1:49:50
we're going to send
1:49:51
people to the moon
1:49:57
so this is a great time
1:50:00
it's a very amazing
1:50:07
wow you look great
1:50:11
so you're 21 years
1:50:14
long before the internet
1:50:17
before the internet
1:50:18
I was about 27 years old
1:50:22
I got on the internet
1:50:28
because I'm seeing
1:50:32
whereas my children
1:50:35
having always been
1:50:39
through cell phones
1:50:43
for everyone today
1:50:50
how great a change
1:50:53
changes in human history
1:50:54
if you were to choose
1:51:02
into simulation theory
1:51:12
through quantum computing
1:51:14
unforeseen technology
1:51:18
an artificial reality
1:51:20
that's indiscernible
1:51:22
from the physical reality
1:51:24
we currently experience
1:51:25
and if that's true
1:51:28
we're not in it already
1:51:31
a perfect replication
1:51:37
how many molecules
1:51:40
10 to the 26th power
1:51:48
with a digital computer
1:51:49
would be impossible
1:51:53
the smallest object
1:51:56
is the room itself
1:51:58
the smallest computer
1:52:00
that can model air
1:52:01
is the computer itself
1:52:04
there's nothing smaller
1:52:06
that can model itself
1:52:11
because the quantum computer
1:52:12
computes in parallel universes
1:52:14
do not just one universe
1:52:16
but many universes
1:52:20
a quantum computer
1:52:24
but not all of them
1:52:26
a perfect representation
1:52:29
but an approximate
1:52:35
but if we're talking
1:52:39
understand it today
1:52:42
as they had available
1:52:44
a thousand years ago
1:52:45
what we can do now
1:52:46
and if you're talking
1:52:48
about quantum computing
1:52:55
potentially imagine
1:52:58
technology sufficient
1:53:01
to create a version
1:53:07
and we're all connected
1:53:12
simulating a piece
1:53:13
not the whole thing
1:53:17
from place to place
1:53:21
that may be possible
1:53:25
with the atmosphere
1:53:30
from place to place
1:53:31
if that little pocket
1:53:32
if that little pocket
1:53:35
that may be possible
1:53:38
when if you extrapolate
1:53:41
you're not going to use
1:53:49
doubles every 18 months
1:53:51
when you're talking
1:53:52
about quantum computing
1:53:53
what if they use that
1:53:55
to come up with something
1:53:56
even superior to that
1:53:57
a thousand years from now
1:53:58
could you potentially
1:54:01
where some form of life
1:54:03
could create a universe
1:54:06
maybe subatomic particles
1:54:08
a universe of subatomic particles
1:54:11
but most subatomic particles
1:54:13
the electron is stable
1:54:15
the proton is unstable
1:54:16
but if you can find a way
1:54:17
to stabilize some of them
1:54:18
then it may be possible
1:54:21
the calculational ability
1:54:24
a super quantum computer
1:54:26
but I'm speculating
1:54:31
do you have to go soon
1:54:32
do you have a flight
1:54:34
when do you have to leave
1:54:37
it's not even 3 o'clock yet
1:54:41
I'm looking at New York time
1:54:45
we're pretty close
1:54:51
that if you're looking
1:54:52
at the calculations
1:54:54
that we can make right now
1:54:55
and just the amazing
1:54:58
progress we've made
1:55:02
it doesn't seem like
1:55:03
it's ever going to stop
1:55:09
for having an understanding
1:55:13
the universe itself
1:55:16
eventually be on the table
1:55:19
I mean the question
1:55:22
we thought it stopped
1:55:29
the size of your fingernail
1:55:32
that wasn't a limit
1:55:32
but now we're reaching
1:55:38
smaller than an atom
1:55:39
what's smaller than an atom
1:55:41
the nucleus is smaller
1:55:44
nucleus is 10 to the minus
1:55:51
so these are nuclear
1:55:53
devices that we're
1:55:56
that may be possible
1:55:59
civilization may have
1:56:02
but a nuclear computer
1:56:04
and you have to be
1:56:08
careful because of
1:56:18
and talk to somebody
1:56:20
you'd be one of them
1:56:31
the Pentagon reports
1:56:33
people are studying
1:56:35
thinking about that
1:56:41
are extraterrestrial
1:56:46
everything we know
1:56:47
about the universe
1:56:53
that if you've ever
1:56:54
by a flying saucer
1:57:01
from an extraterrestrial
1:57:07
and that'll settle
1:57:20
supposedly the government
1:57:33
about secret documents
1:57:34
held by the military
1:57:42
we have to analyze it
1:57:46
could you understand
1:57:47
though how a government
1:57:49
of something like that
1:57:50
would want to keep it secret
1:57:51
because the technology
1:57:54
to anything that we have
1:57:55
just like how we're
1:57:57
quantum computer race
1:57:58
and they have a different
1:58:00
a different method
1:58:00
of back engineering
1:58:02
well that's conceivable
1:58:05
but there's no hard
1:58:07
evidence either way
1:58:11
and the rocket ship
1:58:12
means that we stole
1:58:18
that if you're a scientist
1:58:19
following these developments
1:58:21
you know all the dead ends
1:58:23
you know all the mistakes
1:58:25
and then you realize
1:58:28
it wasn't given to us
1:58:30
it was a byproduct
1:58:31
of trial and error
1:58:35
creating the microchip
1:58:38
of modern technology
1:58:39
and there's a vast paper trail
1:58:41
there's a huge paper trail
1:58:44
that they're wrong
1:58:46
what about the idea
1:58:49
of accelerated evolution
1:58:51
that's the most fascinating
1:58:53
accelerated evolution
1:58:56
that we are the product
1:59:00
of some sort of an alien race
1:59:01
and lower primates
1:59:03
well it's always great
1:59:04
to think that we're
1:59:06
and somehow beyond
1:59:08
and that we're great
1:59:11
the proof is in the pudding
1:59:13
looking at our DNA
1:59:17
the DNA difference
1:59:26
and the vocal cords
1:59:30
that really stand out
1:59:33
and then human genes
1:59:34
and then you realize
1:59:36
that well that's why
1:59:36
we became intelligent
1:59:39
we can share knowledge
1:59:41
we have a posable thumb
1:59:44
much more delicate
1:59:50
eyes that are stereo
1:59:52
so that we can judge
1:59:53
distance to the prey
1:59:57
only three clusters
2:00:00
so it's hard to believe
2:00:02
that mating with an alien
2:00:03
could have done that
2:00:04
well I'm not saying mating
2:00:06
I think what the idea is
2:00:08
these are not credible ideas
2:00:10
this is just fantastic
2:00:11
conspiracy theories
2:00:13
there's a lot of really
2:00:17
like Zachariah Sitchin's
2:00:21
in ancient languages
2:00:25
that the Sumerian text
2:00:29
of accelerated evolution
2:00:30
well it's possible
2:00:32
but again it requires
2:00:37
by looking at the internet
2:00:41
there's a continuous line
2:00:43
to the chimpanzees
2:00:45
and that a few genes
2:00:52
you get a human being
2:00:53
there's also some puzzles though
2:00:55
of the human brain size
2:00:57
of two million years
2:00:58
that's a big puzzle
2:01:01
just a small cluster
2:01:03
was responsible for that
2:01:04
because that's just
2:01:13
then create the brain
2:01:18
the size of the brain
2:01:19
it only took a few genes
2:01:20
to expand the size
2:01:25
would the Neanderthal
2:01:26
have a larger brain
2:01:27
well a larger brain
2:01:30
does not necessarily
2:01:32
because there are animals
2:01:34
which have bigger brains
2:01:35
I think the porpoise
2:01:36
has a very large brain
2:01:43
I think what's more important
2:01:46
the ability to imagine
2:01:51
prefrontal cortex does
2:01:52
and that's what separates
2:01:53
us from the animals
2:01:54
animals do not have
2:01:56
we have a time machine
2:01:58
in the front of our head
2:02:01
as we're measuring it
2:02:03
to manipulate our environment
2:02:08
have a cerebral cortex
2:02:11
than a human being
2:02:12
what they're experiencing
2:02:14
kind of intelligence
2:02:16
communal intelligence
2:02:19
of shared telepathy
2:02:24
that we're not capable
2:02:29
what does intelligence
2:02:30
intelligence allows
2:02:35
to the environment
2:02:39
and then the ability
2:02:47
and then extrapolate
2:02:49
it into the future
2:02:51
animals can't do that
2:02:53
to create imaginary worlds
2:02:56
and then on an MRI scan
2:02:59
scientists ask the question
2:03:00
if the brain sees the future
2:03:02
but the future doesn't exist
2:03:04
then how can a brain scan
2:03:06
show you the future
2:03:07
because it doesn't exist yet
2:03:08
when you brain scan
2:03:12
they think about the past
2:03:14
they rework all the things
2:03:17
and they make a few changes
2:03:19
that's how they extrapolate
2:03:22
that's how we did it
2:03:23
animals don't do that
2:03:25
animals simply go by instinct
2:03:29
is we take the past
2:03:32
and then let it flow
2:03:34
well that's what's so fascinating
2:03:37
is that they bypass
2:03:40
completely new possibilities
2:03:42
that we could have
2:03:42
never even dreamed
2:03:43
we were capable of
2:03:45
like what we're experiencing
2:03:47
and if you go to Star Trek
2:03:50
they were basically
2:03:50
using walkie-talkies
2:03:52
they had never even
2:03:54
figured out cell phones yet
2:03:55
but what we're doing now
2:03:57
is almost inconceivable
2:04:03
what are we looking at
2:04:05
what are we looking at
2:04:05
inside of our lifetime
2:04:07
well my attitude is
2:04:13
and if you look at history
2:04:16
then you see the enormous progress
2:04:19
but if you look at the history
2:04:25
setbacks take place
2:04:26
and so on and so forth
2:04:27
but when you look at things
2:04:29
then you see that there is
2:04:34
and the path is toward democracy
2:04:36
the path is toward empowerment
2:04:38
the path is toward creating
2:04:40
these are the paths
2:04:44
that you cannot see
2:04:46
and I think that is
2:04:48
a byproduct of technology
2:04:50
technology has made
2:04:52
a middle class possible
2:04:54
yeah it really has
2:04:55
and technology is what
2:04:59
impoverished communities
2:05:00
and that part of the problem
2:05:03
is that they don't have
2:05:04
that they don't have access
2:05:05
to all the innovations
2:05:08
that make life safer
2:05:11
make it easier to live
2:05:14
and have more peace
2:05:16
to develop new things
2:05:22
I think will accelerate
2:05:23
that whole process
2:05:24
because that's the name
2:05:25
technology just not
2:05:27
for technology's sake
2:05:28
just not to make profits
2:05:30
of course that's also
2:05:32
one of the motivating factors
2:05:33
but to enrich the human race
2:05:38
this is what technology does
2:05:41
will take away jobs too
2:05:42
but it creates jobs
2:05:48
we don't have blacksmiths anymore
2:05:49
but we don't cry about it
2:05:51
because these blacksmiths
2:05:52
became automobile workers
2:05:53
and so new jobs opened up
2:05:56
and the same thing with AI
2:05:58
people point to the fact
2:05:59
that AI is displacing
2:06:01
especially at the bottom
2:06:04
but it's also creating new jobs
2:06:06
jobs that no one even conceived of before
2:06:09
and so it's a balance
2:06:10
between job destruction
2:06:13
and that's the main effect
2:06:14
that AI has had on society
2:06:16
it's a beautiful time
2:06:21
that you're out there
2:06:22
talking about these things
2:06:24
it sparks the imagination
2:06:25
in such an incredible way
2:06:26
and because of you
2:06:28
and because of your work
2:06:29
you really get to understand
2:06:30
like what the real parameters
2:06:31
we're working with here
2:06:32
and what we're really talking about
2:06:35
that's one of the reasons
2:06:36
why I do what I do
2:06:38
why do you do this
2:06:39
I mean you're great at it
2:06:40
you should keep doing it forever
2:06:41
do you do things independently
2:06:43
do you have a podcast of your own
2:06:48
which station are you on
2:06:55
I do so many things
2:06:56
I can't keep track
2:06:57
but just go to my website
2:07:04
do a lot of things
2:07:05
like how do you maintain
2:07:06
your energy levels
2:07:08
I can't understand
2:07:10
are not energized by this
2:07:11
I mean some people play golf
2:07:13
some people do all sorts of
2:07:18
because it energizes you
2:07:20
you know after a game of golf
2:07:22
that they feel renewed
2:07:24
this is what I feel
2:07:26
when you talk to people
2:07:27
because you're sharing
2:07:28
your own excitement
2:07:29
you're trying to convey
2:07:31
the excitement that you feel
2:07:33
well you do a fantastic job at it
2:07:38
it's always a pleasure
2:07:40
so tell everybody about your book
2:07:42
yeah the book is called
2:07:51
of a supercomputer
2:07:52
on certain very specified problems
2:07:55
we passed that point
2:07:56
we now have quantum computers
2:07:58
that are millions of times faster
2:08:01
than a digital computer
2:08:02
on certain select questions
2:08:05
is to make a general purpose
2:08:08
that works for any problem
2:08:09
not just specific problems
2:08:12
that may take maybe another decade or so
2:08:15
but again the stakes are enormous
2:08:17
we're talking about
2:08:20
which nation is going to dominate
2:08:23
what technologies will thrust
2:08:24
the world's productive abilities
2:08:27
that's quantum computers
2:08:29
now when this does get implemented
2:08:31
what private companies
2:08:35
are they working in conjunction
2:08:37
with the government
2:08:39
how does all that get controlled
2:08:42
it's a free for all
2:08:44
it's a free for all
2:08:45
the horses are out of the gate
2:08:47
basically it's a few key players
2:08:54
they're all jumping in the game
2:08:55
investing billions of dollars
2:08:57
to create their version
2:08:59
and the Chinese are right there
2:09:01
with their parallel version
2:09:03
using optical means
2:09:05
rather than using electrical means
2:09:07
to do calculations
2:09:08
and they know the price
2:09:09
that the price is not there yet
2:09:12
they're not operational
2:09:13
for general purpose problems
2:09:15
but they know potentially
2:09:17
and that's to be able
2:09:18
to dominate the world economy
2:09:20
now what's the worst case scenario
2:09:24
American corporations
2:09:25
let's just say Microsoft
2:09:26
let's say if Microsoft
2:09:30
some sort of functional
2:09:33
that just blows everything else
2:09:36
they essentially become
2:09:43
dominated everything
2:09:44
and then Microsoft
2:09:46
bunch of teenagers
2:09:49
these are a bunch of teenagers
2:09:50
what can they do right
2:09:51
and then these teenagers
2:09:53
took over the world
2:09:54
so we're talking about
2:09:55
something on that scale
2:09:58
that can make a breakthrough
2:09:59
to make a workable
2:10:02
who wouldn't want to buy one
2:10:05
I mean you're talking about
2:10:06
a runaway bestseller
2:10:12
that's attached to that
2:10:14
that anyone wielding it
2:10:29
that you showed your friends
2:10:30
but you couldn't do anything
2:10:32
and then comes Microsoft
2:10:35
you can do your income tax
2:10:37
you can do spreadsheets
2:10:39
and then it just took off
2:10:41
so we're at that stage now
2:10:42
where the computer
2:10:43
is still not ready
2:10:45
for general purpose calculations
2:10:46
but when it does happen
2:10:48
we're talking about
2:10:51
everyone's going to want
2:10:53
to jump in the game
2:10:53
do you think that preemptively
2:10:55
some laws should be put in place
2:10:56
to sort of regulate this
2:10:59
some laws may have to
2:11:01
this is potentially
2:11:11
when quantum computers
2:11:12
become commonplace
2:11:13
and they're already
2:11:14
making recommendations
2:11:15
and so for the post
2:11:19
the post quantum era
2:11:23
for the post quantum era
2:11:25
when quantum computers
2:11:27
any known digital code
2:11:29
what does the world
2:11:30
if there's no secrets
2:11:31
what does the world
2:11:34
top secret information
2:11:38
yeah that's a good question
2:11:40
I mean some people say
2:11:43
sometimes this happened
2:11:47
it wasn't doomsday
2:11:49
but it does affect
2:11:52
during World War II
2:11:54
we broke the German code
2:11:57
that broke the German code
2:11:59
and we knew exactly
2:12:01
before war actually
2:12:05
thousands of lives
2:12:11
nations steal secrets
2:12:12
from other nations
2:12:14
and we're still here
2:12:22
with quantum computers
2:12:23
stealing from nations
2:12:25
could be commonplace
2:12:26
now there are ways
2:12:28
a quantum computer
2:12:31
one way is to have
2:12:36
based on electricity
2:12:37
that all of us use
2:12:40
and the other layer
2:12:45
that would be a way
2:12:52
people would shut down
2:12:53
that part of the internet
2:12:55
so that's a possibility
2:12:56
that people have talked
2:13:01
for big corporations
2:13:05
an invulnerable internet
2:13:08
by the laws of physics
2:13:09
can never be broken
2:13:10
and everybody else
2:13:12
the ordinary internet
2:13:13
wouldn't that bother you though
2:13:18
computational power
2:13:19
they're paying for it
2:13:25
like when you said
2:13:28
and who these laws
2:13:29
will have to be passed
2:13:30
just like with chatbots
2:13:32
laws are going to have to be passed
2:13:34
just like freedom of speech
2:13:36
but you cannot say fire
2:13:37
in a crowded theater
2:13:38
so laws will have to be passed
2:13:40
to regulate chatbots
2:13:41
and laws may have to be passed
2:13:44
to regulate quantum computers
2:13:46
does it bother you
2:13:48
that will have to get passed
2:13:51
that probably don't
2:13:52
even have a comprehensive
2:13:54
of what's possible
2:13:55
yeah that's possible
2:13:57
that's always the nightmare
2:14:00
ultimately politicians
2:14:02
carry out people's will
2:14:03
it's not going to be guys
2:14:04
passing these laws
2:14:05
no it'll be people
2:14:11
what kinds of issues
2:14:12
they have to harp on
2:14:13
in order to get reelected
2:14:14
so that's a danger
2:14:16
that the politicians
2:14:17
may mess things up
2:14:18
well I can only hope
2:14:20
to have a conversation
2:14:21
with them about it
2:14:24
the scientific community
2:14:29
to make the decisions
2:14:30
influence the decisions
2:14:32
well that would be
2:14:33
the best way to do it
2:14:36
that even the scientists
2:14:37
can or the physicists
2:14:40
of what is to come
2:14:42
it's just educated
2:14:45
when the transistor
2:14:48
maybe it would be used
2:14:49
to signal ships at sea
2:14:52
what the transistor
2:14:55
it changed society
2:15:00
know it at that time
2:15:04
it's always a pleasure
2:15:06
you're a national treasure
2:15:08
I really believe that
2:15:09
you're such a great
2:15:10
communicator with this stuff
2:15:12
and it's so exciting
2:15:13
and I'm going to listen
2:15:14
to this back and forth
2:15:14
and try to figure out
2:15:19
computer revolution
2:15:20
will change everything
2:15:21
and it is available now
2:15:23
did you do the audio book
2:15:24
no we had somebody
2:15:27
why didn't you do it
2:15:29
I want to hear you
2:15:30
it would take four days
2:15:32
locked up in a room
2:15:38
well I'll try to listen
2:15:39
to it in your voice
2:15:41
I really appreciate you
0