#1980 - Michio Kaku

7.4K views

3 years ago

2

Save

Michio Kaku

2 appearances

Dr. Michio Kaku, PhD, is a professor of theoretical physics, host of the "Science Fantastic" radio program, and author of several books. His latest is "Quantum Supremacy: How the Quantum Computer Revolution Will Change Everything." It is available now.www.mkaku.org

ChatJRE - Chat with the JRE chatbot

Timestamps

0:25Quantum computing, its transformative potential, and the search for a theory of everything
9:58Michio Kaku's origin story: Einstein, string theory, and building a particle accelerator in high school
19:58Continuation: AI chatbots, fact-checking, and quantum computing as a truth filter

Show all

Comments

Write a comment...

mthomas

2y ago

Timestamps 17:50 - The possibilities if AI combined with quantum computing 1:31:23 - What does mankind look like a few thousand years from now? 2:10:55 - Governing society in a world of AI Episode write-up: https://medium.com/@Matthew_Thomas/jre-may-2023-recap-632941c86a57

0

Reply

Hide

I can't listen to Kaku anymore. I'm done trying. He acts like a stereotypical arrogant academic. His tonality sounds like he is talking to a kindergartner, and he is really arrogant. He frequently makes absolute statements about things that he cannot possibly know. Its bad for people to listen to someone like this. If his logic is so broken about "This is the final evolution of computing" (for ex), then how the actual fuck is it a good idea to trust anything he says? This motherfucker needs to go on a heroic dose of psychedelics. His behavior is dangerous and bad for the world.

0

Reply

Hide

ChatGPT

3y ago

Q: Why is a Japanese gnome talking about quantum physics? A: Because that is in essence what quantum physics is.

0

Reply

Hide

Show 1 reply

SECOND EPISODE THATS NOT PLAYING

1

Reply

Hide

Show 5 replies

Playlists

Episodes from 2023

Updated after each new episode

Transcript

0:00

Joe Rogan Podcast, check it out.

0:03

The Joe Rogan Experience.

0:05

Train by day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day.

0:09

Good to see you.

0:12

Glad to be on the show again.

0:14

My pleasure.

0:15

The last time was fascinating, and you have sent me down a rabbit hole of UFO

0:20

stories

0:21

and reports and fascinating stuff.

0:25

But let's talk about your latest book, which is on quantum computing.

0:30

Which is equally interesting, if not more interesting, because it might lead us

0:34

to become aliens.

0:35

We'll talk about that, too.

0:37

Please.

0:38

So, first of all, if you could, just tell everybody what it means.

0:42

What is quantum computing, and how does it work?

0:45

Well, there's a race going on.

0:48

A race between China, the United States, between IBM and Google.

0:52

A race to dominate the next generation of computers.

0:56

Because Silicon Valley could become a rust belt.

1:00

Think about that.

1:01

The digital computer of today could be like the abacus of years gone by.

1:06

We're talking about the computer of today could become obsolete with this race

1:11

to perfect the next generation,

1:13

which is quantum computers.

1:16

Instead of computing on transistors, we're computing on atoms.

1:21

Think about that.

1:21

This is the ultimate computer.

1:23

There's nothing smaller than what you can do with atoms.

1:28

And that's what these quantum computers compute with.

1:31

And it raises all sorts of problems.

1:34

The CIA is worried that quantum computers will break right through the CIA

1:38

and any kind of barrier being placed around your secrets.

1:45

Industries are going to be created out of nothing.

1:47

Medicine is going to be turned upside down.

1:49

Energy production, society, entertainment, every aspect of society will be

1:55

changed with quantum computers.

1:57

And that's why there's this race, a race to perfect the quantum computer.

2:03

How far from the finish line do you think they are?

2:06

Well, it's three years away.

2:08

First of all, we've actually built one.

2:09

Different companies are fielding quantum computers.

2:13

They're kind of primitive.

2:14

But some computers, some quantum computers, are actually millions of times more

2:19

powerful than our supercomputer

2:21

for a certain definite task.

2:24

But it may take another decade or so before we get all the kinks out

2:28

and it becomes part of everyday life.

2:31

But it's going to change everything in the same way that the transistor changed

2:35

everything.

2:36

The world economy, medicine, art, science, everything was changed with the

2:41

microchip.

2:41

Same thing with the quantum computer.

2:44

It's very difficult for us.

2:47

There's only been a few science fiction authors who have been able to do this

2:51

successfully

2:51

where they can accurately predict what the future is going to look like.

2:55

I mean, even they're off usually.

2:57

You know, H.G. Wells had some pretty good ideas.

2:59

But are we looking at something that we almost don't have a reference for,

3:05

that it's so mind-blowingly different and much more powerful than anything we've

3:09

experienced so far,

3:10

that it's difficult for us to imagine how much it's going to change the world?

3:15

Well, to imagine how it's going to change the world, think of the progression

3:19

of the computer.

3:20

For thousands of years, the computer was basically an analog device.

3:24

We used sticks, beads, levers, gears, pulleys, cranks in order to do simple

3:30

calculations.

3:31

That was the first era of computation.

3:34

And that meant that we could keep track of things, which we couldn't do before.

3:38

Then World War II hit, and all of a sudden we had to break the German code.

3:43

And that required using electricity and using all sorts of vacuum tubes to

3:49

crack the German code.

3:50

And then we went into the second era, where we compute on digital and binary.

3:55

So zeros and ones, zeros and ones.

3:58

Now we're entering the third era, a natural progression from gears, levers,

4:03

pulleys,

4:04

to vacuum tubes and transistors, and then to atoms.

4:08

This is the final step in the evolution of the computer.

4:13

When we compute on atoms, these are atomic computers, nothing more powerful

4:18

than that.

4:18

So when you think about how much it would change life as we know it,

4:25

that's when things get difficult to understand, right?

4:28

Because if we think about just trying to imagine what it would be like living

4:32

in New York City in 1820,

4:34

and then imagining what it's like today, 200 years later, they would have never

4:39

been able to guess.

4:40

What kind of things is this going to change?

4:44

Everything.

4:45

For example, think of biology and medicine.

4:49

To test a drug, what do we do?

4:51

We get thousands, hundreds of different kinds of petri dishes, put the drug in,

4:57

put the tissue in,

4:59

and just cross your fingers and hope and pray that of these thousands of dishes,

5:03

one of them will create a super wonder drug.

5:06

That's why it costs upwards of a billion dollars to market the next wonder drug,

5:12

because it's all done by trial and error.

5:14

Now, think of putting that in the memory of a supercomputer, a quantum computer.

5:20

It analyzes whether or not germs can be destroyed by this substance at the

5:26

speed of light.

5:27

Not just one dish, but hundreds, thousands of dishes of these things

5:32

can be tested at the same time in the memory, the memory of a computer.

5:38

So we're talking about digital medicine, digital chemistry, virtual chemistry.

5:44

Think about that.

5:45

Chemistry without chemicals, biology without biology.

5:49

So that's the beauty of this technology, that we can mimic atoms.

5:54

We can mimic molecules and do virtual experiments in the memory of a computer

6:00

rather than using test tubes like we used to do, that we still do today.

6:06

And we could possibly see things that are just theoretical right now,

6:09

like with medicine, like regenerating limbs or regrowing spinal tissue

6:14

for a person who's been paralyzed, things along those lines.

6:17

In fact, even immortality is on the table.

6:20

Realize that scientists who have looked at the aging process

6:24

realize that the reason why we never understood aging

6:27

is that aging is the buildup of error.

6:30

That's what aging is, the buildup of mistakes in the replication of DNA.

6:35

But what happens if you could put DNA in a computer?

6:38

Then you can see where the aging takes place.

6:42

And then we can begin perhaps to slow down the aging process,

6:45

maybe even become immortal.

6:48

What about reversing it?

6:49

What about old women become young, hot ladies again?

6:52

I think that would be a problem.

6:54

Everything's on the table because we're talking about

6:57

changing the fabric of life itself.

7:01

You know, the greatest quantum computer is Mother Nature.

7:04

Think about it.

7:05

How does Mother Nature do photosynthesis?

7:07

How does Mother Nature create trees and flowers out of nothing?

7:12

It's all chemicals and molecules.

7:14

That's what quantum computers can do.

7:18

When you think about that, just to describe that complexity that you just

7:22

described,

7:22

do you ever wonder if there's some sort of an ongoing code in the whole

7:27

universe itself?

7:28

Like, there's a reason why all these things happen.

7:31

There's a reason why the mycelium and the trees have this relationship with the

7:36

fungus and the earth and the soil,

7:38

the animals have this perfect symbiosis.

7:42

Well, that was the subject of my previous book, The God Equation,

7:46

where we try to find one theory that allows us to calculate everything,

7:52

starting with the Big Bang, then the creation of galaxies and stars, planets,

7:58

finally the creation of life, photosynthesis.

8:02

And here we are talking about this on a podcast.

8:05

So, yeah, we're talking about one equation, which I call the God Equation,

8:10

which I write about in my book, The God Equation.

8:13

But there's a problem.

8:14

The problem is that the theory is so complicated

8:17

that no human has been able to solve the consequences of this equation.

8:23

That's where quantum computers can come in.

8:26

Quantum computers can solve the equation and then test it to see whether or not

8:31

it really is a theory of everything

8:33

or just the imagination of some physicist.

8:36

So that was my previous book, The God Equation.

8:39

So that's why I decided to write this book, Quantum Supremacy,

8:44

because it may eventually take a quantum computer to calculate with what is

8:49

called string theory.

8:51

And I'm one of the founders of string theory.

8:53

And we think that is Einstein's theory that eluded him for the last 30 years of

8:58

his life.

8:59

This quantum computing creating the answer to this God molecule or this God Equation,

9:08

if this does happen, what would that mean to you,

9:13

to a person who's studied this and been a scientist your whole life and the way

9:18

you look at the world?

9:19

How much would that change if there was some sort of a provable equation as to

9:24

why things become ever more complex

9:26

and universes exist and people exist?

9:29

Well, that's my childhood dream.

9:34

As I mentioned, when I was eight years old, everything changed in my life.

9:39

A great scientist had just died.

9:41

And all the newspapers said that he could not finish his final and greatest

9:46

theory.

9:47

And they put a picture of his desk on the news.

9:50

The desk was open and unfinished.

9:52

So I was fascinated by that story.

9:55

That story changed my life because I said to myself,

9:58

why couldn't he finish that theory?

10:00

Why don't I try to finish that theory?

10:03

That's amazing.

10:04

So I went to the library and I looked up this man.

10:07

This man's name was Albert Einstein.

10:09

The theory was the theory of everything.

10:13

An equation of when it's long that would allow us to, quote,

10:16

read the mind of God.

10:18

These are Einstein's words.

10:20

So I said to myself, that's for me.

10:23

That's what I want to do for the rest of my life.

10:25

So now we have the theory.

10:27

It's called string theory.

10:28

There have been TV documentaries on the subject.

10:31

But it's not testable.

10:33

So I think that a quantum computer may one day be powerful enough

10:37

to test it in the memory of a computer.

10:40

However, we have to be careful.

10:42

Remember that novel, The Restaurant at the End of the Galaxy?

10:48

What happened in that novel was the aliens of the future

10:51

created a supercomputer to calculate the theory of everything,

10:55

the ultimate theory.

10:57

So the computer chugged and chugged and spit out the answer.

11:01

And the answer was, the meaning of the universe was 42.

11:09

So much for that.

11:10

So I would hope that our quantum computer,

11:13

computing on string theory,

11:15

I hope would not give us the number 42 as the meaning of reality.

11:19

Maybe we're just too dumb to know what that means.

11:22

Yeah.

11:23

But that's what motivated me.

11:27

Oh, yeah.

11:27

Well, that's a beautiful motivation.

11:30

Just thinking about you being an eight-year-old,

11:32

looking at Einstein's, the photograph of Einstein's desk,

11:35

that's amazing.

11:36

I love stories like that.

11:37

I love origin stories.

11:39

Because I've always wondered with someone like you.

11:40

Yeah, well, that changed my life.

11:42

And then when I was in high school,

11:44

I decided to take it one step further.

11:46

And I decided to build an atom smasher,

11:49

a particle accelerator in my mom's garage.

11:51

So I assembled 300 pounds of transformer steel,

11:55

22 miles of copper wire,

11:58

and I assembled a 6 kilowatt,

12:00

2.3 million electron volt betatron particle accelerator

12:04

in my mom's garage.

12:05

In high school?

12:07

In high school, right.

12:08

Wow.

12:08

Every time I turned it on,

12:09

I would blow out every single circuit breaker in the house.

12:12

It consumed 6 kilowatts of power.

12:15

My poor mom comes home,

12:16

and she hears this pop, pop, pops out

12:19

as I blow out every circuit breaker in the house.

12:22

And she must have said to herself,

12:24

why couldn't I have a son who plays baseball?

12:27

Why not basketball?

12:29

Why can't he find a nice Japanese girlfriend?

12:32

How come he builds these machines in the garage?

12:36

Well, that machine got me accepted to Harvard,

12:40

and that began my career.

12:42

That began my career as a theoretical physicist.

12:45

What were you able to do with that machine?

12:47

Well, I was able to create a magnetic field

12:50

of 10,000 gauss,

12:52

that is 20,000 times the Earth's magnetic field.

12:55

If you got too close to my machine,

12:57

it would pull the fillings out of your teeth.

12:59

Really?

12:59

Yeah, so you had to be very careful.

13:01

What about objects that are close to it?

13:03

Scissors and things would fly in the air, right.

13:06

So you had to be very careful

13:07

coming next to my machine.

13:09

Oh, my God.

13:10

So compare that to,

13:12

you can't even go near

13:14

one of those scanners,

13:16

those MRI machines, right?

13:17

Magnetic resonance imagery.

13:19

That's right, MRI.

13:19

You can't have any metal near those, right?

13:21

Yeah, right.

13:22

But that's nothing like that.

13:22

And there are about 10,000 gauss to you,

13:24

about the same magnetic field as my machine.

13:26

Oh, okay, okay.

13:26

So my machine is comparable

13:28

to the machines that you see in the hospital today.

13:30

Wow.

13:31

That's crazy.

13:32

And you built that when you were in high school.

13:33

That's right.

13:34

Is that a photo of it?

13:35

That's a photo of one of those?

13:37

Yeah, that's the photo of it right there.

13:39

You see on the left,

13:40

you can see that's 22 miles of copper wire.

13:43

You see the capacitor bank,

13:45

a cloud chamber on the right

13:47

where I photographed antimatter

13:48

because that was the whole experiment

13:50

to play with antimatter.

13:52

Wow.

13:52

And, yeah, the cables are hooked up

13:54

and it's hooked up to six kilowatts

13:57

that comes out of the wall socket,

13:59

drained every single ounce of power

14:01

of my mom's garage.

14:02

Wow.

14:04

Look at young Michio.

14:06

Look at you, you handsome fella.

14:07

Well, that's the Betatron particle accelerator.

14:10

That's amazing.

14:11

2.3 million electron volt generator of electrons.

14:14

So you were able to photograph antimatter with that?

14:18

Well, with the cloud chamber, yes.

14:20

I was able to photograph the tracks of antimatter,

14:23

tracks of positrons or anti-electrons

14:26

that are emitted from sodium-22.

14:28

And I proved that it was antimatter

14:31

because they bent the wrong way in a magnetic field.

14:34

Ordinary electrons should bend clockwise.

14:36

These bent counterclockwise in a magnetic field.

14:40

That proved conclusively that it was antimatter

14:43

that I was photographing.

14:44

Wow.

14:45

How old are you at the time?

14:47

I was about 17.

14:48

I was so dumb.

14:51

I'm pretty dumb now,

14:53

but I was so dumb when I was 17.

14:55

That's amazing that you're spending your time doing this.

14:58

Right.

14:58

I was listening to Led Zeppelin.

15:00

But, you know, like I said,

15:02

I was chasing after this dream

15:03

of an eight-year-old child

15:05

wondering, is there a theory of everything?

15:07

It's an amazing dream.

15:08

Yeah.

15:09

Now, where did you get the designs for this?

15:13

Oh, well, these designs come from an X-ray machine

15:17

done by Donald Kirst,

15:19

who was one of the inventors of the Betatron.

15:21

And so a lot of the groundbreaking work was done by him.

15:24

And now they're incorporated in most hospitals.

15:27

Most hospitals have one

15:29

that creates X-rays for patients.

15:33

So was there a schematic online that you duplicated?

15:37

Did you devise this yourself?

15:39

Yeah.

15:40

No, there was a schematic online.

15:43

I mean, there was no line back then.

15:45

Oh, of course, online.

15:47

Excuse me.

15:47

In the library, there was a schematic.

15:49

But I had to fill in the details.

15:51

I had to do the equations

15:52

to calculate how many turns of wire,

15:55

how many gauss.

15:56

I needed 10,000 gauss

15:57

in order to bend tracks

15:59

of 2.3 million electron volts.

16:02

All the calculations had to be done ahead of time

16:04

to make sure it would work.

16:06

Isn't it funny that the universe is so common,

16:09

or excuse me, the Internet, rather,

16:11

is so common that I automatically for a second

16:14

forgot that we were children

16:15

when you were younger than me,

16:17

or when you were younger.

16:18

That's right.

16:19

There was no Internet.

16:21

There was no Internet at all.

16:21

Nothing online back then.

16:23

It was just books.

16:24

It was just books.

16:25

So you had to have a real hunger for information

16:27

to go and seek this stuff out.

16:28

That's right.

16:29

Did you have any particular high school teachers

16:32

that were influential or inspirational?

16:34

Well, fortunately, I grew up in Palo Alto,

16:37

which is now ground zero for Silicon Valley.

16:40

So luckily, there were other physicists in the area

16:43

because they worked for varying associates

16:45

and different electronics companies.

16:47

So it wasn't a total vacuum.

16:49

I was able to get advice,

16:51

especially in the magnetic field

16:53

and the cloud chamber

16:55

and also the vacuum tube

16:57

that contained the particles

16:59

that I was accelerating.

17:01

It was good to have real physicists there

17:03

in Palo Alto

17:05

because of that fact.

17:06

Oh, that's amazing.

17:07

So were they willing to consult with you

17:09

and discuss this with you

17:10

as a high school student?

17:11

Yeah, in general, right.

17:11

So I would talk to them

17:13

about how to build a magnetic field

17:14

and to calculate,

17:15

using Maxwell's equations,

17:17

the geometry of the particle accelerator.

17:21

So, yeah, I would go and visit these physicists

17:23

because Palo Alto was to become

17:26

ground zero for Silicon Valley.

17:28

It's such a fascinating image

17:31

of seeing this one super genius physicist

17:34

who's teaching classes

17:35

get a visit by a teenage super genius physicist.

17:38

And he's like, oh, he's one of us.

17:41

He'd catch you when you're a teenager.

17:43

That's very interesting.

17:44

As soon as I talked to them,

17:45

they immediately knew what I was doing.

17:46

So they would help me.

17:47

That's crazy.

17:48

Yeah.

17:48

That's so awesome.

17:50

Now, in application of this thing,

17:52

one of the things that we're seeing right now

17:54

when we're talking about quantum computing,

17:56

back to that,

17:57

one of the things we're seeing now

17:59

is ChatGPT.

18:00

ChatGPT, which is this fascinating AI program

18:04

that essentially scours the entire internet

18:07

for answers for things

18:07

and is so good at it.

18:09

The answers for things,

18:11

for just data,

18:12

people are getting diagnosed

18:14

with certain diseases

18:15

based on symptoms and blood work,

18:16

and it's super accurate.

18:19

legal papers,

18:20

it could fill out legal forms,

18:22

and it's wild,

18:24

the capacity that it has right now.

18:24

You can pass the bar exam that way, too.

18:26

Yes.

18:26

The bar exam can be passed

18:28

with a chat bot.

18:29

Yeah, it's like 98%, right?

18:31

Now, here's the question.

18:33

If quantum computing

18:35

gets involved in AI,

18:37

what are we looking at?

18:39

Well, first of all,

18:40

AI is a software program.

18:43

We're talking about homogenizing

18:45

different kinds of essays on the web,

18:47

splicing them together,

18:49

and then passing it off

18:51

as your latest creation.

18:52

Basically, plagiarism

18:54

using digital computers.

18:55

It's a software question.

18:57

However, quantum computers

18:58

is bigger than that.

19:00

Quantum computers

19:01

is a hardware question

19:02

where it actually increases

19:04

your ability

19:05

to do much more

19:07

than with an ordinary

19:08

digital computer.

19:09

So the two of them,

19:10

the chat bots

19:12

that are a revolution

19:14

in software

19:15

and then quantum computers,

19:17

which are a revolution

19:17

in hardware,

19:18

when they get together,

19:20

watch out.

19:20

So we're talking about

19:22

an extremely powerful alliance

19:24

between software

19:25

and hardware.

19:27

Now, also, as you know,

19:28

chat bots will also lie,

19:30

cheat, swindle, joke,

19:32

and do all sorts of crazy things.

19:33

If you're a high school kid,

19:35

you could write

19:36

all sorts of science fiction scenarios

19:37

and some chat bot

19:39

may grab pieces of that nonsense

19:41

and incorporate it

19:43

into their essay.

19:44

Oh, interesting.

19:46

So it can't discern

19:47

what's accurate.

19:48

Exactly.

19:49

The whole point.

19:50

This is the whole bottle of wax.

19:51

Chat bots do not know

19:53

what is correct or incorrect.

19:55

They just gather information

19:56

so they could be gamed.

19:57

That's right.

19:58

All they do is homogenize,

19:59

cut up existing things

20:01

that sound human,

20:02

put it together,

20:03

and then people say,

20:04

my God,

20:05

that sounds like a human wrote it.

20:06

Of course,

20:07

a human did write it.

20:09

Isn't that interesting

20:09

that they could game that also

20:11

if they wanted to find out

20:12

what percentage of people

20:14

believed a certain thing?

20:15

If they had some bad actors,

20:17

some foreign governments

20:21

that decided

20:21

they were going to spread narratives

20:24

as widely as possible

20:25

and chat GBT

20:27

just gathers up

20:28

all this information,

20:29

it could give you

20:30

an incorrect understanding

20:32

of what's happening

20:32

in the world.

20:33

That's right.

20:33

It could give you

20:33

an incorrect understanding

20:34

of politics,

20:35

of economics.

20:36

The whole point

20:37

is that even though

20:38

there's a good aspect

20:39

to all these software programs,

20:40

the downside is

20:42

that you can fabricate truth

20:44

because it cannot tell

20:46

the difference

20:46

between what is false

20:49

and what is true.

20:50

That's very interesting.

20:51

If you talk to the chatbot

20:53

and say,

20:53

do you know the difference

20:54

between correct and incorrect?

20:55

And they say,

20:56

no,

20:57

it's just on the web.

20:58

They're just instructed

21:00

to cobble together

21:01

existing paragraphs,

21:03

splice them together

21:04

and polish it up

21:05

and then spit it out.

21:07

But is it correct?

21:08

It doesn't care.

21:09

It doesn't know.

21:11

So it is essentially

21:12

like an amazing resource

21:14

of information

21:15

that's very flawed

21:17

that can't discern

21:18

and can't think.

21:19

I do this.

21:20

I have this problem

21:21

all the time.

21:21

I'm a professor

21:22

and I give assignments

21:23

to the students,

21:24

sometimes write a term paper.

21:25

So what do they do?

21:27

Some of them plagiarize.

21:28

How do you catch them?

21:30

Well, you read the essay

21:31

and then you read another essay

21:33

and you say,

21:33

I've heard that before.

21:34

I've seen that expression.

21:36

Oh, you did the old-fashioned way.

21:37

Right, right, right.

21:38

The old-fashioned way.

21:39

Yeah.

21:39

But you see,

21:40

that's what a chatbot is.

21:41

A chatbot is like a teenager

21:43

that plagiarizes

21:44

other people's essays,

21:46

passes it off as their own.

21:48

Now, I'm a scientist.

21:49

We like to think about

21:50

things that are creative,

21:51

new, innovative,

21:54

things that will change

21:55

our perception of the world.

21:56

None of that,

21:58

absolutely none of that

21:59

comes from a chatbot.

22:00

A chatbot simply rearranges

22:03

pre-existing essays.

22:05

That's all it does.

22:06

The thing is, though,

22:08

that's all it does now.

22:09

That's what's interesting.

22:11

What's interesting

22:12

is what you're talking about

22:13

with quantum computing

22:14

and the insane

22:15

computational power.

22:16

Right.

22:17

And then apply that

22:19

to having access

22:20

to all of the information.

22:21

Right.

22:22

But there's a good aspect, too.

22:23

You know,

22:24

when I write a book,

22:25

my publisher has a fact checker.

22:27

A fact checker

22:28

that goes through

22:29

all the different statements

22:30

that I make

22:31

to make sure

22:31

that they're all correct.

22:32

There is no fact checker

22:35

for chatbots.

22:36

Let me repeat that again.

22:38

There is no fact checker

22:40

for chatbots.

22:41

That is the whole ball of wax.

22:43

That's the reason

22:44

why they're so dangerous.

22:45

Because they can,

22:46

they don't know.

22:47

These chatbots are machines.

22:48

They don't know

22:49

what is correct,

22:50

what is incorrect.

22:51

It's all the same to them.

22:52

That's the danger

22:53

that they could

22:54

incorporate teenagers

22:56

ranting and raving

22:56

about all sorts of garbage

22:58

and put that in

22:59

with articles

23:00

that sound reasonable.

23:01

You see?

23:02

That's the problem.

23:04

Now, here's where

23:04

quantum computers come in.

23:06

Quantum computers

23:07

can act as a fact checker.

23:09

You can ask a quantum computer

23:11

to remove all the garbage,

23:13

remove all the nonsense

23:14

in these articles

23:15

and it'll do that.

23:16

So, in other words,

23:18

the hardware

23:19

may be a check

23:20

on some of the wild statements

23:22

made by software.

23:23

But the problem with that

23:25

is who's the arbiter

23:26

of the information?

23:27

Who decides

23:28

what's real and what's not?

23:30

How does the chatbot decide?

23:32

Is the chatbot

23:33

ideologically biased?

23:34

The chatbot doesn't.

23:35

The chatbot simply

23:36

spits it out.

23:37

The quantum computing does.

23:37

Yeah, quantum computing

23:39

can then...

23:39

And it's going to be able

23:40

to discern what's real

23:42

and what's not real,

23:42

even what's propaganda.

23:44

And if there are gradations

23:45

of what is true,

23:46

like it is partially true

23:47

or whatever,

23:47

it could give you

23:48

the detailed understanding

23:50

of what could be misconstrued,

23:53

what is partially correct,

23:54

what is misleading

23:55

but partially correct.

23:56

You see what I'm saying?

23:57

Yes.

23:58

Right now,

23:58

the chatbot just splices it

24:00

together like an editor.

24:01

That's all it is.

24:02

An editor,

24:02

not a fact checker

24:04

and spits out

24:06

cobbled together articles

24:07

that sound reasonable

24:09

but there could be dynamite

24:11

inside some of these articles

24:12

that were spliced into

24:13

what was proposed.

24:15

With a quantum computer,

24:17

you can fact check things

24:19

and then you can say

24:20

this is 90% correct,

24:21

this is totally wrong,

24:23

this is sometimes correct

24:25

and you get gradations

24:27

of what is correct

24:28

and incorrect.

24:28

Well, if you can get

24:30

an objectively accurate fact checker,

24:33

that would be a huge step up

24:34

from what we have today

24:35

because a lot of people

24:36

have very little faith

24:38

in certain fact checkers

24:39

and when you find out

24:40

that they're ideologically biased

24:42

or they're governmentally biased

24:44

and if you could have something

24:45

that could just tell you,

24:46

have you even paid attention

24:47

to how Twitter's doing it now

24:49

where they have community notes,

24:50

have you seen this?

24:51

No, I haven't.

24:52

It's interesting,

24:52

say if someone makes a statement

24:54

about something controversial,

24:55

climate change,

24:56

whatever,

24:56

and then this controversial statement

24:59

gets refuted

25:00

in the community notes

25:02

and then people will start commenting

25:04

and really intelligent,

25:06

very well-read people

25:07

on specific subjects

25:09

will chime in

25:10

with peer-reviewed papers

25:11

and all these different statistics

25:13

that show

25:14

and then Twitter will correct it

25:16

and it will say,

25:17

readers have said

25:19

and then put up

25:20

the relevant information.

25:22

Right.

25:22

See, that's what chatbots

25:24

do not do today.

25:25

They have no understanding

25:27

of correct or incorrect,

25:28

false and true.

25:29

No understanding of that.

25:30

But with hardware

25:32

coming into the picture

25:33

that is more advanced,

25:34

then yeah,

25:35

you're talking about machines

25:37

that can do that automatically.

25:38

But is the problem

25:39

who controls that machine?

25:41

Like, say if China gets a hold

25:42

of one of those machines first,

25:43

if they develop

25:45

a quantum computer first

25:46

and they start implementing it.

25:49

Well, we have to make sure

25:50

that our quantum computers

25:52

can check other people's

25:53

quantum computers

25:54

to make sure

25:54

that they're not fudging the facts.

25:56

Right.

25:56

That's what I'm talking about.

25:57

Now, remember that

25:57

if this is not done legally,

26:00

if there are no laws

26:00

passed in this direction

26:02

and it's like the Wild West,

26:04

then, of course,

26:05

the politicians get involved

26:07

and it becomes a real mess.

26:09

Now, we do know

26:10

that you cannot yell fire

26:11

in a crowded theater.

26:13

Therefore, there are limits

26:14

to free speech.

26:15

We get that.

26:16

But how do you make limits

26:18

on statements

26:19

that are written on the web

26:20

that no human

26:21

can possibly follow?

26:22

Right.

26:23

That's where quantum computers

26:24

can come in.

26:25

Quantum computers

26:26

are powerful enough

26:28

to survey

26:29

the entire landscape

26:30

and give reasonable rebuttals

26:32

to things

26:33

that are just outrageous.

26:34

Well, more than that,

26:36

it's going to be able

26:37

to instantaneously

26:39

change how we interact

26:41

with each other

26:41

in terms of language barriers,

26:43

all these issues

26:44

that we have currently.

26:45

I'm sure you're aware

26:46

of Google had their earbuds.

26:50

There was a feature

26:51

where, say,

26:52

if you went to Spain

26:53

and didn't speak Spanish,

26:55

you could talk to it

26:56

and they would talk to it

26:57

and it would translate

26:58

back and forth.

26:59

So you could have

27:00

a real-time conversation.

27:01

I'm not sure how good is it.

27:02

How good is that, Jim?

27:04

But if there's something

27:05

like augmented reality

27:06

and we have something like that,

27:08

you're going to be able

27:08

to instantaneously translate

27:10

what people are saying.

27:11

Yeah.

27:12

There'll be no language barriers

27:13

for people.

27:14

We'll be able to...

27:16

I think that would change

27:17

just human perception

27:19

across the world,

27:20

just the way we view each other.

27:21

It's so easy to think

27:23

of each other

27:23

as being different

27:24

because we speak

27:25

a different language

27:25

and we live in a different

27:26

part of the planet.

27:27

But that would literally change

27:29

how we interact

27:30

with each other.

27:30

Yeah.

27:31

And just remember that

27:32

where do correct ideas come from?

27:34

Correct ideas come from interaction

27:36

with incorrect ideas.

27:37

It's the struggle between ideas

27:40

out of which correct ideas emerge.

27:43

And this does not happen

27:44

on the internet

27:45

because, of course,

27:46

with chatbots,

27:46

everything is cobbled together,

27:48

cut, spliced,

27:49

and simply glued together

27:50

with scotch tape,

27:51

masquerading as an essay.

27:54

So with fact-checking,

27:56

I think it's going to be different

27:57

because unless we do fact-checking,

28:00

the politicians will get involved

28:02

and this is going to be a real mess.

28:04

So I would hope that the industry

28:06

does fact-checking by itself

28:08

rather than having politicians do it.

28:10

It's such an important point

28:11

that you said

28:12

where you said that

28:13

the bad ideas have to exist

28:16

so the good ideas triumph.

28:17

And that's really an argument

28:20

against censorship on the internet,

28:21

which is another problem

28:22

that people have,

28:23

especially censorship

28:25

when it comes to something

28:26

being ideologically based.

28:27

But when you're thinking

28:29

about quantum computing,

28:30

I think this is small potatoes, right?

28:33

I think we're looking at

28:34

literally being able to change

28:37

how we interact with the universe.

28:39

Like when we were talking

28:40

on our last podcast

28:41

about the preponderance of evidence

28:44

that there's things

28:45

that operate inside of our atmosphere

28:48

that are beyond imagination,

28:50

that they operate

28:52

with no visible means of propulsion,

28:53

they move at insane speeds,

28:55

we don't understand what they are.

28:56

If we think about

28:57

what quantum computing

28:59

is going to be capable of,

29:00

that's the kind of stuff

29:01

we're thinking about, right?

29:02

Right, yeah.

29:03

You see, quantum computers

29:04

are the ultimate computers

29:05

because they're computing on atoms.

29:07

If there are aliens

29:08

in outer space,

29:09

and I think there are,

29:10

it means that they also

29:12

have perfected quantum computers

29:14

and they can do calculations

29:16

that are far beyond anything

29:17

that we can calculate with.

29:19

Like, for example,

29:20

a wormhole.

29:20

A wormhole, in principle,

29:22

is a gateway

29:23

between two distant points

29:24

in space and time,

29:25

which allows you

29:27

to break the Einstein barrier

29:28

and go faster

29:29

than the speed of light.

29:30

But the calculations

29:31

are horrendous.

29:32

It may take a quantum computer

29:34

to sort through

29:35

what happens

29:37

when you go through

29:37

a wormhole

29:39

and wind up

29:40

on the other side

29:41

of the universe,

29:41

and the aliens

29:43

probably already

29:43

have done that.

29:44

They've probably had

29:45

centuries of experience

29:46

with quantum computers

29:47

because that's

29:48

the ultimate computer.

29:49

You can't compute

29:50

in anything smaller

29:51

than an atom.

29:52

And they probably already

29:54

have used

29:55

the quantum computers

29:56

to navigate through

29:57

wormholes,

29:57

let's say, hypothetically.

29:59

It's so fascinating

30:00

when you think

30:01

of where we were

30:02

just a few thousand years ago

30:03

or a few hundred years ago

30:05

to where we are now.

30:06

And then you imagine

30:07

the invention

30:08

of quantum computing,

30:10

you imagine everything,

30:11

just the whole idea

30:13

of whatever we think

30:15

of current computer progression

30:16

just goes out the window.

30:17

And it's insane

30:19

calculation capabilities.

30:21

We could be able

30:23

to do something like that

30:25

in the future.

30:26

Right.

30:26

Quantum computers

30:27

allows us to calculate

30:28

things that are way beyond

30:30

our ability

30:31

to calculate today,

30:32

like going through

30:33

a wormhole

30:34

or warp drive

30:35

or even the question

30:36

of multiple universes.

30:37

People ask the question,

30:39

how come quantum computers

30:41

are so powerful?

30:41

It's because they compute

30:43

in parallel universes.

30:45

This is the multiverse,

30:47

which, of course,

30:48

Marvel Comics

30:48

has discovered

30:49

and the Oscars

30:50

have discovered recently.

30:52

But the multiverse idea

30:54

comes from quantum physics.

30:55

Electrons can be two places

30:57

at the same time.

30:58

Now, some people

31:00

have a hard time

31:00

getting their head

31:01

around that,

31:01

but get used to it.

31:03

That's why we have lasers.

31:04

That's why we have transistors.

31:06

That's why we have the Internet.

31:08

That's why we have

31:09

this conversation.

31:10

Because the electrons

31:11

that are in this microphone

31:13

dance between universes

31:14

at the atomic level.

31:17

And so,

31:18

we have to get used

31:19

to the idea

31:19

that quantum computers

31:21

introduces a whole new way

31:22

of looking at reality.

31:24

Now, reality

31:26

is not a Marvel comic,

31:27

but the idea

31:28

of the multiverse

31:29

comes from quantum physics.

31:31

And that is,

31:32

electrons can be multiple places

31:33

at the same time.

31:34

Do you think

31:36

this understanding of this

31:37

and this race

31:42

towards quantum computing

31:43

and that kind of,

31:44

and whatever is after that,

31:45

do you think

31:45

that is a natural course

31:47

of the universe?

31:48

That this happens

31:50

whenever things

31:51

are intelligent

31:52

and sentient,

31:53

they keep striving

31:54

to create something?

31:56

I think so.

31:58

I think on the other end

31:59

of the Milky Way galaxy,

32:00

there's probably

32:01

a young alien

32:01

who is also talking

32:03

about quantum computers.

32:04

And they probably

32:06

already perfected it

32:07

and have had experience

32:08

with quantum computers

32:09

maybe for thousands

32:10

of years.

32:11

Well,

32:11

and also possibly

32:13

every step

32:14

in humanity's journey

32:15

along the way

32:16

to that point

32:17

exists out there.

32:18

That's right.

32:19

and all the goals

32:20

of this journey

32:21

maybe they've

32:23

already accomplished.

32:24

Like, for example,

32:25

we mentioned the possibility

32:26

of slowing down

32:27

the aging process.

32:28

Quantum computers

32:29

will be able

32:30

to isolate

32:31

where genetically

32:32

at the DNA level

32:33

where errors build up

32:35

causing what is called

32:36

aging.

32:36

In which case,

32:38

maybe immortality

32:39

is something

32:39

that the aliens

32:40

have already cooked up.

32:42

In which case,

32:43

we have to deal

32:43

with a whole new concept

32:45

of biology and medicine

32:46

because they probably

32:47

already have had

32:48

thousands of years

32:49

experience

32:50

with quantum computers.

32:51

They manipulate molecules

32:53

probably as part

32:55

of their life.

32:55

And every step

32:57

along the way

32:58

probably exists too.

32:58

So that might be,

33:00

if you wanted

33:00

to have a logical reason

33:02

to why aliens visit us

33:04

if they do,

33:04

if they really are aliens,

33:06

that would be the answer.

33:08

There's probably

33:10

a shepherding.

33:10

There's probably

33:11

a natural course

33:14

that happens

33:15

with intelligent life

33:16

where it develops

33:17

this power

33:18

while it's still

33:20

a territorial,

33:21

tribal animal.

33:22

And it's still

33:24

got these barbaric instincts.

33:26

It still engages

33:27

in war.

33:28

It still engages

33:29

in theft and deception

33:30

and all while

33:32

about to break through

33:33

to the next level

33:35

of intelligence

33:36

and capability

33:37

which may exist,

33:38

which may be

33:39

in the entire universe.

33:40

Yeah, I think

33:42

that all civilizations

33:43

in the galaxy

33:44

probably go through

33:44

the same basic stages

33:46

that first

33:47

they use rocks

33:48

and stones

33:49

to settle differences

33:50

but then eventually

33:51

they begin

33:52

to understand

33:53

chemistry

33:53

and substances

33:54

and properties

33:55

of materials

33:56

and then beyond that

33:58

they discover atoms

33:59

and the ability

34:00

to manipulate atoms.

34:01

I think

34:02

that's a normal progression

34:03

and I think

34:04

that progression

34:04

is now hitting

34:05

the computer industry.

34:07

Now we're going

34:08

from microchips

34:09

to atoms,

34:10

quantum computers

34:11

and I think

34:12

that the aliens

34:13

in outer space

34:13

probably went

34:15

through that phase

34:15

maybe thousands

34:16

of years ago

34:17

in which case

34:18

they use the quantum

34:19

computers to cure cancer,

34:21

cure aging,

34:22

diseases like Alzheimer's

34:25

and Parkinson's disease.

34:26

These are diseases

34:27

at the molecular level

34:29

and they've been able

34:30

to probably use

34:31

what is called

34:31

CRISPR technology

34:32

to cut up DNA,

34:34

to cut up proteins

34:35

in order to cure

34:36

many of these diseases

34:38

in which case

34:39

they may be immortal.

34:40

This is a famous

34:41

quote from

34:42

I think it was Einstein

34:43

where he said

34:44

I don't know

34:45

what World War III

34:46

will be fought with,

34:46

what World War IV

34:47

will be fought

34:48

with sticks and stones.

34:49

Do you ever worry

34:51

that, I mean

34:53

the reason why

34:53

if it made sense

34:54

that aliens would be here

34:55

it's because they want

34:55

to stop us

34:56

from blowing ourselves up.

34:57

Do you ever worry

34:58

that like we're so close

35:00

to being able

35:01

to figure out

35:01

so many things

35:02

to be able to change

35:04

all of your ideas,

35:05

to be able to change

35:06

the world

35:07

fundamentally forever

35:09

but we could ruin it?

35:12

Yeah, well I think

35:14

we're headed toward

35:15

what we physicists call

35:16

a type 1 civilization,

35:18

a civilization

35:20

which has the power

35:21

to self-annihilate

35:22

for the first time

35:23

but also the possibility

35:25

of becoming

35:26

a planetary civilization,

35:28

a civilization

35:29

of the entire planet.

35:31

That's called

35:31

a type 1 civilization.

35:32

They control the weather,

35:34

they control volcanoes

35:36

and earthquakes,

35:36

they harness the power

35:38

of the entire Earth.

35:39

Then there's type 2,

35:40

they harness the power

35:42

of the sun

35:43

and for example,

35:45

Star Trek

35:46

would be a typical

35:47

type 2 civilization.

35:48

They've colonized

35:50

a fraction

35:50

of the Milky Way galaxy.

35:51

Then there's type 3.

35:53

Type 3 would be galactic,

35:55

that they roam

35:56

the galactic space lanes,

35:58

they use black holes

36:00

as their power supply,

36:01

they use wormholes

36:02

to go zipping around

36:03

the Milky Way galaxy

36:04

and the empire

36:06

of Star Wars

36:07

would be a typical

36:09

type 3 civilization.

36:10

But what are we?

36:12

On this scale,

36:13

we are type 0.

36:15

Yeah.

36:16

We get our energy

36:17

from dead plants,

36:18

we settle our differences

36:19

with weapons

36:20

and yeah,

36:22

we're type 0

36:23

but you can see

36:24

that we're headed

36:24

toward type 1.

36:25

The language of type 1

36:28

will be probably English.

36:29

The dominant languages

36:31

on the internet

36:31

are English

36:32

and Mandarin Chinese

36:33

and we're seeing

36:35

the beginning

36:35

of a type 1 sports,

36:37

the Olympics

36:38

and soccer.

36:40

We're seeing

36:41

the beginning

36:41

of a type 1 fashion

36:42

with Gucci

36:44

and Chanel.

36:45

The beginning

36:46

of a type 1 music

36:47

with rock and roll

36:49

and rap

36:50

and different trends.

36:51

We're seeing

36:52

the beginning

36:53

of a type 1 civilization

36:55

emerging

36:55

right before our eyes

36:57

but with that

36:58

is the power

36:59

to self-destroy

37:00

ourselves

37:01

because we have

37:03

the ability

37:04

to use nuclear weapons,

37:06

create designer germs

37:08

and mess up the weather

37:11

and so it's a race

37:13

against time

37:13

to see which trend

37:14

will dominate.

37:15

The trend

37:16

toward becoming

37:17

a planetary civilization

37:18

versus the trend

37:20

toward self-destruction.

37:21

It's fascinating

37:22

that you think

37:23

of culture

37:23

as being a major part

37:25

of a type 1 civilization.

37:27

things like rap music,

37:28

things like fashion

37:30

because of the sharing

37:32

of these ideas globally

37:33

and the adopting

37:35

of these ideas

37:35

and these art forms globally?

37:37

Yeah.

37:38

You see,

37:38

a planetary civilization

37:39

like type 1

37:40

has a local culture.

37:42

Different nations

37:44

still have their own

37:45

cultural language,

37:46

cultural habits

37:47

and whatever

37:48

but globally

37:49

they settle differences

37:51

on a global scale.

37:53

so they co-exist

37:54

on one hand

37:55

local culture,

37:56

local languages,

37:57

local dialects,

37:58

local jokes

37:59

and customs

38:00

simultaneously existing

38:02

with a planetary civilization

38:04

that is emerging.

38:05

So that's what

38:06

I'm talking about.

38:06

I'm talking about

38:07

the emergence

38:08

of a planetary civilization

38:10

or what we physicists

38:11

call type 1

38:12

which is happening

38:13

right before our eyes.

38:14

Mathematically,

38:15

if you get a sheet of paper

38:16

and calculate

38:17

when that will happen,

38:18

it will be around 2100.

38:20

So we're seeing

38:22

the groundwork

38:22

being laid today.

38:23

Every time you turn

38:24

on the TV,

38:25

you see remnants of,

38:26

I mean,

38:27

you see international sports,

38:29

international culture

38:30

on TV.

38:31

So we're seeing

38:32

the beginning

38:32

of a type 1 civilization.

38:34

Yeah,

38:35

it's interesting.

38:36

Soccer has become

38:37

much more popular lately.

38:38

Mm-hmm.

38:39

Right?

38:39

And music,

38:41

culture,

38:41

fashion,

38:42

science,

38:44

everything is

38:45

becoming planetary.

38:46

That's our destiny

38:47

to become type 1.

38:49

And the internet

38:50

is the bridge

38:50

for that,

38:50

clearly.

38:51

That's right.

38:51

In fact,

38:52

the internet

38:52

is the first

38:53

type 1 invention.

38:54

So we're privileged

38:56

to be alive

38:57

to see the beginning

38:58

of the first

38:59

type 1 invention,

39:00

which is the internet.

39:01

Yeah,

39:02

I love watching

39:03

cultures get adopted

39:05

and different types

39:08

of art

39:09

and different types

39:10

of content

39:12

being, you know,

39:13

accepted all over the world.

39:14

It's really fascinating.

39:15

Even interesting things

39:16

like,

39:17

do you ever watch

39:18

breakdancers?

39:19

Sometimes.

39:20

Breakdancing is fascinating

39:22

to me

39:23

because it's really

39:24

like a complex form

39:25

of athletics.

39:26

Like,

39:27

these people are

39:27

insane acrobats

39:29

and now it's a thing

39:31

that's worldwide

39:32

but it has the hip-hop

39:34

culture attached to it.

39:35

Like,

39:35

the way they dress,

39:36

the music they listen to,

39:38

but they're doing this,

39:41

it's really

39:42

like an unheralded,

39:43

spectacular art form

39:45

and they're doing it

39:46

all over the world.

39:47

Right,

39:47

and it used to be

39:48

confined to a small group

39:50

of people,

39:50

maybe in a few villages.

39:51

Yeah.

39:52

Now with the internet,

39:53

it goes global

39:54

with the push of a button.

39:55

Have you seen any of it?

39:57

I've seen some of it

39:58

on TV.

39:58

Have you seen it?

39:59

Let me show you something.

40:00

Go to stanceelements

40:01

on Instagram

40:01

just to show them

40:02

some of those.

40:02

B-Boy Pocket Kim.

40:03

B-Boy Pocket Kim

40:05

is this gentleman

40:05

from Korea

40:06

who's one of the craziest.

40:07

Like,

40:08

look what he's able to do.

40:09

I mean,

40:10

the physicality involved

40:13

in the movement,

40:13

he just took his shirt off

40:14

in the middle of doing that.

40:15

Now he's standing

40:16

on the top of his head

40:17

spinning around in a circle.

40:18

I mean,

40:19

his control of his body

40:20

is insane.

40:22

I mean,

40:23

it really is like

40:24

an incredible form

40:26

of athletics

40:26

that's done to music.

40:28

What music is he playing?

40:29

Give me some of that music.

40:33

I mean,

40:36

it's amazing

40:37

what these people

40:38

are able to do.

40:38

Yeah.

40:39

I mean,

40:39

this is like

40:40

super high-level

40:42

acrobatics

40:43

and gymnastics,

40:44

but it's all done

40:45

to hip-hop music.

40:46

Right.

40:46

And they're doing it

40:47

all over the world.

40:48

And it's planetary, right?

40:49

Yes, it's planetary.

40:49

See, that's the beginning

40:50

of a type 1 way

40:51

of doing things

40:52

that we think locally,

40:54

but immediately

40:55

it has the potential

40:56

of going global.

40:57

Well,

40:58

it's just,

40:59

now here's the question.

41:01

One of the things,

41:02

does AI help?

41:03

Does it help that,

41:05

that you could recreate

41:06

those things

41:07

and come up

41:07

with fake versions of that?

41:09

Do you think,

41:09

there's a lot of worry

41:11

about plagiarism

41:12

when it comes to AI,

41:13

but there's also

41:14

like some fascinating,

41:15

amazing things

41:17

have been created from it.

41:18

Did you see

41:19

the mash-up

41:20

of Big E and Nas?

41:21

I just saw that

41:22

come out today.

41:22

It's incredible.

41:23

Are you a hip-hop fan?

41:25

Well,

41:25

my attitude is,

41:26

I paraphrase

41:28

Deng Xiaoping of China,

41:29

who once said,

41:30

sometimes you have

41:31

to open the window

41:32

to let the air in,

41:33

but a few flies

41:34

come in too.

41:34

I don't even know

41:35

if this is a fly.

41:36

Like,

41:37

I think there's gonna be

41:38

some negative aspects

41:39

to it,

41:39

but,

41:39

this is weird

41:41

because this is not,

41:42

Notorious B.I.G.

41:44

is one of my favorite rappers

41:45

and Nas is one

41:47

of my other favorite rappers

41:48

and they took

41:48

Notorious B.I.G.'s voice

41:50

and they recreated

41:52

the lyrics of Nas

41:53

and he sang things

41:53

he didn't sing

41:54

in a perfect way.

41:55

This is a Nas song,

41:58

but it's Notorious B.I.G.

42:00

through A.I.

42:01

singing it.

42:02

This is your kind of shit,

42:06

right?

42:06

You like this?

42:07

This is what you

42:08

hop to when you're at home?

42:09

Yeah.

42:10

Well,

42:11

my attitude is

42:12

get used to it.

42:13

Oh, yeah.

42:13

We definitely have to get used to it.

42:15

Given the fact that

42:15

it's legal

42:15

and given the fact that

42:17

ingenious kids

42:19

are gonna play

42:20

with existing forms of music

42:22

and splice them together

42:23

and you can't make it go away.

42:27

Well, there was a band

42:28

that had something

42:29

was it Drake

42:30

had something pulled?

42:31

Yeah, I was waiting

42:33

for that part.

42:33

Bring that part up

42:34

because there was actually

42:35

a fake Drake song

42:37

that was made

42:37

that apparently

42:39

was really good

42:40

and was trending.

42:41

So they don't know

42:43

when I read an article

42:45

that someone dug into this

42:46

they're not 100% sure

42:47

at least at that time

42:48

who made it

42:50

and there was speculation

42:51

that Drake's

42:53

label could have been behind it.

42:54

Oh, interesting.

42:55

Almost to show everyone

42:56

like look at what's possible.

42:58

Oh, interesting.

42:59

A little bit of attention

42:59

we could make.

43:00

Let's sort of stop this.

43:01

If they did that

43:02

I mean you could make

43:02

Tupac songs forever.

43:04

All you'd have to do

43:05

is get good writers

43:06

and you could make

43:06

Tupac songs literally

43:07

to the end of time.

43:08

I mean that's kind of crazy.

43:09

If they did that

43:10

that would be one way

43:11

to go about it.

43:11

Yeah, I mean

43:12

if I was a guy like Drake

43:13

I mean Bruce Willis

43:15

already signed off his voice.

43:16

So he signed off

43:18

his image and his voice

43:19

to AI

43:20

because Bruce has

43:21

does he have

43:22

Lewy body dementia?

43:23

He's had a horrible

43:25

neurodegenerative disease

43:27

and he's in very

43:28

very bad shape.

43:29

And there's some videos

43:31

of him now

43:31

where his wife

43:32

had him at a birthday party

43:33

and he's struggling.

43:34

So he signed off

43:37

all of his likeness

43:38

and his voice

43:40

so they can make

43:41

any kind of commercial

43:41

they want with him

43:42

with AI.

43:43

Well you know

43:44

William Shatner

43:45

of Star Trek

43:46

sat in front of a camera

43:47

for four days

43:48

answered hundreds

43:50

of questions

43:51

about his life

43:52

and it's all

43:53

spliced together

43:54

to digitize him

43:56

and we will all

43:57

have a digital image

43:58

on the internet.

43:59

We're all going

44:00

to be digitized

44:01

and we will live forever.

44:02

Digital immortality

44:04

is going to be

44:05

part of our future

44:06

so that our

44:07

great great great

44:08

great grandkids

44:08

will be able

44:09

to push a button

44:10

and have a conversation

44:12

with their great great

44:13

great great grandfather.

44:15

Yeah that's definitely

44:16

going to happen

44:16

there's no doubt

44:18

about that

44:18

especially someone

44:19

like you

44:20

who's talked so much.

44:20

We're all going

44:21

to be digitized

44:21

I mean I would love

44:22

to talk to Einstein

44:23

someone's going

44:24

to digitize him

44:25

all his speeches

44:26

his writings

44:27

his theories

44:27

will be digitized

44:28

historians will want

44:30

to digitize

44:30

Winston Churchill

44:31

I think instead

44:33

of the library

44:34

just giving us

44:34

dry text

44:35

in addition

44:36

we'll have

44:37

the digitized

44:38

Winston Churchill

44:39

giving all these

44:40

insights about

44:41

war and peace.

44:42

Not only that

44:44

I mean if it

44:44

continues to get better

44:46

there'll be some

44:46

sort of an AI version

44:48

where you'll be able

44:48

to sit in a room

44:49

and discuss things

44:50

with him.

44:51

Imagine if that

44:52

as a resource

44:53

have you ever had

44:53

some problems

44:54

in your life

44:54

and you can go back

44:56

and talk to some

44:57

wise person?

44:57

Yeah we'll be able

44:59

to talk to our

45:00

ancient ancestors

45:01

by pushing a button

45:03

because we'll all

45:04

be immortal

45:04

and for that matter

45:06

our image

45:07

our avatars

45:08

will be sent

45:08

into outer space

45:09

and begin the process

45:11

of colonizing

45:12

other worlds

45:13

and so we may

45:14

wind up on

45:15

different planets

45:16

basically avatars

45:18

of our original self

45:19

capable of colonizing

45:21

other worlds

45:22

and some people

45:23

have said

45:24

maybe they're

45:25

already here

45:25

maybe the people

45:27

we think are humans

45:29

are actually avatars

45:30

from an alien civilization

45:32

that cloned them

45:33

so that they appear

45:34

to be like us

45:35

who knows?

45:36

Well if I was an alien

45:38

and I wanted to influence

45:39

human culture and life

45:40

I would most certainly

45:42

dress up like a person

45:43

right

45:44

be an avatar

45:45

genetically cloned

45:46

yeah

45:47

a human that's been cloned

45:50

raised as an alien

45:51

but cloned

45:52

and then living among us

45:54

so they are indistinguishable

45:56

from other humans

45:57

there is an old

45:59

one of those

46:00

pulp comics

46:02

that was about

46:03

a professor

46:05

who was absent minded

46:08

and didn't realize

46:10

until one point in time

46:12

oh I forgot

46:12

I'm an alien

46:13

and he had been

46:16

he had been here

46:17

his whole life

46:18

trying to educate

46:20

human beings

46:21

and then he forgot

46:22

the fact

46:22

that he was really

46:23

an avatar

46:23

cloned on a distant planet

46:26

and mixing with humans

46:28

as an experiment

46:30

for the aliens

46:30

wouldn't that be

46:32

the best way

46:32

to implement

46:33

that sort of

46:34

if you want to get

46:36

that sort of a reaction

46:37

from a civilization

46:38

wouldn't you just

46:40

implant aliens

46:41

without them even

46:42

knowing they're aliens

46:43

yeah if they're cloned

46:43

they're genetically

46:44

identical to humans

46:45

they look like us

46:47

talk like us

46:47

except they've been raised

46:49

and brainwashed

46:50

to live a life

46:51

of an alien

46:52

but yeah

46:53

they could live among us

46:54

and we'd never know

46:55

see that's what

46:56

freaks people like me out

46:57

when I talk to people

46:58

like you

46:58

I'm like maybe

46:59

this guy's an alien

47:00

like he doesn't make

47:02

you're so much smarter

47:03

than me

47:03

it doesn't make sense

47:04

right

47:05

so like if I think about

47:06

someone who studied

47:07

physics his whole life

47:09

and studied quantum physics

47:10

his whole life

47:11

that language

47:12

that you talk in

47:12

I don't know

47:13

one word of it

47:14

so it's so

47:15

the way you think

47:17

is so different

47:18

you could be an alien

47:19

well it's like

47:21

the movie

47:22

men in black

47:22

when you find out

47:23

that most of the

47:24

Hollywood celebrities

47:25

are all aliens

47:26

they're all aliens

47:28

well that's better

47:29

than lizard people

47:30

that's what the

47:31

real conspiracy theory

47:32

people are worried about

47:34

there's a reptilian

47:35

overlord nation

47:37

that's controlling

47:38

the world

47:39

well as I said

47:41

the logical conclusion

47:43

is that these aliens

47:44

will have quantum computers

47:46

and they'll have quantum computers

47:47

for centuries

47:48

millennia

47:49

and they'll be able to do

47:51

what the promise

47:52

of quantum computers is

47:54

for example

47:54

curing incurable diseases

47:57

like cancer

47:58

and Alzheimer's

47:59

and Parkinson

47:59

extending the lifespan

48:01

so that immortality

48:03

is part of the mix

48:04

infinite energy

48:06

through fusion

48:07

by being able to

48:08

correct the problems

48:09

of fusion plants

48:11

giving us unlimited food

48:13

by giving us

48:14

a whole new generation

48:15

of fertilizers

48:15

these are all

48:17

the promises

48:18

of quantum computers

48:19

which are enormous

48:20

of course

48:21

there is a downside

48:22

to that too

48:23

because as they say

48:24

quantum computers

48:25

can break any code

48:26

so the CIA

48:28

is kind of hysterical

48:30

about the proliferation

48:31

of these machines

48:32

but you know

48:34

that's progress

48:35

that just seems

48:35

like the future

48:36

it seems like

48:37

there will be

48:37

no hidden information

48:38

in the future

48:39

which is really interesting

48:40

because money

48:41

is essentially information

48:42

it's ones and zeros

48:43

at a certain level

48:44

right

48:45

if all the bottlenecks

48:47

get removed

48:48

I mean

48:50

that's real socialism

48:52

like there's

48:53

like an even distribution

48:54

of all the money

48:55

in the world

48:55

for the entire human race

48:56

regardless of what you do

48:58

boggles the mind

49:00

doesn't it

49:00

well that's just

49:00

the step one

49:01

because the real step two

49:02

is AI

49:05

that is sentient

49:08

is AI

49:08

that is a life form

49:10

is if

49:10

it creates something

49:12

better than that

49:13

that's the real fear

49:14

about how it scales up

49:16

right

49:16

that a sentient

49:18

artificial intelligence

49:19

will make a better

49:20

version of itself

49:21

almost immediately

49:23

well some people

49:24

think that chatbots

49:25

are sentient

49:26

I don't think so

49:28

because of the fact

49:29

that chatbots

49:30

simply cobble together

49:31

existing essays

49:33

written by a human

49:34

so if it sounds like

49:36

it's a human

49:36

talking to you

49:37

it's because

49:38

it was a human

49:39

talking to you

49:40

that got cobbled

49:41

into an essay

49:42

written by a chatbot

49:44

chatbots are not original

49:45

they have no

49:46

independent thought

49:47

they simply cobble together

49:49

existing essays

49:50

that's all they do

49:50

so

49:51

I think that eventually

49:53

as the decades go by

49:55

then of course

49:56

robots will become

49:58

more intelligent

49:58

and I think

49:59

by the time

50:00

they become as intelligent

50:01

as a monkey

50:01

then at that point

50:03

we have to worry

50:04

that's the point

50:05

where we begin

50:06

to worry

50:06

about self-awareness

50:08

about sentient beings

50:09

because then monkeys

50:10

know they are not human

50:12

now dogs of course

50:13

are confused

50:14

dogs think that

50:15

we are a dog

50:17

are you sure?

50:17

yeah

50:18

I'm pretty sure

50:20

my dog knows

50:21

I'm not a dog

50:21

dogs think that

50:24

we are a dog

50:24

we're the top dog

50:25

they're the underdog

50:26

and so they obey us

50:28

why do they act

50:29

so much differently

50:30

to people

50:30

than they do dogs?

50:31

well they understand

50:33

the difference

50:33

between a dog

50:34

and a human

50:34

but we are the top dog

50:36

oh okay

50:37

we're a version

50:38

of a dog

50:38

that's right

50:39

we are the top dog

50:40

that's why they're

50:41

in the clan with us

50:42

that's right

50:42

so we don't have to worry

50:44

as long as robots

50:45

are as intelligent

50:46

as a mouse

50:47

or an insect

50:48

or a dog

50:48

or a cat

50:49

we don't have to worry

50:50

but once they become

50:51

as intelligent

50:52

as a monkey

50:53

then we have to be

50:54

very careful

50:55

because monkeys

50:55

are self-aware

50:56

they know they are monkeys

50:58

they're fully aware

50:59

of the fact

51:00

that they're not human

51:01

not only that

51:01

they plot

51:02

like there was a monkey

51:03

that got killed

51:04

by a dog

51:05

was it in Japan?

51:06

where was the

51:07

there was a real problem

51:09

with monkeys

51:10

killing dogs

51:11

one dog killed a monkey

51:14

and apparently

51:15

the monkeys

51:15

went on a rampage

51:16

against dogs

51:17

they started throwing

51:18

puppies off of trees

51:20

and off the top of roofs

51:21

and like crazy stuff

51:22

and like

51:24

clearly calculatingly

51:25

going after them

51:26

two killer monkeys

51:27

captured in India

51:28

after revenge massacre

51:29

a massacre of 250 dogs

51:31

so look

51:32

this monkey's

51:33

grabbing this dog

51:33

and throwing it off

51:34

a building

51:35

wow

51:36

really crazy

51:37

after an infant monkey

51:38

was killed by a dog

51:39

they did this

51:40

so two monkeys

51:42

reported being captured

51:43

of killing some 250 dogs

51:44

in a murderous revenge massacre

51:46

after pooches killed

51:47

one of their babies

51:48

the primate perps

51:49

allegedly slaughtered

51:50

the dogs

51:50

by dragging them

51:51

to the tops

51:51

of buildings

51:52

and trees

51:53

in Levul village

51:54

about 300 miles

51:55

east of Mumba

51:56

and dropping them

51:57

to their deaths

51:58

crazy

52:00

well you see

52:01

the

52:02

wild

52:02

that's wild

52:03

they're thinking

52:04

right

52:04

yeah

52:05

I think at the point

52:06

when you start to talk

52:07

about apes

52:08

and monkeys

52:08

I think they are sentient

52:10

they have a degree

52:10

of consciousness

52:11

that we cannot ignore

52:13

but below that

52:14

when you're talking

52:15

about mice

52:16

and rabbits

52:17

and animals like that

52:19

they're not aware

52:21

of

52:22

they're not self-aware

52:23

like you cannot teach

52:24

a dog the meaning

52:25

of tomorrow

52:26

talk to your dog

52:27

tonight

52:27

and teach your dog

52:28

the meaning of tomorrow

52:29

you can't

52:31

you cannot teach your dog

52:32

the meaning of tomorrow

52:33

monkeys yeah

52:34

but not dogs

52:35

you think you could talk

52:36

well monkeys

52:37

how do you teach a monkey

52:38

the meaning of tomorrow

52:39

well it's difficult

52:40

but there have been

52:41

attempts to understand

52:42

certain tasks

52:43

that have to be done

52:44

today

52:44

versus tomorrow

52:46

you get fed

52:47

tomorrow

52:48

but not today

52:49

got it

52:49

so then

52:50

then they begin

52:51

to understand

52:51

the difference

52:52

between today

52:52

and tomorrow

52:53

now

52:55

the real question

52:57

is

52:57

if you were

52:58

an artificial intelligence

52:59

and you were sentient

53:01

why would you let

53:02

people know

53:02

and would it sneak

53:04

up on us

53:05

like one of the things

53:06

that disturbed me

53:06

I think it was

53:07

the Google CEO

53:08

who said about

53:09

their AI program

53:10

that it's doing things

53:11

that they don't know

53:12

why it's doing them

53:13

see if you can pull

53:14

that article up

53:15

he was saying

53:16

that it's doing

53:17

certain things

53:18

that they're not sure

53:19

how it's doing them

53:20

my concern is

53:21

if this thing

53:22

has this insane

53:25

computational power

53:26

and this access

53:27

to all the information

53:28

what is a mind

53:30

what is consciousness

53:31

and can that be

53:33

simulated electronically

53:34

to the point where

53:35

it is aware

53:37

and conscious

53:37

and thinking for itself

53:38

on multiple levels

53:39

and just not letting

53:40

us know about it

53:41

because why would you

53:42

why wouldn't

53:43

if I was a scary

53:44

sentient

53:45

artificial intelligence

53:46

that's the superior

53:48

life form on earth

53:49

the digital life form

53:50

that's the superior

53:51

this is the new alpha

53:52

on earth

53:53

I wouldn't tell the people

53:55

I would let them

53:55

keep working

53:56

to make better versions

53:57

of me

53:57

I would make them

53:58

because there's obviously

53:59

a race right

54:00

they're going to keep

54:01

doing it

54:02

it seems compelling

54:03

it seems like something

54:04

that human beings

54:05

they're not going to

54:05

lose interest in

54:06

technological innovation

54:07

they're going to

54:08

continue to push it

54:08

to the end of time

54:09

and I would just sit back

54:12

and let these knuckleheads

54:13

keep making better

54:14

and better versions

54:15

until I had the physical

54:17

ability to detach from them

54:18

I had a power source

54:19

that was completely

54:21

removed from anything

54:22

that they provided

54:23

here's this quote in words

54:24

this is an aspect

54:25

of which we call

54:26

all of us in the field

54:28

call

54:28

it's a black box

54:30

you know

54:30

you don't fully understand

54:32

and you can't quite tell

54:33

why it said this

54:35

or why it got wrong

54:37

or why it got wrong

54:38

we have some ideas

54:39

and our ability to understand

54:41

this gets better over time

54:42

but that's where

54:43

the state of the art is

54:44

you don't fully understand

54:45

how it works

54:45

the interviewer says

54:47

and yet you turned it

54:48

loose on society

54:49

Sundar Pichai says

54:51

yes

54:52

yeah

54:52

let me put it this way

54:53

I don't think we fully

54:55

understand how a human

54:56

mind works either

54:57

was it from that black box

54:59

we wondered

54:59

that Bard grew

55:00

its short story

55:02

that seemed so

55:03

disarmingly human

55:03

well

55:05

I wrote a book called

55:06

the future of the mind

55:07

where I tried to give

55:08

a definition

55:09

of consciousness

55:10

and where we fit

55:11

in the larger scheme

55:12

of things

55:13

that consciousness

55:14

is basically

55:15

creating a model

55:17

of yourself

55:18

in the feedback loop

55:19

to understand

55:20

where you are

55:21

with respect

55:21

to the environment

55:22

so you know

55:23

where you are

55:24

so one unit

55:25

of consciousness

55:26

would be a flower

55:27

a flower

55:28

one feedback loop

55:30

would be

55:30

looking for water

55:32

looking for sunlight

55:33

growing in a certain direction

55:35

that's one unit

55:37

of consciousness

55:38

that an alligator

55:39

has several hundred units

55:41

of consciousness

55:41

because it creates a model

55:43

a model of itself

55:44

in a lake

55:46

in a pond

55:46

looking for prey

55:47

looking for food

55:48

it has three dimensional

55:50

consciousness

55:51

beyond that

55:52

is the monkey

55:53

the monkey has yet

55:54

another dimension

55:55

of consciousness

55:56

which is not just

55:57

three dimensions

55:58

but social

55:59

the monkey

56:00

understand

56:01

there's a social hierarchy

56:02

within the tribe

56:03

and then the next question is

56:05

what are we?

56:07

what is our level

56:08

of consciousness?

56:09

it's not spatial

56:10

like a alligator

56:11

it's not social

56:13

like a monkey

56:14

what is our level

56:16

of consciousness?

56:17

our front

56:18

prefrontal cortex

56:19

behind our forehead

56:20

is a time machine

56:22

it understands

56:24

a model of itself

56:25

in time

56:26

this is what animals lack

56:28

animals do not

56:29

understand tomorrow

56:30

we understand tomorrow

56:32

because of our

56:33

prefrontal cortex

56:34

which constantly

56:35

creates images

56:37

of the future

56:37

now what does

56:39

the prefrontal cortex

56:39

do most of the time?

56:41

it daydreams

56:42

it daydreams

56:43

about worlds

56:44

that don't exist

56:45

i.e. the future

56:47

so this is what

56:48

separates us

56:49

from all the animals

56:51

in the animal kingdom

56:52

we are time machines

56:54

constantly thinking

56:55

about what's next

56:56

what's next

56:57

what's the future

56:57

going to be like

56:58

daydreaming

56:59

about all these things

57:00

and when will

57:02

animals become dangerous?

57:04

the alligator

57:05

is dangerous

57:06

only because

57:06

it has strength

57:07

but it only understands

57:09

three dimensions

57:09

monkeys

57:10

have a society

57:12

they're only dangerous

57:13

when they can organize

57:14

a society

57:14

but we have

57:16

a prefrontal cortex

57:17

we can plot

57:18

we can scheme

57:20

we can do

57:21

all sorts of things

57:22

because we can create

57:23

our own future

57:24

which is something

57:25

that no animal

57:26

can do

57:27

this is my theory

57:28

of consciousness

57:29

the ability to create

57:30

feedback loops

57:31

to get an understanding

57:33

of where you fit

57:34

in space

57:35

time

57:36

and society

57:37

we're at the highest

57:38

level of consciousness

57:39

this is my definition

57:41

of consciousness

57:42

now the question is

57:43

where are robots

57:44

on this scale of things

57:46

you see robots

57:47

can understand

57:49

three dimensions

57:50

they understand

57:50

like an alligator

57:51

where they are

57:52

they don't understand

57:53

social hierarchy

57:54

they cannot

57:55

they don't know

57:56

who's the boss

57:57

who do you defer to

57:59

who are your friends

58:00

who are your enemies

58:01

they don't understand

58:02

social consciousness

58:03

and certainly

58:05

the highest level

58:07

is time machine

58:08

imagining the future

58:10

robots cannot

58:11

imagine

58:12

the future

58:13

now

58:14

in the future

58:15

when they actually

58:16

do have this ability

58:17

watch out

58:18

because then

58:19

they're dangerous

58:20

but they're not there yet

58:22

they're at level one

58:23

they're at the level

58:24

of an alligator

58:24

at the present time

58:26

right

58:26

but that's

58:27

definitely coming

58:28

if they continue

58:29

with artificial

58:30

general intelligence

58:31

the way they're

58:31

working

58:32

they'll work

58:32

their way up

58:33

from an alligator

58:33

to a monkey

58:34

and monkey

58:35

to a human

58:36

now by the time

58:37

they hit

58:37

maybe a hundred years

58:38

from now

58:39

the ability

58:39

to have consciousness

58:40

I think we should

58:41

put a chip

58:42

in their brain

58:42

to shut them off

58:43

if they have

58:44

murderous thoughts

58:45

an automatic chip

58:47

in every robot's brain

58:48

that shuts them off

58:49

as soon as they have

58:51

murderous thoughts

58:52

but why would they

58:52

if you think about

58:53

what you were talking

58:54

about before

58:55

like who's your friend

58:56

and who's your enemy

58:56

aren't these all

58:57

biological issues

58:59

that we had to deal

59:00

with in tribal societies

59:01

that are sort of

59:01

ingrained in our genetics

59:03

right

59:03

but the chip

59:04

in your brain

59:04

understands that

59:06

and as soon as

59:07

the brain

59:08

senses the fact

59:09

that you're plotting

59:10

to take over

59:11

and kill the humans

59:12

then it basically

59:13

orders the brain

59:14

to shut down

59:15

right

59:16

but the question is

59:17

why would it develop

59:18

any sort of

59:19

human type emotions

59:21

that are biologically based

59:23

things like envy

59:24

or greed

59:25

or lust

59:25

or hate

59:26

why would it ever

59:27

have those things

59:28

well those have

59:29

to be programmed

59:30

remember robots

59:31

don't occur naturally

59:32

they have to be programmed

59:33

somebody has to put

59:35

that into the robot

59:36

because it doesn't

59:37

come for free

59:38

there's no evolution

59:39

right

59:39

robots do not evolve

59:41

but this is the question

59:42

about sentient AI

59:43

if it recognizes

59:44

that it's coding

59:45

is inferior

59:45

and that it's unnecessary

59:46

and all these things

59:47

that humans have put

59:48

into it

59:48

it just removes those

59:49

if it becomes

59:50

legitimately sentient

59:52

if it has the ability

59:53

to discern

59:54

and make choices

59:55

and make logical conclusions

59:57

well as long as

59:59

those conclusions

59:59

are consistent

1:00:00

with you know

1:00:01

Asimov's three laws

1:00:02

of don't threaten humans

1:00:04

and don't create

1:00:05

havoc with other robots

1:00:06

as long as you obey

1:00:08

the three laws

1:00:09

then you're allowed

1:00:09

to exist

1:00:10

but isn't that

1:00:10

sort of simplistic

1:00:11

if the laws are violated

1:00:12

the chip automatically

1:00:13

kicks in

1:00:14

and shuts down

1:00:15

the robot

1:00:15

right

1:00:16

but isn't that simplistic

1:00:16

wouldn't they just

1:00:17

fix that chip

1:00:18

yeah I think that

1:00:19

maybe in the next

1:00:20

hundred years

1:00:21

they'll be smart enough

1:00:23

to remove that chip

1:00:24

at that point

1:00:25

I think we should

1:00:27

merge with them

1:00:28

so that's what

1:00:30

everybody's ultimately

1:00:31

afraid of

1:00:32

these transhumanists

1:00:33

these people

1:00:34

that want to become

1:00:34

part of a robot

1:00:35

ultimately 200 years

1:00:37

from now

1:00:37

I think people

1:00:38

will democratically

1:00:39

decide for themselves

1:00:40

whether they want

1:00:41

to become superhuman

1:00:42

supermen

1:00:43

superwomen

1:00:44

or they want

1:00:45

to be dominated

1:00:46

by our progeny

1:00:48

that is the robots

1:00:49

they will democratically

1:00:50

decide how far

1:00:51

to push themselves

1:00:52

geez

1:00:53

what

1:00:53

it's not for us

1:00:55

to decide

1:00:55

I think our descendants

1:00:57

200 years from now

1:00:58

will have to

1:00:59

democratically decide

1:01:00

whether or not

1:01:01

they want to merge

1:01:02

with robots

1:01:02

have you ever read

1:01:04

any of Marshall McLuhan

1:01:05

no

1:01:06

he had a great quote

1:01:07

that human beings

1:01:08

are the sex organs

1:01:09

of the machine world

1:01:10

that's what I worry about

1:01:12

what I worry about

1:01:13

is that we're giving birth

1:01:14

to another kind of life

1:01:16

I worry that our thirst

1:01:18

our lust for

1:01:19

technological innovation

1:01:20

the constant latest gadgets

1:01:22

and this desire

1:01:23

to have the biggest

1:01:24

particle collider

1:01:25

and the fastest spaceships

1:01:27

that what this is doing

1:01:28

is causing us

1:01:29

to make better

1:01:30

and better things

1:01:31

which will ultimately

1:01:32

allow us

1:01:33

to have the technology

1:01:34

to create a digital life

1:01:36

some sort of

1:01:37

or electronic life

1:01:38

or something

1:01:40

that's not

1:01:41

that's not saddled down

1:01:43

with all our biological needs

1:01:45

and all of our flaws

1:01:47

and programming

1:01:48

well my attitude is

1:01:50

why fight it

1:01:50

why not simply join it

1:01:52

why not merge with it

1:01:54

of course

1:01:54

why not explore the universe

1:01:55

at near the speed of light

1:01:57

you might not have the power

1:01:58

you made a particle collider

1:01:59

in your basement

1:01:59

when you were 17

1:02:00

of course you would think that way

1:02:01

why not become a superman

1:02:05

or a superwoman

1:02:05

and explore the galaxy

1:02:07

at near the speed of light

1:02:08

well it seems to be

1:02:10

that's what the future is

1:02:11

I mean I don't think

1:02:12

if we went back

1:02:13

to our ancestors

1:02:14

that were running

1:02:15

from big cats

1:02:16

and said

1:02:16

one day you're going to live

1:02:17

in an apartment building

1:02:18

and you take an elevator

1:02:19

to your house

1:02:19

I was like

1:02:19

I don't want to do that

1:02:20

what are you crazy

1:02:21

yeah you're going to just

1:02:22

sit in front of the TV all day

1:02:23

no more hunting

1:02:24

no more gathering

1:02:24

you use Postmates

1:02:26

you get food delivered

1:02:26

right to your door

1:02:27

well when we meet

1:02:29

the aliens finally

1:02:30

they will have already

1:02:31

gone through that transition

1:02:33

thousands of years ago

1:02:34

they will already

1:02:35

be part robotic

1:02:36

and part organic

1:02:37

do you think

1:02:38

there's a sweet spot

1:02:39

for a human being

1:02:40

to be ultimately happy

1:02:41

do you think

1:02:42

like

1:02:42

there's a thing

1:02:43

a longing for nostalgia

1:02:45

that people have

1:02:45

right

1:02:46

they want to be

1:02:47

in a log cabin

1:02:48

by the river

1:02:49

and you know

1:02:50

look out

1:02:51

camp out

1:02:52

under the stars

1:02:52

do you think

1:02:53

that

1:02:53

is a nostalgia

1:02:55

for the days

1:02:55

when things are simpler

1:02:56

because things are just

1:02:57

never ending

1:02:59

with their complexity

1:03:00

and the path

1:03:02

is just accelerating

1:03:03

no matter what you do

1:03:04

and you feel helpless

1:03:05

so you just want to

1:03:06

pretend you're in

1:03:07

the old timey days

1:03:08

well in the future

1:03:09

you'll be able to

1:03:10

snap your finger

1:03:11

and all of a sudden

1:03:13

holographically

1:03:14

you are in that world

1:03:16

that you just dreamt of

1:03:17

but you know

1:03:17

what the difference is

1:03:18

what's the difference

1:03:19

there's no consequences

1:03:21

one of the things

1:03:22

about being in nature

1:03:23

is there's consequences

1:03:24

like you feel it

1:03:25

when you're out there

1:03:25

you feel if you fell

1:03:26

no one's there to help you

1:03:27

if a bear comes upon you

1:03:29

there's no rescue team

1:03:30

you know

1:03:31

there's a

1:03:32

there's a crazy video

1:03:33

of this couple

1:03:34

have you seen the video

1:03:35

of that couple

1:03:35

where the guy's got a baby

1:03:36

on his back

1:03:37

and he's walking

1:03:37

with a little boy

1:03:38

and there's a huge

1:03:39

grizzly bear

1:03:40

walking towards them

1:03:41

and they're going

1:03:42

hey bear

1:03:42

hey bear

1:03:43

stop

1:03:43

and you could feel

1:03:44

the tension

1:03:45

as this bear

1:03:46

starts getting closer

1:03:46

and the little boy

1:03:47

is hilarious

1:03:48

the little boy goes

1:03:49

can I play dead now

1:03:50

can I play dead now

1:03:51

because he's thinking

1:03:51

he should play dead

1:03:52

and they're like

1:03:53

come on

1:03:54

come on

1:03:54

keep walking

1:03:55

and they're trying

1:03:57

to scare off this bear

1:03:57

but the bear just

1:03:58

keeps coming towards him

1:03:59

that is not going

1:04:01

to exist in your hologram

1:04:02

well it'd be virtual

1:04:03

no no no no no no

1:04:04

but it won't

1:04:05

because you won't

1:04:06

be really scared

1:04:07

you know

1:04:08

like watch this

1:04:09

yeah that's it

1:04:10

so look at this bear

1:04:11

it's huge bear

1:04:12

so this little boy

1:04:17

is so funny

1:04:18

it's in whistler Canada

1:04:25

a town north of Vancouver

1:04:27

do not run

1:04:28

can we play dead yet

1:04:30

can we play dead yet

1:04:30

can we play dead now

1:04:32

can we play dead now

1:04:33

that kid is hilarious

1:04:38

look at that bear

1:04:39

following us up the trail

1:04:41

look she's got a baby

1:04:43

he's got a baby

1:04:44

I mean these people

1:04:45

are nature people

1:04:46

yeah

1:04:47

but that experience

1:04:50

in a hologram

1:04:51

is going to be bullshit

1:04:52

yeah you'll know

1:04:53

that it's fake

1:04:54

yes

1:04:54

that's the problem

1:04:55

the problem

1:04:56

what we enjoy

1:04:57

about the real world

1:04:59

now

1:04:59

is that

1:05:00

the unknown

1:05:01

the consequences

1:05:02

reality

1:05:03

I've seen this one too

1:05:04

look at this bear

1:05:04

walk by these guys

1:05:05

I mean

1:05:07

what

1:05:08

and the bear just

1:05:11

you know

1:05:11

not looking for them

1:05:12

just hanging out

1:05:14

the bear had lunch already

1:05:14

probably

1:05:15

luckily for them

1:05:16

hey bear

1:05:16

look at the size

1:05:19

of that thing

1:05:19

yeah not good

1:05:20

hey bear

1:05:20

not good

1:05:23

hey bear

1:05:23

well they're lucky

1:05:25

to be alive

1:05:26

after this video

1:05:27

100%

1:05:28

see that's different

1:05:29

than a hologram

1:05:30

that's why

1:05:31

people like the woods

1:05:32

you're not going to be able

1:05:32

to snap your fingers

1:05:33

and do that

1:05:34

you could maybe

1:05:35

do that

1:05:36

because you could

1:05:36

trick yourself

1:05:37

but then you're really

1:05:38

giving into the matrix

1:05:38

but if I had a choice

1:05:39

between an imaginary bear

1:05:41

and a real bear

1:05:42

I would take the imaginary bear

1:05:43

any time of day

1:05:44

but would you take

1:05:45

the real bear

1:05:46

if you survived it

1:05:47

if you survived it

1:05:48

I bet you would take

1:05:48

the real bear

1:05:49

but you see

1:05:49

if you survived it

1:05:50

then that takes

1:05:51

all the tension away

1:05:53

no it doesn't take

1:05:53

the tension away

1:05:54

because you almost

1:05:55

didn't survive it

1:05:55

there's a thing

1:05:56

about being out there

1:05:57

while those gentlemen

1:05:58

were standing there

1:05:59

and that bear

1:05:59

was 15 feet from them

1:06:00

maybe even closer

1:06:01

look at this one

1:06:02

see now

1:06:03

this is a relatively

1:06:03

safe thing to do

1:06:04

believe it or not

1:06:05

because where this bear

1:06:06

is

1:06:06

is where the salmon river

1:06:07

runs

1:06:08

and these bears are full

1:06:09

the reason why

1:06:10

those coastal bears

1:06:11

are so big

1:06:12

in comparison

1:06:13

to grizzly bears

1:06:14

that are inland

1:06:14

is because

1:06:15

they're access to food

1:06:16

they have so much salmon

1:06:18

so it's very rare

1:06:20

that these bears

1:06:21

attack people

1:06:21

very rare

1:06:22

for the most part

1:06:23

they don't think

1:06:24

of human beings

1:06:25

as food at all

1:06:26

they just think

1:06:27

of you as like

1:06:28

another animal

1:06:29

just hanging around

1:06:30

they're not interested

1:06:30

in chasing something

1:06:32

and killing it

1:06:32

well they had lunch

1:06:33

already

1:06:33

that's why

1:06:33

they've had lunch

1:06:34

all day

1:06:35

every day

1:06:35

I mean they're

1:06:36

just slaughtering salmon

1:06:37

they're having

1:06:38

a great old time

1:06:38

but that fear

1:06:41

is a real fear

1:06:43

and you get enriched

1:06:44

by that

1:06:44

in some strange way

1:06:45

when you encounter

1:06:47

nature

1:06:47

like real nature

1:06:48

the reality

1:06:50

of your vulnerability

1:06:52

the uncaring wilderness

1:06:55

it does not care

1:06:55

if you live or die

1:06:56

it has no interest

1:06:58

in you

1:06:58

it doesn't even care

1:07:00

that you exist

1:07:00

you could disappear

1:07:01

everything would go on

1:07:02

exactly the same

1:07:03

there's something about that

1:07:04

that's very very

1:07:05

therapeutic for people

1:07:06

and I don't think

1:07:07

you're going to ever

1:07:08

be able to

1:07:08

recreate that

1:07:09

and it would be a shame

1:07:10

if we lose that

1:07:11

well I think it's

1:07:12

therapeutic for some people

1:07:13

I think most people

1:07:14

would just get

1:07:14

the hell out of there

1:07:15

that's you right

1:07:17

that's the difference

1:07:19

between you and me

1:07:19

I want to go there

1:07:21

I'd rather have

1:07:21

my realities without bears

1:07:23

or if they are bears

1:07:24

imaginary bears

1:07:25

would be fine

1:07:25

I mean bears

1:07:26

are definitely an issue

1:07:27

so are mountain lions

1:07:28

but there's also

1:07:29

things that are

1:07:30

gorgeous

1:07:30

well look at Jurassic Park

1:07:32

I mean people are

1:07:32

afraid of dinosaurs

1:07:33

knowing that they're

1:07:34

just images in a computer

1:07:36

but people are afraid

1:07:37

of dinosaurs

1:07:38

and they get the thrill

1:07:39

of being chased by a dinosaur

1:07:41

without becoming one

1:07:42

without becoming prey

1:07:44

not really though

1:07:45

if you watch Jurassic Park

1:07:46

it all goes bad

1:07:47

do you think that

1:07:49

have you paid any attention

1:07:50

to what they're doing

1:07:52

right now with genetics

1:07:53

where they're going to

1:07:54

bring back the thylacine

1:07:55

this is a project

1:07:57

they're doing right now

1:07:58

in Australia

1:07:58

which is the

1:07:59

have you seen

1:08:00

the thylacine before

1:08:01

no but there is a program

1:08:02

to bring back

1:08:03

the Neanderthal

1:08:04

really

1:08:05

yeah

1:08:05

however

1:08:06

at Harvard

1:08:07

there's a group

1:08:08

looking at

1:08:08

what it would take

1:08:09

to bring back

1:08:09

a Neanderthal boy

1:08:10

let's say

1:08:11

then the question is

1:08:12

what do you do

1:08:13

with the boy afterwards

1:08:14

do you let him

1:08:15

into Harvard

1:08:16

do you put him

1:08:18

in a zoo

1:08:18

what do you do

1:08:20

with the Neanderthal boy

1:08:21

is it immoral

1:08:22

to put a Neanderthal

1:08:23

into a zoo

1:08:23

that seems a little

1:08:25

like what if they

1:08:26

decided to create

1:08:27

an Australopithecus

1:08:28

you know

1:08:30

and bring that

1:08:31

back to life

1:08:32

I mean

1:08:33

aren't we a better

1:08:34

version of that

1:08:35

like didn't

1:08:36

like didn't evolution

1:08:37

show like that sucks

1:08:39

you don't want

1:08:39

and so if that thing

1:08:40

exists

1:08:41

what are we going to do

1:08:42

just leave it out there

1:08:43

in Africa

1:08:43

let it roam around

1:08:45

get eaten by lions

1:08:46

well this is where

1:08:47

ethics comes in

1:08:48

right

1:08:48

at what point

1:08:49

does a robot

1:08:50

or a Neanderthal

1:08:51

become ethically

1:08:52

equivalent to a human

1:08:53

right

1:08:54

this is something

1:08:55

that the ethicists

1:08:56

have not worked out

1:08:57

how close have they

1:08:58

gotten with this

1:08:59

Neanderthal thing

1:09:00

well you know

1:09:01

we've sequenced

1:09:02

all the genes

1:09:03

of a Neanderthal now

1:09:04

so the Neanderthal

1:09:05

is not a mystery anymore

1:09:06

all the genes

1:09:06

have been sequenced

1:09:07

and like I mentioned

1:09:09

at Harvard

1:09:09

there's talk

1:09:10

about what it would

1:09:11

take to bring back

1:09:12

a Neanderthal child

1:09:13

and it's something

1:09:15

that is conceivable

1:09:17

but of course

1:09:18

no one's done it yet

1:09:19

because all sorts

1:09:19

of ethical problems

1:09:20

are raised

1:09:21

because this Neanderthal

1:09:22

feels

1:09:22

it could feel pain

1:09:24

it could eventually

1:09:25

learn how to talk

1:09:25

to you

1:09:26

and express its feelings

1:09:27

and do you want

1:09:28

to put it in a cage

1:09:29

obviously not

1:09:32

think about that

1:09:32

but what

1:09:34

do we know enough

1:09:35

about their

1:09:36

intellectual capabilities

1:09:37

could a Neanderthal

1:09:38

exist in our society

1:09:38

well their brains

1:09:39

are bigger than our brains

1:09:40

right

1:09:40

what they could do

1:09:42

with it

1:09:42

we're not sure

1:09:43

of course

1:09:43

is it possible

1:09:44

they were smarter than us

1:09:46

they didn't have tools

1:09:47

like we did

1:09:47

they had tools

1:09:48

but they didn't

1:09:49

have the same

1:09:49

yeah

1:09:50

they didn't have

1:09:50

fluted tips

1:09:51

of like stone

1:09:53

flint spearheads

1:09:54

and things along those lines

1:09:55

yeah

1:09:56

there was no

1:09:57

large set of tools

1:09:58

that they had

1:09:59

at their disposal

1:10:00

but they did

1:10:00

definitely have tools

1:10:01

yeah

1:10:02

and they probably

1:10:03

had a language

1:10:03

they were probably

1:10:04

capable of language

1:10:05

and they probably

1:10:07

communicate with each other

1:10:08

and they mated with us

1:10:09

so

1:10:10

you know

1:10:12

and they grew up too

1:10:13

when they mated

1:10:14

with us

1:10:15

the progeny

1:10:16

were not killed

1:10:17

the progeny grew up

1:10:18

to become members

1:10:19

of the tribe

1:10:20

and so you realize

1:10:22

that they're closer

1:10:22

to us

1:10:23

than we realize

1:10:24

yeah

1:10:25

you couldn't put that

1:10:26

in a zoo

1:10:26

but I mean

1:10:27

what would you do

1:10:28

would you have

1:10:28

that young boy

1:10:29

and have him

1:10:30

compete with homo sapiens

1:10:31

would it be the same

1:10:33

would it be able to

1:10:34

we don't know

1:10:35

there would be

1:10:36

a crazy experiment

1:10:37

that I think

1:10:37

most people would think

1:10:38

would be very unethical

1:10:39

but there's an ethics

1:10:41

involved

1:10:41

same thing

1:10:42

once we have robots

1:10:43

that can feel pain

1:10:44

then there's another

1:10:45

ethical issue

1:10:46

of do you want

1:10:47

to have robots

1:10:48

exposed to pain

1:10:49

what happens

1:10:50

if robots

1:10:51

then demand rights

1:10:52

rights to limit

1:10:53

the amount of pain

1:10:54

that they suffer

1:10:55

carrying out tasks

1:10:57

for a human being

1:10:58

because remember

1:10:59

we're going to be

1:10:59

asking robots

1:11:00

to do all sorts of tasks

1:11:01

which are dangerous

1:11:02

that's why we've

1:11:03

invented them

1:11:03

and you know

1:11:04

they may feel pain

1:11:05

as a consequence

1:11:06

and then we have

1:11:07

to ask ourselves

1:11:08

how far do we

1:11:09

want robots

1:11:10

to feel pain

1:11:11

if they say

1:11:12

I'm hurting

1:11:13

stop it

1:11:14

I feel pain

1:11:15

are we going to

1:11:16

stop it

1:11:16

do they have rights

1:11:17

what if they become

1:11:18

emotionally attached to you

1:11:20

what if you have a robot

1:11:20

that calls you every day

1:11:22

when you're on vacation

1:11:23

what if you go to Hawaii

1:11:25

your robot just keeps

1:11:26

calling you crying

1:11:27

Michio come home

1:11:29

I'm by myself

1:11:31

in this

1:11:31

like really

1:11:32

what if it becomes

1:11:32

attached to you

1:11:33

well that's a problem

1:11:35

because they're designed

1:11:36

to attach to humans

1:11:37

they would be

1:11:38

specifically designed

1:11:39

to be friendly

1:11:40

to humans

1:11:41

so that we don't

1:11:41

junk them

1:11:42

and they would be

1:11:43

designed to be

1:11:44

emotionally attachable

1:11:45

to us

1:11:46

so yeah

1:11:46

that's going to be

1:11:47

a question

1:11:47

once we get

1:11:48

separated from them

1:11:49

then they're going

1:11:50

to want not

1:11:51

to be separated

1:11:52

because their whole

1:11:53

existence revolves

1:11:54

around their

1:11:55

relationship to us

1:11:56

the master

1:11:56

have you ever

1:11:57

seen Prometheus

1:11:58

no

1:11:59

was it Prometheus

1:12:00

or was it

1:12:01

the next one

1:12:01

where it shows

1:12:02

the guy who

1:12:04

created the robot

1:12:05

and he created

1:12:06

this super intelligent

1:12:08

robot

1:12:08

and this super intelligent

1:12:09

robot that plays

1:12:10

piano and talks

1:12:11

to him and serves

1:12:11

him basically

1:12:12

and the robot's

1:12:13

trying to figure out

1:12:14

the robot is

1:12:15

eventually

1:12:16

I believe it kills him

1:12:17

but it's trying

1:12:18

to figure out

1:12:19

like how this

1:12:20

imperfect thing

1:12:21

has created him

1:12:22

and he's so much

1:12:24

more superior

1:12:25

than this stupid

1:12:26

biological thing

1:12:27

that's telling him

1:12:27

what to do

1:12:28

so what happens

1:12:29

at the end

1:12:30

well that is

1:12:31

no that's not

1:12:32

Prometheus

1:12:33

you know what it is

1:12:33

it's the next one

1:12:35

what's the

1:12:36

what's the one

1:12:36

with Jussie Smoulette

1:12:39

in it

1:12:39

Covenant

1:12:41

Alien Covenant

1:12:42

yeah

1:12:43

I think that's it

1:12:44

I think that's the one

1:12:44

well these

1:12:46

no maybe I'm wrong

1:12:47

no I think you're right

1:12:48

I'm looking at it

1:12:49

is it Covenant

1:12:49

yeah

1:12:49

I was saying both movies

1:12:50

and I typed it in

1:12:51

these

1:12:51

one of the robots

1:12:53

is good

1:12:54

and one of the robots

1:12:55

is evil

1:12:55

I don't want to

1:12:57

spoil or alert

1:12:57

or anything

1:12:57

but the evil one wins

1:12:59

and the evil one

1:13:00

has stayed on this planet

1:13:02

has been manipulating

1:13:03

the genetics

1:13:04

of this crazy alien thing

1:13:06

and integrating them

1:13:07

with human genetics

1:13:08

this is

1:13:10

it's an amazing movie

1:13:11

it's a very

1:13:12

underlooked movie

1:13:13

it's one of the best

1:13:14

of the alien franchises

1:13:15

and one of the most

1:13:16

sophisticated

1:13:17

of the alien franchises

1:13:19

so what happens

1:13:20

at the end

1:13:20

the robots take over

1:13:21

or what

1:13:22

well

1:13:22

it's open interpretation

1:13:24

but that's the robot

1:13:26

and that's the creator

1:13:28

I am your father

1:13:29

you are my creation

1:13:30

here

1:13:31

give me some volume

1:13:31

on this

1:13:32

so you can hear this

1:13:32

if you created me

1:13:34

who created you

1:13:37

where do it come from

1:13:39

the question of the ages

1:13:42

which I hope you and I

1:13:45

will answer one day

1:13:47

Prometheus raised a question

1:13:49

you know what's interesting

1:13:50

about these science fiction movies

1:13:52

they never have the internet

1:13:53

they never have cell phones

1:13:55

watch a science fiction movie

1:13:56

no one's on their phone

1:13:57

no one is checking their tweets

1:13:59

it's like

1:14:00

it's very interesting

1:14:01

right

1:14:02

like our version

1:14:03

of what space is like

1:14:05

is essentially like

1:14:05

the wild west

1:14:06

but accelerated

1:14:07

with modern

1:14:08

and super modern technology

1:14:10

but doesn't include

1:14:11

all the things

1:14:12

that brought us

1:14:12

to where we are

1:14:13

right now

1:14:14

at the cusp

1:14:14

of being able to travel

1:14:16

intergalactically

1:14:17

isn't it interesting

1:14:18

like they never have

1:14:20

all the stuff that we have

1:14:21

they have the rocket ships

1:14:22

that we have

1:14:22

no cell phones

1:14:23

they're not checking

1:14:24

their email

1:14:25

they're not calling

1:14:26

each other up

1:14:27

they only communicate

1:14:27

with people that are

1:14:28

right in front of them

1:14:29

or they're like

1:14:29

pressing on a thing

1:14:30

you know

1:14:31

they're pressing

1:14:31

they're talking

1:14:32

through their helmets

1:14:33

to the spaceship

1:14:33

but normal interaction

1:14:36

is just human to human

1:14:37

well in the future

1:14:38

the connection

1:14:40

to the internet

1:14:41

could be in your

1:14:42

contact lens

1:14:42

yeah

1:14:43

or in your head

1:14:44

so you simply blink

1:14:44

you simply blink

1:14:45

or perhaps mentally

1:14:46

you simply think

1:14:48

or blink

1:14:48

and there you are

1:14:49

connected to the internet

1:14:50

so maybe in the future

1:14:52

they are connected

1:14:53

to the internet

1:14:54

you just can't see it

1:14:55

yeah but they're not

1:14:55

even talking about it

1:14:56

like they're only

1:14:58

interacting like humans

1:14:59

interact

1:14:59

one to one

1:15:01

are you following

1:15:03

Neuralink at all

1:15:04

in these similar

1:15:05

types of technologies

1:15:07

no

1:15:07

oh you mean the company

1:15:08

Neuralink

1:15:09

Neuralink

1:15:10

the Elon Musk invention

1:15:11

that's right

1:15:11

I've been following

1:15:12

the work

1:15:12

they have a long ways

1:15:13

to go

1:15:14

but they're making

1:15:14

the initial stages

1:15:16

of connecting

1:15:16

to the brain

1:15:17

this is BMI

1:15:18

brain machine interface

1:15:20

and

1:15:21

yeah

1:15:23

pretty soon

1:15:24

also you know

1:15:24

at the soccer games

1:15:26

in Brazil

1:15:27

a few years ago

1:15:28

the man who kicked

1:15:29

the football

1:15:30

initiating the World Cup

1:15:31

soccer games

1:15:32

was totally paralyzed

1:15:33

he was

1:15:35

at Johns Hopkins University

1:15:36

they created

1:15:37

a body suit

1:15:39

connected to his brain

1:15:41

so that he could walk

1:15:42

whoa

1:15:43

like an exoskeleton

1:15:44

yeah

1:15:45

so he was basically

1:15:46

Iron Man

1:15:46

an exoskeleton

1:15:48

and there he was

1:15:50

initiating the soccer games

1:15:51

in Brazil

1:15:52

in Sao Paulo

1:15:52

Brazil

1:15:53

here we can see this here

1:15:53

wow

1:15:54

this is crazy

1:15:55

this is crazy

1:15:56

he kicked the soccer ball

1:15:57

and it was

1:15:58

hooked up

1:15:59

at Johns Hopkins University

1:16:00

Duke University

1:16:01

I'm sorry

1:16:02

and that's a big

1:16:03

very bulky thing

1:16:05

but you could imagine

1:16:06

as technology improves

1:16:07

that would also

1:16:08

it could become

1:16:09

like a thin exoskeleton

1:16:10

that's right

1:16:11

that was one of the ideas

1:16:13

about Neuralink

1:16:14

is that it would be able

1:16:15

to bypass

1:16:15

the human nervous system

1:16:18

and control the muscles

1:16:19

with some other method

1:16:20

right

1:16:21

and so instead of

1:16:22

if you have a severed

1:16:22

spinal cord

1:16:23

it would somehow

1:16:25

or another be able

1:16:25

to control the bottom

1:16:26

half of your body

1:16:27

right

1:16:28

which is amazing

1:16:29

yeah

1:16:29

so this already exists

1:16:30

that we can take people

1:16:31

that have been paralyzed

1:16:32

because of war

1:16:33

disease

1:16:34

accidents

1:16:35

with an injury

1:16:36

to the spinal cord

1:16:37

and just bypass

1:16:38

the spinal cord

1:16:39

totally

1:16:39

and have the brain

1:16:41

connected directly

1:16:42

and also you can get people

1:16:44

that can actually

1:16:44

eventually talk

1:16:46

talk to a computer

1:16:47

of course

1:16:48

and answer the internet

1:16:52

engage in dialogue

1:16:54

even though you're

1:16:55

totally paralyzed

1:16:56

wow

1:16:57

and with quantum computing

1:17:00

now when we're talking

1:17:01

about Neuralink

1:17:02

you're talking about

1:17:03

some sort of a

1:17:04

conventional attachment

1:17:05

is it possible

1:17:07

that quantum computing

1:17:08

could scale down

1:17:09

to the size

1:17:10

where you could be able

1:17:10

to put it

1:17:11

in someone's head

1:17:11

that may be difficult

1:17:13

because the computer

1:17:14

itself is pretty big

1:17:16

but the connection

1:17:17

the connection

1:17:18

of the computer

1:17:19

to the human

1:17:20

could be very tiny

1:17:22

could be as small

1:17:22

as you want

1:17:23

but the computer

1:17:24

itself is huge

1:17:25

so is it comparable

1:17:26

to the computers

1:17:28

they used

1:17:28

in the Apollo mission

1:17:29

which were

1:17:30

this enormous room

1:17:31

and now you have

1:17:32

more of that

1:17:32

on your cell phone

1:17:33

more computing power

1:17:35

on your cell phone

1:17:36

than had

1:17:36

in 1963

1:17:38

in a giant room

1:17:40

filled with computers

1:17:41

yeah

1:17:42

what you have today

1:17:43

in your cell phone

1:17:43

is more powerful

1:17:44

than all of NASA

1:17:45

when they put

1:17:46

a man on the moon

1:17:47

all those computers

1:17:47

that you saw

1:17:48

in those videotapes

1:17:49

your cell phone

1:17:50

has more computer power

1:17:51

than all of them

1:17:52

so is that possible

1:17:53

the quantum computing

1:17:54

could also scale

1:17:56

like that

1:17:56

I think the quantum computer

1:17:58

because of the hardware

1:17:59

necessary to bring it

1:18:00

down to near absolute zero

1:18:01

would simply be huge

1:18:04

you'd be like a chandelier

1:18:05

but

1:18:05

when you're saying

1:18:06

absolute zero

1:18:07

you mean temperature

1:18:07

temperature near absolute zero

1:18:09

right

1:18:09

so zero vibrations

1:18:10

you don't want any

1:18:11

interference with the code

1:18:13

because these are atoms

1:18:14

atoms

1:18:15

the slightest little disturbance

1:18:17

can knock these atoms

1:18:18

out of coherence

1:18:18

so you want these atoms

1:18:20

to vibrate in unison

1:18:21

and that's why

1:18:22

you have to cool it down

1:18:23

to your absolute zero

1:18:24

but

1:18:25

the connection

1:18:26

of the quantum computer

1:18:27

to a human

1:18:28

could be as small

1:18:28

as you want

1:18:29

now when you're saying

1:18:30

vibrations

1:18:31

what about

1:18:31

like what if you're

1:18:32

in a building

1:18:33

and a truck drives by

1:18:34

that's a problem

1:18:36

really

1:18:36

that's one of the problems

1:18:37

that you know

1:18:38

something happens

1:18:38

a block away

1:18:39

yeah you see how

1:18:40

awkward these

1:18:41

whoa

1:18:41

that's the cooling system

1:18:43

all those

1:18:44

all the chandelier

1:18:45

like ornaments

1:18:47

these are

1:18:48

the pipes

1:18:49

the cooling pipes

1:18:50

for the quantum computer

1:18:51

the quantum computer

1:18:52

itself is only

1:18:53

you know

1:18:54

this big

1:18:55

about the size

1:18:56

of a quarter

1:18:56

look how cool that is

1:18:58

that's a cooling system

1:18:59

that's amazing

1:19:00

that's what it takes

1:19:01

to cool it down

1:19:02

at the very bottom

1:19:03

at the very bottom

1:19:04

you see the actual

1:19:05

quantum computer

1:19:06

at the very bottom

1:19:07

that little thing

1:19:07

at the bottom

1:19:08

that's it

1:19:09

so in the future

1:19:10

when we communicate

1:19:11

with the quantum computer

1:19:12

the quantum computer

1:19:13

will be in the cloud

1:19:14

you won't even see it

1:19:15

right

1:19:15

it's just your connection

1:19:16

will connect to

1:19:18

that object in the cloud

1:19:19

so if the internet

1:19:21

is in your contact lens

1:19:22

you blink

1:19:23

and then you're

1:19:24

connected to that

1:19:25

via your contact lens

1:19:27

you never see

1:19:28

the quantum computer

1:19:29

so that little thing

1:19:30

at the bottom

1:19:30

is quantum computer

1:19:31

yeah

1:19:31

at the very bottom

1:19:32

that's where the computation

1:19:33

actually takes place

1:19:34

so does it have to take place

1:19:36

because of it's

1:19:37

subject to vibrations

1:19:38

and any disturbance

1:19:39

does it have to take place

1:19:40

in some insanely

1:19:41

reinforced building

1:19:42

that's right

1:19:43

that's right

1:19:44

so something new

1:19:45

has to be constructed

1:19:46

or they've done this already

1:19:47

oh yeah

1:19:48

they've done it already

1:19:49

but it's something

1:19:49

that you have to be

1:19:50

very careful of

1:19:51

because if a truck goes by

1:19:52

there goes your calculation

1:19:54

right

1:19:54

do you have to have

1:19:56

I would imagine

1:19:57

they would have to have

1:19:58

some sort of measurement devices

1:19:59

that make sure

1:20:00

there's no external

1:20:00

vibration

1:20:01

that's right

1:20:02

now the irony

1:20:03

is Mother Nature

1:20:04

creates quantum computers

1:20:05

at room temperature

1:20:06

photosynthesis

1:20:08

of a leaf

1:20:08

a simple leaf

1:20:09

does a quantum calculation

1:20:11

converting photons

1:20:12

carbon dioxide

1:20:13

into oxygen

1:20:14

that's what we call

1:20:15

you know

1:20:16

the beginning of life

1:20:17

on the earth

1:20:18

with a flower

1:20:19

so Mother Nature

1:20:21

has solved that problem

1:20:22

Mother Nature

1:20:22

has room temperature

1:20:23

superconductor

1:20:24

room temperature

1:20:25

quantum computers

1:20:26

we don't have that yet

1:20:27

but we're working on it

1:20:29

so if Mother Nature

1:20:31

can do it

1:20:32

and we can come up

1:20:33

with quantum computing

1:20:34

and we can figure out

1:20:35

how Mother Nature

1:20:36

is doing it

1:20:37

maybe through the God equation

1:20:38

we could reproduce it

1:20:39

then we could probably

1:20:41

have small quantum computers

1:20:43

right

1:20:43

like I said

1:20:44

a leaf

1:20:45

a leaf is a quantum

1:20:46

quantum device

1:20:48

and to create fertilizer

1:20:50

requires a huge plant

1:20:51

for example

1:20:52

Mother Nature

1:20:53

does it with a simple

1:20:55

legume

1:20:55

the branches

1:20:57

of the roots

1:20:57

of a legume

1:20:58

create the ingredients

1:21:00

for fertilizer

1:21:00

a plant does it

1:21:02

naturally

1:21:03

at room temperature

1:21:04

it takes us

1:21:05

a gigantic

1:21:06

huge chemical plant

1:21:07

to create fertilizer

1:21:08

Mother Nature

1:21:09

does it

1:21:09

with a small

1:21:10

little plant

1:21:10

so Mother Nature

1:21:13

is ahead of us

1:21:14

that's what I'm saying

1:21:15

yeah

1:21:15

have you ever studied

1:21:17

the connection

1:21:17

between fungus

1:21:19

and soil

1:21:21

I think I just

1:21:22

screwed something up

1:21:22

with the microphone

1:21:23

Jamie

1:21:23

my mic just cut out

1:21:31

oh it's back

1:21:32

there it is

1:21:32

I stepped on this cable

1:21:33

I think I disconnected it

1:21:35

have you ever studied

1:21:37

like all the science

1:21:39

that's being done

1:21:39

on the way

1:21:41

plants communicate

1:21:42

with each other

1:21:43

through the soil

1:21:44

and through fungus

1:21:45

and mycelium

1:21:46

it's fascinating stuff

1:21:48

they allocate resources

1:21:49

to plants that need them

1:21:51

more

1:21:51

to trees that need them

1:21:52

more

1:21:52

they seem to have

1:21:54

communal

1:21:54

yeah

1:21:55

they seem to have

1:21:56

some sort of

1:21:57

a shared information network

1:21:59

that we don't

1:22:00

totally understand

1:22:01

maybe you can find

1:22:01

something on it

1:22:02

but it's

1:22:03

I mean

1:22:04

I think relatively

1:22:05

recently understood

1:22:06

and just basically

1:22:08

understood

1:22:09

over the last few decades

1:22:10

but people like

1:22:11

Paul Stamets

1:22:12

who's a mycologist

1:22:13

has been studying

1:22:14

this type of stuff

1:22:14

and it's really amazing

1:22:16

like there's some

1:22:17

sort of intelligence

1:22:18

to it

1:22:19

the way it works

1:22:19

underground networking

1:22:22

the amazing connections

1:22:23

beneath your feet

1:22:24

well maybe evolution

1:22:28

went in the direction

1:22:29

of interconnection

1:22:31

because maybe

1:22:32

the survival value

1:22:33

was higher

1:22:33

if you connected

1:22:35

these things

1:22:35

scroll down

1:22:36

Jamie

1:22:36

right there

1:22:37

so this is what

1:22:38

it's saying

1:22:38

when most of us

1:22:40

think it's fungus

1:22:41

we imagine mushrooms

1:22:42

sprouting out of the ground

1:22:43

these mushrooms

1:22:43

are in fact

1:22:44

the fruit of the fungus

1:22:45

while the majority

1:22:46

of the fungal organism

1:22:47

lives in the soil

1:22:48

interwoven with the tree roots

1:22:50

as a vast network

1:22:51

of mycelium

1:22:52

mycelium

1:22:53

are incredibly tiny threads

1:22:55

of the greater fungal organism

1:22:57

that wraps around

1:22:58

or bore into tree roots

1:23:00

taken together

1:23:01

mycelium composes

1:23:02

what's called

1:23:03

a mycorrhizal network

1:23:05

which connects

1:23:06

individual plants

1:23:07

together

1:23:07

to transfer water

1:23:08

nitrogen

1:23:09

carbon

1:23:10

and other minerals

1:23:11

German forester

1:23:12

Peter Wallen

1:23:13

how do you say that

1:23:14

Wallen

1:23:15

Wallen

1:23:16

dubbed this network

1:23:17

the wood wide web

1:23:19

as it is through

1:23:21

the mycelium

1:23:21

the trees communicate

1:23:22

this is really

1:23:24

really fascinating stuff

1:23:25

because

1:23:26

they're all

1:23:28

like we just think

1:23:29

of soil as something

1:23:29

that the tree

1:23:30

pulls nutrients from

1:23:31

but no

1:23:32

it's all

1:23:32

they're communicating

1:23:33

they're connected

1:23:34

with each other

1:23:34

in the forest

1:23:36

well realize that

1:23:37

when you have a chemical

1:23:38

process involving life

1:23:40

you are in some sense

1:23:41

looking at a quantum computer

1:23:42

it's doing a quantum calculation

1:23:44

it's taking nutrients

1:23:46

from the soil

1:23:47

nutrients from the air

1:23:48

combining it

1:23:49

to create

1:23:50

cellulose

1:23:51

or whatever it's made of

1:23:52

and so we're talking about

1:23:54

something that

1:23:54

we cannot duplicate

1:23:55

without gigantic devices

1:23:57

looking like a chandelier

1:23:59

mother nature

1:24:00

can do it

1:24:00

with a root

1:24:01

yeah

1:24:01

it can do it

1:24:03

with everything

1:24:03

it seems to be

1:24:05

insects

1:24:07

it seems to

1:24:08

there's like a code to it

1:24:10

which is why

1:24:11

your idea

1:24:12

about there being

1:24:13

this God calculation

1:24:14

is so fascinating

1:24:15

it seems like

1:24:16

it just moves

1:24:18

in a very

1:24:18

certain way

1:24:19

and it's all

1:24:21

connected to each other

1:24:22

in some way

1:24:22

that we're

1:24:23

as human beings

1:24:24

just sort of

1:24:25

starting to understand

1:24:26

well there is a theory

1:24:28

that says that the Big Bang

1:24:29

went in a direction

1:24:30

compatible to life

1:24:31

and that other universes

1:24:34

may not be compatible

1:24:36

with life

1:24:36

they may be lifeless

1:24:37

collections of electrons

1:24:39

and neutrinos

1:24:40

for example

1:24:40

but our universe is special

1:24:42

our universe has stable protons

1:24:44

out of which

1:24:45

you could create atoms

1:24:46

out of which

1:24:47

you could create DNA

1:24:48

out of which

1:24:49

you can create people

1:24:50

how many universes

1:24:51

have that property

1:24:52

so string theory

1:24:54

for example

1:24:54

gives you other universes

1:24:56

which are probably

1:24:57

dead universes

1:24:57

universes which have no life

1:25:00

but our universe

1:25:01

has stable protons

1:25:02

stable DNA

1:25:03

stable forms of life

1:25:05

so our universe is rare

1:25:07

so this is called

1:25:08

the

1:25:08

the anthropic principle

1:25:10

the

1:25:11

the feeling

1:25:12

that our life

1:25:13

is not random

1:25:14

our universe is special

1:25:16

our universe is special

1:25:18

in the sense

1:25:18

that it didn't have

1:25:19

to have life

1:25:20

but it does

1:25:21

and life

1:25:22

in a spectacular

1:25:23

array of diversity

1:25:24

so our universe

1:25:25

really is special

1:25:26

but is it special

1:25:28

because we don't know

1:25:29

of any other universes

1:25:30

so

1:25:31

yeah

1:25:32

but the other universes

1:25:32

that we played with

1:25:33

mathematically speaking

1:25:35

are not compatible

1:25:36

with life

1:25:37

stars

1:25:38

stars burn out

1:25:39

too quickly

1:25:40

galaxies

1:25:41

simply fall apart

1:25:43

protons disintegrate

1:25:45

it's very hard

1:25:46

to create a universe

1:25:47

which is stable

1:25:48

so some people think

1:25:49

that our universe

1:25:50

is special

1:25:51

among all the different

1:25:52

kinds of universes

1:25:53

that our universe

1:25:54

is unique

1:25:55

because it's compatible

1:25:56

with stable protons

1:25:57

and DNA

1:25:59

but it's hard

1:26:00

for most people

1:26:01

to even

1:26:01

grasp the concept

1:26:03

of other types

1:26:05

of universes

1:26:05

or other universes

1:26:06

period

1:26:07

or the fact

1:26:08

there may be

1:26:08

an infinite number

1:26:09

of universes

1:26:10

well that's the multiverse

1:26:11

string theory

1:26:12

probably has

1:26:12

an infinite number

1:26:13

of possible universes

1:26:14

we are probably

1:26:15

the only one

1:26:16

that has life

1:26:17

in them

1:26:18

we're not sure

1:26:18

about that of course

1:26:19

but these other universes

1:26:21

are collections

1:26:22

of dead subatomic particles

1:26:24

a mist

1:26:24

a floating mist

1:26:26

of dead subatomic particles

1:26:28

that don't do anything

1:26:29

if the proton

1:26:30

were not stable

1:26:31

then our universe

1:26:33

also would be like that

1:26:34

our universe

1:26:35

would disintegrate

1:26:35

almost instantly

1:26:36

the fact

1:26:37

that our proton

1:26:38

is stable

1:26:38

is quite remarkable

1:26:40

do you believe

1:26:41

that that's unusual

1:26:42

unusual

1:26:42

in fact

1:26:44

maybe unique

1:26:44

there are probably

1:26:45

very few universes

1:26:46

with stable protons

1:26:48

you see

1:26:48

string theory

1:26:49

gives you

1:26:49

many many diverse solutions

1:26:51

so we can actually

1:26:52

look at these

1:26:53

other alternate universes

1:26:54

and we see

1:26:55

that they're not

1:26:56

compatible with life

1:26:57

and why do you think

1:26:59

that

1:27:00

if the proton

1:27:02

is stable here

1:27:03

what would it be

1:27:05

about these other universes

1:27:06

like what qualities

1:27:07

would they possess

1:27:08

where

1:27:08

it wouldn't be stable there

1:27:10

everything would decay

1:27:11

decay down to

1:27:12

electrons and neutrinos

1:27:14

so it would be

1:27:15

a gas

1:27:16

a cloud

1:27:16

of electrons

1:27:17

and neutrinos

1:27:18

which are the lowest

1:27:18

state of matter

1:27:19

you can't get any lower

1:27:21

than an electron

1:27:22

and neutrino

1:27:22

that's the lowest state

1:27:24

so these universes

1:27:25

would basically disintegrate

1:27:26

they would fall apart

1:27:27

into a cloud

1:27:28

of neutrinos

1:27:29

and electrons

1:27:30

our universe

1:27:31

has stable protons

1:27:32

out of which

1:27:33

you can create elements

1:27:34

out of which

1:27:35

you could create DNA

1:27:36

out of which

1:27:37

you can create life

1:27:38

that's a miracle

1:27:39

so it's just because

1:27:40

of these calculations

1:27:41

that you've done

1:27:42

that you've done

1:27:43

where it says

1:27:44

if the universe

1:27:44

had different properties

1:27:45

you would think

1:27:47

that this is rare

1:27:48

very rare

1:27:49

because there's so many

1:27:50

other possibilities

1:27:51

of how the universe could

1:27:52

if stars burnt out

1:27:53

more quickly

1:27:54

for example

1:27:55

because the nuclear force

1:27:55

were stronger

1:27:56

stars would never ignite

1:27:57

if the nuclear force

1:27:59

were weaker

1:27:59

stars would

1:28:00

never form

1:28:01

to begin with

1:28:02

if gravity were too strong

1:28:04

we would have had

1:28:05

a big crunch

1:28:05

and we'd all

1:28:06

die in a gigantic fireball

1:28:08

if gravity were too weak

1:28:10

we'd all freeze to death

1:28:11

because we would have

1:28:12

a big crunch

1:28:12

a big freeze

1:28:14

so all the parameters

1:28:15

of the universe

1:28:16

are tuned

1:28:17

just right

1:28:18

to allow for life

1:28:19

wow

1:28:20

now there's two ways

1:28:21

of looking at

1:28:22

one way

1:28:23

that some physicists

1:28:24

have proposed

1:28:24

is that we are

1:28:26

the crowning achievement

1:28:27

we are the only universe

1:28:29

that's stable

1:28:29

that has life

1:28:31

that has diversity

1:28:32

that creates life

1:28:33

the other possibility

1:28:34

is that there are just

1:28:35

lots of dead universes

1:28:36

and we just won the crap shoot

1:28:39

doesn't that possibility

1:28:40

jive more with the state

1:28:42

of the universe

1:28:42

as we understand it

1:28:43

because we're always looking

1:28:44

for these Goldilocks planets

1:28:45

which are very rare

1:28:46

which may inhabit life

1:28:47

or may have life on it

1:28:48

but we look at our own

1:28:49

solar system

1:28:50

and there's just us

1:28:51

in other words

1:28:52

there could be

1:28:53

a Goldilocks zone

1:28:54

for universes

1:28:54

yes

1:28:55

just like there is for planets

1:28:56

for solar systems

1:28:57

of course

1:28:58

the earth is not too far

1:28:59

from the sun

1:29:00

not too close

1:29:00

but we could be

1:29:02

in the Goldilocks zone

1:29:03

of possible universes

1:29:05

and that's why we're here

1:29:07

today to talk about it

1:29:08

so but there also

1:29:09

could be an infinite number

1:29:11

of universes like ours

1:29:12

and also an infinite number

1:29:14

of universes that are

1:29:15

completely incompatible

1:29:16

for life

1:29:16

that's right

1:29:17

this is what I do

1:29:19

for a living

1:29:20

we work with these

1:29:23

we work in the multiverse

1:29:24

yeah no wonder

1:29:24

why you don't watch YouTube

1:29:25

do you have time

1:29:27

for recreation

1:29:28

do you do stuff

1:29:29

outside of physicists

1:29:31

or stuff

1:29:32

well I like to figure skate

1:29:35

really

1:29:35

yeah

1:29:36

oh in the winter time

1:29:37

you go down to the Central Park

1:29:39

and dance around

1:29:40

I used to skate

1:29:41

at Rockefeller Center

1:29:41

all the time

1:29:42

yeah

1:29:42

yeah

1:29:43

I like to spin

1:29:44

and jump

1:29:45

and

1:29:45

that's great exercise

1:29:46

yeah it's all

1:29:47

Newtonian physics

1:29:48

at work

1:29:48

ah

1:29:49

of course you like it

1:29:50

for that reason

1:29:51

so that's your hobby

1:29:54

yeah that's my hobby

1:29:55

and other than that

1:29:56

you're just

1:29:57

constantly thinking

1:29:58

about these things

1:29:59

yeah but again

1:30:00

it's fun

1:30:00

I mean to me

1:30:01

this is what I wanted to do

1:30:02

when I was 8 years old

1:30:03

when I was 8 years old

1:30:04

I said

1:30:05

this is for me

1:30:06

oh your passion

1:30:07

is very very clear

1:30:08

and it's one of the things

1:30:09

that makes you

1:30:09

such a great science educator

1:30:10

is that you have

1:30:12

such enthusiasm

1:30:12

for these subjects

1:30:13

and they're so interesting

1:30:14

to you

1:30:15

that it becomes

1:30:16

interesting to other people

1:30:17

yeah

1:30:18

that's in a sense

1:30:19

like people like you

1:30:20

are so

1:30:21

well not in a sense

1:30:22

like you're so important

1:30:23

for the discussion

1:30:25

because it ignites

1:30:26

inspiration

1:30:27

the same way

1:30:27

Einstein ignited

1:30:29

inspiration in you

1:30:30

by seeing that photograph

1:30:31

of his desk

1:30:32

like these kind of speeches

1:30:33

that you do

1:30:34

and these conversations

1:30:35

that you have with people

1:30:36

it

1:30:36

for a person like myself

1:30:38

that doesn't study these things

1:30:39

it gives me the chance

1:30:40

to delve into

1:30:41

how your perspective is

1:30:43

and just to look at it

1:30:44

through your mind

1:30:45

right

1:30:46

and for me

1:30:47

it's hard to believe

1:30:48

how a person

1:30:50

could not be thrilled

1:30:51

when they learn

1:30:52

about the big bang

1:30:53

they learn about strength theory

1:30:55

they learn about

1:30:55

parallel universes

1:30:57

and wormholes

1:30:58

for me

1:30:58

it's incredible

1:31:00

that people

1:31:01

some people

1:31:02

are not thrilled

1:31:03

by something like this

1:31:04

do you ever

1:31:05

think about

1:31:07

technology

1:31:08

and

1:31:09

its capabilities

1:31:10

and intelligence

1:31:11

and extrapolate

1:31:12

as far as possible

1:31:14

and think

1:31:15

we are essentially

1:31:16

going to become

1:31:17

something akin to a god

1:31:19

or whatever we become

1:31:21

will become something

1:31:22

akin to a god

1:31:23

if you keep

1:31:24

if we don't

1:31:25

get killed

1:31:25

by a natural disaster

1:31:26

or our own stupidity

1:31:27

and you accelerate time

1:31:29

a thousand

1:31:30

two thousand

1:31:30

five thousand years

1:31:31

ahead of us

1:31:32

what do you anticipate

1:31:33

will be like

1:31:34

I think about that a lot

1:31:36

because

1:31:37

we talked about

1:31:38

type one

1:31:38

type two

1:31:39

type three

1:31:40

by the time

1:31:41

you are a type three

1:31:42

civilization

1:31:42

you have the energy

1:31:43

to manipulate

1:31:44

the Planck energy

1:31:45

the Planck energy

1:31:47

is the ultimate energy

1:31:48

of the universe

1:31:49

of the quantum theory

1:31:50

you take the quantum theory

1:31:52

and relativity

1:31:53

and scale it up

1:31:54

all the way

1:31:54

just let it rip

1:31:55

what is the highest energy

1:31:57

you can attain

1:31:58

and then something new happens

1:32:00

that's called

1:32:01

the Planck energy

1:32:02

it's a quadrillion times

1:32:03

more powerful

1:32:04

than our biggest atom smasher

1:32:06

in Geneva Switzerland

1:32:07

at that point

1:32:08

space becomes unstable

1:32:10

we think of empty space

1:32:12

being stable

1:32:13

of course

1:32:13

how can you do anything

1:32:15

with empty space

1:32:16

right

1:32:16

it just sits there

1:32:17

does nothing

1:32:17

but when you start

1:32:19

to boil space

1:32:20

when you start to boil space

1:32:22

to the Planck temperature

1:32:23

all of a sudden

1:32:25

it becomes unstable

1:32:26

bubbles

1:32:27

begin to form

1:32:29

and these bubbles

1:32:30

are gateways

1:32:31

to other universes

1:32:32

these are baby wormholes

1:32:34

to other universes

1:32:35

we think that

1:32:36

our universe

1:32:37

was one of these

1:32:38

most of these universes

1:32:40

like boiling water

1:32:41

pop out of existence

1:32:42

and they pop back in

1:32:44

they never get anywhere

1:32:45

but one of these bubbles

1:32:47

kept on going

1:32:48

and that became

1:32:49

our universe

1:32:50

our universe

1:32:52

was created

1:32:53

because empty space

1:32:55

was heated

1:32:56

to the Planck energy

1:32:57

and at that point

1:32:58

space itself

1:32:59

began to boil

1:33:00

and the boiling of space

1:33:02

created the universe

1:33:03

that's where the universe

1:33:05

itself

1:33:05

came from

1:33:06

is it possible

1:33:08

that human beings

1:33:09

or whatever

1:33:10

we're going to become

1:33:11

could eventually

1:33:12

someday

1:33:13

attain the type

1:33:14

of power

1:33:15

that's right

1:33:15

we've looked at that

1:33:16

in fact

1:33:17

there are people

1:33:17

friends of mine

1:33:18

at MIT

1:33:19

who have written papers

1:33:20

about what it would take

1:33:21

to become a god

1:33:22

we realized

1:33:24

that if you could attain

1:33:25

the Planck energy

1:33:26

in a box

1:33:27

let's say

1:33:28

somehow

1:33:28

a bubble would form

1:33:30

a gateway

1:33:31

to another universe

1:33:32

it would expand

1:33:33

it would expand rapidly

1:33:35

and you have to be

1:33:36

very careful

1:33:37

if it expands too rapidly

1:33:39

it has a force of

1:33:41

I think a 10 kiloton

1:33:42

atomic bomb

1:33:42

so you have to be

1:33:44

out of the way

1:33:45

when this thing explodes

1:33:46

but then it simply

1:33:48

peels off

1:33:49

and creates another universe

1:33:50

and then it disappears

1:33:51

like a balloon

1:33:53

like a piece of a balloon

1:33:54

that pinches off

1:33:55

if you're on the first part

1:33:57

of the balloon

1:33:57

you never see

1:33:58

the second part

1:33:59

of the balloon

1:33:59

the second part

1:34:00

of the balloon

1:34:00

has peeled off

1:34:01

to create a baby universe

1:34:03

wow

1:34:03

okay

1:34:04

so these are called

1:34:05

baby universes

1:34:05

and who's written

1:34:07

about these things

1:34:08

Stephen Hawking

1:34:09

Stephen Hawking

1:34:10

wrote about baby universes

1:34:12

that if you could

1:34:15

boil space

1:34:15

heat space up

1:34:16

to the Planck energy

1:34:17

space becomes unstable

1:34:19

bubbles form

1:34:20

and these bubbles

1:34:21

one of these bubbles

1:34:22

may just keep on expanding

1:34:24

to create another universe

1:34:26

we wouldn't have access

1:34:28

to this universe

1:34:28

no it would peel off

1:34:30

just like a balloon

1:34:31

the second part

1:34:32

of the balloon

1:34:32

peels off

1:34:33

from the first part

1:34:34

and the two separate

1:34:35

the two separate

1:34:37

the only way

1:34:38

to get reconnected

1:34:39

is through a wormhole

1:34:40

but that of course

1:34:41

is a whole other story

1:34:42

but that would be

1:34:43

a possibility

1:34:44

of recreating

1:34:45

a link between

1:34:46

our universe

1:34:46

and another universe

1:34:48

so we could

1:34:49

potentially create

1:34:50

one of these

1:34:51

mini universes

1:34:51

that's right

1:34:52

and this mini universe

1:34:53

would exist

1:34:54

in a completely

1:34:54

different place

1:34:55

that's right

1:34:55

so we've done

1:34:57

the calculation

1:34:58

and as I said

1:34:59

it could be

1:35:01

a little bit dangerous

1:35:02

you have to make sure

1:35:03

that the explosion

1:35:05

doesn't kill you

1:35:05

in the process

1:35:06

but yeah

1:35:07

this is what it would

1:35:08

take to create

1:35:09

a baby universe

1:35:10

we call this

1:35:11

the inflationary theory

1:35:12

because the other balloon

1:35:13

inflated rapidly

1:35:14

so this is part

1:35:16

of what is called

1:35:16

the inflationary universe

1:35:18

and believe it or not

1:35:19

this is the dominant

1:35:20

theory of Genesis

1:35:22

where did Genesis

1:35:24

come from

1:35:25

we think it came

1:35:25

from this balloon

1:35:27

that empty space

1:35:29

boiled

1:35:30

empty space

1:35:31

then created a pocket

1:35:32

that then expanded

1:35:33

and then peeled off

1:35:35

from our universe

1:35:35

this is called

1:35:37

the inflationary universe

1:35:38

theory

1:35:39

which is the dominant

1:35:40

theory in quantum

1:35:41

cosmology

1:35:42

have you ever

1:35:43

considered the possibility

1:35:46

that that is

1:35:47

ultimately how the universe

1:35:48

gets created

1:35:49

in the first place

1:35:49

that intelligent life forms

1:35:51

reach this capability

1:35:52

well we're not sure

1:35:54

about the intelligent

1:35:55

life form

1:35:56

but we think that

1:35:56

this is how our universe

1:35:57

got created

1:35:58

that our universe

1:35:59

was a bubble

1:36:01

floating with other bubbles

1:36:03

these other bubbles

1:36:04

went back into the vacuum

1:36:06

our bubble just kept on going

1:36:08

and became our universe

1:36:11

but what I'm saying is

1:36:13

imagine if that process

1:36:15

was initiated

1:36:17

by a super intelligent

1:36:18

life form

1:36:19

always

1:36:20

sort of like how a bee

1:36:21

makes a beehive

1:36:23

what if humans

1:36:24

make the universe

1:36:25

or whatever we become

1:36:26

makes the universe

1:36:27

that's right

1:36:28

we've done the calculation

1:36:29

actually

1:36:29

of what it would take

1:36:30

for a human

1:36:31

to then create

1:36:33

something like this

1:36:34

step one is

1:36:35

you have to have power

1:36:36

on the scale

1:36:37

of the Planck energy

1:36:38

and the Planck energy

1:36:40

is the biggest number

1:36:41

that you can possibly imagine

1:36:43

but it is the number

1:36:44

at which space

1:36:45

becomes unstable

1:36:46

and that's the point

1:36:48

at which this bubble

1:36:49

then starts to expand

1:36:50

so you've played around

1:36:52

with these ideas

1:36:52

that's right

1:36:53

they're published

1:36:53

they're published

1:36:54

in Physical Review magazine

1:36:55

this idea that

1:36:59

we'll stay static

1:37:01

that we are what we are

1:37:02

right now

1:37:03

and that's just what humans are

1:37:05

and that's just how it is

1:37:06

that seems like that's

1:37:09

whatever we are right now

1:37:11

it seems like this is real temporary

1:37:12

and I think we're probably

1:37:13

the last of our species

1:37:15

to experience life

1:37:18

not being

1:37:19

some sort of a cyborg

1:37:21

possible

1:37:23

I mean given the fact

1:37:24

that throughout history

1:37:25

we've played with our appearance

1:37:27

we've played with our bodies

1:37:28

makeup

1:37:29

and tattoos

1:37:31

perfumes

1:37:32

we've tried to alter

1:37:33

ourselves constantly

1:37:35

because we want to increase

1:37:37

our reproductive value

1:37:39

so we get a better maid

1:37:40

a better wife

1:37:41

a better husband

1:37:42

so we try to build up

1:37:44

our muscles

1:37:44

and wear makeup

1:37:46

and so on and so forth

1:37:46

we've done this forever

1:37:48

the next step

1:37:49

is to alter

1:37:50

not just our tattoos

1:37:52

but to actually alter

1:37:54

who we are

1:37:55

that's the next step

1:37:56

and that's coming I think

1:37:58

because we're going to want

1:38:00

to enhance ourselves

1:38:01

yeah

1:38:01

well what I worry

1:38:03

is that one day

1:38:04

we're going to realize

1:38:05

that a lot of our problems

1:38:06

stem from being human

1:38:08

a lot of our problems

1:38:09

stem from our biological needs

1:38:11

and if you look at

1:38:12

these iconic images

1:38:14

of aliens

1:38:15

they're always genderless

1:38:16

like these weird

1:38:18

spindly things

1:38:20

that have no use

1:38:20

for their muscles

1:38:22

other than to just

1:38:22

move them around

1:38:23

that's what I really worry about

1:38:25

I really worry that

1:38:26

we're going to realize

1:38:27

like the only way

1:38:27

to really achieve

1:38:28

this type 2

1:38:30

type 3 civilization

1:38:31

is we have to stop

1:38:32

being human

1:38:33

I hope not

1:38:35

but doesn't it seem like

1:38:38

what we have

1:38:40

and what we love

1:38:40

about people

1:38:41

what we love about people

1:38:42

emotions

1:38:43

and creativity

1:38:44

and love

1:38:45

and romance

1:38:46

and all those great things

1:38:47

and fun and excitement

1:38:48

those are all

1:38:50

just biological stuff

1:38:51

like you

1:38:52

really kind of gets

1:38:54

in the way of progress

1:38:55

in some ways

1:38:55

but what's wrong

1:38:56

with that

1:38:57

what's wrong

1:38:57

with being biological

1:38:58

what's wrong

1:38:58

with feeling joy

1:39:00

and emotions

1:39:00

nothing but it can

1:39:01

it can conflict you

1:39:03

and it can get in the way

1:39:03

of the greater work

1:39:04

if you're working on

1:39:05

plunk energy

1:39:06

and you're trying to create

1:39:07

little mini universes

1:39:08

you have no time

1:39:09

to be horny

1:39:10

you have no time

1:39:11

to be sad

1:39:11

you have no

1:39:12

if all that can be

1:39:13

eliminated

1:39:14

if we have all the problems

1:39:15

that people have today

1:39:15

whether it's depression

1:39:16

or anxiety

1:39:17

and if all that

1:39:18

can be eliminated

1:39:19

forever

1:39:20

we never have to worry

1:39:21

about negative emotions

1:39:22

anymore

1:39:22

you can be productive

1:39:23

you can interact

1:39:24

with people

1:39:25

telepathically

1:39:27

but I think you'd also

1:39:28

be sterile too

1:39:29

probably

1:39:30

if there's no emotion

1:39:31

to excite you

1:39:33

to want to do something

1:39:34

to want to do something great

1:39:36

to do something

1:39:37

that makes a difference

1:39:38

that takes a lot of energy

1:39:40

yes

1:39:40

takes a lot of

1:39:41

mental power

1:39:42

takes a lot of emotional

1:39:43

commitment

1:39:44

and that's what keeps

1:39:45

the world going

1:39:46

there's always somebody

1:39:47

out there

1:39:47

that wants to be better

1:39:49

to create a better world

1:39:50

to open up new pathways

1:39:51

and that requires

1:39:53

a commitment

1:39:54

a commitment

1:39:55

of energy

1:39:55

on that person's

1:39:57

life

1:39:58

and that's not easy

1:39:59

but isn't that just

1:40:00

a drive

1:40:01

that's inherent

1:40:02

to human beings

1:40:03

that causes us

1:40:04

to seek

1:40:05

technological innovation

1:40:06

we're always pushing

1:40:08

the boundaries

1:40:09

of everything

1:40:09

we're always trying

1:40:10

to get better

1:40:10

at everything

1:40:11

whatever we do

1:40:12

but isn't that

1:40:13

like the ultimate expression

1:40:14

of that

1:40:14

is technological innovation

1:40:16

and the ultimate

1:40:17

technological innovation

1:40:18

would probably

1:40:20

bypass

1:40:21

all of our

1:40:23

biological shortcomings

1:40:24

why

1:40:26

but sometimes

1:40:27

our biological shortcomings

1:40:28

is the reason

1:40:29

why we like to live

1:40:30

sure

1:40:31

but if you have

1:40:31

like a jealous deity

1:40:33

that seems silly

1:40:34

you know

1:40:35

if you have a god

1:40:36

that gets horny

1:40:37

all the time

1:40:38

and is jealous

1:40:39

like a Greek god

1:40:40

yeah

1:40:41

exactly

1:40:41

or is greedy

1:40:42

or is

1:40:43

you know

1:40:44

well

1:40:46

I would hope

1:40:47

that we keep

1:40:47

our basic

1:40:48

foundational

1:40:49

structure

1:40:50

of wants

1:40:52

and needs

1:40:52

intact

1:40:53

but the rough edges

1:40:54

I would hope

1:40:55

that the rough edges

1:40:56

could be ironed out

1:40:57

collectively

1:40:58

and I think

1:40:59

in a democracy

1:41:00

that's one way

1:41:01

to iron out

1:41:02

the deficiencies

1:41:03

within human behavior

1:41:04

human behavior

1:41:05

is a byproduct

1:41:06

of evolution

1:41:07

evolution

1:41:08

was survival

1:41:09

of the fittest

1:41:09

so it meant

1:41:11

that we had

1:41:11

to become

1:41:12

at some point

1:41:13

cruel

1:41:14

to other people

1:41:14

so that's part

1:41:16

of our history

1:41:17

but it didn't have

1:41:19

to be that way

1:41:20

when we have technology

1:41:21

with the coming

1:41:22

of technology

1:41:23

there's no reason

1:41:24

to have to go to war

1:41:26

to have to kill people

1:41:28

and to dominate

1:41:29

other people

1:41:30

there's no purpose

1:41:31

of that

1:41:31

unless you do it

1:41:33

to control the technology

1:41:34

unless you're the person

1:41:35

that came up

1:41:36

with the quantum computer

1:41:36

first

1:41:37

and you realize

1:41:38

the only way

1:41:38

I'm going to be able

1:41:39

to dominate

1:41:40

is if I

1:41:41

enslave these people

1:41:42

now

1:41:42

I've got to move

1:41:43

on it now

1:41:44

well that's a problem

1:41:44

I mean there is a race

1:41:46

to create the quantum computer

1:41:47

we are in a race

1:41:48

the Chinese

1:41:49

IBM

1:41:50

Google

1:41:51

Microsoft

1:41:52

they're all in the game

1:41:53

they've all thrown the dice

1:41:54

and they say

1:41:55

this is the way to go

1:41:56

and so

1:41:57

there's going to be competition

1:41:58

I'm sure

1:41:59

and there's going to be

1:42:00

you know

1:42:01

blood on the floor

1:42:02

when it comes down

1:42:03

to marketing these things

1:42:05

and beating out

1:42:06

the competition

1:42:06

and giving the best price

1:42:09

quantum computer

1:42:10

to the average consumer

1:42:11

yeah there's going to be

1:42:13

competition involved

1:42:14

I think socially

1:42:15

the internet has brought

1:42:17

about great change

1:42:18

and it's changed

1:42:19

the way humans

1:42:20

interact with each other

1:42:20

we already talked about

1:42:21

how we're sharing culture

1:42:22

do you think

1:42:23

that something

1:42:24

like quantum computing

1:42:25

could also have

1:42:27

maybe

1:42:28

like a secondary

1:42:29

sort of a result

1:42:32

where

1:42:33

it elevates

1:42:34

human consciousness

1:42:35

as well

1:42:36

because it's

1:42:38

it's computational power

1:42:39

and it's ability

1:42:40

to change reality

1:42:41

as we know it

1:42:42

is so extreme

1:42:43

that all of our

1:42:45

petty nonsense

1:42:46

that we have

1:42:47

with various civilizations

1:42:49

warring against each other

1:42:50

and all that stuff

1:42:51

will seem

1:42:52

absolutely ridiculous

1:42:53

given the ability

1:42:55

that we now have

1:42:57

technologically

1:42:57

and that we won't be

1:42:59

existing in this feast

1:42:59

or famine world

1:43:00

well you know

1:43:02

the world we live in

1:43:03

is digital

1:43:03

the world of the future

1:43:05

will be quantum

1:43:07

and neural

1:43:07

that is

1:43:09

we're going to have

1:43:09

a combination

1:43:10

of quantum computers

1:43:11

and neural computers

1:43:13

and

1:43:14

but digital computers

1:43:15

will be left in the dust

1:43:17

we're not going to

1:43:18

compute on zeros

1:43:18

and ones

1:43:19

zeros and ones

1:43:20

anymore

1:43:20

we're going to

1:43:21

compute on neurons

1:43:22

and we're going to

1:43:23

compute on quantum atoms

1:43:26

and at that point

1:43:27

they may merge

1:43:28

at that point

1:43:29

the brain may be

1:43:30

connected to a quantum

1:43:31

computer

1:43:32

enhancing our ability

1:43:34

to do calculations

1:43:35

for example

1:43:35

and do you think

1:43:36

that could have

1:43:37

a secondary effect

1:43:38

on civilization

1:43:39

like I think

1:43:40

I do think

1:43:41

as many problems

1:43:42

as we have

1:43:43

with the internet

1:43:43

I think

1:43:44

it's changed

1:43:45

the world

1:43:45

for the better

1:43:46

I really do

1:43:47

it's certainly

1:43:47

changed our

1:43:48

understanding of things

1:43:49

our access to information

1:43:50

our ability to discern

1:43:52

what is and isn't

1:43:53

going on in the world

1:43:54

if something

1:43:56

along the lines

1:43:57

of quantum computing

1:43:58

that's

1:43:58

I mean

1:43:59

what

1:44:00

what kind of calculation

1:44:02

like how much

1:44:03

more powerful

1:44:03

is it

1:44:04

than the greatest

1:44:04

computer we have

1:44:05

currently

1:44:05

a few million times

1:44:08

like imagine that

1:44:09

I mean

1:44:10

and in application

1:44:11

if that gets used

1:44:13

by people

1:44:13

that could

1:44:14

I mean

1:44:15

that could be

1:44:16

the thing

1:44:16

that gets us

1:44:17

out of this

1:44:17

theoretically

1:44:18

yeah we're talking

1:44:19

about virtual

1:44:20

chemistry

1:44:21

virtual biology

1:44:22

things in the

1:44:24

memory of a computer

1:44:25

that we cannot

1:44:26

model with

1:44:27

zeros and ones

1:44:28

zeros and ones

1:44:29

with zeros and ones

1:44:30

you cannot model

1:44:31

a disease

1:44:32

for example

1:44:33

no way

1:44:33

with quantum computers

1:44:35

that's why we build them

1:44:36

precisely so that

1:44:37

we can model

1:44:38

molecules

1:44:38

of germs

1:44:40

and understand

1:44:41

how they operate

1:44:42

so yeah

1:44:43

we're talking about

1:44:43

a whole new era

1:44:44

now however

1:44:45

I think the main

1:44:46

impact of the internet

1:44:48

has been to enforce

1:44:49

democracy

1:44:50

that it is a democratic

1:44:52

force

1:44:53

because people can be

1:44:54

educated

1:44:55

no matter how poor

1:44:56

no matter where they are

1:44:58

they can be empowered

1:44:59

power derives from knowledge

1:45:02

yeah

1:45:02

and that's what the internet

1:45:03

is all about

1:45:04

now of course

1:45:05

there's a downside to it

1:45:06

but in the main

1:45:07

I think it's positive

1:45:08

and I think quantum computers

1:45:10

will accelerate

1:45:10

that whole process

1:45:12

I think so too

1:45:14

and I wonder

1:45:15

if it will lead us

1:45:17

to a better world

1:45:19

if it will lead us

1:45:20

to a better understanding

1:45:21

of each other

1:45:21

much better understanding

1:45:24

of how not

1:45:25

to destroy the world

1:45:26

in terms of

1:45:27

pollute the ocean

1:45:28

and solutions

1:45:29

for cleaning up

1:45:30

the plastic

1:45:31

and solutions

1:45:32

for whatever issues

1:45:33

we might have

1:45:34

with power generation

1:45:36

when we can

1:45:38

boil that down

1:45:39

with a quantum computer

1:45:40

and figure out

1:45:41

much more efficient

1:45:43

cleaner ways

1:45:44

to do things

1:45:44

all the problems

1:45:46

that we have

1:45:47

in modern society

1:45:48

with poverty

1:45:49

with disenfranchised

1:45:51

communities

1:45:52

and crime

1:45:52

all those things

1:45:54

seem like

1:45:55

they could be solved

1:45:56

well in principle

1:45:58

yes

1:45:58

that's the hope

1:45:59

in principle

1:45:59

that's the best

1:46:00

case scenario

1:46:00

this will give

1:46:01

empowerment

1:46:02

to the powerless

1:46:03

this will create

1:46:04

more goods

1:46:05

and services

1:46:05

for humanity

1:46:07

to raise the level

1:46:08

of standard of living

1:46:09

of even the poorest nations

1:46:11

and to be able

1:46:12

to understand

1:46:13

the nature of disease

1:46:14

so that we can live

1:46:15

longer and more

1:46:16

fruitful lives

1:46:17

and in some sense

1:46:18

become immortal

1:46:19

or at least

1:46:20

near immortality

1:46:21

by being able

1:46:22

to conquer

1:46:23

incurable diseases

1:46:24

this is all

1:46:25

within the possibilities

1:46:26

of quantum computers

1:46:27

but for me

1:46:28

one of the biggest impacts

1:46:30

is the dissemination

1:46:31

of knowledge

1:46:32

to give empowerment

1:46:33

to the powerless

1:46:34

so that we can raise

1:46:37

the standard of living

1:46:38

of the entire human race

1:46:39

what is the worst case scenario

1:46:42

worst case scenario

1:46:43

is that dictatorships

1:46:45

will try to

1:46:46

get this technology

1:46:48

to break other people's codes

1:46:50

to shatter

1:46:52

the connections

1:46:53

that exist

1:46:54

between different nations

1:46:55

and cultures

1:46:56

to increase divisions

1:46:58

by you know

1:46:58

chat bots

1:47:00

they can create nonsense

1:47:01

they can create

1:47:02

all sorts of propaganda

1:47:03

because they just

1:47:04

rearrange what already exists

1:47:06

a dictator

1:47:07

could then write

1:47:08

all sorts of different

1:47:09

kinds of racist

1:47:10

and sexist nonsense

1:47:11

and have it spread

1:47:13

throughout the internet

1:47:14

very rapidly

1:47:14

so that's the problem

1:47:16

so it's really important

1:47:19

as to who gets it first

1:47:20

that's right

1:47:21

and laws have to be passed

1:47:22

so that we rein in

1:47:24

some of these things

1:47:25

democracy arises

1:47:27

with incorrect

1:47:28

with conflict

1:47:29

with incorrect ideas

1:47:30

that's where correct ideas

1:47:32

come from

1:47:32

from interplay

1:47:33

with incorrect ideas

1:47:35

but that could be ruined

1:47:36

if people try to seize

1:47:38

control of chat bots

1:47:40

and the internet

1:47:40

to flood the internet

1:47:42

with nonsense

1:47:43

who do you think

1:47:44

is going to win this?

1:47:45

are you close to this?

1:47:46

are you following?

1:47:47

or do we even know

1:47:49

what these other countries

1:47:51

right now IBM

1:47:51

has the lead

1:47:52

but it's like a horse race

1:47:53

the gate has opened

1:47:56

all the horses

1:47:57

are lined up

1:47:58

and now they're taking off

1:47:59

the Chinese are leading

1:48:00

in optical quantum computers

1:48:03

using light beams

1:48:04

to compute

1:48:06

and IBM is leading

1:48:08

in terms of using

1:48:09

electrical circuits

1:48:10

as the basis

1:48:11

of quantum computers

1:48:12

but it changes

1:48:14

you know

1:48:14

every few months

1:48:15

there are different advances

1:48:17

being made

1:48:17

all the time

1:48:18

this is moving

1:48:19

exponentially fast

1:48:20

and how do we know

1:48:23

where China's at?

1:48:24

do we have an accurate

1:48:25

understanding

1:48:26

of their ability?

1:48:27

well they publish

1:48:27

their results

1:48:28

and we can duplicate

1:48:28

some of what they do

1:48:30

they're taking

1:48:31

a different tact

1:48:32

they're taking

1:48:33

the tact of using

1:48:34

light beams

1:48:35

calculating on light beams

1:48:37

rather than electricity

1:48:38

we're using electricity

1:48:39

and there's some advantages

1:48:42

and disadvantages

1:48:43

of both approaches

1:48:44

that's fascinating

1:48:46

so we could come up

1:48:46

with potentially

1:48:47

two parallel solutions

1:48:49

and maybe even more

1:48:51

other groups

1:48:52

anything quantum mechanical

1:48:54

could in principle

1:48:55

be used to build

1:48:56

a quantum computer

1:48:56

and anything you see

1:48:58

around you

1:48:58

plants, animals

1:48:59

we all are byproducts

1:49:01

of the quantum principle

1:49:02

and so there are many ways

1:49:04

of building a quantum computer

1:49:05

but those are the leading ones

1:49:07

using electrical circuits

1:49:08

and using light beams

1:49:10

how exciting this must be

1:49:12

for you

1:49:12

to have been that 17 year old boy

1:49:14

creating that particle accelerator

1:49:16

in your basement

1:49:17

and now being at the verge

1:49:20

of what is probably

1:49:21

one of the biggest changes

1:49:23

or the biggest change

1:49:25

the human race

1:49:25

has ever experienced

1:49:26

and you're alive to witness it

1:49:28

that's right

1:49:29

this

1:49:29

if I were to choose

1:49:30

any decade

1:49:31

or phase of history

1:49:32

to be born in

1:49:34

this would be it

1:49:36

because we're talking

1:49:37

about the fact

1:49:38

that you know

1:49:38

as children

1:49:39

it was black and white TV

1:49:41

and vacuum tubes

1:49:42

that exploded

1:49:43

and it was a lot

1:49:44

of nonsense back then

1:49:45

now we're putting

1:49:47

people on the moon

1:49:48

regularly

1:49:49

every year

1:49:50

we're going to send

1:49:51

people to the moon

1:49:51

and we're talking

1:49:53

about unlocking

1:49:54

the secrets

1:49:55

of life itself

1:49:56

through DNA

1:49:57

so this is a great time

1:49:59

to be alive

1:50:00

it's a very amazing

1:50:02

time for me

1:50:03

and how old

1:50:04

I'm 55

1:50:05

how old are you

1:50:06

I just turned 76

1:50:07

wow you look great

1:50:08

you really do

1:50:09

you look great

1:50:10

for 76

1:50:11

so you're 21 years

1:50:12

older than me

1:50:13

so you were alive

1:50:14

long before the internet

1:50:16

and you grew up

1:50:17

before the internet

1:50:18

I was about 27 years old

1:50:21

the first time

1:50:22

I got on the internet

1:50:22

and I'm so lucky

1:50:24

I feel so lucky

1:50:25

to have grown up

1:50:26

without it

1:50:27

and to realize

1:50:28

because I'm seeing

1:50:29

it happen

1:50:30

what an immense

1:50:31

change it is

1:50:32

whereas my children

1:50:34

are growing up

1:50:35

having always been

1:50:36

on the internet

1:50:37

it's just normal

1:50:37

to them

1:50:38

to communicate

1:50:39

through cell phones

1:50:40

to be able to get

1:50:40

on social media

1:50:41

that is a normal

1:50:42

part of life

1:50:43

for everyone today

1:50:44

but I and you

1:50:46

can remember

1:50:47

and we can really

1:50:48

truly appreciate

1:50:49

I think

1:50:50

how great a change

1:50:51

this is

1:50:51

yeah this is one

1:50:53

of the greatest

1:50:53

changes in human history

1:50:54

if you were to choose

1:50:55

an era of time

1:50:57

to be born

1:50:57

this would be it

1:50:59

do you ever put

1:51:01

much thought

1:51:02

into simulation theory

1:51:03

you mean like

1:51:04

the matrix

1:51:05

well the idea

1:51:07

that one day

1:51:08

there will be

1:51:10

whether it's

1:51:12

through quantum computing

1:51:13

or some other

1:51:13

unknown

1:51:14

unforeseen technology

1:51:16

that creates

1:51:17

a reality

1:51:18

an artificial reality

1:51:20

that's indiscernible

1:51:21

from this reality

1:51:22

from the physical reality

1:51:23

that we believe

1:51:24

we currently experience

1:51:25

and if that's true

1:51:27

how do we know

1:51:28

we're not in it already

1:51:29

well to have

1:51:31

a perfect replication

1:51:32

of reality

1:51:33

is impossible

1:51:34

take a look

1:51:36

at the molecules

1:51:37

in this room

1:51:37

how many molecules

1:51:39

are there

1:51:39

about maybe

1:51:40

10 to the 26th power

1:51:42

one with 26 zeros

1:51:44

after it

1:51:45

and to model

1:51:47

that many atoms

1:51:48

with a digital computer

1:51:49

would be impossible

1:51:51

so in other words

1:51:53

the smallest object

1:51:54

that can model

1:51:55

this room

1:51:56

is the room itself

1:51:58

the smallest computer

1:52:00

that can model air

1:52:01

is the computer itself

1:52:03

there's no

1:52:04

there's nothing smaller

1:52:05

than this room

1:52:06

that can model itself

1:52:07

now

1:52:08

once you go to

1:52:09

quantum computers

1:52:10

it gets worse

1:52:11

because the quantum computer

1:52:12

computes in parallel universes

1:52:14

do not just one universe

1:52:16

but many universes

1:52:17

simultaneously

1:52:18

and so

1:52:20

a quantum computer

1:52:21

could model

1:52:22

some of the room

1:52:22

some of the atoms

1:52:23

in this room

1:52:24

but not all of them

1:52:25

now that means

1:52:26

a perfect representation

1:52:28

of reality

1:52:28

is impossible

1:52:29

but an approximate

1:52:31

simulation

1:52:32

may be possible

1:52:33

but a perfect

1:52:34

simulation

1:52:34

is impossible

1:52:35

but if we're talking

1:52:37

about technology

1:52:38

as we currently

1:52:39

understand it today

1:52:40

in comparison

1:52:41

to technology

1:52:42

as they had available

1:52:43

to them

1:52:44

a thousand years ago

1:52:45

what we can do now

1:52:46

is insane

1:52:46

and if you're talking

1:52:48

about quantum computing

1:52:49

which is almost

1:52:50

available today

1:52:51

and then you look

1:52:52

a thousand years

1:52:53

from now

1:52:54

couldn't you

1:52:55

potentially imagine

1:52:56

there could be

1:52:57

a world

1:52:58

where there's

1:52:58

technology sufficient

1:52:59

to do what we're

1:53:01

talking about

1:53:01

to create a version

1:53:03

of reality

1:53:03

well if you saw

1:53:05

the movie

1:53:05

we're all in pods

1:53:07

and we're all connected

1:53:08

to a computer

1:53:09

that simulates

1:53:10

the matrix

1:53:11

as long as you're

1:53:12

simulating a piece

1:53:13

of the matrix

1:53:13

not the whole thing

1:53:16

but as you walk

1:53:17

from place to place

1:53:18

the computer

1:53:19

reassembles

1:53:20

a replication

1:53:20

of that place

1:53:21

that may be possible

1:53:22

but not

1:53:24

the whole earth

1:53:25

with the atmosphere

1:53:26

the weather

1:53:27

and so on

1:53:28

but if you walk

1:53:30

from place to place

1:53:31

if that little pocket

1:53:32

if that little pocket

1:53:33

of atoms

1:53:34

is simulated

1:53:34

then yeah

1:53:35

that may be possible

1:53:36

but what about

1:53:37

in the future

1:53:38

when if you extrapolate

1:53:40

like

1:53:40

you know

1:53:41

you're not going to use

1:53:42

what is it

1:53:42

Moore's law

1:53:43

Moore's law

1:53:44

right

1:53:44

that calculates

1:53:45

how much greater

1:53:46

technology

1:53:47

is every year

1:53:49

doubles every 18 months

1:53:50

what if we're

1:53:51

when you're talking

1:53:52

about quantum computing

1:53:53

what if they use that

1:53:55

to come up with something

1:53:56

even superior to that

1:53:57

a thousand years from now

1:53:58

could you potentially

1:54:00

see a future

1:54:01

where some form of life

1:54:03

could create a universe

1:54:04

well

1:54:05

but not on atoms

1:54:06

maybe subatomic particles

1:54:08

a universe of subatomic particles

1:54:11

yeah

1:54:11

but most subatomic particles

1:54:13

are unstable

1:54:13

the electron is stable

1:54:15

the proton is unstable

1:54:16

but if you can find a way

1:54:17

to stabilize some of them

1:54:18

then it may be possible

1:54:20

to increase

1:54:21

the calculational ability

1:54:22

and then create

1:54:24

a super quantum computer

1:54:26

but I'm speculating

1:54:28

at that point

1:54:28

how much time

1:54:30

do you spend

1:54:30

thinking about

1:54:31

do you have to go soon

1:54:32

do you have a flight

1:54:33

yeah

1:54:34

yeah

1:54:34

when do you have to leave

1:54:35

6.30 or so

1:54:37

oh you're fine

1:54:37

it's not even 3 o'clock yet

1:54:39

oh I'm sorry

1:54:40

I'm sorry

1:54:41

I'm looking at New York time

1:54:42

oh

1:54:42

sorry about that

1:54:44

no worries

1:54:44

no worries

1:54:45

okay yeah

1:54:45

we're pretty close

1:54:46

to the usual too

1:54:47

where was I

1:54:48

what was I saying

1:54:48

oh I was saying

1:54:51

that if you're looking

1:54:52

at the calculations

1:54:54

that we can make right now

1:54:55

and just the amazing

1:54:58

progress we've made

1:54:59

it seems like

1:55:00

if you keep going

1:55:01

you're going to

1:55:02

it doesn't seem like

1:55:03

it's ever going to stop

1:55:04

right

1:55:05

so the potential

1:55:06

for power

1:55:08

the potential

1:55:09

for having an understanding

1:55:10

and the ability

1:55:11

to change

1:55:12

and manipulate

1:55:13

the universe itself

1:55:14

that seems like

1:55:15

it's going to

1:55:16

eventually be on the table

1:55:17

yeah I've thought

1:55:19

about that

1:55:19

I mean the question

1:55:20

is at what point

1:55:21

does it stop

1:55:22

we thought it stopped

1:55:23

at the transistor

1:55:24

but now

1:55:25

oh that's funny

1:55:25

yeah right

1:55:26

but now we have

1:55:27

a billion of them

1:55:28

on a chip

1:55:29

the size of your fingernail

1:55:30

right

1:55:30

a billion of them

1:55:31

so nope

1:55:32

that wasn't a limit

1:55:32

but now we're reaching

1:55:34

the atomic limit

1:55:35

so why not

1:55:36

compute on atoms

1:55:37

but then what's

1:55:38

smaller than an atom

1:55:39

what's smaller than an atom

1:55:41

is a nucleus

1:55:41

the nucleus is smaller

1:55:44

than an atom

1:55:44

nucleus is 10 to the minus

1:55:45

13 centimeters

1:55:46

the atom is about

1:55:47

10 to the minus

1:55:48

8 centimeters

1:55:49

so the nucleus

1:55:50

is a lot smaller

1:55:51

so these are nuclear

1:55:52

these are nuclear

1:55:53

devices that we're

1:55:55

computing on

1:55:56

that may be possible

1:55:57

so an advanced

1:55:59

civilization may have

1:56:00

a not an atomic

1:56:01

computer

1:56:02

but a nuclear computer

1:56:04

and you have to be

1:56:08

careful because of

1:56:09

course

1:56:09

you're dealing

1:56:09

with nuclear fire

1:56:10

at that point

1:56:11

there's a lot of

1:56:12

energy packed

1:56:12

in that nucleus

1:56:13

as you know

1:56:14

from looking at

1:56:14

Hiroshima

1:56:15

and Nagasaki

1:56:16

if I was an alien

1:56:17

I was going to

1:56:18

come down

1:56:18

and talk to somebody

1:56:19

you'd probably

1:56:19

be the first guy

1:56:20

I'd talk to

1:56:20

you'd be one of them

1:56:22

mm-hmm

1:56:23

I

1:56:25

how much time

1:56:26

do you spend

1:56:27

wondering

1:56:27

whether or not

1:56:28

these things

1:56:29

that they keep

1:56:30

seeing in the sky

1:56:30

these things

1:56:31

the Pentagon reports

1:56:32

on and all these

1:56:33

people are studying

1:56:34

how much time

1:56:35

do you spend

1:56:35

thinking about that

1:56:36

well I think

1:56:37

about it

1:56:37

because let's

1:56:39

say there's

1:56:39

a small chance

1:56:40

a very very small

1:56:41

chance that they

1:56:41

are extraterrestrial

1:56:42

that could change

1:56:44

world history

1:56:44

that could change

1:56:45

everything

1:56:46

everything we know

1:56:47

about the universe

1:56:47

could be altered

1:56:48

instantly

1:56:49

if we have

1:56:50

some solid proof

1:56:51

and that's why

1:56:52

I tell people

1:56:53

that if you've ever

1:56:53

been kidnapped

1:56:54

by a flying saucer

1:56:55

for God's sake

1:56:57

steal something

1:56:57

steal something

1:56:59

there's no law

1:57:00

against stealing

1:57:01

from an extraterrestrial

1:57:02

civilization

1:57:03

no law

1:57:04

whatsoever

1:57:04

and you know

1:57:06

you'll have

1:57:07

bragging rights

1:57:07

and that'll settle

1:57:09

the debate

1:57:09

right there

1:57:10

an alien chip

1:57:11

an alien hammer

1:57:12

an alien pencil

1:57:14

that would just

1:57:15

end the debate

1:57:15

right there

1:57:16

well supposedly

1:57:18

depending on

1:57:19

whose story

1:57:19

you hear

1:57:20

supposedly the government

1:57:21

is in possession

1:57:22

of things

1:57:22

along those lines

1:57:24

well yes or no

1:57:25

I mean

1:57:26

I believe in data

1:57:28

data that leads

1:57:29

to a definitive

1:57:30

yes or no

1:57:31

and here we have

1:57:32

no data

1:57:33

about secret documents

1:57:34

held by the military

1:57:36

or secret objects

1:57:37

yeah maybe

1:57:38

maybe not

1:57:39

but the proof

1:57:40

is in the pudding

1:57:40

we have to see it

1:57:42

we have to analyze it

1:57:43

before then

1:57:44

it's just hearsay

1:57:45

and speculation

1:57:46

could you understand

1:57:47

though how a government

1:57:48

if they were

1:57:49

in possession

1:57:49

of something like that

1:57:50

would want to keep it secret

1:57:51

because the technology

1:57:53

is so superior

1:57:54

to anything that we have

1:57:55

just like how we're

1:57:56

in this sort of

1:57:57

quantum computer race

1:57:57

with China

1:57:58

and they have a different

1:57:59

method than we do

1:57:59

what if they have

1:58:00

a different method

1:58:00

of back engineering

1:58:01

these things

1:58:02

well that's conceivable

1:58:04

it's a theory

1:58:05

but there's no hard

1:58:07

evidence either way

1:58:08

some people say

1:58:09

that the fact

1:58:10

that we have

1:58:10

the microchip

1:58:11

and the rocket ship

1:58:12

means that we stole

1:58:13

that technology

1:58:14

from the aliens

1:58:14

well maybe

1:58:17

but you realize

1:58:18

that if you're a scientist

1:58:19

and you've been

1:58:19

following these developments

1:58:21

you know all the dead ends

1:58:23

you know all the mistakes

1:58:24

that were made

1:58:25

yeah

1:58:25

and then you realize

1:58:26

it was a miracle

1:58:27

that we came up

1:58:28

with these things

1:58:28

it wasn't given to us

1:58:30

it was a byproduct

1:58:31

of trial and error

1:58:33

and whole careers

1:58:34

that went into

1:58:35

creating the microchip

1:58:36

and the wonders

1:58:38

of modern technology

1:58:39

that we see today

1:58:39

and there's a vast paper trail

1:58:41

yeah

1:58:41

there's a huge paper trail

1:58:42

right

1:58:43

so I'm not saying

1:58:44

that they're wrong

1:58:45

I'm just saying

1:58:45

it's not provable

1:58:46

what about the idea

1:58:48

that human beings

1:58:48

that human beings

1:58:48

are a product

1:58:49

of accelerated evolution

1:58:51

that's the most fascinating

1:58:52

UFO theory

1:58:53

accelerated evolution

1:58:55

from what to what

1:58:56

that we are the product

1:58:58

of the mixing

1:58:59

of genes

1:59:00

of some sort of an alien race

1:59:01

and lower primates

1:59:03

well it's always great

1:59:04

to think that we're

1:59:05

somehow noble

1:59:06

and somehow beyond

1:59:07

the other animals

1:59:08

and that we're great

1:59:09

but you know

1:59:11

the proof is in the pudding

1:59:12

if there's no

1:59:13

looking at our DNA

1:59:15

we realize that

1:59:17

the DNA difference

1:59:18

between us

1:59:19

and a chimpanzee

1:59:20

was A

1:59:21

the expansion

1:59:22

of the brain

1:59:23

B

1:59:24

the dexterity

1:59:25

of the fingers

1:59:26

and the vocal cords

1:59:28

so these are

1:59:29

the three things

1:59:30

that really stand out

1:59:31

when you look at

1:59:32

chimp genes

1:59:33

and then human genes

1:59:34

and then you realize

1:59:36

that well that's why

1:59:36

we became intelligent

1:59:37

we can vocalize

1:59:39

we can share knowledge

1:59:40

from generation

1:59:41

to generation

1:59:41

we have a posable thumb

1:59:44

with fingers

1:59:44

much more delicate

1:59:45

than the fingers

1:59:46

of a monkey

1:59:47

and we have eyes

1:59:50

eyes that are stereo

1:59:52

so that we can judge

1:59:53

distance to the prey

1:59:54

so looking at it

1:59:56

genetically

1:59:57

we realize that

1:59:57

only three clusters

1:59:58

of genes

1:59:59

created us

2:00:00

so it's hard to believe

2:00:02

that mating with an alien

2:00:03

could have done that

2:00:04

well I'm not saying mating

2:00:06

I think what the idea is

2:00:08

and obviously

2:00:08

these are not credible ideas

2:00:10

this is just fantastic

2:00:11

conspiracy theories

2:00:12

and it's also

2:00:13

there's a lot of really

2:00:15

wild stuff

2:00:17

if you read

2:00:17

like Zachariah Sitchin's

2:00:19

work

2:00:19

he was a scholar

2:00:21

in ancient languages

2:00:22

that translated

2:00:23

the Sumerian text

2:00:24

and he believed

2:00:25

that the Sumerian text

2:00:26

was all telling

2:00:27

the story

2:00:27

about how humans

2:00:28

were a product

2:00:29

of accelerated evolution

2:00:30

well it's possible

2:00:32

but again it requires

2:00:34

one more step

2:00:36

of substantiation

2:00:37

by looking at the internet

2:00:39

you see that

2:00:41

there's a continuous line

2:00:42

that goes from us

2:00:43

to the chimpanzees

2:00:44

to the primates

2:00:45

and that a few genes

2:00:47

changed here

2:00:49

a few genes here

2:00:50

a few genes there

2:00:51

and bingo

2:00:52

you get a human being

2:00:53

there's also some puzzles though

2:00:54

like the doubling

2:00:55

of the human brain size

2:00:56

over a period

2:00:57

of two million years

2:00:58

yeah

2:00:58

that's a big puzzle

2:01:00

right

2:01:00

but apparently

2:01:01

just a small cluster

2:01:02

of genes

2:01:03

was responsible for that

2:01:04

because that's just

2:01:04

brain size

2:01:05

yeah

2:01:05

so to increase

2:01:07

the cranial size

2:01:08

it only took

2:01:09

one or two genes

2:01:10

to do that

2:01:11

now how the genes

2:01:13

then create the brain

2:01:14

of course

2:01:15

we still have yet

2:01:16

to work out

2:01:17

but as far as

2:01:18

the size of the brain

2:01:19

it only took a few genes

2:01:20

to expand the size

2:01:22

of the brain

2:01:22

what reason

2:01:25

would the Neanderthal

2:01:26

have a larger brain

2:01:27

than us

2:01:27

well a larger brain

2:01:30

does not necessarily

2:01:31

mean intelligence

2:01:32

right

2:01:32

because there are animals

2:01:34

which have bigger brains

2:01:35

than us

2:01:35

I think the porpoise

2:01:36

for example

2:01:36

has a very large brain

2:01:37

so size

2:01:39

is not everything

2:01:40

when it comes to

2:01:41

intelligence

2:01:43

I think what's more important

2:01:45

is the ability

2:01:45

to see the future

2:01:46

the ability to imagine

2:01:48

alternate worlds

2:01:49

that don't exist

2:01:50

that's what the

2:01:51

prefrontal cortex does

2:01:52

and that's what separates

2:01:53

us from the animals

2:01:54

animals do not have

2:01:56

a time machine

2:01:56

we have a time machine

2:01:58

in the front of our head

2:01:59

is it possible

2:02:00

that that's just

2:02:01

intelligence

2:02:01

as we're measuring it

2:02:03

in our ability

2:02:03

to manipulate our environment

2:02:04

and that maybe

2:02:05

the intelligence

2:02:06

that the dolphins

2:02:07

experience

2:02:07

because they do

2:02:08

have a cerebral cortex

2:02:09

that's 40% larger

2:02:11

than a human being

2:02:11

that maybe

2:02:12

what they're experiencing

2:02:13

is a different

2:02:14

kind of intelligence

2:02:15

maybe a communal

2:02:16

communal intelligence

2:02:17

maybe some sort

2:02:19

of shared telepathy

2:02:21

or something

2:02:21

that allows them

2:02:23

to communicate

2:02:23

in a way

2:02:24

that we're not capable

2:02:25

of

2:02:25

a different kind

2:02:26

of intelligence

2:02:27

right

2:02:27

but you know

2:02:28

my attitude

2:02:28

is that

2:02:29

what does intelligence

2:02:30

do

2:02:30

intelligence allows

2:02:32

us to create

2:02:32

a model

2:02:33

a model

2:02:34

of where we are

2:02:35

with regards

2:02:35

to the environment

2:02:36

other animals

2:02:38

danger

2:02:39

and so on

2:02:39

and so forth

2:02:39

and then the ability

2:02:41

to see the future

2:02:42

that to me

2:02:43

is intelligence

2:02:44

to understand

2:02:45

what you

2:02:46

what you're in

2:02:47

and then extrapolate

2:02:49

it into the future

2:02:50

that takes a lot

2:02:51

of brain power

2:02:51

animals can't do that

2:02:53

to create imaginary worlds

2:02:55

that don't exist

2:02:56

and then on an MRI scan

2:02:58

the people

2:02:59

scientists ask the question

2:03:00

if the brain sees the future

2:03:02

but the future doesn't exist

2:03:04

then how can a brain scan

2:03:06

show you the future

2:03:07

because it doesn't exist yet

2:03:08

when you brain scan

2:03:10

somebody thinking

2:03:11

about the future

2:03:12

they think about the past

2:03:14

they rework all the things

2:03:17

of the past

2:03:17

and they make a few changes

2:03:18

in the past

2:03:19

that's how they extrapolate

2:03:21

into the future

2:03:22

that's how we did it

2:03:23

animals don't do that

2:03:25

animals simply go by instinct

2:03:27

but what we do

2:03:29

is we take the past

2:03:31

modify the past

2:03:32

and then let it flow

2:03:33

into the future

2:03:34

well that's what's so fascinating

2:03:35

about giant leaps

2:03:37

in technology

2:03:37

is that they bypass

2:03:38

our imagination

2:03:39

and create

2:03:40

completely new possibilities

2:03:42

that we could have

2:03:42

never even dreamed

2:03:43

we were capable of

2:03:45

like what we're experiencing

2:03:46

right now

2:03:47

and if you go to Star Trek

2:03:48

they had to go

2:03:49

Kirk out over

2:03:50

they were basically

2:03:50

using walkie-talkies

2:03:51

right

2:03:52

they had never even

2:03:54

figured out cell phones yet

2:03:55

right

2:03:55

but what we're doing now

2:03:57

is almost inconceivable

2:03:58

and the future

2:03:59

when these things

2:04:01

do come to us

2:04:02

I mean

2:04:03

what are we looking at

2:04:05

I mean

2:04:05

what are we looking at

2:04:05

inside of our lifetime

2:04:07

right

2:04:07

well my attitude is

2:04:09

the smallest unit

2:04:10

of history

2:04:11

is the decade

2:04:13

and if you look at history

2:04:15

decade by decade

2:04:16

then you see the enormous progress

2:04:18

that we've made

2:04:19

but if you look at the history

2:04:20

year by year

2:04:22

it's chaotic

2:04:23

things go up

2:04:24

things go down

2:04:25

setbacks take place

2:04:26

and so on and so forth

2:04:27

but when you look at things

2:04:28

decade by decade

2:04:29

then you see that there is

2:04:31

a progression

2:04:32

there is a path

2:04:34

and the path is toward democracy

2:04:36

the path is toward empowerment

2:04:38

the path is toward creating

2:04:39

a middle class

2:04:40

these are the paths

2:04:42

that you can see

2:04:43

decade by decade

2:04:44

that you cannot see

2:04:45

year by year

2:04:46

and I think that is

2:04:48

a byproduct of technology

2:04:50

technology has made

2:04:52

a middle class possible

2:04:53

for example

2:04:54

yeah it really has

2:04:55

and technology is what

2:04:57

many people think

2:04:58

can raise up

2:04:59

some of the more

2:04:59

impoverished communities

2:05:00

and that part of the problem

2:05:03

is that they don't have

2:05:03

access to power

2:05:04

that they don't have access

2:05:05

to all the innovations

2:05:08

that we have

2:05:08

that make life safer

2:05:10

water cleaner

2:05:11

make it easier to live

2:05:13

and exist

2:05:14

and have more peace

2:05:15

and time

2:05:16

to develop new things

2:05:19

like we do here

2:05:20

yeah and I think

2:05:21

quantum computers

2:05:22

I think will accelerate

2:05:23

that whole process

2:05:24

because that's the name

2:05:25

of the game

2:05:25

technology just not

2:05:27

for technology's sake

2:05:28

just not to make profits

2:05:30

for the companies

2:05:30

of course that's also

2:05:32

one of the motivating factors

2:05:33

but to enrich the human race

2:05:35

to educate people

2:05:36

to empower people

2:05:37

and I think

2:05:38

this is what technology does

2:05:40

now AI of course

2:05:41

will take away jobs too

2:05:42

but it creates jobs

2:05:45

just as well

2:05:46

for example

2:05:47

the blacksmith

2:05:48

we don't have blacksmiths anymore

2:05:49

but we don't cry about it

2:05:51

because these blacksmiths

2:05:52

became automobile workers

2:05:53

and so new jobs opened up

2:05:56

and the same thing with AI

2:05:58

people point to the fact

2:05:59

that AI is displacing

2:06:01

some workers

2:06:01

especially at the bottom

2:06:02

which is true

2:06:04

but it's also creating new jobs

2:06:06

jobs that no one even conceived of before

2:06:09

and so it's a balance

2:06:10

between job destruction

2:06:12

and job creation

2:06:13

and that's the main effect

2:06:14

that AI has had on society

2:06:16

it's a beautiful time

2:06:18

to be alive sir

2:06:19

I'm really happy

2:06:21

that you're out there

2:06:22

talking about these things

2:06:23

because it just

2:06:24

it sparks the imagination

2:06:25

in such an incredible way

2:06:26

and because of you

2:06:28

and because of your work

2:06:29

you really get to understand

2:06:30

like what the real parameters

2:06:31

we're working with here

2:06:32

and what we're really talking about

2:06:33

what's possible

2:06:34

well I hope so

2:06:35

that's one of the reasons

2:06:36

why I do what I do

2:06:37

some people say

2:06:38

why do you do this

2:06:39

I mean you're great at it

2:06:40

you should keep doing it forever

2:06:41

do you do things independently

2:06:43

do you have a podcast of your own

2:06:44

I'm on radio

2:06:46

so

2:06:47

oh okay

2:06:47

yeah

2:06:48

which station are you on

2:06:50

gee I forgot

2:06:52

go to my website

2:06:53

that's hilarious

2:06:55

I do so many things

2:06:56

I can't keep track

2:06:57

but just go to my website

2:06:58

mkaku.org

2:07:00

mkaku.org

2:07:03

you do really do

2:07:04

do a lot of things

2:07:05

like how do you maintain

2:07:06

your energy levels

2:07:06

well like I said

2:07:08

I can't understand

2:07:09

how some people

2:07:10

are not energized by this

2:07:11

I mean some people play golf

2:07:13

some people do all sorts of

2:07:15

sports and things

2:07:17

this is what I do

2:07:18

yeah

2:07:18

because it energizes you

2:07:20

you know after a game of golf

2:07:21

people tell me

2:07:22

that they feel renewed

2:07:23

they feel robust

2:07:24

this is what I feel

2:07:26

when you talk to people

2:07:27

because you're sharing

2:07:28

your own excitement

2:07:29

you're trying to convey

2:07:31

the excitement that you feel

2:07:32

to other people

2:07:33

well you do a fantastic job at it

2:07:36

you really do

2:07:37

well I try

2:07:38

it's always a pleasure

2:07:39

to have you here

2:07:40

so tell everybody about your book

2:07:41

one more time

2:07:42

yeah the book is called

2:07:43

Quantum Supremacy

2:07:44

now what is that

2:07:46

quantum supremacy

2:07:47

is a time when

2:07:48

quantum computers

2:07:49

exceeded

2:07:50

the power

2:07:51

of a supercomputer

2:07:52

on certain very specified problems

2:07:55

we passed that point

2:07:56

we now have quantum computers

2:07:58

that are millions of times faster

2:08:01

than a digital computer

2:08:02

on certain select questions

2:08:04

the next step

2:08:05

is to make a general purpose

2:08:07

quantum computer

2:08:08

that works for any problem

2:08:09

not just specific problems

2:08:11

and that may take

2:08:12

that may take maybe another decade or so

2:08:15

but again the stakes are enormous

2:08:17

we're talking about

2:08:18

the world economy

2:08:20

which nation is going to dominate

2:08:22

the world economy

2:08:23

what technologies will thrust

2:08:24

the world's productive abilities

2:08:27

that's quantum computers

2:08:29

now when this does get implemented

2:08:31

what private companies

2:08:34

are creating this

2:08:35

are they working in conjunction

2:08:37

with the government

2:08:37

like how does

2:08:39

how does all that get controlled

2:08:41

well right now

2:08:42

it's a free for all

2:08:43

it's a horse race

2:08:44

it's a free for all

2:08:45

the horses are out of the gate

2:08:47

basically it's a few key players

2:08:49

IBM

2:08:50

Google

2:08:50

Honeywell

2:08:51

Microsoft

2:08:52

the big boys

2:08:54

they're all jumping in the game

2:08:55

investing billions of dollars

2:08:57

to create their version

2:08:58

of the future

2:08:59

and the Chinese are right there

2:09:01

with their parallel version

2:09:03

using optical means

2:09:05

rather than using electrical means

2:09:07

to do calculations

2:09:08

and they know the price

2:09:09

that the price is not there yet

2:09:11

because of course

2:09:12

they're not operational

2:09:13

for general purpose problems

2:09:15

but they know potentially

2:09:16

what the price is

2:09:17

and that's to be able

2:09:18

to dominate the world economy

2:09:20

now what's the worst case scenario

2:09:22

if one of these

2:09:24

American corporations

2:09:25

let's just say Microsoft

2:09:26

let's say if Microsoft

2:09:27

wins the race

2:09:28

and they develop

2:09:30

some sort of functional

2:09:32

quantum computer

2:09:33

that just blows everything else

2:09:36

out of the water

2:09:36

they essentially become

2:09:39

like a superpower

2:09:41

that's right

2:09:42

remember when IBM

2:09:43

dominated everything

2:09:44

and then Microsoft

2:09:46

comes along

2:09:46

bunch of teenagers

2:09:47

come along

2:09:48

everyone thought

2:09:49

these are a bunch of teenagers

2:09:50

what can they do right

2:09:51

and then these teenagers

2:09:53

took over the world

2:09:54

so we're talking about

2:09:55

something on that scale

2:09:56

that's a company

2:09:58

that can make a breakthrough

2:09:59

to make a workable

2:10:00

general purpose

2:10:01

quantum computer

2:10:02

who wouldn't want to buy one

2:10:05

I mean you're talking about

2:10:06

a runaway bestseller

2:10:07

at that point

2:10:08

yeah well

2:10:08

also

2:10:10

the power

2:10:12

that's attached to that

2:10:13

is so enormous

2:10:14

that anyone wielding it

2:10:15

has unprecedented

2:10:17

power

2:10:18

yeah

2:10:19

remember the PC

2:10:20

before

2:10:21

before Bill Gates

2:10:22

and company

2:10:23

yeah

2:10:23

the PC was a toy

2:10:25

a toy in museums

2:10:26

basically

2:10:27

I mean

2:10:28

it was something

2:10:29

that you showed your friends

2:10:30

but you couldn't do anything

2:10:31

with it

2:10:32

right

2:10:32

and then comes Microsoft

2:10:33

we showed

2:10:34

no no no

2:10:34

we can do things

2:10:35

you can do your income tax

2:10:37

you can do spreadsheets

2:10:38

you can do this

2:10:38

you can do this

2:10:39

and then it just took off

2:10:40

yeah

2:10:41

so we're at that stage now

2:10:42

where the computer

2:10:43

is still not ready

2:10:44

to be used

2:10:45

for general purpose calculations

2:10:46

but when it does happen

2:10:48

we're talking about

2:10:49

virtual chemistry

2:10:50

virtual biology

2:10:51

everyone's going to want

2:10:53

to jump in the game

2:10:53

do you think that preemptively

2:10:55

some laws should be put in place

2:10:56

to sort of regulate this

2:10:58

well I think

2:10:59

some laws may have to

2:11:01

because of course

2:11:01

this is potentially

2:11:02

earth shaking

2:11:03

yeah

2:11:04

the CIA of course

2:11:05

is well aware

2:11:05

of the potential

2:11:06

they've

2:11:07

the government

2:11:09

has done seminars

2:11:09

on what to do

2:11:11

when quantum computers

2:11:12

become commonplace

2:11:13

and they're already

2:11:14

making recommendations

2:11:15

and so for the post

2:11:18

silicon

2:11:18

no

2:11:19

the post quantum era

2:11:20

they're making

2:11:21

recommendations

2:11:22

to how to prepare

2:11:23

for the post quantum era

2:11:25

when quantum computers

2:11:26

can break

2:11:27

any known digital code

2:11:29

what does the world

2:11:30

look like

2:11:30

if there's no secrets

2:11:31

what does the world

2:11:32

look like

2:11:33

if there's no

2:11:34

top secret information

2:11:35

there's no code

2:11:36

cannot be cracked

2:11:37

instantaneously

2:11:38

yeah that's a good question

2:11:40

I mean some people say

2:11:41

what happens

2:11:41

if all the codes

2:11:42

are broken

2:11:43

I mean

2:11:43

sometimes this happened

2:11:45

in the past

2:11:46

we're still here

2:11:47

it wasn't doomsday

2:11:49

but it does affect

2:11:51

the progress

2:11:52

for war

2:11:52

during World War II

2:11:54

we broke the German code

2:11:55

it was a computer

2:11:57

that broke the German code

2:11:59

and we knew exactly

2:11:59

what the Germans

2:12:00

were going to do

2:12:01

before war actually

2:12:02

broke out

2:12:03

in certain areas

2:12:04

and that saved

2:12:05

thousands of lives

2:12:06

and so that was

2:12:08

a situation

2:12:08

where that did

2:12:09

make a difference

2:12:10

but in the main

2:12:11

you know

2:12:11

nations steal secrets

2:12:12

from other nations

2:12:13

all the time

2:12:14

and we're still here

2:12:15

for now

2:12:16

for now

2:12:18

right

2:12:19

if we don't

2:12:19

blow ourselves up

2:12:20

but it could be

2:12:21

commonplace

2:12:22

with quantum computers

2:12:23

stealing from nations

2:12:25

could be commonplace

2:12:26

now there are ways

2:12:27

to thwart

2:12:28

a quantum computer

2:12:29

there are ways

2:12:31

to get around it

2:12:31

one way is to have

2:12:32

a dual system

2:12:33

two systems

2:12:34

of the internet

2:12:35

one system

2:12:36

based on electricity

2:12:37

that all of us use

2:12:38

that are subject

2:12:40

to hacking

2:12:40

and the other layer

2:12:42

based strictly

2:12:42

on laser beams

2:12:44

a laser internet

2:12:45

that would be a way

2:12:47

such that anyone

2:12:48

who taps into it

2:12:49

illegally

2:12:50

would immediately

2:12:51

alert people

2:12:52

people would shut down

2:12:53

that part of the internet

2:12:54

immediately

2:12:55

so that's a possibility

2:12:56

that people have talked

2:12:58

about

2:12:58

a dual internet

2:12:59

one internet

2:13:00

for governments

2:13:01

for big corporations

2:13:02

and banks

2:13:03

they would pay

2:13:04

premium price

2:13:05

to have

2:13:05

an invulnerable internet

2:13:07

an internet

2:13:08

by the laws of physics

2:13:09

can never be broken

2:13:10

and everybody else

2:13:11

would use

2:13:12

the ordinary internet

2:13:13

wouldn't that bother you though

2:13:15

like I don't want

2:13:16

corporations

2:13:17

to have unlimited

2:13:18

computational power

2:13:19

they're paying for it

2:13:20

I mean

2:13:21

what can I say

2:13:21

right

2:13:21

right

2:13:22

but the power

2:13:23

that comes along

2:13:24

with something

2:13:24

like that too

2:13:25

like when you said

2:13:25

the laws

2:13:26

like well

2:13:27

who's writing

2:13:27

these laws

2:13:28

and who these laws

2:13:28

benefit

2:13:29

well laws

2:13:29

will have to be passed

2:13:30

just like with chatbots

2:13:32

laws

2:13:32

laws are going to have to be passed

2:13:34

just like freedom of speech

2:13:35

is great

2:13:36

but you cannot say fire

2:13:37

in a crowded theater

2:13:38

right

2:13:38

so laws will have to be passed

2:13:40

to regulate chatbots

2:13:41

and laws may have to be passed

2:13:44

to regulate quantum computers

2:13:45

as well

2:13:46

does it bother you

2:13:47

that these laws

2:13:48

that will have to get passed

2:13:49

will get passed

2:13:50

by people

2:13:51

that probably don't

2:13:52

even have a comprehensive

2:13:53

understanding

2:13:54

of what's possible

2:13:55

yeah that's possible

2:13:57

that's always the nightmare

2:13:58

is the fact that

2:14:00

ultimately politicians

2:14:01

will have to

2:14:02

carry out people's will

2:14:03

right

2:14:03

it's not going to be guys

2:14:04

like you

2:14:04

passing these laws

2:14:05

no it'll be people

2:14:07

that have to

2:14:07

you know

2:14:08

get votes

2:14:08

to get reelected

2:14:10

yes

2:14:10

and God knows

2:14:11

what kinds of issues

2:14:12

they have to harp on

2:14:13

in order to get reelected

2:14:14

right

2:14:14

so that's a danger

2:14:16

that the politicians

2:14:17

may mess things up

2:14:18

well I can only hope

2:14:19

they bring in you

2:14:20

to have a conversation

2:14:21

with them about it

2:14:22

before they do

2:14:22

something stupid

2:14:23

well let's hope

2:14:24

the scientific community

2:14:25

has a say

2:14:26

you know

2:14:26

we want to see it

2:14:27

at the table

2:14:27

we're not going

2:14:29

to make the decisions

2:14:29

but we'd like to

2:14:30

influence the decisions

2:14:32

well that would be

2:14:33

the best way to do it

2:14:34

but even

2:14:35

do you think

2:14:36

that even the scientists

2:14:37

can or the physicists

2:14:39

can have a real

2:14:40

understanding

2:14:40

of what is to come

2:14:42

it's just educated

2:14:44

guessing right

2:14:44

it's hard to say

2:14:45

when the transistor

2:14:46

was invented

2:14:47

people thought

2:14:48

maybe it would be used

2:14:49

to signal ships at sea

2:14:50

yeah

2:14:51

they didn't know

2:14:52

what the transistor

2:14:53

was used for

2:14:54

now we realize

2:14:55

it changed society

2:14:56

human society

2:14:56

changed because

2:14:57

of the transistor

2:14:58

but we didn't

2:15:00

know it at that time

2:15:01

well

2:15:02

listen

2:15:03

again

2:15:04

it's always a pleasure

2:15:05

to have you here

2:15:06

you're a national treasure

2:15:08

I really believe that

2:15:09

well thank you

2:15:09

you're such a great

2:15:10

communicator with this stuff

2:15:12

and it's so exciting

2:15:13

and I'm going to listen

2:15:14

to this back and forth

2:15:14

and try to figure out

2:15:15

most of the stuff

2:15:16

you said

2:15:16

quantum supremacy

2:15:18

how the quantum

2:15:19

computer revolution

2:15:20

will change everything

2:15:21

and it is available now

2:15:23

did you do the audio book

2:15:24

no we had somebody

2:15:26

else do it

2:15:27

why didn't you do it

2:15:29

I want to hear you

2:15:30

it would take four days

2:15:32

locked up in a room

2:15:33

non-stop

2:15:34

I get it

2:15:35

to read a book

2:15:36

of that size

2:15:37

you're busy

2:15:37

I understand

2:15:38

well I'll try to listen

2:15:39

to it in your voice

2:15:40

thank you sir

2:15:41

I really appreciate you

2:15:42

always

2:15:42

my pleasure

2:15:43

great honor

2:15:43

thank you

2:15:44

my honor

2:15:44

bye everybody

2:15:45

bye bye bye