Joe Rogan Experience #2496 - Julia Mossbridge

16 views

10 hours ago

0

Save

Julia Mossbridge

1 appearance

Julia Mossbridge, PhD, is a cognitive neuroscientist, author, and educator. She is the founder and president of American Electrodynamics, the co-founder and chief science officer of The Institute for Love and Time, and a senior advisor for American DeepTech. Her latest book, “Have a Nice Disclosure!,” is available now. https://www.youtube.com/@JuliaMossbridge https://www.applied.love https://www.juliamossbridge.com

ChatJRE - Chat with the JRE chatbot

Timestamps

0:09Julia Mossbridge’s background, precognition research, and how internet culture enables taboo conversations
9:58Academia vs. discovery: stigma around “psychic” research, politics, and expert ego
19:57Insecurity, dominance, and what makes a good conversation (listening, humility, boundaries, and separating message from messenger)

Show all

Comments

Write a comment...

Transcript

0:00

Joe Rogan Podcast, check it out.

0:03

The Joe Rogan Experience.

0:05

Train by day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day.

0:09

Hello, Julia.

0:13

Hello, Julia.

0:14

Pleasure to meet you.

0:15

Yeah, I'm very excited.

0:17

So you said you had questions for me?

0:18

Yeah.

0:19

We can start with your questions.

0:20

Excellent.

0:21

First of all, tell everybody what you do.

0:23

Okay, let me just change the angle of this.

0:25

Just so folks just tuning in right now, we're like, who is this young lady?

0:30

Thank you.

0:30

What do you do?

0:30

I'm a year younger than you.

0:32

Then you're young.

0:33

Nice.

0:35

What do I do?

0:38

I was trained as a scientist, cognitive neuroscience and computer science, and

0:44

did some AI stuff,

0:46

did some stuff with the human brain in terms of trying to understand how time

0:50

works in the human brain.

0:51

And then I got really interested in how funky time works in the human brain,

0:56

like precognition,

0:58

which is, of course, predicting future events in ways that we don't normally

1:01

think about.

1:02

That's how I found out about it.

1:03

That is the Popular Mechanics article.

1:05

Yeah, I believe so.

1:06

Yeah.

1:07

And then a bunch of other stuff that I looked at.

1:08

And then a bunch of other stuff, yeah.

1:10

Yeah.

1:10

And then I got interested in just the idea of what we call exceptional human

1:13

performance.

1:15

So I actually don't think it's that exceptional.

1:17

I think people have these capacities, and they've been dampened down.

1:21

And they're in us, and they can be developed.

1:24

And some people have them just sort of naturally.

1:26

I'm a person who has some of them just naturally, not all of them.

1:29

But there are people all over who have these different gifts.

1:32

And how does that work?

1:34

And so that became a question that was interesting to me.

1:36

Well, it's always interesting when this question is asked by an actual

1:40

scientist.

1:41

So you approach it by, let's try to gather data.

1:44

Let's try to find out what we can actually show.

1:46

Because so many people have feelings that there's something else.

1:51

Like, you have intuition.

1:53

You have some sort of pre-knowledge of events and some feeling of something.

1:59

You're thinking of someone, and they call you.

2:01

Is that real?

2:02

You know, that kind of stuff has always puzzled people.

2:06

So it's always fascinating when someone like yourself actually spends a lot of

2:11

time studying it

2:12

and trying to gather data and trying to show what's real and what's not

2:15

and what you can actually show.

2:16

I agree it's fascinating.

2:18

I'm not sure it matters.

2:20

So, I mean, my experience has been that sort of regardless of how much time I

2:26

spend studying it

2:27

and how much I see it and how much I can test different controls to make sure

2:31

it's not this,

2:32

that, or the other thing and that it really is getting information from the

2:34

future

2:35

or it really is telepathy, people still kind of don't, in the science world,

2:42

tend to just ignore it.

2:44

Or it actually is actively suppressed.

2:46

I mean, there's some papers that I've published that just won't get listed in

2:49

Google Scholar,

2:50

even though they're in peer-reviewed journals with other articles that do get

2:53

listed in Google Scholar.

2:54

So there's -- it's frustrating.

2:57

And who cares because it's just an academic complaining, but I'm also not an

3:01

academic.

3:02

I also want to build things.

3:03

I'm into making stuff.

3:05

So I got my PhD at these tier one research institutions like Northwestern.

3:09

I got my master's at UCA San Francisco.

3:12

I did my postdoc at Northwestern.

3:14

And so fancy-dancey institutions.

3:15

So I learned a lot about how to think and how to write and how to do these kind

3:21

of experiments.

3:22

And I know what I'm seeing, and I keep seeing it.

3:24

And other people who study the same stuff keep seeing it.

3:27

But it is -- it is inside of me, or there's something inside of me that wants

3:34

to create things with this.

3:34

Okay, so this is happening.

3:36

People have these capacities.

3:38

You know, they're actually useful.

3:40

What can we do with them?

3:41

And it turns out you can do a lot with them if you feel like you are allowed to

3:49

have them, if it doesn't feel like it's verboten, if it doesn't feel like

3:53

shameful, which is part of the cultural piece.

3:55

Or foolish.

3:56

Or foolish, which is part of the questions I wanted to ask you.

3:58

Okay.

3:59

So what I notice when you talk with people is you're -- you seem like a tough

4:06

guy, but you're really sensitive.

4:09

Like, you're an incredible, obviously an incredible listener, and you learn all

4:13

these things, and you're putting together -- just this is my impression -- you're

4:19

putting together a kind of a map of the world, like a map of knowledge of the

4:24

world, through all these different people's eyes.

4:27

And my question for you is, how do you see culture shifting, because I think

4:33

you're really sensitive to it, and I think you're kind of like one of these

4:37

signal fish that are at the --

4:39

And you notice what's happening in the environment, and you're going to guide a

4:44

school of fish accordingly?

4:46

So do you think that the culture is shifting towards sort of better use of

4:54

these, I guess, exceptional -- or these natural capacities that we already have?

5:01

Or do you think that we're shifting away from it, and we're going to run away

5:05

in fear?

5:06

Hmm.

5:07

That's a good question.

5:08

Okay.

5:09

So I think that because of conversations like the ones that you've had, and the

5:15

ones that I've had, the ones that are available online, I think people get a

5:19

much deeper understanding of so many different topics, and so many different

5:19

things, than has ever been available through whatever you want to call the

5:19

mainstream media.

5:20

And when you have these inherent prejudices in higher learning, whether it's

5:23

people that don't want to be foolish, so they don't want to entertain certain

5:26

notions, or they don't want to accept certain things because it goes against

5:33

things that they've taught, and things that they've wrote by, or they don't

5:49

want to entertain certain notions, or they don't want to accept certain things

5:49

because it goes against things that they've taught, and things that they wrote

5:49

by.

5:49

We have a problem of ego, and ego becoming a wall to gathering more information,

5:54

or getting a better detailed map of the landscape.

5:58

And I think there's way more people that are pondering these ideas, and having

6:06

these conversations, and thinking about these things, than has ever been before.

6:15

And I think that's one of the really beautiful things about the internet. The

6:20

internet has made much more information available, and many more people are

6:26

thinking about these things in ways that, you know, if you were in an

6:31

environment where your career depended upon you following certain lines and

6:36

certain narratives, you wouldn't pursue that, because that would be detrimental

6:41

to your own personal interest.

6:43

Like, if you wanted to get ahead in academia, and all of a sudden, you're

6:46

talking about psychics, and premonition, and you know, people are like, "Oh,

6:50

Julia's a fucking loon." Like, why? You know? But you're courageous, and you

6:56

see value in these things. And because you can come on here and talk about it,

7:01

instead of just addressing a class, or selling a book that's going to reach a

7:06

few thousand people, we can have a conversation where 10 million people are

7:10

going to listen.

7:10

10 million people are gonna listen and so then those 10 million people are

7:14

gonna go to work and they're gonna tell their friends at work like

7:17

This is you know, you know how that feeling that you get or sometimes you know

7:21

something's gonna happen and happens like that might be real

7:23

And then there was this lady she was on the Joe Rogan podcast and she's not and

7:28

so that

7:28

Opens up people to this idea that you don't have to worry about being a fool

7:34

because

7:36

That's what a lot of people worried about that's what it was a big hurdle

7:40

Talking about aliens UFOs like all my life all my life

7:46

I've always been fascinated by UFOs and aliens, but I don't mind being a fool

7:51

Like I I was fascinated by Bigfoot forever kind of abandoned that for the most

7:55

part

7:56

But I like weird stuff. I'm interested in it and I don't I'm not a person that

8:01

needs to be taken seriously

8:02

It's not my job. I'm literally a comedian like you can make fun of me. I'll

8:06

make fun of me. It's fine

8:07

I don't it doesn't my my future doesn't rely on people taking me seriously

8:12

So I think having that ability to have conversations

8:18

About all kinds of different things is really changed the way the entire world

8:24

is

8:26

Discussing just reality like every everything about reality from

8:31

quantum computing to alien life to

8:36

International politics to the way human beings misrepresent each other purposefully

8:43

for their own gains like

8:44

What is all this like and why?

8:47

Why is it taking so long to have so many discussions about this?

8:52

So I think that's if I have a purpose in this world. It's like I'm an antenna

8:57

for that

8:58

Yeah, I tell I'm just popping because it's such a great purpose because you

9:03

know

9:03

The reason I fell in love with science was it's about discovery. It's about not

9:08

knowing

9:09

It's about being foolish. I had this I was just thinking today. I had this

9:13

amazing high school

9:14

Biology teacher who had us go outside and he gave us these little note cards

9:20

and he said on one side of the note card

9:21

I want you to write a question about your environment look around you know at

9:25

the plants or whatever pick something the dirt whatever and

9:27

Write a question you think Einstein would ask about this

9:31

And then he said okay now flip it over and I want you to write a question that

9:34

like a two-year-old would ask if a two-year-old good, you know, right?

9:37

And my favorite side was the two-year-old and at the end he said now Einstein

9:42

was more like the two-year-old

9:43

he said Einstein was full of wonder and confusion and

9:48

Uncertainty and he just asked questions and imagine things and that's how I

9:53

want you all to learn to be and I was just yes

9:56

That's a good teacher

9:58

That's amazing teacher and and so then I but I went to graduate school and I

10:02

went in the world of academia and I was like there's all this pressure to

10:07

You know, you write your grant after you're you've done about three-quarters of

10:12

the work

10:12

So that as soon as you get the grant then you can publish the papers that go

10:16

with the grant

10:16

So you're not really discovering anything you're kind of talking about here's

10:19

what I already know

10:20

But I'm acting like I haven't looked at it yet or and there's pressure to

10:23

Follow as you said follow the line of thinking

10:28

For both funding and for your career mm-hmm and you know, I was told very

10:33

nicely by wonderful people who wanted to support me

10:36

That if I took the stuff about psychic stuff off my resume, I would have a

10:41

perfectly good resume for

10:42

I was like are you crazy?

10:45

This is the stuff that's actually interesting. Why would I want to take it off?

10:49

But that's what took me away from academia and made me realize I had to put one

10:52

foot in building things I could leave a foot in academia

10:55

but I had to I had to build shit because

10:58

Academia is so slow they can learn something and then ten years later. They're

11:02

like do you think it's true?

11:04

And then 20 years later, they're like maybe we can make something with it and

11:07

it's like

11:07

But at the same time you have to be careful. You don't get to just say well

11:12

I just know people are psychic and therefore you know right screw it so

11:18

So yeah, there's this dance. There's this dance there, but I when you were

11:22

saying this thing about

11:23

That you look people afraid to be foolish. I mean I wonder how much it helps me

11:28

to come from a family of

11:31

Very foolish eccentric people. I'm sure it helps a lot. I'm not afraid to be

11:36

foolish. In fact, I just know that I am

11:38

Well, I think intelligent kind people don't mind talking to people that say

11:45

Occasionally say foolish things

11:48

Well, or things that could be perceived as foolish because they're willing to

11:52

take chances and look at these obscure topics and

11:55

strange phenomenon and just

11:58

and not not worry about the stigma that's attached to these subjects that keeps

12:04

Supposedly intelligent or serious people people that want to be considered as

12:09

serious people

12:09

Yeah, yeah from discussing well like when you said the thing about Bigfoot

12:14

Yeah, and and I laughed a little bit that was that was like a reflex laugh from

12:19

academia

12:20

So that's the fun one well, it's a fun one

12:22

It is and I have friends who study Bigfoot and other cryptids and and in us in

12:26

a scholarly way

12:28

And I had to learn not to laugh like it's like we have our little discomfort

12:33

and then we laugh because the whole I would I want to be taken

12:36

seriously and stuff but you know interestingly the ufo whole world got accepted

12:42

into the mainstream

12:44

Land of things that possibly exist before the psychic world

12:48

But the psychic world has been studied like by the intelligence community, etc.

12:52

since openly

12:53

Since like the 50s, right whereas the ufo world was supposed to be oh, we don't

12:58

care about that

12:59

And then only recently has come to the fore so it's really interesting to see

13:02

this balance. They're both related

13:03

And and they're both have their own processes of disclosure, but it's just

13:08

interesting the culturally. It's interesting to see this instinct

13:11

To be right as you called it and I feel like that's I was

13:17

There's the pbs

13:20

Convention is in town right now in the hotel where I'm staying and I and I I

13:25

gotta say I think that's still largely very left

13:27

Leaning organization and I was raised up in a really left-leaning household,

13:32

but the thing that really

13:33

pisses me off about the left is this

13:36

wanting to be smart

13:39

and

13:40

Proving that you're smart and the thing that pisses me off about the right is

13:44

wanting to be right and I feel like

13:47

Both of those things fail. Yes, I mean

13:50

Neither of them allows us to just discover. Okay, what's next like how can we

13:54

actually

13:55

How can we actually solve the problems that are going on instead of just

13:59

wanting our team to win? Yeah, or and so

14:01

It's interesting to me how the cultural change with

14:04

Science also relates to our politics

14:07

Yeah, I grew up in a very left-leaning household as well. My parents are still

14:12

very left

14:13

and um

14:14

I think that there is a real problem with

14:18

ideologies where

14:21

Especially in this country. We're so polarized. We have a right and a left and

14:25

I think most people are kind of in the middle somewhere

14:27

You know, and i'm i'm certainly in the middle. I'm probably like middle left.

14:30

That's where I kind of see myself

14:32

But if you like read about me, i'm like far right somehow or another, which is

14:36

I know it's interesting. I i'm i'm now independent i'm officially independent

14:40

because i'm like screw it

14:41

Yeah, I don't I do think those people are in the center and I think we need to

14:46

um

14:46

Get clarity on that you get to you get to say something that's different from

14:51

what either side is saying

14:52

Yeah, the problem with either side is you have to

14:56

Accept if you're going to accept if you're going to join one of their team

14:59

I had a bit about it my last comedy special that if you're going to join their

15:02

team you have to believe

15:03

All the things

15:06

Yeah, right and you have to kind of display them perform like you're performing

15:10

very good point, right?

15:11

Yeah, you have to you have to say all the right words

15:13

And if you say the wrong words you're cancelled and that happens on both sides

15:16

100% and you know the right was always complaining about the left doing it

15:19

But now the right's doing it

15:21

They're canceling each other about all kinds of stupid things and it's just a

15:23

it is

15:24

It's you know mark andreessen's talked about this that

15:29

They display all of the behavior that you get from cults

15:33

It's the same thing

15:35

communication

15:37

Yeah

15:37

Extreme following of doctrine

15:39

With no deviation whatsoever

15:42

Everyone's very performative that they are more in line with the doctrine than

15:47

you are

15:48

Ew

15:49

Yeah, and by the way academia is a lot like that. Oh, it's very much like that.

15:54

That's very disturbing

15:55

It is disturbing because these people were you're supposed to be open-minded

15:58

because how are you going to get to true?

16:00

I mean the idea is to get to truth, right? Yeah, how are you going to get to

16:03

truth?

16:03

If if you've decided well that person's asking this question, that's an

16:07

inappropriate question. Yes

16:08

Yeah, and it's also there's this thing about people being gatekeepers of

16:13

information

16:14

So like if you're an expert in a very particular subject and someone disagrees

16:19

with that people are like

16:20

I am a phd in the subject and let me tell you about this and I know what's

16:24

going on

16:25

It's so irritating and actually that bothers me when I go on shows and people

16:29

say oh, but you're a scientist and you study this

16:30

And it's like yeah, but could we not revere me for that reason?

16:34

Could we instead ask the question like does she do good work? Does she have

16:38

interesting thoughts?

16:39

You know does this seem reasonable?

16:41

Does it seem like she's after the you know moving towards the good those are

16:45

really the standards regardless of your degree?

16:48

and so

16:49

It worries me that we put so much reverence and scientists or whatever it are

16:53

experts

16:54

And I also see that there can be this problem where you go. Oh experts are all

16:59

full of shit

17:00

And then you know, you have to get like brain surgery and you're like I would

17:03

like a really good neurosurgeon

17:06

So there's kind of both

17:08

Oh 100% there's both I think the problem is human ego and the problem is that

17:13

even people that have like deeply studied subjects

17:16

The wanting the reverence and wanting people to defer to you wholly with no

17:24

questions whatsoever like as if you have

17:27

The entire database on whatever this thing this thing is settled this is

17:30

settled science

17:31

We know everything about it and that doesn't seem to be the case very often.

17:36

There's very few things that seem to be completely settled and

17:38

It's much more interesting to me when I talk to someone that their perspective

17:44

is

17:44

I'm a person that has spent an inordinate amount of time

17:48

Going over this stuff. And this is what I know. I might not know all of it

17:52

But this this is this is what we know and this is why we think this is what it

17:56

is and this is

17:57

so instead of like

17:58

having this ego and I see it

18:01

God, I see it from so many it's a very male thing too. It's a very male ego

18:06

thing to be like

18:07

the you know, the

18:10

Dominant force of the narrative, you know that they're the enforcer of the

18:16

narrative and you know

18:17

very

18:18

dismissive and very rude and

18:21

saying you know just

18:24

Insulting things about anybody that deviates from it instead of

18:28

Just saying this is why I think this is the case and this is what we've learned

18:34

over the years and this is

18:35

But having humility when you're dealing with especially when you're dealing

18:40

with something like cognitive

18:41

like anything

18:44

Involving consciousness anything involving the human mind. It's so complex.

18:49

There's so much going on and it's so

18:51

Biologically variable there's so many different people that have different ways

18:55

of thinking and their mind works differently

18:57

one of the more illuminating things about doing this pond this podcast is

19:02

Having so many different people in here and so many different conversations so

19:07

many unique and fascinating people, but they're all different

19:10

Yeah, yeah, you're you're like you're like

19:13

Tasting from all the different flavors of humanity and and it's a delight to

19:18

listen to but I

19:18

I sort of want to

19:20

Know what it's like to be in your brain as you start to so it's like you're a

19:24

sponge and you're soaking in all these points of view

19:26

So the model that you're building

19:28

I just I wonder a lot about what it's like to be different people and I imagine

19:31

the model that you're building of the world is really well informed

19:34

Hey, Jamie, could you turn down my um, oh, you could do it. There's a little

19:37

thing right there

19:38

We're like professionals. That's like your whole show

19:43

But yeah, I I think the model that you're building could be put to some really

19:50

powerful use

19:51

So i'm here to convince you to run for president. Oh god trying to get me

19:55

killed julia. How dare you?

19:57

No, I'm not interested in any job in any government whatsoever. I'm I like

20:02

doing this

20:03

Okay, I get it. But what you said about it's a really male thing. I think it's

20:07

better said to say um

20:09

it's a really um

20:11

Insecure male thing or yeah, it's an insecurity thing that happens more

20:16

probably to men because there's such a standard of you're supposed to be alpha

20:19

Everyone's supposed to be alpha right and for women. There's not that standard

20:23

or you're not, you know, right

20:24

And so there's more insecurity because everyone can't be alpha and what the

20:28

heck is alpha and so

20:30

I feel like

20:32

I I I have a desire for someone

20:36

Who has a sense of their own

20:38

Like a secure in their own masculinity

20:41

And their own femininity, which I think you have both. I hope you don't mind me

20:45

calling you out on that

20:46

I know that you're like have this reputation of being like total guy guy

20:52

But you have this I mean because you're a deep listener that's already a

20:56

feminine trait

20:56

And so isn't really yeah. Oh, yeah

20:59

Okay, yeah, I didn't know that I never thought of listening as being masculine

21:04

or feminine

21:04

Listening is a deeply feminine trait because you have to be relatively humble

21:09

to want to listen and the humility is a feminine trait

21:12

Yeah, no, it's just I don't I don't think of it as a feminine. Yeah, I don't

21:15

think listening is a feminine trait

21:18

Yeah, maybe i'm wrong. I think it's a kind of women are generally better

21:21

listeners. I mean that's really yeah

21:23

Depends on if you're in a relationship with them or not

21:26

It depends on who you're talking to

21:28

I don't know if that's true

21:31

I don't know if that's true. Let me see where i'm gonna get in

21:33

I think curious people genuinely curious people are better listeners. That's

21:37

what I think

21:38

And I don't think women or men are genuinely more curious. You're right

21:43

and

21:45

I think that there's a thing if you're always trying to prove that you're alpha

21:49

and I think men more susceptible to that

21:51

You know where you could not be a good listener because you want to make sure

21:55

you say the right thing

21:56

That's an insecurity thing and then I think there's more insecurity among men

22:00

because of those standards that are ridiculous

22:02

And so maybe that's what i'm talking about, but you're definitely right. I can

22:05

definitely think of men and women who are both

22:07

Crappy listeners and good listeners. So it's about the insecurity. It's about

22:12

the emotional maturity

22:13

I think it's also a learned thing that you know people have this desire

22:18

To show everyone how intelligent they are and how dominant they are in any

22:23

particular subject

22:24

And it's one of the most infuriating things about having conversations where

22:27

people aren't really talking to you

22:29

They're just trying to win whatever little

22:31

Verbal game yeah you're playing

22:34

They're trying to one-up you and they're trying to i've seen that yeah

22:38

It's gross and also just like it makes you want to leave. Yeah, it's not fun

22:43

It's not a fun conversation like i love talking to people way smarter than me.

22:47

Yeah, it's fun

22:48

Like i don't need like i can't be the smartest purpose i'm friends with elon i'm

22:52

definitely not the smartest person

22:53

I'm friends with a lot of people that are way smarter than me

22:57

So i'm just curious and i think

23:00

The world would be a lot better place if more people were curious and if you

23:06

embraced it and not and just

23:08

squash that

23:11

That that insecurity that makes you want to like puff your chest up and

23:14

See, I don't think you can squash it like I get

23:17

I also think the world would be a better place if more people were curious, but

23:20

I think the solution is I don't think any squashing anything works

23:23

like I

23:25

I think

23:27

I think you have to work through it

23:29

That's a better way to say it. Yeah

23:31

Then squashing it squashing it just means it's going to come up later as

23:34

garbage

23:35

Yeah, that's yeah, no, you said it better. Yeah, it's really just addressing

23:39

why you're insecure and for a lot of men

23:42

Um, there's there's just physical insecurity

23:45

And the physical insecurity is a real problem

23:48

But some of my favorite people are martial artists

23:51

And one of the reasons why is because they're the least insecure

23:55

Everyone's insecure in some way, but martial artists are dealing with that

24:00

insecurity

24:00

Literally on a daily basis

24:03

So like say jujitsu for instance

24:05

If you're training jujitsu if you go from white belt to black belt, you have to

24:10

get humiliated

24:11

thousands of times

24:13

If there's no ifs ands or buts about it there's if you're a white belt and you

24:17

train with a black belt, you're going to get humiliated or

24:20

dominated you're going to lose you have no chance and so by

24:24

Learning over and over and over and over again that you're not really special

24:29

And it's really just about the time you put in and then about getting better

24:32

and having the ability to objectively assess

24:35

Your position who you are in this this room of people that are trying to strangle

24:41

each other who you are in the world

24:43

Itself and I think a lot of people don't ever address that and so they run

24:48

around trying to

24:50

Posture and pretend there's something they're not pretend. They're smarter than

24:54

they are

24:55

They're more of an expert a subject. They're the one who should talk you should

24:59

listen

24:59

You know, there's a lot of that whenever people say just shut up and listen

25:03

like that's not

25:05

I'm not going to do that and I don't want to talk to anybody

25:07

I don't ever want anybody to do that if I'm talking well, yeah, because then

25:11

you're not having a conversation

25:13

That person doesn't exist exactly. You've just decided that person doesn't

25:16

exist. They don't matter

25:17

You just you've asserted dominance in the dumbest way possible, which is

25:21

intellectual

25:21

like

25:24

It is the dumbest way possible sure and and the funny thing is culturally we

25:28

kind of think that it's the smartest way possible

25:30

It's just a bunch of fools. Well, yeah

25:32

Yeah, yeah, and so with a lot of information, okay, but let's talk about what

25:37

what a better world would be so in a better world

25:41

In a better world if you're gonna start dominance you would like the martial

25:45

art what I love about martial art is

25:47

First of all, it's it's all mental

25:49

Almost all mental and then second

25:52

It's very similar to what happens when you go through and get your phd

25:56

You get beaten down and you realize you're not the smartest person in the room

25:59

And you're hanging out with all these other super smart people and then

26:03

You gotta learn to be like, okay, that's not what matters. So that's the good

26:06

part of of going nuts with school

26:09

but

26:11

but there's this um

26:13

false information

26:15

That it reminds me of when I was at ucsf and I went to go see this talk by this

26:18

famous scientist. I think he won a nobel prize

26:20

I forget his name

26:23

But he was an asshole and he gave his brilliant talk

26:26

But I couldn't pay attention to it because he was an asshole. He was being rude

26:30

to people

26:31

who asked questions. He was

26:33

Just dickish. I mean, I don't know how else to say it just like arrogant

26:37

Yeah, and I walked out and someone said to me one of my mentors said to me

26:42

You know, you have to learn to separate the personality from the information

26:47

that they're that they're giving and I said, you know

26:49

No, I don't like he's giving me all the information in his personality

26:53

Right. I don't need to learn to listen to that. I need to learn to say

26:59

Unlike all of you all I need to learn to say

27:03

I'm not going to hang out with people and put myself in the presence of people

27:06

Who are rude like that that's more important than their amazing intellect and I

27:12

somehow

27:12

Somehow we got to a place culturally where we think you can be

27:18

really mean or

27:20

dismissive or rude

27:23

And arrogant and that's fine because you're winning

27:27

And I feel like a better world would acknowledge that what's more important is

27:33

Oh love

27:35

Which is this connection where you actually acknowledge there's someone else

27:39

there, even if you like

27:40

Think they're an asshole, but still yeah, you know, like I wasn't practicing

27:44

love

27:45

I wasn't accepting him who he was

27:46

But I was in a place where the environment wanted me to just

27:50

ignore

27:52

Sort of the information I was getting about who this guy was and just say no

27:56

all that matters is his intelligence. Yeah

28:00

Though sometimes

28:01

You can learn a lot from people that are gross

28:03

Yeah, you know, and it's valuable to be able to put their personality aside and

28:09

listen to the actual information

28:11

But still in that moment though, I don't want to yeah

28:14

Well in that moment

28:16

In that moment, I was like 24 and I was a woman in a field where there are a

28:21

lot of guys and I was

28:22

Feeling

28:25

Like I have to have boundaries

28:26

You know, I have to learn to have boundaries and then later when I'm you know

28:31

Like now I'm postmenopausal and you know how postmenopausal women are we have

28:35

much more confidence

28:37

But you're not playing that game anymore

28:40

Yeah, no, right exactly. It's just like now. I'm like I can listen to

28:43

You know some asshole listen to what he's saying

28:46

But at the time it's like no like I have to stand up for something that I think

28:50

is important, right, you know

28:51

I

28:53

I'm not saying i'm better than i'm saying I had that experience that made me

28:57

see that there was this

28:58

level of

29:00

like sort of import placed on

29:02

The intellect and that had always been the case my family had always placed all

29:07

this level of import on the intellect

29:09

And I just kind of walked out of that. Well, it has to be balanced

29:13

like I think putting all of the

29:16

Emphasis on the intellect itself and ignoring the personality is kind of

29:21

like

29:23

The messenger is important like the message is important, but the the messenger

29:27

sucks

29:28

That that you know if if someone was yelling out the most amazing information

29:33

in the world

29:34

But they were singing it like a slayer song

29:37

I don't know

29:38

It's a bad example, but you know i mean like you know those death metal bands

29:41

where they just scream yeah, and you're like oh jeez

29:43

I gotta get out of here. It's not my thing right, but

29:46

It could be like the most interesting information, but the messenger sucks. It's

29:51

not fun to listen to it's not exciting

29:53

Or the messenger's arrogant or the messenger's rude or

29:57

It ruins the message. Yeah, you need both human beings need to communicate and

30:01

in order to communicate we need to

30:03

We need to establish that we're just two people

30:06

You know and if you have some information that I don't have I want to hear it

30:11

I don't want to like oh, she's saying too many smart things. I want to say

30:14

something smart to show i'm smarter than her

30:15

Well, I'll hold on there

30:17

You know, there's a lot of that and that's a lot of that in academia because

30:21

that is their entire identity

30:23

It's a chess game. Yes, yeah, but it's a chess game with pieces that are stunted

30:28

like they're not allowed to freely move

30:29

No kidding. Yeah, it is a cult. I mean that's the cult part. Yes, that's where

30:33

you leave and people feel sorry for you

30:36

And you're like I have my freedom. I'm so excited and they're like i'm so sorry

30:39

for you. Yeah, it's social hierarchies

30:42

It's gross. Yeah, and you know, I mean I think that's going to

30:47

exist

30:49

Whenever there's ego or whenever there's these the human dynamics of these

30:53

Bizarre creatures that we are where they would territorial apes with weapons

30:58

You know, they're like we're weird and we're always establishing some kind of

31:02

dominance whether it's intellectual dominance or

31:05

Wealth dominance or social hierarchy dominance like people love

31:09

That stuff they love it

31:13

Do we or so I they love to play it they love to pretend we love to pretend it

31:18

but do I mean do we really?

31:19

Well, that's why people name drop

31:21

That's why people want to have the the fanciest cars and the nicest watches

31:25

But is that really making them happy? No, it's not

31:29

So I don't know that people love it

31:31

I think people do it because they think it's gonna make them happy, but I don't

31:33

think they love it

31:34

Yeah, there's something to that

31:36

But there's there's probably something that some sociopaths feel

31:40

If they show up with a million dollar watch and a million dollar car and they

31:44

you know pull up in front of a giant house

31:45

It's bigger than anybody's like wow sure

31:47

I did it

31:49

But I think yeah, but that's rare. I think that's rare. Yeah

31:52

I think it's not lasting either

31:54

And then there's also a bunch of people that are on fucking pills

31:56

They don't even know what they like

31:58

Just running around in the fog of pharmaceutical cloud. That's the way they're

32:02

dealing with it

32:03

So it's like like I guess if we see it as like

32:06

There's this big problem, which is that I call this the human problem

32:09

No one knows how to be with themselves or others in any kind of harmony like

32:13

right harmony. This is good work

32:16

We don't know how to get to harmony right right and so

32:19

one way is for drugs and one way is prayer and one way is

32:24

the big car and the dominance and one way is

32:29

You know being addicted to your phone. I mean what you know none of them work

32:33

Right

32:34

But all of I mean that's not true. I think prayer works, but but

32:38

I think the only one that works is love and I think that's what prayer is about

32:41

but um

32:42

earnest prayer, but

32:44

We have to try I mean we're built to try to get to harmony

32:49

Apparently because we keep trying and so part of me wants to say

32:56

I'm of two minds part of me just says like we're trying the best we can and we

32:59

have all these faults

33:00

And then there's a part of me that says and we can do better

33:03

Well, we definitely can and I think that's one of the reasons why people hunger

33:06

for conversations because we're all trying to figure out how to do better

33:09

Yeah, the human mind is one of the most

33:12

Extraordinary things that's ever been studied and yet there's no guidebook and

33:17

how to use it

33:17

Because we still don't know do you know how much we don't know we know about as

33:21

much about the human mind

33:23

Now as we knew in 1991 when I first went to graduate school

33:27

I mean in neuroscience I mean the brain we know a lot more about the brain

33:32

We still don't know that much about it

33:34

We're still missing some basic pieces of like things like what's the neural

33:38

code?

33:38

How do these neurons actually communicate and how do we actually learn how do

33:42

we actually represent things in memory?

33:44

But but we know more but in terms of the mind

33:48

Wow, we're just beginning I mean, I guess I'm differentiating the brain and the

33:52

mind like the brain is this like physical chunk of stuff

33:55

That's related to the mind, but the mind is what we are doing right. Well the

34:00

thinking feeling

34:01

emoting

34:04

Wondering all that stuff is mind stuff

34:07

And that's super mysterious and super difficult to manage for almost everybody.

34:13

Yeah, and again, no guidebook

34:15

Yeah, you're giving the most complex instrument known to man, which is the

34:20

human mind

34:20

Yeah, and everybody's like figure it out

34:22

And you're like fuck. Maybe I'll become a Mooney. Maybe I'll go into Scientology.

34:27

What do I do? I have to do something

34:29

I have to do something someone else knows I know I'm the one who knows follow

34:32

that guy

34:35

I'll do these 10 things and you'll be okay. Yes, that's how cult gets started.

34:38

I'll do those 10 things because we're so nervous

34:40

We can't figure it out. Exactly. Yeah. Yeah

34:43

Um, have you ever seen a baby be born? Sure. Yeah. Yeah, so

34:47

So have I my own but also I was a doula for a couple friends who are babies and

34:53

You know

34:55

Everyone should just see a baby be born

34:57

It's very psychedelic. It's psychedelic and it's also it just it puts you in

35:00

that liminal space

35:02

Where um, it's like you've seen me on the veil. You've seen the the borderland

35:06

between life and death

35:07

and it feels to me like

35:10

That experience which is much more rare for people to have now most people

35:14

Can can avoid seeing a baby being born

35:17

But that experience is and also seeing someone die that experience I think

35:24

helps train

35:25

Us in it is the instruction book

35:28

For the human mind. I don't know why i'm saying that I look at you, you know,

35:32

you're wrinkling your brow

35:33

And i'm like also, why am I saying that?

35:35

No, I'm not only wrinkling my brow because i'm listening

35:37

The face of someone who's always upset, but it's not true

35:41

No, I don't know why I said that like i've never had that thought before but it

35:46

occurred

35:47

I guess I was looking at this little like you've got this little like idol

35:50

thing. Oh, that is um a death whistle

35:53

That's an aztec death whistle. Don't do it. You'll you last time we did the

35:56

pandemic. Yeah, we're close enough

36:02

Don't blow it. Okay. Yeah, there's a meme online because my friend brian cowan

36:07

was in the podcast studio and he blew this aztec death whistle

36:10

Like literally it was like a week before the fucking pandemic. It was way

36:14

kicked off

36:14

it was way too close and

36:17

The meme was brian cowan kicking off the pandemic with the aztec death whistle.

36:21

Okay. Well, I didn't blow it. Yeah

36:23

I saved everybody. Do you know what aztec death whistles are?

36:27

I imagine it's really scary. It sounds horrible and they would play them at

36:31

night while

36:32

Their enemy was like camped at night and so they would haunt them. So they

36:37

couldn't sleep

36:37

They would stand on the mountaintops and

36:41

Make that noise. Wow, and it's very high pitched and it carries like a crying

36:45

baby. Well, no, it's very it's like demons

36:48

It sounds like demons like people. Yeah, and you just think this is the last

36:52

day of my life

36:52

Here's it

36:54

Aztec soldiers will blow while charging to battle and during human sacrifices

36:58

But how does a whistle make that horrifying when air is blown into the tube the

37:03

airflow splits into a big and small chamber each making a different

37:07

Poison about to hear

37:09

Click here to see me try the world's loudest. Yeah

37:13

Did that guy survive this video? I don't know. He might not even be real in

37:17

this world. That might be ai

37:19

That's true. So no wonder I was thinking about like the veil between life and

37:23

death because I was looking at that thing and

37:25

There's something that is like a reset

37:28

You know when you um

37:31

When you see a baby be born or you see someone die, it's like a um

37:38

It's like you get to what matters

37:40

And it's and it's not whatever the dominance thing and it's not the insecurity

37:45

thing and it's not the

37:46

It's not any of that. Yeah

37:50

You know, so I think that's the instruction book and so we're sort of given

37:54

these little

37:55

Resets that allow us to get in touch with what really matters

37:59

But the more we get away from them, you know in the modern world

38:02

um

38:04

Maybe the fewer instructions we have

38:06

I don't know never had that thought before. Yeah, um

38:10

I think it would benefit almost everyone to do something that takes you out of

38:17

your own thoughts

38:19

and um, I think that physically difficult things are the very best at that

38:25

Like yoga is one of the very best things at that because it's very physically

38:29

difficult to do

38:31

It requires a lot of willpower and concentration while you're doing it. You're

38:37

balancing yourself

38:38

You're sweating you're straining

38:40

And because it's so difficult you can't think of anything else other than it

38:45

while you're doing it

38:46

And I think that cleans your mind out and that

38:49

it

38:51

purges you of

38:53

All this weirdness that's inside of you that is constantly battling with

38:58

everything around you and it allows you to just be

39:00

Yeah, just exist. Yeah yoga. I mean childbirth is very physical

39:04

Dying is very physical. Yeah, but the thing is you can't voluntarily do that

39:08

every day. No, you can't

39:10

But I do sort of think like childbirth for women who who go through it are

39:14

lucky enough to go through it

39:15

Um, it's kind of like boot camp for men. I mean it really it really

39:21

pushes you to your limit and then

39:26

Puts you in an altered state where oh for sure you just had a human come out of

39:30

your body

39:31

No, it's now it's alive and you love it more than anything

39:33

Yeah, and it brings this like

39:35

Incredible i'm looking at this ufo guy behind you it brings this incredible

39:38

self-transcendent experience of like whoa

39:41

Right, this is not about me. You know, and so

39:44

Yeah, same with people who play team sports. I was never one of them, but I

39:48

hear that that experience

39:50

Happens yes, or like when you're practicing a musical instrument. Well, I think

39:54

anything difficult. Yeah, I think doing when I was talking about martial arts

39:58

you could

39:59

Martial arts will help you in that regard

40:02

But I think kind of anything that's hard to do gets you out of your head yeah

40:06

and helps you yeah and just

40:07

getting an understanding that

40:10

Whatever you're doing in life if you concentrate on it and focus on it and and

40:16

you'll get better at it

40:17

And that gives you confidence and an understanding of kind of how the world

40:21

works

40:21

And then you could also apply that to being a person, you know

40:24

Like you're you're not the same person you were when you were 20 years old,

40:28

right?

40:28

Why because you're better at being a person because you've lived a lot you've

40:32

had a lot of experiences

40:33

You've made a lot of mistakes, and you're constantly constantly practicing and

40:37

learning

40:37

You know, and I think other things that you can do other than just being a

40:42

person will enhance your ability to be a person

40:44

Yeah

40:46

Being a person who is applying yourself to something. Yes, my martial arts

40:50

instructor had this thing that he told me when I was very young

40:52

He said that martial arts are a vehicle for developing your human potential

40:56

And yeah, yeah, I think but I think that could be guitar playing that could be

41:02

tennis

41:03

When I used to teach for my viewing we used to call it a mental martial art it's

41:06

anything that's hard

41:07

On which you have to concentrate that puts you in that space of flow

41:13

And the flow means you know, you know that

41:17

holly chicks at moholly the idea. I don't know if I pronounced his name, right

41:20

but this idea of timelessness and

41:22

You're just sort of having to surf

41:25

Whatever's happening. Mm-hmm and that could happen

41:28

It could happen in any field

41:31

Right, whatever

41:33

Whenever you have to apply your whole self to something

41:35

Then what's a it's so ironic because you apply your whole self to something

41:40

And then what that allows to happen is that you become selfless like you're

41:44

almost like a tube, right?

41:45

You're not thinking about you anymore. You're thinking about the thing. Yeah,

41:49

and there's neuroscience to back that up, right?

41:51

Yeah, yeah

41:52

Yeah, I think anything difficult

41:54

There that I feel that when I practice archery. I feel that when I play pool

42:00

I feel that when I work out

42:02

Anything difficult where you you lose yourself

42:05

But in doing that you like you can you have a better understanding of yourself,

42:09

which is

42:10

Yeah

42:12

And it's almost like you come into consciousness more. Yeah, I'm really

42:15

fascinated by the remote viewing and I want to get to that

42:17

But I want to start with like, how did you begin?

42:20

Studying this stuff

42:22

so you're involved in neuroscience you're

42:25

You know, you're trying to

42:28

Pick which lane you're gonna really pursue all your interests in how did you

42:33

get involved in

42:34

This idea of premonition and psychic ability and that there's a real

42:39

Something there

42:41

Yeah, I

42:43

I sort of hid it from my I hid my agenda from myself

42:47

So yeah, I discovered, you know later in life

42:51

Yeah, because when I was a kid

42:54

My first precognitive dream that I remember was when I was seven

42:57

And um, it was very clear

43:00

I dreamt that my friend I knew which friend eshane

43:05

Would what would happen? She would lose her watch where would happen on the

43:09

playground?

43:09

And then the next day that happened as very specific

43:13

You know, it wasn't like you don't have to be metaphorical about it. What does

43:16

it mean?

43:16

That eshane lost her watch on the playground the next day

43:20

And so

43:21

Did you tell your parents?

43:22

Yeah, and they said my mom so my so my

43:26

So my very eccentric

43:28

Family would always talk about dreams at the breakfast table

43:33

My mom is a therapist and a learning disability specialist. My dad was a

43:37

physicist

43:38

My sister's an artist and we would all talk about dreams and so I would I

43:43

mentioned this

43:44

And my dad the physicist says well, that's a coincidence

43:47

And my mom the therapist says you should get a dream journal and write them

43:51

down

43:51

And so I did that and um

43:54

Your dad just dismissed it as a coincidence?

43:56

You know, he he has come around that's a very specific coincidence

44:01

It's three three factors and I always like to say if you have two or more

44:05

factors, it's likely precognitive

44:07

But just the one lost the watch and then she loses her watch

44:11

But she did just get her watch

44:12

She was we were seven years old. She got a watch from her father

44:15

You know, I could you could predict that as someone who's good at figuring out

44:19

what kids do is that they might lose the watch

44:21

Right, so that could be a coincidence

44:23

You have to think about all the possible things that could happen to a seven-year-old

44:26

on the watch that they just got losing it is up there

44:28

Yeah, but you thought about it the day before she lost it

44:31

I dreamt it the day before she yeah

44:34

Yeah, so he did dismiss it as a coincidence, but we also had ball lightning and

44:38

like weird orbs in our house

44:39

And he also dismissed that as not actually having happened wait, you had ball

44:43

lightning in your house

44:44

Yeah, we were in this old farmhouse in libertyville, illinois where I grew up

44:48

And we lived with my grandparents there and um

44:52

And uh ball lightning came inside the house and my mother stood up for it

44:58

My mother said ed my my dad's name, you know, didn't you see that lightning zipping

45:03

around the house last night?

45:04

lightning

45:06

And my dad said um

45:08

That couldn't have happened

45:11

Did he see it?

45:11

Of course he saw it

45:13

But he just wanted but he didn't have an explanation for it. What does your dad

45:16

do?

45:16

He was a theoretical physicist when he for his dissertation. He was at

45:19

university of chicago

45:20

He he discovered or or showed somehow the electron layer on the moon that there's

45:25

this like atmosphere of electrons on the moon

45:27

And um

45:28

How can he say that that couldn't happen?

45:30

So

45:31

One of the reasons so people are so complex with the reasons they go into

45:35

particular fields

45:37

My experience with physicists my dad included

45:40

Is they tend to go into this field of physics because the whole job of physics

45:44

is to simplify everything into a few equations

45:47

Right, let's like there's the funny. There's the I don't know if it's funny

45:51

But there's the standard physics joke of like all right, let's figure out the

45:55

volume of a cow

45:56

You know, let's let's just estimate it. It's a sphere, you know

45:59

And so it's like you cut off the legs and the and the head and the tail and all

46:03

of a sudden

46:04

You're just calculating a sphere which doesn't give you the volume of the cow

46:07

and

46:09

So I think there's a desire to simplify everything and I think there's a desire

46:12

to control things

46:13

um

46:15

And many many many physicists have ocd and I have control issues. My dad had

46:20

severe severe ocd

46:21

and so in his in his mind

46:25

um

46:26

It couldn't have happened because it would all his circuits would fry because

46:30

he didn't know how to explain it

46:31

And my mother just stood up for it and said well

46:34

It did happen and you saw it and I saw it and it hit the edge of my room

46:38

And then went out and there was still like the brown mark where it was burned

46:43

In the corner of the room. So like we had plenty of evidence

46:46

um

46:48

So there was stuff going on

46:50

And there was a there was this push-pull with my mom who just

46:56

uh believed in the primacy I guess of or the importance of

47:00

experience like we saw it

47:02

and

47:04

Uh the pull from my dad who believed in if you didn't understand if you didn't

47:08

have a theory for something it couldn't exist

47:10

And so I was living in that so what I did was I kept a dream journal

47:15

Sort of the rest of my life. I still write every morning my dreams

47:18

and

47:20

Started to notice that I was really good at precognitive dreaming

47:23

And it would happen again and again and again and I would have um

47:27

Experience we can get into later the weird school stuff

47:31

But experiences at school that reminded me that I had this capacity and um

47:36

Then I hid it from myself

47:40

When I realized I wanted to go to graduate school and actually be a scientist

47:45

So

47:46

By which I mean I just sort of said well all of that stuff's crap even though I

47:50

was still having those experiences

47:51

I had to kind of split off

47:52

This is a thing that you have to do if if you think okay, I have to ride the

47:56

academic train

47:57

Right and the academic train says

48:00

Like i'm going to do hard science. I'm going to go to the best neuroscience

48:03

school. I'm gonna you know, right

48:05

And then by the time I was in my late 20s

48:08

And um

48:11

I was in my second graduate school getting my phd at northwestern

48:14

I started to remember and the reason I started and it's not like I had really

48:18

forgotten

48:18

But it's like it just wasn't allowed to be real

48:21

I started to study

48:24

Timing in the auditory system because I was into understanding

48:28

How the auditory system managed things in time

48:31

And then I started to ask myself why am I so interested in time?

48:34

Why am I so interested in the nature of time and how it works?

48:38

And then boom oh, right because I keep having these precognitive dreams

48:41

There's obviously something we don't understand about how time works because

48:45

these are so

48:45

Consistent and clear and at that point, you know, I knew that was happening

48:50

Because I knew I wasn't making it up. I could look at my journal and I could

48:52

see it

48:54

So that's when I started saying all right, you know, I'm old enough to choose

48:54

my own path and I'm going to start

49:01

Asking these questions and when you started asking them and trying to apply it

49:06

in

49:07

Using the scientific method. How did you first attempt to do that?

49:11

Well, I called I was a

49:14

I'm kind of fearless

49:17

When it comes to cold calling people, especially scientists because very few

49:20

people call scientists

49:21

So I called up Dean readin. I had read some of his work from the institute on

49:27

aquatic sciences

49:28

I called him up and I said um

49:30

Hi, my name's julia and I was thinking of going into this field and I think

49:34

recognition is real and he's like, oh, okay

49:36

and

49:38

And I remember where I was sitting

49:40

when I called him and

49:42

He said the thing you have to do is get your phd in a field that is not this

49:46

So finish your phd

49:49

And then as a postdoc start to investigate it

49:52

So I did I finished my phd while I was studying all this other stuff and

49:55

understanding the field

49:57

And then as soon as I got into my postdoc years

49:59

I found a sympathetic advisor at northwestern in the cognitive neuroscience

50:03

program and

50:04

And just said I want to start studying this stuff

50:08

So I at the same time I had one foot in more mainstream stuff about timing and

50:12

the auditory and the visual system

50:14

And then the other foot was in this purely basically psychic stuff trying to

50:19

understand it and I

50:21

Made an experiment there's a foundation called the be all foundation in portugal

50:25

and I wrote I wrote an application to them

50:27

And they funded my postdoc so I could study

50:31

A sense of being stared at

50:32

With like closed circuit tv monitors and I could study how the skin physiology

50:39

You know skin conductance or sweat changes

50:41

When just before you get a response right on a random like psychic task

50:47

And so that that's kind of precognition or pre-sentiment

50:50

And then I just pulled from

50:53

I got really interested in pre-sentiment because I saw that it was real

50:56

And I also saw there was a big gender difference that was fascinating to me

50:59

which is that

51:00

Before men got their first trial correct

51:05

And this is just a guessing game so you know it's all randomly selected

51:08

Their skin conductance would go crazy like they just won the lottery

51:13

And when they're before they didn't get it correct or they were incorrect it

51:17

would just kind of like peter along

51:18

So they were anticipating at a very high level

51:21

What the future was going to bring whether they were going to win or not

51:24

whereas women

51:25

Practically but not totally showed the opposite

51:29

But their skin but but regardless of what happened whether it was correct or

51:32

incorrect

51:33

They were much lower than men

51:35

So men were really excited about the future

51:39

Correct thing at least their physiology showed that so I got fascinated by that

51:44

and pulled together a bunch of

51:46

Worked with a couple other people at different institutions and pulled together

51:51

26 studies over the past or the prior

51:54

I guess 40 years

51:56

That looked at this kind of physiological change that predicts essentially a

52:00

random future event

52:02

And just analyzed it. Do you have a theory as to why men have that response and

52:07

women don't?

52:09

You know, I kind of think it's cultural you were talking about the importance

52:13

of winning

52:13

And I think

52:16

I mean that we know that gambling addicts are twice as likely maybe three times

52:22

as likely to be men as women

52:24

really yeah and

52:27

The importance of winning well, I don't know if it's biological or cultural but

52:32

in any case the importance of

52:34

Being alpha or the importance of winning. I think it's a big deal

52:38

It's a big deal to the to men. Do you think that goes back to tribal war?

52:44

I think it goes like back to like

52:47

Chimpanzees. Yeah, which do tribal war. Yeah. Yeah. I mean it kind of makes

52:53

sense that the importance in winning is literally survival or death

52:56

You will get kicked out of your little chimpanzee colony

52:59

Not only that the ability to predict things that are going to happen would

53:03

probably keep you alive

53:05

Yeah, like if you were running into an ambush, you know, like I don't like this

53:09

Or something is wrong something's off or now's the time to go like I feel it

53:14

Yeah, yeah, so those combined but you know, there's other tasks that aren't

53:19

about winning that are just about is, you know

53:21

Are you going to see a picture that's scary versus a picture that's neutral

53:25

where women and men both show the effect?

53:27

But in this particular task, it was just

53:29

Like very clear and then I replicated it in heart heartbeat. So the first one

53:34

was in skin conductance

53:35

And then I looked at heart rhythms

53:37

And I replicated that same thing where men are like, oh, yeah, here we go

53:41

And women are like

53:43

Um, it doesn't if something doesn't matter so much to you in the future

53:47

I don't think it matters so much to you in anticipating it

53:51

Now here's the question about this stuff

53:55

Do you think that this is an emerging phenomenon in human consciousness?

54:00

Or do you think it's something that has atrophied that was available before

54:05

language?

54:06

So

54:08

Very clearly available. I mean before language. Okay. That's what I think

54:12

I've been thinking that a lot lately and one of the things that I've been

54:14

thinking is

54:15

One of the things that we've noticed like I think phones and the internet and

54:20

The computers are an amazing thing you can acquire so much information you can

54:26

learn about things you can

54:27

Encounter new people. There's so much stuff. That's great about the internet

54:32

The bad thing is

54:34

A lot of people have a much shorter attention span now because of social media

54:39

and then now they're demonstrating that

54:41

Through use of large language models a lot of people are actually getting dumber

54:46

Yeah, or they're noticed it. Yeah, well, it's

54:48

They've studied it and they especially children. They're they're actually less

54:54

capable of solving problems themselves

54:56

Because they always turn to a computer and have the computer solve a problem

55:00

And the more I think about that the more I look at that I go. Well, what is

55:04

language language is a technology

55:05

And language is a technology that allows you to say things with your mouth and

55:10

I know what you're thinking

55:11

Maybe before that existed. We had an understanding of what we were thinking

55:17

You know, maybe there's like some sort of a weird psychic

55:21

Connection that we all believe that people have with each other in some way or

55:26

form and some of it's

55:27

You could demonstrate some of it, you know, but most of it is just intuition

55:33

and feeling

55:33

And I always wonder like is this atrophied like before we could talk when we

55:37

were just these bipedal hominids with

55:39

You know larger brains and all the other mammals and these weird abilities to

55:43

be curious and figure out things and develop tools

55:46

Like what was what was consciousness like before language?

55:50

Before written language you didn't have a word for dog and tree and like what

55:55

was it?

55:56

That was going on in your head if you don't like you think in your head. I

56:02

think in my head in a voice

56:03

Yeah, you know, and they say some people don't have

56:07

You don't have an internal voice. I have pictures. Oh, that's interesting. Yeah,

56:11

really?

56:12

Yeah, I sometimes wonder about that if that's why I can I can do the remote

56:16

only pictures

56:17

Feelings oh, I have a whole dude in my brain. Yeah, I've heard that most people

56:24

have that

56:24

No, I don't think it's most people really I think it's kind of

56:27

Well, is it your voice like oh, it's not me. No, I mean, it might be like your

56:32

dad. No, no, no

56:34

Is it a guy? Yeah, it's like a general. Oh, it's like someone's gone shut the

56:39

fuck up

56:39

Like go to work go do this. What are you talking about? Why are you being such

56:43

a bitch?

56:43

So he's kind of a jerk. No, no, no, no, no. He's right always

56:47

My favorite voice is never wrong. My inner self-correcting voice is always

56:53

correct

56:54

It's always right. It's always like it's uh

56:57

I mean if you wanted to get really crazy you would say it's like a guardian

57:02

angel in your brain that's stirring you

57:04

Steering you in the right direction

57:06

But if i've done something wrong in my life made a mistake in my life said

57:10

something

57:11

I shouldn't have said that voice berates me wow, so that seems hard. No, it's

57:16

good

57:17

It's great. I mean like but you got to get over it. Well, but that's how you

57:21

learn well

57:21

I mean

57:25

Let's talk about that. Okay

57:27

Because when people go through hard things one way to learn is like berating uh-huh

57:32

um

57:33

but that's kind of like not as sustainable as

57:36

forgiving yourself and

57:39

Deciding that you couldn't figuring out how you can do better. I mean is berating

57:43

really the best

57:44

I think you have to feel pain from mistakes, but don't you already feel the

57:48

pain?

57:48

No, you got to really feel it

57:50

Do you feel like I don't like making mistakes twice and the best way to not

57:54

make

57:54

Make a mistake twice is have the first one suck so bad that you never want to

57:58

go through that again for sure

57:59

If it doesn't really suck make it suck in your head, but does it already?

58:02

I feel like it already sucks without a guy telling you that it sucks

58:07

Well, it's not ness. I mean i'm kind of exaggerating

58:10

It's not just that but it's like it's not even like you're you it's not

58:14

Pejoratives. It's not you know insults. You're a fucking loser. It's like

58:18

You fucked up that you did this you were supposed to do that

58:22

You you were supposed to get something done. You didn't get it done

58:26

You were supposed to do this, but you fucked it up

58:29

Like don't fuck it up again. This is what you did wrong

58:32

Don't do that again. I get it. This is what you could have done, right?

58:35

It's like your conscience. It is like a conscience, but it's very strong. It's

58:40

very loud

58:41

Yeah, yeah, and I have to learn how to sometimes ignore it and just calm

58:46

otherwise I won't sleep

58:47

Right, it's gonna be too harsh. Yeah, but it doesn't like I don't hate myself

58:51

or anything like that. It's not that but it's just like

58:54

Honest yeah, it's just an honest assessment of everything that i've ever done

59:01

Ever yeah

59:03

That's like instant karma. Yeah, in a way. Yeah, but it works

59:07

It works

59:09

And I think it made me makes me a better person i'm better than I would have

59:12

been if I didn't have that

59:13

Self-correcting mechanism. There's this poem by this mystic and I forget her

59:18

name

59:18

But at the end of it, she says

59:21

At the end of the day, I always

59:24

Bring to my mind all the people that I was kind to

59:29

And

59:30

Then I can fall asleep and so if you know that's another way to do it right if

59:34

you know that

59:34

At the end of the day, you have to look in the face

59:37

Yeah, of all the people that you were kind to so you can fall asleep

59:41

Then that kind of makes your day

59:44

Yeah, no, definitely

59:46

And I think I always tell people that being kind and being generous is kind of

59:50

selfish

59:51

Yeah, because because exactly because you feel better

59:54

Yeah, you feel better about yourself. You feel better about life. You feel

59:57

better about everything

59:58

It's actually a good thing to do to be kind and generous and that's like

1:00:02

Counter like you shouldn't think that way. No, you should just be kind and

1:00:06

generous. I agree

1:00:07

but also

1:00:09

You benefit from it and I think the more people understand that you benefit the

1:00:13

more people are likely to behave in that way

1:00:15

And it'd be better for everybody

1:00:17

So back to the language thing. So this actually to me relates to the language

1:00:21

thing

1:00:22

If you develop language

1:00:24

You are more aware of of what you're thinking in a certain sense if you think

1:00:29

linguistically

1:00:30

But you also

1:00:33

In a way sort of dampen down as as you say and I agree with you that there's

1:00:37

this there's a there's a trade-off there

1:00:39

You dampen down the the sort of instant knowledge

1:00:43

Of how people around you are feeling like that telepathy thing. So I keep

1:00:46

looking at this skull, right?

1:00:48

And so what we know I don't think

1:00:51

But I don't think we've lost it. So you you had this idea that we've lost that

1:00:55

psychic stuff

1:00:55

I think it's absolutely there and I think it's

1:00:58

Neuroscientifically defensible that it's there, but that language actually

1:01:02

suppresses it. So yeah

1:01:04

Atrophies it. It doesn't atrophy it. It's like you can actually use um

1:01:09

So, okay, so there's this cool result from this guy in baycrest his name's morris

1:01:14

freeman and he's a neurologist there

1:01:17

up in canada and he noticed in his

1:01:21

stroke patients

1:01:23

That if they have lesions here, so their stroke kind of messed up this area

1:01:28

here left frontal orbital area

1:01:31

of the brain in the cortex

1:01:33

That they seem to be more psychic like he didn't know how to explain it

1:01:38

So he did an actual experiment where he tried to get people to move

1:01:43

With their minds an arrow on a computer screen

1:01:46

So that there was no mouse there was no way to move it

1:01:49

They just had to look at the arrow and say move to the left or move to the

1:01:53

right and wish it to happen

1:01:54

And using their intention, right?

1:01:57

So the people who had the strokes there were able to do it statistically

1:02:01

significantly

1:02:01

Um, people who had the strokes over here were not able to do it. So can I pause

1:02:06

you here?

1:02:07

What was actually moving the cursor?

1:02:09

So he had a random number generator hooked up to the driver

1:02:12

So the cursor was kind of like shaking

1:02:13

And the random number generator would make it deviate to the left or to the

1:02:16

right

1:02:17

So the person was effectively changing the random number generator. How often?

1:02:21

Enough so that it was statistically significant

1:02:24

What is statistically significant? So what you would do is sure you would have

1:02:28

a control so

1:02:29

You have the the try period where you say to the person try to move it to the

1:02:33

left

1:02:33

Try to move it to the right

1:02:35

And then you have the control period where you say, you know read a book like

1:02:38

you're not trying

1:02:39

And you compare the amount the distance and the amount of time it's spent in

1:02:42

the intended direction

1:02:43

to the reading a book time

1:02:46

And if it's you can you know, there's statistical tests you can use to

1:02:49

determine whether it

1:02:51

Was spending time in the intended direction more often when it was intended

1:02:55

But how much more often?

1:02:57

um

1:02:58

A number that's statistically significant. So I guess

1:03:01

So it's like imagine five percent ten percent. Oh, I forget what the actual

1:03:06

quantitative

1:03:07

But that would be interesting to know. I totally would I just whether or not it

1:03:10

would change with different humans

1:03:13

I I agree, but then he then he replicated it instead of looking at stroke

1:03:17

patients

1:03:18

He looked at used uh transcranial magnetic stimulation

1:03:22

Which turns down activity. So he put that over here. So he's putting that over

1:03:27

the left area

1:03:27

And to turn that down

1:03:30

And again, there were people these are not people who've had strokes just

1:03:33

regular people you and I

1:03:35

They were able to do this with their minds. So it's just sitting there

1:03:38

What was his explanation is that the front

1:03:42

Left orbital frontal area is

1:03:46

We know that it inhibits the right

1:03:49

Frontal area and we know that the right orbital frontal inhibits the left

1:03:53

And his explanation is this stuff is going on in the right hemisphere

1:03:57

Or at least is dominated by that

1:04:00

And um, when you suppress it it you're not as psychic and when you release the

1:04:04

suppression you are more psychic

1:04:06

And it's just right under the surface. It's right there

1:04:08

And so when I when I work with non-speaking autistic kids, it's um

1:04:13

It feels to me like

1:04:16

That's a pretty good explanation of what's going on. They're not

1:04:19

Activating this part as much. I not that i've proven this i'm this is a

1:04:24

hypothesis

1:04:25

And and it's not i'm not the only one with hypothesis, but they're not

1:04:29

Activating this part as much we know that because this is where speech is over

1:04:32

here, right these areas

1:04:34

In the left

1:04:36

And so therefore this area can be a little bit more free. So the psychic stuff

1:04:40

is coming out, huh?

1:04:41

Well, that's one of the weird things that they've demonstrated about

1:04:45

Certain psychedelics like psilocybin you would think that it just like turns on

1:04:49

your mind and all the synapses are firing. No

1:04:52

Dampens yeah, yeah, which is very weird. Yeah, so it makes you think like what

1:04:57

are we doing with the mind?

1:04:58

Yeah, the brain I should say not the mind well and the brain is related to the

1:05:03

mind

1:05:03

In ways we don't understand and then it's sometimes not related to the mind

1:05:06

right like in the psilocybin results

1:05:08

You're having all these experiences

1:05:10

But the brain is dampened. Yeah, what's going on and there's the filter theory

1:05:14

of consciousness says

1:05:15

Well, consciousness is kind of like out there almost like a radio signal and

1:05:19

your brain's kind of

1:05:21

Filtering it yes, so that then you have this simple like oh pick up the cup and

1:05:25

say the words and you know

1:05:27

You can kind of live your life without realizing that person over there is

1:05:30

Having this experience and that's going on and then in the future this will

1:05:33

happen

1:05:34

So that makes sense to me that it's like our conscious minds in order to just

1:05:39

deal with daily life

1:05:40

Have to be kind of stupid

1:05:44

And then because otherwise you'd be overwhelmed by all the data and

1:05:47

possibilities

1:05:48

It's so much you're in the universe and it's so much data

1:05:52

Multicellular creatures all around you and subatomic particles

1:05:56

Well, yeah, and then and that's and and when we're working with

1:05:59

I work with a whole team that works with non-speaking autistic kids like in

1:06:03

telepathy tapes

1:06:04

And when we're working with them

1:06:06

Like they get distracted by that stuff like they'll say I you know i'm

1:06:09

distracted there when I say say I mean they're

1:06:11

You know

1:06:13

Typing on a letter board or a keyboard

1:06:15

You know their spirits in the room or you know, i'm i'm thinking about what you

1:06:19

did earlier today that I didn't know about

1:06:21

But I do know about because i'm telepathic

1:06:22

And so it's like a lot of information that makes it pretty hard to be in the

1:06:27

here and now

1:06:28

Has have any of those non-verbal autistic kids ever wrote something down where

1:06:33

they couldn't possibly have known it?

1:06:35

Yeah, like what?

1:06:37

Oh, I can give you many examples. In fact, um

1:06:39

Do you want to I have a video of that?

1:06:42

Oh, sure. Yeah, I have to walk you through the video. Okay. Yeah. Do you have

1:06:46

that over there?

1:06:46

I gave you like 18 things

1:06:49

Okay, so that so let me explain the context okay, so um

1:06:58

uh

1:06:59

I met my research team

1:07:01

partially

1:07:03

Through people I had already worked with and partially

1:07:05

Folks who uh, kai dickens creator of the telepathy tapes introduced me to her

1:07:09

on yeah, I know it was a great show very interesting and so

1:07:12

I I wanted to ask that question can we use rigorous methods

1:07:17

To have folks write down non-speakers or spellers whatever we want to call them

1:07:22

I think non-speakers or spellers are preferred

1:07:26

Non-verbal kind of implies that they don't have language at all

1:07:29

But the reality is they don't they may speak but they don't speak to

1:07:33

communicate they use letter boards or got it or keyboards

1:07:36

um

1:07:37

I wanted to understand like

1:07:39

They're doing all these tests where they're repeating numbers and letters

1:07:43

And that's interesting

1:07:46

But it doesn't really to me

1:07:49

I mean the whole world of testing people for psychic abilities

1:07:53

It's not very interesting

1:07:54

And if we presume that these students are actually pretty smart

1:07:58

It's got to be boring for them

1:08:00

And so I thought well, let's give them

1:08:03

An opportunity to really show their stuff and so I set up this whole rigorous

1:08:08

trial set

1:08:10

And even the non-speakers came on board and actually told us what they would

1:08:14

like to see the stimuli be we want videos

1:08:16

We want music. We want words in the videos that are sung

1:08:19

I mean, they just told us all these things that they wanted

1:08:21

And by by again using the letter boards and we said, okay, we can do all that

1:08:26

But the catch is

1:08:28

The person who's sending

1:08:30

The information is going to be in another room maybe like 30 yards away with a

1:08:35

closed door

1:08:36

And you can work with your communication partner, but she is not going to know

1:08:40

what the target is

1:08:41

And she's going to have no idea what the target could be because she's never

1:08:44

going to see any of the target videos that we'll use

1:08:47

And so we were preparing

1:08:49

for this and

1:08:52

We were getting our software ready

1:08:54

We were preparing for the formal trials that would be filmed for the for the

1:08:57

documentary

1:08:58

And so we were doing that on zoom

1:09:00

We weren't yet in person

1:09:02

But the non-speaker that i'm about to tell you about was with his communication

1:09:07

partner maria welch who's a speech and language pathologist

1:09:10

And

1:09:13

He was you know getting ready to do the trial. We were explaining it to him

1:09:16

And I was in virginia maria and the student were in

1:09:23

In illinois and then jeff tarrant

1:09:25

another co-investigator

1:09:28

another neuroscientist was in oregon

1:09:30

and

1:09:32

So the person who was going to send the video in other words just intend to

1:09:37

send the video like in a telepathy experiment was going to be jeff

1:09:40

the non-speaker chose jeff

1:09:42

and then

1:09:45

We did it we turned off our cameras we were on zoom we turned off our cameras

1:09:49

we turned off our microphones

1:09:51

jeff sent the video

1:09:53

Maria and the student

1:09:55

Started I don't know intending to receive it and then these the student said he

1:09:59

was ready he spelled that he was ready

1:10:01

And then maria asked the question that I put

1:10:04

I thought I had put in the zoom chat for her because we didn't have our

1:10:08

software set up

1:10:09

So I had to send her a question in the zoom chat

1:10:11

And I and the way we traditionally did it at that time was

1:10:15

I asked multiple choice is it a is it a this this this or this

1:10:19

But the thing is by mistake I sent that to jeff because I had a private chat

1:10:24

with him going

1:10:25

So I didn't realize that she didn't have the questions

1:10:28

Meanwhile, the student

1:10:30

Starts to spell on the letter board. He says i'm ready

1:10:33

He says it's a beautiful sky

1:10:36

And she had not seen the questions

1:10:39

It was a beautiful sky that of all the videos in the world that he picked to

1:10:45

describe that way

1:10:46

It was a video of the tops of trees and then above them

1:10:49

Like northern lights that had been colored

1:10:52

Like by an artist to look even more cool

1:10:55

And then there's like a time lapse

1:10:58

And he said it's it's art of a beautiful sky

1:11:01

and

1:11:03

That was a really great description

1:11:05

And statistically there's almost no way to calculate how statistically likely

1:11:09

that is because it could have been any video in the world

1:11:11

And we didn't even give him the multiple choice

1:11:14

Yeah, so actually that's not the video i'm going to show you

1:11:17

I just realized that I wanted to answer the question more directly

1:11:20

The video i'm going to i want to show you if you can find it

1:11:22

Is one of what we call a telepathy train

1:11:25

Where the students and this happened more than once when when we were

1:11:30

physically in town

1:11:31

In in chicago as a team

1:11:33

Where this one student comes in and says something leaves

1:11:38

And the next student comes in with their mom

1:11:40

And they check in you know maria always asks them would you like to check in?

1:11:45

And then they refer to the thing the last student was talking about

1:11:48

And um

1:11:50

And it happened in a really compelling way

1:11:52

In this video because there was also a discussion that the first student who

1:11:57

comes in

1:11:58

Which I believe i'm calling participant four just for anonymity

1:12:01

So participant four comes in and asks says he wants to go on a double date with

1:12:05

participant five and his girlfriend

1:12:09

And then and then he says tell his mom and then when participant five comes in

1:12:14

He says

1:12:17

Tell my mom I want to go to on a double date with participant four and his

1:12:19

girlfriend

1:12:20

So they clearly had

1:12:22

Already discussed this telepathically because they're not speakers. They're not

1:12:27

talking to each other

1:12:27

Their parents haven't talked to each other about this the parents don't know

1:12:30

each other

1:12:31

And so

1:12:32

So that happened

1:12:36

And then they also passed on this

1:12:38

I mean so this stuff kept happening

1:12:40

They also passed on this idea of slamming a beach ball on the ground

1:12:45

In order to

1:12:46

Identify each of the videos because they wanted to get the telepathy

1:12:51

Signals right, but they were missing them you know on the formal trials

1:12:55

So they discussed between themselves apparently telepathically

1:12:58

If you slam a beach ball on the ground before we do the trial then we'll focus

1:13:03

on it in time

1:13:04

And we'll go to the right timeline

1:13:06

To talk about this is this is what they write down

1:13:10

To get to the video in our minds and so that's the video that I wanted to show

1:13:14

you if it's here

1:13:15

Because I don't include the double date stuff in it because it's too private

1:13:19

and they say too many names of other

1:13:20

Page I have it says here's a link, but

1:13:23

There's no link that I can find

1:13:26

Oh, um, you know what if you go

1:13:28

Go back to what you just saw and then say I worked with my team to get out this

1:13:32

response right away

1:13:33

It includes a link to this video as well

1:13:38

Yeah, so that's the on the in a level right then if you go um down

1:13:44

I didn't see a video

1:13:46

Go up

1:13:49

Go down you're going too faster. Sorry. I'm just going to the top and then yeah,

1:13:52

so that's my mom and my other mom

1:13:54

All right scroll all the way down

1:13:56

You got it keep going this is all about the science stuff okay now stop right

1:14:05

there slow down

1:14:07

And then now go a little bit more down

1:14:09

Okay, go up

1:14:13

Yeah

1:14:14

Video the debrief you got it

1:14:16

All right

1:14:17

This is it yeah, okay

1:14:21

And that's jeff and me on the right and that's maria. Maybe someone else has

1:14:28

questions to ask

1:14:30

I was wondering if that was the best way to present the video so that

1:14:35

The timing doesn't become a factor like maybe he saw a video at a different

1:14:40

time

1:14:40

But how could we make this one stand out? So, you know, that's the one we're

1:14:44

talking about

1:14:45

Yeah, great. That's kind of what I was going to ask

1:14:49

And that's natalia on the very left

1:14:59

And so he's typing something into a keyboard right now. He's typing into the

1:15:06

keyboard

1:15:07

It's got electronic voice

1:15:11

And the electronic voice is hard to hear so she'll repeat it and then I also

1:15:16

have a little slide that shows what he said

1:15:19

What did the voice say?

1:15:20

S-O-A-N

1:15:21

Slam

1:15:22

Slam

1:15:22

Slam

1:15:22

S-O-A-N

1:15:27

Ball

1:15:36

Slam a ball

1:15:40

This is where he's giving us this idea

1:15:42

To slam a ball on the ground to get him to the right timeline in telepathy

1:15:48

trials

1:15:48

It was his idea. We never never occurred to us

1:15:53

That's before

1:15:54

I picked up the F. I don't know why

1:15:57

Before

1:15:58

Great

1:15:58

By the way, Maria has a big crush on you

1:16:06

She knows you're married, but she told me not to tell you

1:16:12

Thanks

1:16:14

Tar said thanks

1:16:21

Video

1:16:22

Okay, who should where or which person would be helpful to do that before the

1:16:29

video?

1:16:29

Okay, so this is the transcript of it slam a ball before sending. That's what

1:16:38

he's saying. Yeah

1:16:39

Natalia says who should do that before the video is sent?

1:16:43

He says he says sender what kind of ball slam a beach ball?

1:16:47

Why would you draw your to why would that draw your attention to this timeline?

1:16:52

He says because I could see and hear it when looking in the future

1:16:56

Does it matter how many times she slams it? He says before each video once

1:17:00

Yeah, so the slamming of the ball allowed him to look into the future is what

1:17:05

he was saying

1:17:06

He was hoping that would work because he had just failed a telepathy trial

1:17:10

And he said I was on a different timeline and we said so how can we get you on

1:17:14

this timeline?

1:17:16

And he said he made up this idea of slamming a beach ball and what we found

1:17:20

fascinating about it was

1:17:21

You know, that's an original idea that none of us

1:17:25

Thought about but then we also found it fascinating because of what you'll see

1:17:29

next which is the next person who comes in

1:17:31

Who of course hadn't heard any of this?

1:17:34

This is another participant participant five and natalia's

1:17:37

Participant four arrives out to participant five leaves he has to go on a

1:17:43

double date with participant five and his girlfriend

1:17:45

Something participant five asked about participant four already

1:17:49

He also brings up something participant five mentioned about how to make the

1:17:53

telepathy work better

1:17:54

What is that voice that's him? He um

1:18:11

he's able to type and

1:18:15

Do this sort of sing-song talking at the same time. It would be good to try the

1:18:18

beach ball slam

1:18:19

Now, did you see how natalia just does that little shrug?

1:18:23

It would be good to try the beach ball slam. So now he didn't hear that other

1:18:28

conversation at all. He wasn't in the room

1:18:30

His mom where was he so he was at home with his mom

1:18:33

So he came in after we had a 20 minute break between the purchase so he wasn't

1:18:37

anywhere near the building

1:18:38

No, there's no way he could have known. That's why natalia gave that shrug

1:18:42

Like see she and maria see this all the time where students will all be talking

1:18:47

about the same thing

1:18:48

And so he just comes in and says the beach ball slam would be a good idea. Yeah,

1:18:53

so he

1:18:56

Whoa, yeah, and this this is it is

1:18:59

it is like they are all in the same conversation and

1:19:04

It is so

1:19:07

It's hard to think about what it would be like

1:19:09

But it's becoming more and more clear to me that it would be very

1:19:12

Difficult to just be in this conversation where the words are coming out of our

1:19:16

mouths

1:19:17

If you also are just having all these conversations with other people. I mean,

1:19:22

it's like an incredible focus

1:19:23

And so the work that he has to do to type and then he's also using his sing-song

1:19:27

voice

1:19:28

And he's clearly having some kind of conversation

1:19:31

In his head, it's incredible focus that they're actually having to do and many

1:19:37

of them have dyspraxia

1:19:38

So their bodies it's hard for them to control their bodies

1:19:41

Which is part of the speech issue and so

1:19:44

I'm I just think they're all gifted. I mean at this point

1:19:48

Right, but there's that thing that they kept talking about in the telepathy

1:19:52

tapes where they all meet

1:19:54

Psychically on the hill. Yeah, yeah

1:19:56

Yeah, so I had they all talk about it independently

1:19:59

Like it's not something that has been taught to them. Like do you meet on the

1:20:02

hill? Oh, yeah, I do

1:20:03

No, they've they've talked about it independently, which is very weird

1:20:07

Right and one way so my concept well

1:20:09

I

1:20:11

Turn on my scientist hat when I think about that and I think okay

1:20:14

Well, they could have heard it on the telepathy tapes and then they started

1:20:17

talking about it

1:20:17

But that's not how it seemed to have worked

1:20:20

But I have my own experience of that particular student

1:20:24

I forget whether I called him participant four or participant five at the end

1:20:27

He and I became I had a good understanding of his mind and we had some good

1:20:33

conversations

1:20:33

and I had a dream

1:20:35

one night where

1:20:39

He came to me and all he did was show me this like

1:20:41

It was like a it was like a sun where you could see the sunspots

1:20:45

And it was just slowly turning

1:20:47

And it was beautiful and he just gave it to me

1:20:51

And then the next day I was working with him over zoom and so I asked maria I

1:20:55

said can I ask him a question?

1:20:56

You know, and she said sure and I said, you know

1:20:58

Last night you gave me

1:21:01

Something you gave me a shape

1:21:03

What was the shape because I didn't I hadn't told maria about the dream or

1:21:07

anyone else

1:21:07

It was just my dream that I wrote in my journal

1:21:09

Um, and I was thinking he would say ball or sphere and that would either be a

1:21:14

good guess

1:21:15

Or it would be telepathy, but he goes

1:21:17

I can't I still can't get over this

1:21:22

I sent you

1:21:25

A pre-revolutionary orb with four stars on it slowly rotating

1:21:31

What is a pre-revolutionary orb?

1:21:35

I don't fucking know, but I don't know

1:21:37

I mean four stars on it with four star stars on it slowly rotating

1:21:42

But that's not exactly what you saw in the dream

1:21:44

Well, there were these sunspots

1:21:45

So see he's see

1:21:47

There's a poetic license

1:21:51

That they have

1:21:52

I I would say

1:21:55

That's 80% correct

1:21:57

So it was slowly rotating

1:21:58

And there were these sunspots that I were calling

1:22:01

I was calling sunspots

1:22:02

He was calling stars

1:22:03

And it was definitely an orb

1:22:05

What does pre-revolutionary mean?

1:22:07

I don't know

1:22:08

They talk about and I talk about in my book the love revolution

1:22:11

This idea that we're moving towards a time when we can actually

1:22:14

Use love in our lives

1:22:17

To communicate and to connect people

1:22:19

But maybe that's what he means

1:22:22

And then

1:22:23

So that's one instance

1:22:24

So I sort of go

1:22:25

Okay, that was interesting

1:22:27

And it kind of blew my mind that he used that language

1:22:29

He's very, he's just gifted at interesting language

1:22:32

And then this other non-speaker who worked with Natalia

1:22:36

Who was the young woman you saw on the left who also works with a lot of spellers

1:22:42

Just decided

1:22:42

To start reading my mind

1:22:45

Like we did

1:22:46

He started

1:22:47

I asked Natalia

1:22:49

I said can we just do an experiment where I'll be doing something

1:22:52

And I'll know what I'm doing at that time

1:22:55

And you just ask one of your students to read my mind

1:22:58

And then no one else will know what I'm doing

1:22:59

And she won't know what I'm doing

1:23:00

And so what I was doing was doing this remote viewing for a friend

1:23:04

And so I knew exactly what I was doing during that time and what I was thinking

1:23:09

But what I was thinking about was remember that comet

1:23:11

Three-Eye Atlas

1:23:13

So I was thinking I was kind of obsessively thinking about Three-Eye Atlas

1:23:18

Like what is it?

1:23:18

What's the deal?

1:23:19

You know

1:23:19

It was during that exact time

1:23:21

Right

1:23:21

In December last year

1:23:22

And he comes back with

1:23:25

Some stuff I don't understand

1:23:28

Like poetic license

1:23:29

I call it poetic license or just it's wrong

1:23:31

That I don't understand where it came from

1:23:33

And then he says

1:23:34

Oh and Three-Eye Atlas

1:23:38

And he talks about this owl that I saw in a video when I was doing the remote

1:23:41

viewing

1:23:41

And I was like

1:23:44

So Natalia didn't even know what Three-Eye Atlas was

1:23:47

She had to look it up

1:23:48

And the parent didn't know what Three-Eye Atlas was

1:23:50

And he spelled it Three-E-Y-E Atlas

1:23:53

Right

1:23:54

So it was phonetic

1:23:56

Yeah

1:23:57

And then later a couple weeks ago

1:24:00

I get a text from Natalia that the same student who apparently has now felt

1:24:05

perfectly fine reading my mind

1:24:06

Tapped into my mind when I was thinking about a medication that my stepmom was

1:24:11

taking

1:24:11

And he used her name which Natalia didn't know

1:24:14

And told me that she would be okay on the medication that it would help her

1:24:18

And then told Natalia to text me and so she did

1:24:21

The Three-Eye Atlas in writing it as E-Y-E

1:24:26

Yeah

1:24:26

Is very strange

1:24:27

Well

1:24:27

And that's hard

1:24:28

Because that's not how it's written anywhere

1:24:31

Yeah

1:24:32

Right

1:24:32

So the fact that he wrote it I-E-Y-E means he was hearing you

1:24:36

It's how it's how you would hear it

1:24:37

What the hell?

1:24:39

Yeah

1:24:39

How weird

1:24:40

So there's no way I can explain

1:24:42

Also he came up with my son's name which Natalia didn't know

1:24:45

So that could have been from her but still he read her mind

1:24:48

Did you ask him more about this pre-revolutionary orb with four stars?

1:24:53

Like why did you give me that?

1:24:54

What does that mean?

1:24:55

I wish I did

1:24:57

One thing I know with this particular participant is that

1:25:00

He's so gifted and his family asks him a lot like about

1:25:04

To do mediumship stuff like what does grandpa think about this or whatever

1:25:10

And in fact

1:25:11

The grandpa's dead?

1:25:12

Yeah

1:25:12

Yeah

1:25:13

And to him there's not a lot of difference

1:25:15

And so

1:25:15

And so

1:25:17

Yeah

1:25:18

And they also like the grandmother

1:25:20

Had a had a lung transplant and they asked who the donor was

1:25:25

And he identified a probable donor who lived in the area who had died that day

1:25:30

And they won't know for a year if it was the actual donor because it takes time

1:25:34

to learn who the donor is

1:25:36

But they're pretty sure that it probably is

1:25:38

But so

1:25:39

Boy, if they if it turns out that he's right and you can't find out for another

1:25:44

year

1:25:44

Yeah, but they won't release the information

1:25:46

Well, you know, yeah, my husband had a double lung transplant

1:25:48

It just takes a while. Everyone has to agree that they want to release the

1:25:51

information

1:25:52

But um in any case he's just really good at this

1:25:56

Like he's very skilled

1:25:58

And I didn't want him to feel like he was a show pony and I wanted to get on

1:26:02

with his lesson

1:26:04

And so I didn't want to ask other questions. I feel like

1:26:07

You know, he'll probably just show up in my dream and tell me at some point

1:26:10

Yeah, but do you think that he even

1:26:12

Would think of himself as a show pony like wouldn't it just be communication?

1:26:17

He doesn't but I didn't also I wanted like

1:26:20

I feel like I would want to know. Why'd you give me a song?

1:26:23

Of course I wanted to know but also

1:26:25

What's pre-revolutionary? What do you mean?

1:26:26

I agree. I mean he's the kid who I mean there there are there are some we

1:26:31

worked with six kids

1:26:31

They're all gifted and amazing, but he's one that showed up in telepathy tapes

1:26:36

as

1:26:37

Do you I don't know if you remember this story? It's so wonderful

1:26:41

His teacher said maria what she does is like they'll read a paragraph about a

1:26:46

topic

1:26:46

And then he'll ask you know the students like, okay, let's you know talk about

1:26:51

the topic just like in school

1:26:52

But he has to spell out his answers and so I think the topic was um like gothic

1:26:56

art and so um

1:26:59

Excuse me. I'm gonna have a drink of water

1:27:02

So the topic of the paragraph was gothic art and

1:27:07

She says so you know what was the purpose of gothic art and he said oh it it aphorizes

1:27:14

the masses

1:27:14

And she says I don't think that's a word

1:27:19

And then she thinks well, I better look it up because he says it's a word

1:27:22

And so she looked it up and it was only a word that was used in the 1600s

1:27:28

Oh my god

1:27:33

And so and it means like it appeases them so that's he wrote out it means it

1:27:38

calmed them down

1:27:39

And and she said well, how do you know about the word?

1:27:42

It was only used in the 1600s he said or the 1400s or something and he writes

1:27:47

out

1:27:48

Oh, I was talking with a magistrate from that time period

1:27:51

So like

1:27:55

What you know, what do you do with that?

1:27:58

What do you do with that?

1:28:01

Except for maybe

1:28:03

State that there's something going on we don't understand and it deserves more

1:28:08

study and these students shouldn't be dismissed

1:28:11

Now is he I don't know if you've even asked this but is he communicating with

1:28:17

people in a different timeline?

1:28:19

Or he would is he communicating with disembodied souls?

1:28:23

That no longer live in that timeline, but still contain consciousness

1:28:29

So my experience of him and several other people who are non-speakers is that

1:28:34

there's really not a lot of distinct like

1:28:36

It's hard for them to know if someone's alive or dead

1:28:39

Because they're not spending too much time in the physical right

1:28:43

They're not spending too much time

1:28:45

We spend all this time in the physical and that's what seems to be real and

1:28:48

important to us

1:28:50

But to them, it's like when I brought up that someone he mentioned he said oh,

1:28:54

I was just talking to the jp who was another non-speaker

1:28:56

And I said oh, were you sad when jp died and he said oh, I didn't know he was

1:29:02

dead

1:29:03

um

1:29:04

Because because you're just talking to him just talking to him and and it does

1:29:09

seem to be on this timeline

1:29:11

Because there's information that they say well again, this is their experience

1:29:16

But their experience is that they get contemporary information

1:29:20

Like jp saw his mother do this and he's happy that she's doing that and that

1:29:25

would happen two years after he died. So

1:29:27

wow

1:29:29

So jp was relaying information about his mom two years after he died

1:29:35

He gets around

1:29:39

God it's so weird

1:29:45

Oh, and that and that was that was the students it's so hard not to say his

1:29:48

name

1:29:48

But that that was this student's story about it

1:29:51

But like as we know from people who study mediumship like the the winbridge

1:29:55

institute or the winbridge research center and

1:29:57

Places like that that study mediumship

1:29:59

There's a this big argument about their experiences. They're talking to dead

1:30:03

people

1:30:04

Are they actually just tapping into some kind of informational substrate that

1:30:07

underlies everything or are those the same thing?

1:30:09

Right, yeah, right

1:30:12

So we we're trying to differentiate so we could exist in this consciousness in

1:30:16

this form in this

1:30:17

Reality and we think that this is it. This is it. This it's locked down. This

1:30:22

is the box

1:30:23

And it's not

1:30:27

Apparently

1:30:28

It looks like it's not it seems like it's not to them

1:30:31

So then the question is what is it about being non-speaking?

1:30:36

That allows them to have access to this

1:30:39

Yeah, is it

1:30:42

You know, is it like one of those things where you know people that can't see

1:30:47

apparently they can hear much better?

1:30:48

Yeah, you hear about that. Yeah, yeah, sure sure

1:30:53

You know there was this cool article recently came out in the new york times

1:30:56

about these singing mice

1:30:58

So cold spring harbor researchers

1:31:00

uh

1:31:02

Are studying these mice that sing at a frequency that we can hear humans can

1:31:06

hear all all mice vocalize at ultrasonic

1:31:08

frequencies

1:31:10

uh, but when they're close to each other

1:31:12

But when they're far away from each other these singing mice will do this

1:31:15

Singing and I guess they call it singing because it sounds like singing to us.

1:31:19

It's really really communication of course

1:31:21

um

1:31:22

But they wait they take turns

1:31:24

You know i'll sing and then you sing i'll sing and then you sing just like you

1:31:28

would in a conversation

1:31:30

And they looked at what the difference was between regular laboratory mice who

1:31:34

don't do this

1:31:34

And these singing mice because they were thinking these ones have speech and

1:31:37

these ones just do this other thing

1:31:39

And there was very little difference. They saw like some more fibers, but that's

1:31:44

it. So when you say singing mice, what do they do?

1:31:48

Like jimmy jimmy okay play this here we go

1:31:51

I don't hear anything

1:31:57

Do you hear it? Yeah, you want to hear that chirping?

1:32:01

You know that chirping watch the with the with the audio wave here it'll pop up

1:32:06

here look at the spectrogram on the phone

1:32:08

It's like it starts right after the four second mark

1:32:11

that

1:32:16

God I barely hear that turn my thing up. That's right. Oh, oh my thing's really

1:32:21

low. Oh, yeah, and then I hear it

1:32:23

Okay, that's a okay my

1:32:27

My volume is really that's what I mean. So that's singing mice. They just make

1:32:30

a little chirp chirp

1:32:31

Yeah, and so the reason i'm bringing that up is because

1:32:34

If we can understand what gives mice the capacity to have this kind of

1:32:39

communication and other other mice the capacity that they don't have it

1:32:43

Maybe we can understand non-speaking autism versus

1:32:46

You know sort of speaking autism or people who can are neurotypical

1:32:49

But it turns out that the difference just as in degree

1:32:53

In other words, just a few more fiber tracks

1:32:56

um

1:32:58

And so

1:33:00

That's why I keep saying I don't think it's about something that's atrophied

1:33:03

It's just like a slight difference allows us to speak

1:33:05

Most people have that ability to speak people who don't

1:33:09

Are I think very much like that

1:33:11

You get to

1:33:13

Be in contact with this information that is generally sorted out if you're

1:33:17

using language more actively

1:33:18

like you're like

1:33:21

I almost think that that babies

1:33:23

Are probably telepathic? I think i'm wondering if that's how we learn language

1:33:27

I keep thinking like we have so few exposures compared to an llm

1:33:32

We have very few exposures of like

1:33:34

You know death whistle like how many times do you hear that before you have to

1:33:38

learn it if you're a baby

1:33:39

I have to like

1:33:41

Know that when you say apple you're talking about the thing in your hand and

1:33:44

not the 8 000 other things that are going on

1:33:46

Right, and I don't hear it that many times before I get that. That's what an

1:33:49

apple is

1:33:50

And so imagine if you could just go back and be a baby again before you learned

1:33:54

language

1:33:55

just to just like just to exist and

1:33:57

Understand what thinking is like

1:34:00

Well, I think and then you wouldn't be able to understand it because everything

1:34:03

would be like william james said like blooming buzzing confusion

1:34:06

I mean, right, but it would probably be if you could just

1:34:07

I mean if if you could access that memory

1:34:11

To a time where you didn't understand language, but could you even do that?

1:34:15

I don't know the thing is like the problem is you already understand language

1:34:19

So how would you even be able to access it?

1:34:21

It's like those movie fantasies where you go back in time and you have all the

1:34:23

wisdom you have now

1:34:24

But you get to experience being a kid again like that's the fantasy. That would

1:34:28

be amazing. That's a coward's dream

1:34:30

But isn't it nice sometimes

1:34:34

No, no, that's a coward's dream because it's like no one wants to make the

1:34:38

mistakes that they made in high school boy

1:34:39

If I could go back now, I'd be the king of the school like

1:34:42

No, you'd be a cheater playing video games on god mode. I mean, that's how I

1:34:47

made it through

1:34:48

Trauma as a as a kid. That's how I made it through abuse. I mean like

1:34:53

That time travel therapy is a thing

1:34:55

So going back and like reliving your life as an adult who knows better and has

1:35:00

information

1:35:01

It really helps people interesting because you can love yourself from the

1:35:05

future

1:35:05

I think you're talking about a different thing, right?

1:35:08

You're talking about abuse and getting over abuse what i'm talking about is

1:35:12

just general sucking at life

1:35:14

Boy, if I could go back and do it again. I'd be so much better. Oh, I

1:35:18

understand. That's different

1:35:18

Now this isn't going back and doing it again. This is almost like the opposite

1:35:22

This is like you're still there back experiencing it making the bad choice or

1:35:26

abuse or whatever it is

1:35:28

But then your wiser self who's survived and who gets that it was a bad choice

1:35:32

or who gets that it was abusive

1:35:34

You go back in time mentally and you see yourself

1:35:38

So you're still there doing it, but you're like a second character is

1:35:40

introduced

1:35:41

In the timeline you see yourself and you go, you know what?

1:35:44

You're going to learn from this things are going to get better. You are loved

1:35:48

It's going to be okay

1:35:51

And that works regardless of whether it's a bad choice or whether it's abuse.

1:35:55

It's like

1:35:56

You're doing the best you can

1:35:58

No matter what right that

1:36:00

That seems to make sense

1:36:03

Like you're a human being that understands language back then

1:36:07

If you go back to being a baby

1:36:09

Oh, yeah, then you don't know language, but then people would be talking. So

1:36:13

what would you hear?

1:36:14

What would the sound? I think you'd feel things

1:36:17

Right, you would probably feel their intention or feel where they're coming

1:36:20

feel their vibes

1:36:21

It's like, you know, like you know how babies and even dogs will like

1:36:25

Someone will give off vibes and they'll just be like no, yeah, you know, yeah,

1:36:29

I think it's like that

1:36:30

Yeah, dogs are really good at that. Some dogs not my dog

1:36:33

I have a golden retriever. Everybody's the best

1:36:36

No wonder you could have like a general in your brain. You have a golden retriever

1:36:41

who will love you forever

1:36:42

Oh, he's the best. He loves everybody's his best friend

1:36:45

Like if he was in the room, he would just go from you get pet by you go over to

1:36:49

jamie get pet by jamie come over to me

1:36:51

He would just make the rounds you should bring him

1:36:54

I do sometimes he's on the floor. It's a carpet. Oh, right there. That's marshall.

1:36:59

Oh, he's wonderful

1:37:00

Golden retrievers are the best emotional support animals. Oh, they're so sweet.

1:37:04

They just love people. Yeah, they love everybody

1:37:06

Yeah, I have a little dog to a little, um, king charles cavalier spaniel

1:37:11

Yeah, and uh, all he does is like attack marshall like bite his face and marshall's

1:37:16

so tolerant

1:37:17

He just lays there this dog's licking his ear licking his eyeballs licking his

1:37:21

face and just kissing him and biting him

1:37:22

and he's just

1:37:25

Never gets upset never growls never never says get off me just deals with it. I

1:37:30

love that. Oh, he's the sweetest. Yeah, I'm on a dog

1:37:32

They're the best. I know I love them. I had a weird dream about my little dog

1:37:37

My little dog was so little that I could hold him in my hand

1:37:41

He's not that little he's pretty little it's like that big but he was so little

1:37:44

that I could hold him in my hand

1:37:45

And he was running into traffic and so I had to run into traffic

1:37:49

And risk dying to grab this dog and pick him up and hold on to him and somehow

1:37:54

or not

1:37:54

Not get hit by a car. Oh, wow. It was a very strange dream. Was this recent?

1:37:58

Mm-hmm. Yeah, but he didn't even look like him. He looked like a chihuahua

1:38:03

But I knew it was charlie. Huh isn't that funny how in dreams you just know it's

1:38:07

someone even it could be someone else

1:38:09

Yeah

1:38:09

I knew it was charlie, but it didn't look like charlie because he was so tiny

1:38:12

He was like a mouse like literally I was holding him in my hand like a like a

1:38:15

little baby mouse

1:38:16

you know that reminds me of that that dream quality of uh

1:38:20

Of someone being someone like having the essence of them, but not looking like

1:38:24

them

1:38:25

Yeah reminds me also of something i've noticed in the non-speakers where they're

1:38:28

not very good at labeling animals like

1:38:30

like

1:38:32

Like camels and kangaroos might be the same. It's like it's like the physical

1:38:37

form

1:38:37

Uh, it's not what's important. It's just not what's important. It's like that

1:38:42

feeling

1:38:42

Yeah on the inside. It's what to me. It's like proof of a soul or something

1:38:46

I don't I really think we ought to start studying

1:38:48

souls scientifically

1:38:51

because if we can show that

1:38:53

This is I didn't think we're gonna talk about this, but oh, well, i'm sure that

1:38:57

happens a lot, but

1:39:00

But if we could start

1:39:02

Understanding what a soul is right. How would you quantify it? Yeah, I don't

1:39:06

know right?

1:39:06

I mean, I think I think maybe it's one of those things you just can't

1:39:09

Maybe you can't study, but if you understand I guess i'm always coming back to

1:39:14

the informational substrate because that's like my favorite concept

1:39:17

but if you understand

1:39:18

That underneath if this is true

1:39:22

I sort of think this is true that underneath all of what we call physical

1:39:26

reality

1:39:26

So space time matter energy

1:39:28

Is this informational substrate that it's almost like has all the information?

1:39:33

from the beginning of the universe to the end of the universe like all of it

1:39:36

including like what you're thinking feeling etc at this moment or other moments

1:39:40

and

1:39:42

If you could

1:39:44

I guess

1:39:46

Insert information into it

1:39:49

And read information from it

1:39:52

Then I think

1:39:55

Maybe that means you're

1:39:58

Have a soul

1:40:01

Maybe that's what a soul is is that which

1:40:03

You know inserts information into that informational substrate so you change

1:40:07

things in the world

1:40:09

And reads things from it you perceive things in the world and

1:40:13

Maybe if you can do both of those things it means that's what a soul is

1:40:16

What makes you think that there's an informational substrate that contains all

1:40:22

the information from the beginning of time to the end of time?

1:40:25

Yes, very good question

1:40:27

Um, it's just a feeling

1:40:30

I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm not saying i'm wrong either, but i'm not

1:40:36

saying i'm right

1:40:37

It's aesthetically pleasing to me

1:40:39

to

1:40:41

Okay

1:40:41

It does seem like people whether they're

1:40:45

Non-speakers or people are particularly gifted at remote viewing or whatever

1:40:48

Can go to different times in space time or different places in space different

1:40:53

times in time

1:40:54

And get information

1:40:57

That seems like in this physical world

1:41:00

You shouldn't be able to get right. I mean that's what i've been studying and

1:41:04

and i've shown that that's the case at a great

1:41:07

At a rate greater than chance

1:41:09

Especially if people are in a place of self-transcendence or feeling love

1:41:13

And so

1:41:14

That

1:41:16

Suggests

1:41:17

That there's this sort of link about what we call

1:41:20

God or love or universal love or

1:41:23

This ineffable

1:41:26

Force

1:41:27

I don't know what to call it universal love i'll call it

1:41:30

Um

1:41:31

It suggests that there's a link between sort of what happens

1:41:33

In the universe and what we experience and what we do and what we intend

1:41:38

And this universal love force. So I want to

1:41:41

As a scientist i'm like, how do you make a physics of love?

1:41:44

So I want to

1:41:47

Think about it as something that I can think of

1:41:49

As what I could do physics or math on and that would the way that comes out

1:41:54

Is like this informational soup or something that has

1:41:58

All that information there and then it is

1:42:02

We play with it throughout our lives

1:42:04

Right, but how would it have all the information from now to the end?

1:42:09

Because time doesn't work in this linear way that we're used to experiencing

1:42:14

right like

1:42:15

That's what precognition is showing us

1:42:17

If you can get information about future events at a rate above chance and I can

1:42:21

do that and other people can do that and

1:42:23

And actually most people can do that according to the statistics and they're

1:42:28

just not conscious of it

1:42:29

If your physiology is changing

1:42:32

Then that means that sort of information can leak backwards from the future

1:42:37

Right, but can it leak backwards an infinite amount of time like could it link

1:42:42

backwards all the way to the end of the universe?

1:42:44

Where it dies of heat death and so

1:42:46

Jamie's bringing up this oh the akashic records here, right?

1:42:49

I was gonna bring that up. Yeah, it's a modern esoteric term

1:42:51

The idea of a cosmic library that stores every event thought feeling and

1:42:57

intention that has ever occurred often said to be accessible through psychic or

1:43:00

mystical means

1:43:01

That's that has ever occurred

1:43:04

But what about forever in time in the future the potential future?

1:43:07

yeah, so in theosophy and

1:43:10

Anthroposophy

1:43:13

Yeah

1:43:14

Uh, what is that word?

1:43:16

Anthroposophy

1:43:16

What does that word?

1:43:17

What does it mean?

1:43:18

Yeah, what does that mean?

1:43:19

I don't know I don't get whether anthroposophy there's all these

1:43:21

Anthroposophists and they're related to the waldorf people

1:43:24

But I don't totally understand it's perplexity our ai sponsor trying to flex

1:43:28

Oh, okay, cool

1:43:30

That's what it's doing. It's flexing on us showing us how smart it is

1:43:33

They're described as non-physical compendium of all universal events thoughts

1:43:37

words emotions and intents spanning past present and potential future

1:43:42

So potential future meaning forever

1:43:44

So the idea that we're somehow or another

1:43:47

When these people are able to sense something that's going to happen or know

1:43:53

about an image that's going to be displayed

1:43:56

That this small leap in the future of a few seconds or a minute or whatever it

1:44:01

is

1:44:02

It's also accessible forever. It's like there's no distance

1:44:08

That's time if you just think about time as a landscape

1:44:12

Imagine time as a landscape. There's a mountain. There's a waterfall. There's a

1:44:18

tree

1:44:19

And we're used to just walking in in single file right in one direction in the

1:44:24

landscape

1:44:25

But if you fly a plane above you could say oh, I see on the other side of the

1:44:28

mountain. There's this waterfall

1:44:30

And so flying the plane above is like

1:44:33

Doing any of these mystical practices like with the akashic records or doing

1:44:37

remote viewing or

1:44:38

Accessing that information accessing the landscape in a different way not

1:44:43

through this linear

1:44:45

Sort of physical

1:44:47

Dimension or reality or whatever we want to call it, but through some other

1:44:50

like maybe you go to a different dimension

1:44:51

I don't know how to think about it mathematically

1:44:53

Maybe you go to a different dimension

1:44:55

The thing about memory and consciousness and just the idea of future and time

1:44:59

at all

1:44:59

Everything is made out of matter, right?

1:45:03

We are made out of atoms

1:45:06

Ideas aren't made out of matter

1:45:08

No, but i'm going to get to that. So the idea is that

1:45:10

If we are made out of atoms

1:45:14

Well, that means

1:45:15

Subatomic particles exist inside of us

1:45:17

Subatomic particles are made out of magic

1:45:20

Like what they do is they exist in superposition. They're moving and they're

1:45:25

still at the same time

1:45:26

they

1:45:28

They can be quantumly connected to other particles that are nowhere near

1:45:32

So why wouldn't we think consciousness that exists?

1:45:36

Supposedly at least if not exists is tuned in by our own minds

1:45:42

That's somehow or another that's probably connected in some weird

1:45:45

Spooky action in a distance way

1:45:48

Well, it's not even weird as you said

1:45:50

It's exactly what we're made of, right?

1:45:53

So we call it weird because

1:45:54

We're trapped in this

1:45:56

Monkey mind

1:45:57

We're trapped in this like linear. Yeah

1:45:59

Oh, it works like this. Oh, the ball will always go in this direction

1:46:03

We're trapped in that, but we are made of quantum particles as you said quantum

1:46:08

wave particles

1:46:09

By the way at the larger level than the subatomic particles

1:46:14

You have chemicals in our body that are actually

1:46:16

You know in quantum coherence or super superposition

1:46:20

And so and in birds and in leaves. I mean, that's how photosynthesis works

1:46:24

So don't get me started on quantum computing because

1:46:28

I get a little pissed off about this because

1:46:33

Okay, I know we were talking about consciousness

1:46:35

Yeah, okay. All right. I'll just go on my little train

1:46:39

My heartbeat is going wild. Is it?

1:46:42

Yeah, because this is remember this is really

1:46:44

Something that is really important to me for some reason that I don't

1:46:48

understand quantum computing is

1:46:51

Our mistake our current mistake with quantum computing

1:46:54

But what I believe to be the current mistake

1:46:56

Misunderstanding

1:46:59

So a leaf is is using

1:47:02

Essentially quantum computing to do photosynthesis

1:47:06

In a way that we don't

1:47:09

That we can't replicate right now. I mean at room temperature above room

1:47:13

temperature if it's out in the sun, right?

1:47:17

It's keeping these chemicals in superposition

1:47:20

It is

1:47:22

Able to trap energy from photons

1:47:27

Better than anything that we have

1:47:30

It's um

1:47:32

It's doing quantum computing without

1:47:35

A lot of expense

1:47:37

So when we go and we

1:47:40

Decide that we want we want to be the first in quantum computing and we're

1:47:44

going to invest all this money

1:47:45

In like super cooling systems and

1:47:47

Uh, and very difficult to understand error correction methods and all these

1:47:52

things working on trapping single particles

1:47:54

At the subatomic level and that's how we're going to have to do it to make it

1:47:58

to force it into these patterns

1:48:00

like

1:48:01

Come on. We're doing something wrong like

1:48:03

A leaf can do it outside in the sun and does it all the time

1:48:07

We're doing something wrong. So

1:48:11

So I started thinking that way

1:48:14

Like 12 years ago

1:48:16

And uh

1:48:16

Got really passionate about photons and how photons are kind of like this

1:48:22

Almost like a link

1:48:25

This is another thing that i'm going to say you're going to be like why do you

1:48:27

think this but

1:48:28

Regardless it came into my mind that photons are kind of like a link between

1:48:32

mind and matter

1:48:34

Like they're not really

1:48:36

Like you said, they're made of magic. They're not really

1:48:40

Matter they don't have any mass

1:48:42

You know and they're actually they're bosonic particles

1:48:45

So there's two type types of particles one one is a fermionic named after enrico

1:48:50

fermi

1:48:50

And those are things we're used to like

1:48:52

Protons neutrons electrons

1:48:55

um

1:48:56

And then there's bosonic particles which are things that

1:49:00

Generally, I think they none of them have any mass

1:49:03

And they're very different

1:49:05

Like the higgs boson is one photons as another example photons are another

1:49:10

example

1:49:10

I think there's a version of helium that's also bosonic

1:49:12

But what makes it bosonic is

1:49:14

Um, it could be in the same place

1:49:16

At the same time as another bosonic particle

1:49:21

And then another one and another one and another one

1:49:23

So like they kind of don't exist in physical reality

1:49:26

It's like

1:49:26

We have this idea that two electrons can't be in the same place at the same

1:49:29

time and they can't but these can

1:49:32

And and so it's almost like they're interacting in another dimension. That's

1:49:37

less physical

1:49:38

and

1:49:41

It seems just interesting to me

1:49:45

That we think a lot about what a photon would feel and I just I just keep

1:49:50

thinking

1:49:51

That there's some connection between what we call mind and what we call brain

1:49:55

that has to do with photons

1:49:56

So anyway, I got obsessed with photons and I started thinking about

1:50:01

The double slit experiment. Does your does your audience know what that is?

1:50:06

Probably but a refresher probably good for everybody. Okay. Yeah, so

1:50:10

When I first told my husband about the double slit experiment, he's an artist

1:50:15

He's like

1:50:17

I'm like that never occurred to me because I'm like I'm ready to explain it to

1:50:25

him

1:50:25

And he's like couldn't get off that but anyway, it was peeps and butt heads.

1:50:28

Yeah

1:50:29

You said double slit

1:50:31

So

1:50:33

Uh imagine there's like a like a flashlight at one end of a tube

1:50:36

And then there's like a um a photon detector at the other end of the tube

1:50:40

And in between the flashlight and the photon detector are two slits

1:50:45

And they could be in cardboard or metal or whatever. So there's two slits here

1:50:48

and they're very skinny

1:50:49

And the reason I say they're skinny is because they're so skinny

1:50:53

That if you turn down the light enough

1:50:55

Only one photon is going to get through and it's going to have to choose

1:50:59

between this slit or that slit

1:51:01

And the weird thing is if you do this over time

1:51:04

You'll see the pattern at the photon detector at the other end of the tube. It'll

1:51:08

look like

1:51:09

An interference pattern. What does that mean? Oh, look at you. Yeah, here it is

1:51:14

Yeah, so the electron beam gun

1:51:16

Electrons goes through the double slit and at the end of it you get this very

1:51:20

bizarre pattern

1:51:22

Yeah, and this pattern and so I was talking about photons, but yeah, you can do

1:51:25

it with electrons

1:51:26

You can do it with larger particles, but um and that does it doesn't matter

1:51:31

but um

1:51:32

if you

1:51:35

Hear that one double slit up there

1:51:37

Is really good. That's a good one. Yes

1:51:39

So

1:51:42

There's two two pieces of it that are weird the first bullet up there that you

1:51:46

can't see on the screen

1:51:47

But it's going to say that when you send a single

1:51:50

Particle one at a time it has to choose between the slits, but it still

1:51:55

interfere

1:51:56

It seems to interfere with itself in space. It's like it goes through both slits

1:52:00

one particle goes in two places at once

1:52:03

It's called non-local in space. It's non-local. In other words, it's not

1:52:08

behaving like we're used to

1:52:09

It's not behaving like a billiard ball. It's going to one thing is going

1:52:13

through two slits

1:52:14

So I kept looking at this and saying

1:52:17

Well

1:52:18

It might be non-local in space, but if it it could be non-local in time

1:52:23

And by that I mean that if you put electron or a photon in there

1:52:28

It could be interfering from

1:52:31

The future like with another electron or another photon

1:52:34

That happens in the future and there's actually an experiment you can do to

1:52:38

test that and I wanted to do the experiment

1:52:40

so

1:52:43

First of all, did you understand what I just said?

1:52:45

Okay

1:52:45

So the way you could test that is

1:52:48

Look if

1:52:50

The photon that's gonna

1:52:53

If the photon i'm just like saying now i'm gonna pretend i'm a photon

1:52:57

I don't really like thinking of photons traveling because I don't think they

1:53:00

really travel

1:53:01

But anyway, i'm going to pretend i'm a photon. I just got shot out of this

1:53:04

flashlight or this light bulb

1:53:06

i'm traveling towards this light and

1:53:09

I interfere with another photon that wasn't just shot out of the light bulb

1:53:14

It's going to be shot out of the light bulb in the future

1:53:16

But it's just sort of hanging out there

1:53:18

Because it's floating around in time is it is the actual light able to do one

1:53:23

photon at a time

1:53:24

Yeah, if you turn it down

1:53:25

Enough it is how could you measure whether it's one photon you calculate

1:53:29

You can just calculate the expected amount of light that should come through

1:53:34

with the detector

1:53:34

And it's that accurate down to a single photon

1:53:37

You yeah, you can calculate based on the speed of light and the emission

1:53:43

And the where the detector is okay, how much yeah, so you can turn it down to

1:53:48

that level

1:53:48

And I mean, I think I think it's this experiments like almost I think it's 100

1:53:55

years old

1:53:55

uh, so they were able to do that way back then and

1:53:59

So imagine this photon gets shot out of this flashlight it interferes with

1:54:04

another photon just like it from the future

1:54:06

Just imagine that's possible

1:54:09

if that's true

1:54:11

then

1:54:12

In experiments where you have a lot of photons available to interact from the

1:54:16

future

1:54:17

Like in other words, the light is on for a long time

1:54:19

The interference pattern should show a different sort of pattern

1:54:24

than if

1:54:26

You don't have very many photons in the future. So the light's not going to be

1:54:30

on a long time

1:54:30

So the experiment I wanted to do and that I did

1:54:33

Was look just randomly determine how long this experiment's going to last

1:54:38

How long are you going to leave this light on into the future?

1:54:42

And then look at the very first period of time like look at the first 30

1:54:46

seconds

1:54:46

And after 30 seconds you randomly choose

1:54:49

Are you going to turn this light off or are you going to leave it on for

1:54:52

another two minutes?

1:54:52

In the first 30 seconds, can you determine what the choice is going to be

1:54:57

Based on the pattern if you can that means this thing is interfering in time

1:55:01

And it turns out you could

1:55:02

So I ended up replicating that and replicating that and replicating that

1:55:08

And then a friend at UC Berkeley who teaches the advanced physics lab there

1:55:14

Said I want to set up my own equipment

1:55:16

Do the exact same experiment. I'm going to run it over a year

1:55:20

And I'm going to see if I get the same result. So he sent me his data. He

1:55:24

walked away

1:55:24

I analyzed the data

1:55:26

And I figured out the equation that relates

1:55:30

The amount of future time after the decision to

1:55:34

The detection pattern before the decision

1:55:40

And so

1:55:41

That's the kind of result that I think is going to actually shift quantum

1:55:46

computing

1:55:46

Because you're working at room temperature with groups of photons rather than

1:55:51

trying to trap them

1:55:52

And you're treating them more like a giant unit

1:55:56

This unit in time

1:55:58

Rather than this unit in space

1:56:00

And so actually

1:56:01

Can I name drop my new company?

1:56:04

Yeah, what was the results of his data?

1:56:05

Oh, that the same result happened?

1:56:08

I mean

1:56:09

So it really was that somehow or another the photons were able to predict the

1:56:14

future?

1:56:14

Yeah

1:56:15

Well, if you think of a box

1:56:17

Okay, so think of a really deep well

1:56:20

Let's think of a well with water in the bottom

1:56:22

You cannot see

1:56:24

You can't like look over the edge

1:56:25

It's so deep you don't know how deep it is

1:56:27

So you might drop something in it

1:56:29

And then you listen for the ding

1:56:31

And you can have a sense of how deep it is

1:56:33

It's a little like this

1:56:35

You can't know in

1:56:37

Sort of with our eyes

1:56:39

How long that experiment's going to last

1:56:43

But you're getting a little reverberation from the future

1:56:47

In the photons

1:56:48

It's like they're telling on themselves

1:56:50

Like we've got a lot of future photons to interfere with

1:56:52

So we're going to behave in this way

1:56:54

Or we don't have so many future photons to interfere with

1:56:57

We're going to behave in this other way

1:56:58

One of the things that people are very familiar about

1:57:00

That know about the double slit experiment

1:57:02

Is the idea of the observer

1:57:04

And how the observer changes reality

1:57:07

Yeah

1:57:08

What do you think is going on there?

1:57:13

The word change is super telling

1:57:15

Because when you think of

1:57:16

When you're asking about timelines before

1:57:18

So uh

1:57:21

Hey can you pull

1:57:24

Can you pull up like a picture of timelines

1:57:25

And and retro like a picture of retro causality

1:57:30

Can you look at retro causality and put up a picture

1:57:32

I want to want to say something about the word change

1:57:34

Because we have this idea of

1:57:36

It was supposed to be like this

1:57:40

Whatever it is

1:57:40

It was supposed to be like

1:57:42

That's a kind of a complicated one

1:57:49

Oh gosh there's all these complicated ones

1:57:51

There's a look

1:57:53

That path diagram

1:57:55

Boom boom boom

1:57:58

No that's why are they all so complicated

1:58:02

Let's do this

1:58:04

No

1:58:04

Well what is it about them that's so complicated?

1:58:07

Well because people don't really know how it works

1:58:10

And so they make all these different pictures of it

1:58:12

Okay I'm just let's ignore that

1:58:13

I'm just going to make a picture

1:58:14

Okay okay

1:58:15

Imagine a figure eight

1:58:17

So we normally think of things just going like this

1:58:19

Figure eight goes oh I go back

1:58:21

Like that

1:58:22

I get the information here

1:58:23

And I bring it back

1:58:24

Exactly

1:58:25

And so it's more like time is doing that

1:58:27

Our events are doing that right

1:58:29

So I guess

1:58:31

What was your original question though?

1:58:33

I got obsessed with pictures of it

1:58:35

Oh timelines change

1:58:36

Observer

1:58:37

Yeah

1:58:37

So the thing about changing something

1:58:40

Is

1:58:41

If it was all

1:58:43

If it was

1:58:44

I like to use the word influence

1:58:46

Because if it was already

1:58:47

Always going to happen

1:58:50

You didn't change anything

1:58:52

It's not like you're on a different timeline

1:58:54

It's that

1:58:56

The future influenced the past

1:58:58

Right

1:58:59

But the observer influences reality

1:59:02

In the results of the tests

1:59:04

So if you do an experiment

1:59:06

Yeah

1:59:07

Let me explain that effect

1:59:09

And then

1:59:09

So with the double slit experiment

1:59:11

The result is

1:59:12

That indicates this

1:59:14

If you put a little detector

1:59:17

By one of the slits

1:59:18

Because you say

1:59:18

I'm going to trap one of those

1:59:19

I'm going to trap a photon or electron

1:59:21

I'm going to figure out

1:59:23

Which slit it's going through

1:59:24

So you put a detector

1:59:25

At one of the two slits

1:59:26

If it

1:59:27

If you get a bing

1:59:28

It means it went through that

1:59:29

If you don't get a bing

1:59:30

It went through the other one

1:59:31

Right

1:59:31

What happens is

1:59:33

The actual outcome

1:59:34

Now looks different

1:59:35

You don't get the same

1:59:36

Interference pattern

1:59:38

You get a single slit

1:59:39

Interference pattern

1:59:40

As if it didn't

1:59:42

It wasn't non-local

1:59:43

In space or time

1:59:44

It didn't interfere with itself

1:59:46

And it just kind of like

1:59:46

Went through like a billiard ball

1:59:48

And so

1:59:49

That's where the observer effect comes in

1:59:52

There's this idea

1:59:53

That you have observed

1:59:54

You've tried to trap the photon

1:59:56

During its flight

1:59:57

So that's

1:59:59

The other reason

2:00:00

Why I think that

2:00:00

Mind and photons are related

2:00:03

Is because there's something about

2:00:06

The knowledge

2:00:08

I almost again

2:00:09

Think of it informationally

2:00:10

But it's like

2:00:10

You just gained knowledge

2:00:12

About this system

2:00:14

As our knowledge mechanisms

2:00:15

Of our mind

2:00:16

You've just gained knowledge

2:00:18

And it has now changed

2:00:19

It's almost like

2:00:20

The photons are part of mind

2:00:23

So of course mind is affecting mind

2:00:26

And so

2:00:27

Mind observing the photon

2:00:29

Changes the path of the photon

2:00:31

It changes mind

2:00:32

Changes the behavior of the photon

2:00:34

Changes what we see

2:00:35

As a result

2:00:37

It's like

2:00:37

Like effects like

2:00:39

So if photons are like mind

2:00:41

And mind interacts with mind

2:00:43

Now both minds are different

2:00:44

You have gained this knowledge

2:00:45

The photon has gone into this different place

2:00:47

It's

2:00:52

The

2:00:53

The problem that it's so weird

2:00:55

And so weird to think of

2:00:57

That and observing something

2:01:00

Changes it

2:01:00

That it makes people

2:01:02

Start to consider

2:01:04

Okay, like

2:01:05

If that's the case

2:01:07

How much of observing

2:01:09

The known universe

2:01:10

Is a part of it existing

2:01:14

It all

2:01:15

All of it

2:01:16

It's like this figure eight

2:01:17

That's the thing

2:01:18

Is that

2:01:18

That's just a great example

2:01:21

It seems to me

2:01:21

Of mind observing mind

2:01:23

Your mind and my mind

2:01:25

Will never be the same

2:01:25

After observing each other

2:01:26

Just like with

2:01:27

Every other person we meet

2:01:28

Right?

2:01:29

We're constantly changing

2:01:30

We're like influencing

2:01:32

We're constantly influencing each other

2:01:34

And it is like this figure eight thing

2:01:37

Carrying it back

2:01:38

So

2:01:40

I don't think there's any difference

2:01:44

It's just that photons behave more like our minds

2:01:47

So they're showing it to us

2:01:48

But electrons and you know

2:01:51

Anything that's doing the quantum thing

2:01:53

And so

2:01:54

Why do you think that we have a bad understanding of quantum computing?

2:01:59

Oh, I mean

2:02:01

No, I shouldn't

2:02:01

This is how we started

2:02:02

Yeah, not that we have a bad understanding of quantum

2:02:05

We have great understanding of what we are currently considering quantum

2:02:08

computing

2:02:08

Or maybe this is the way people are talking about it

2:02:12

It's the approach

2:02:12

No, it's the approach

2:02:13

It's this approach of

2:02:14

We're going to trap a single

2:02:17

Particle

2:02:19

Slash wave

2:02:21

We're going to trap a single photon

2:02:22

We're going to trap a single ion

2:02:24

We're going to

2:02:25

Have it behave in ways repeatedly

2:02:29

According to these commands

2:02:30

These gates

2:02:32

These gating functions that they do

2:02:35

We understand that

2:02:38

The problem is

2:02:39

It seems to me

2:02:40

It's forcing something that shouldn't behave that way

2:02:43

That doesn't naturally behave that way

2:02:45

To behave that way

2:02:46

It's like we're trying to imitate classical computers

2:02:48

With quantum computers

2:02:52

And we're not taking into account these group classical level properties

2:02:55

That clearly a leaf uses when it's doing photosynthesis

2:03:00

It has to

2:03:01

It's not building a super cooling system

2:03:03

And, you know, trapping ions

2:03:06

It's functioning in this really wet physiological environment

2:03:10

And it's doing just fine with quantum computation

2:03:14

So, it's more like the approach needs to become more naturalistic

2:03:20

And I think it needs to take into account these non-local

2:03:23

Temporarily non-local phenomena like the like the one I discovered

2:03:27

Well, aren't they considering that at least partially

2:03:30

At least it's being discussed

2:03:31

That this many worlds interpretation of the results of quantum computing

2:03:35

That something's happening that you can't account for in the known universe

2:03:39

Something's happening with the scale of the equations

2:03:44

That it's able to solve in the time span in which it's able to solve

2:03:47

It's not possible that the same sort of process is going on

2:03:52

That would occur if it was happening right here and right now

2:03:55

That it seems that it's gathering the computing power

2:03:58

Yeah, that's great

2:03:59

That's the whole point of quantum computing is to capture that

2:04:03

And yes, it could be multiple universes

2:04:05

It could also be retro causality

2:04:07

And people some people don't like the retro causality answer

2:04:10

I think that's actually more likely

2:04:11

So the retro causality thing would be that all time is happening in this figure

2:04:15

eight loop

2:04:16

And then somehow or another this quantum computer is able to tap into that

2:04:20

And have this infinite access to all potential future and past information

2:04:26

Right, and then I just think it's easier to do quantum computing if you take

2:04:30

into account

2:04:31

Excuse me

2:04:33

If you take into account this retro

2:04:38

Retro causality piece and these group properties

2:04:41

Of particles at room temperature that can tell us about the future

2:04:46

So the idea that this

2:04:49

Does that include a many worlds interpretation of the universe?

2:04:55

Does that is that also there?

2:04:57

I mean, is it possible that not only do you get the time

2:05:01

Of

2:05:02

All time available instantaneously that because it is a part of a loop and

2:05:08

somehow another

2:05:08

A quantum computer is able to tap into that but not just

2:05:12

This timeline in this loop in this universe

2:05:16

But multiple universes infinite in fact

2:05:20

That all of their time is also available

2:05:23

You know, maybe you the thing is

2:05:25

Sorry, i'm just gonna have to drink more water. No, that's okay. There's water

2:05:29

there in the glass too if you want

2:05:31

Yeah

2:05:31

Want some this coffee? I get so excited about this stuff. The thing is good

2:05:35

The thing is you don't need both and so

2:05:39

It could be both

2:05:42

I was just thinking this morning about how it could be both it could be both

2:05:44

You could have these loops

2:05:47

With the information retro causally bringing it back

2:05:50

And and you could have multiple universes of those loops infinite loops, but

2:05:54

they're kind of it's kind of like saying

2:05:57

Like you know how physicists really like to be to simplify things. It's kind of

2:06:01

like saying

2:06:02

We could do whatever we want we could pick it paint a picture of a fairy who

2:06:06

also does something

2:06:07

You know, and then there's a gnome over here that does something, but if you

2:06:11

don't need those things

2:06:12

You throw them out, right?

2:06:14

And so it's like usually either

2:06:17

People talk about multiple universes or retro causality, but not both because

2:06:22

they're solving the same problem

2:06:23

Hmm

2:06:25

But it is possible that even with our little monkey minds trying to understand

2:06:30

retro causality that we're

2:06:31

Not taking into account the possibility that retro causality might exist in

2:06:36

infinite timelines

2:06:37

Yep

2:06:38

I'm certainly

2:06:40

Certainly the universe works in ways that we don't understand and the deeper we

2:06:44

look the more confused we get

2:06:46

Yeah, and also you find yourself looking right into mind. I really do think

2:06:51

there's something to

2:06:53

The more you look into physics the more you look into mind

2:06:56

I mean all the the physicists from did you ever read that book how the hippies

2:07:01

saved physics? No. Oh

2:07:03

Sweet. Yeah, sweet good book about like the 70s and esalen and physicists. Okay

2:07:09

realizing like that's the real hippies

2:07:10

That's where the ass was

2:07:12

Flowing. Yeah, they're all tripping

2:07:14

And they had this experience of like if we really understood quantum mechanics

2:07:18

We just get it that it's mine looking into mine

2:07:21

Hmm

2:07:23

How do you think that?

2:07:24

Aligns with this whole extraterrestrial thing

2:07:29

You're pointing at my book. Yeah, yeah, just said this cover my husband did the

2:07:34

art have a nice disclosure

2:07:35

Yeah, it's like a little quirky like

2:07:37

Alien face engaging it took him five minutes. I love it. Um

2:07:44

Yeah, so

2:07:46

This book is not about aliens and some people get disappointed

2:07:50

It has an alien on the cover because people think of disclosure with aliens

2:07:53

right now

2:07:55

But it's really about

2:07:57

What you know what we fight can find out by going into our inner space?

2:08:02

Like what we can find out by tapping into our own

2:08:06

Wisdom and our own experience and not waiting for some authority figure to say

2:08:10

hey, this is what's true

2:08:12

And now we will reveal the great secret because honestly when that happens,

2:08:17

which could be literally tomorrow

2:08:19

Um, it might be today. It might be today with the release of the files. I don't

2:08:23

know what they're gonna tell us

2:08:24

Yeah, I think there's gonna be a lot of redacted stuff and flood the zone with

2:08:27

shit, but yeah, but uh

2:08:29

But when that happens, it does it's not gonna matter because when someone tells

2:08:34

you something

2:08:35

And they say it's true

2:08:37

It doesn't matter until you experience it

2:08:39

You know, it doesn't matter until it matters to you

2:08:43

Right and so that's a good point and so I think that disclosure if you want to

2:08:49

have a nice disclosure, it's really about

2:08:51

learning what matters to you and

2:08:54

Disclosing all your own weird shit

2:08:57

To yourself, you know all the weird thoughts like you're talking about that guy

2:09:01

in your head

2:09:03

All those weird thoughts that we have and the weird experiences we've had in

2:09:06

our lifetimes that we sort of vary

2:09:08

We say that like the thing about the ball lightning like every I still forget

2:09:13

that and i've talked about it several times

2:09:14

Um, we sort of say well, that's not normal. That's not usual. So maybe it didn't

2:09:20

happen somehow, but it did

2:09:21

you know

2:09:23

or people who have

2:09:24

experienced seeing uap or ufos or people who are psionic assets or

2:09:31

People like me who have psychic experiences all the time it's it's and how I

2:09:35

suppressed it so that I could go into get my phd

2:09:39

And then it came up as a flower later

2:09:41

I think that the movement has to switch like we need a copernican revolution

2:09:47

where we're not looking from for some authority figure to tell us what's true

2:09:50

I would I would agree with that but I also think

2:09:55

It really helps if someone who knows more than you who's honest can tell you

2:10:00

what's true

2:10:01

What I was kind of getting into well, I agree with that what I was kind of

2:10:05

getting into is this idea of retro causality

2:10:08

If all timeline exists in the future these things that people keep experiencing

2:10:12

Which uh, if you just extrapolated from what we understand about evolution from

2:10:17

ancient hominids to current human beings to

2:10:21

What do you think we're going to look like?

2:10:22

Well, that's what I think we're going to look like

2:10:24

Yeah, very frail things that don't need muscles

2:10:27

Very big heads kind of like weird arms and communicate telepathically

2:10:32

Yeah, it seems like and then I mean gender seems like that's the direction that

2:10:36

the human species is moving in like so

2:10:38

If you thought of this whole idea of time going in this figure eight loop

2:10:44

Then you would consider always that us. Yeah

2:10:47

well, so I

2:10:49

That hypothesis is one of the many hypotheses, but I think that's a really good

2:10:54

one

2:10:54

At least for the greys. Yeah, at least for when people describe as the greys

2:11:00

I think there people have described other kind of beings or creatures

2:11:03

Um, and there's this there's this guy michael masters who studies that yeah, I've

2:11:09

had him on. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, and

2:11:11

So we won't we if someone the thing is okay. So what if someone says that's the

2:11:16

truth?

2:11:16

It's still like

2:11:20

It's the same problem I have when I tell people like look all of us can

2:11:25

basically get information from the future

2:11:27

And so can photons like it doesn't matter until it matters. It doesn't matter

2:11:31

until you make something

2:11:32

it doesn't and that's

2:11:35

It doesn't matter until you make something like you show that something works

2:11:39

That uses this principle then people believe it

2:11:43

It's like general relativity lots of people don't know what it is, but we have

2:11:47

gps

2:11:47

You know, so we kind of have to say that's real

2:11:52

But someone saying something

2:11:54

And making something with it are two different things and so I i'm very

2:11:58

impressed with

2:11:59

What people like anna brady estevez who used to be at the national science

2:12:04

foundation is doing she made this company call

2:12:06

It's a I guess I don't know much about money companies. It's it's like a

2:12:10

fund

2:12:12

Some kind of fund investment fund called american deep tech and she's like i'm

2:12:17

going to reverse engineer ufos

2:12:19

Because that's making something from these principles

2:12:24

Well, there's a lot of people that believe that's already being done

2:12:28

Well, yeah, but she wants to do it in the private sector outside of

2:12:31

You know the big

2:12:34

Attempting to reverse engineer well, she's she's not she's building a fund that's

2:12:39

trying to invest in different companies that are using

2:12:41

These kind of principles like alternative propulsion or you know informational

2:12:45

time travel or these kind of principle space time metric

2:12:48

And so she's one of many people

2:12:51

Who recognize that we have to get sort of out of the top five?

2:12:57

Contracting companies who are holding all the knowledge about this stuff

2:13:02

We have to build things and just go forward

2:13:04

Hmm

2:13:08

I know

2:13:09

What are you thinking?

2:13:11

Well, I mean

2:13:11

um

2:13:12

If this retro causality idea about aliens in the future does exist one of the

2:13:17

one of the weirder things is the back engineering part

2:13:20

because part of the back engineering

2:13:23

There's

2:13:26

If you do you know diana posolka is yeah, yeah. Yeah, so her work is very

2:13:30

interesting. You've had her on the show. Yes

2:13:31

Very interesting and I love her new book, too. Yeah, it's her books are great

2:13:35

Um

2:13:36

One of the things that she talked about though, was that the idea that these

2:13:38

things are donations

2:13:39

Yes, yeah, Jacques Vallée talks about that. Yes. Yeah, yeah, yeah, and it and

2:13:44

so does

2:13:44

Gary nolan. Yeah, it's so it's this weird the people that have examined the

2:13:49

physical characteristics of them. They're very strange

2:13:52

Like when they've gotten these

2:13:54

Little bits like weird metals that we don't have

2:13:56

Yeah, atomically layered, you know, somehow or another printed and this is very

2:14:01

Strange alloys that would cost billions of dollars to make and they found this

2:14:06

crash in 1976

2:14:07

Like it doesn't make any sense. No, they seem like little to me. They seem like

2:14:11

little acupuncture

2:14:12

Points like in the history of humanity

2:14:14

Like little just little acupuncture like oh, let's put a needle there. Maybe

2:14:18

they could have an iphone

2:14:19

Maybe they could figure out how to cure cancer

2:14:23

You know, maybe they could figure out how to do faster than light travel

2:14:27

So it does feel like

2:14:29

Yeah, a little acupuncture and it can be done with with with artifacts like

2:14:33

people find and i'm you know

2:14:35

Reading diana poselka's book american cosmic

2:14:38

She talks about finding these artifacts artifacts and how she's like not even

2:14:41

sure she believes in them and I totally get it

2:14:43

I think I would feel the same way, but

2:14:45

but then

2:14:47

There's this other side to it. It's not artifactual. It's about consciousness.

2:14:52

It's about some kind of

2:14:54

Mystical awareness you can also do acupuncture that way, right? You could put

2:14:59

into someone's mind like

2:15:00

I'm not sure how I had the idea as a cognitive neuroscientist to do this

2:15:04

experiment with photons

2:15:05

I think you could put into someone's mind

2:15:08

Information that will be helpful to the future

2:15:12

And I think that happens to people all over inventors. That's the muse

2:15:17

Yeah, and and and the muse could come from the future, right?

2:15:22

Yeah, that's um, eric wargo talks about that. I've thought about that with

2:15:26

ideas that

2:15:27

Almost it's almost like ideas are a life form and this is the thought that I

2:15:31

had like if you think about

2:15:32

Everything that exists today that human beings have created

2:15:36

All that stuff came from an idea

2:15:38

Like the idea then manifests itself in physical form and we want to take credit

2:15:42

for it

2:15:42

We want to say oh, I made that, you know steam engine and you did right

2:15:47

But how the fuck did you do that? Like where did the idea come from because

2:15:50

ideas?

2:15:51

Anybody that's really honest about their ideas will tell you like boy. I don't

2:15:55

even know if that's my idea

2:15:56

It just came out of the ether every

2:15:58

Great thought that i've ever had every great joke that i've ever written all

2:16:02

that stuff just came out of space

2:16:04

came out of

2:16:06

Some weird place and i've always thought of that like

2:16:08

What if ideas are a different type of life form and it's a life form that

2:16:14

manifests itself through us in physical space?

2:16:18

And that's marshall mcclewin's thought um in a book from the 1960s

2:16:22

He said human beings are the sex organs of the machine world

2:16:26

Isn't that amazing that's amazing isn't that an amazing quote?

2:16:30

What came into my head so I love that idea?

2:16:33

I always thought of science as like a um

2:16:35

A living being like it like it has its desire and if you if you don't do the

2:16:38

experiment someone else is going to do it

2:16:40

Possesses you and songwriters talk about that too. If you don't write the song

2:16:44

someone else is going to write this

2:16:45

Yes, and you know the image I had in my head because I think in images was of

2:16:49

do you remember those play-doh

2:16:51

Heads that would have holes in them and you would turn the crank and the play-doh

2:16:55

would come out. Oh, yeah

2:16:56

Shave and haircut

2:16:58

That's what came into my head like it's just coming out of whatever hole isn't

2:17:02

blocked

2:17:03

And it just has its own momentum. Yeah, and then like what if one of those

2:17:07

little holes said oh look what I did

2:17:08

I grew this hair and it's like well, okay

2:17:11

Yeah, right I know that's what it's like. I mean most people that I've talked

2:17:15

to that are singers

2:17:17

songwriters

2:17:19

Authors in particular

2:17:21

They'll tell you that these ideas just sort of come out of nowhere and you just

2:17:25

got to be there to receive them

2:17:26

Yeah, pressfield wrote a great book about it called the war of art stephen

2:17:29

pressfield. No, I don't know

2:17:31

He wrote the legend of bagger vance and he's a screenwriter and just a

2:17:34

brilliant guy

2:17:35

But his book the war of art is really like a masterpiece because I I have a

2:17:40

stack of them

2:17:40

And I give them to comedians when I just read this because it talks about the

2:17:43

muse

2:17:44

And it talks about like treating it as if it's like a real deity that you are

2:17:49

summoning

2:17:50

And you do the work you show up every day you like have this intention to do

2:17:55

this and if you do that

2:17:56

It will be real. It'll and it is like these are

2:18:01

Things that come from somewhere else well into your head especially in comedy

2:18:05

because you have to be in the moment

2:18:07

You're not think I mean even if you write your whole show ahead of time

2:18:11

Right, Mike Birbiglia talks about this on working it out, right

2:18:14

Even if you write your whole show ahead of time if you're not in the moment the

2:18:17

timing is going to be off

2:18:18

Yeah, not only that it's not just the timings off the audience knows yeah

2:18:22

You could say things exactly correctly with the right timing. Yep, but they're

2:18:27

animals

2:18:28

They smell it. Yeah, if you're thinking about your laundry or something else

2:18:31

like they know

2:18:32

Like they know if you're really thinking about a thing. It's hypnosis. Yeah, or

2:18:37

it's like telepathy. They could I I

2:18:38

When I was this morning, I'm like, oh god

2:18:41

I just have to take a nap because i'm thinking too much about what i'm going to

2:18:45

say on joe rogan's show, you know

2:18:46

And that's just the worst when you're thinking about what you're gonna say

2:18:50

Yeah, because then if you say it as everyone could just tell you we're thinking

2:18:54

about like you're reading a line

2:18:55

You're thinking about a result instead of thinking about the process. Yeah, or

2:18:59

you're just not in the process. Right, right, right

2:19:01

Yeah, yeah

2:19:02

Which is so funny because we're sitting here talking about retro causality and

2:19:06

these figure eight things in the multiple worlds

2:19:07

And then we're talking about how important it is to be in the now

2:19:09

Which kind of like doesn't exist physically but sure exists psychologically

2:19:13

like it's all that exists

2:19:14

And we're also talking before about ego and I think that's a part of the

2:19:17

problem with the way people

2:19:18

Can create or not create is that you got to learn how to get out of your own

2:19:23

way and everybody talks about that

2:19:24

Writers always talk about that like you have to get just get out of your own

2:19:27

way

2:19:28

And that's really what's going on with this wrestling match with the mind. Yes,

2:19:33

it's like we're trying to like

2:19:36

Just be clear what and I think that's where probably some of this non-verbal

2:19:41

these non-speaking people

2:19:43

That's where they have this advantage. Yes, they're not they don't have the

2:19:46

same

2:19:47

Perception of themselves the way we do I bet

2:19:50

Um, not not at all or so they're free in that regard that they don't have that

2:19:56

monkey on their back

2:19:57

Well, but then they have another monkey on their back

2:19:59

Which is they live in this culture in which people think they're idiots

2:20:01

Because we read each other's bodies and we say there's something wrong with the

2:20:05

way you're moving

2:20:06

Your body you can't talk you're making these sounds and so you're free in your

2:20:10

mind, but you're not free in your body

2:20:12

And we're giving off negativity. Oh, what's wrong with this guy? And then they

2:20:15

hear it

2:20:15

And so when we were filming for a for kai's documentary

2:20:20

We all got together with the sound people and the camera people before our

2:20:25

first non-speaker came in for their trial

2:20:27

And we said when you know, they're telepathic, so

2:20:31

We're gonna do a little prayer right now that we can all be in a proper

2:20:34

Positive state when they come in and our first student came in said it was

2:20:38

really great walking through the hall and feeling that good

2:20:41

And and you know, it's not like we told him we did that but it was just

2:20:45

Validation that that was there and then getting out of your own way

2:20:50

Like god, I think that's less of a problem for these students. Is that a part

2:20:54

of the book?

2:20:54

Well, the reason i'm looking I guess that the book is that the first two

2:20:57

chapters

2:20:58

Popped out of me. I didn't know I was writing a book until I was on the second

2:21:02

chapter

2:21:02

What did you think you were writing?

2:21:04

I'm like i'm writing words on a page with this weird story about a guy who

2:21:08

hears the walls start talking and he's like what's going on and

2:21:11

And it's in the in it's in the second person like i'm saying you this is

2:21:15

happening to you

2:21:16

i'm like why don't i never written like that before and

2:21:18

The second chapter i'm like i think i'm writing a book and i don't know what

2:21:22

this is about and

2:21:23

By the third chapter i'm finally like what the fuck i mean what is going on

2:21:28

And so it was a discovery process so the whole first half of the book is this

2:21:31

discovery process of like

2:21:32

what am i trying to communicate

2:21:35

and

2:21:37

I had to get everything out of the way in terms of all like the scholarly stuff

2:21:40

like well

2:21:40

I better not say that nope didn't get to nope just had to say the things that

2:21:44

were coming up had to do it all

2:21:46

Just exactly as it was like I was writing a song

2:21:48

you know

2:21:50

And then what it kind of did was work on me like

2:21:53

Like it had its own process that I didn't think it was going to have

2:21:56

Like I thought it would work on other people. I don't know what I thought

2:22:00

I just had to write the words and then I just I guess in the back of my mind i'm

2:22:03

like it's gonna make people

2:22:04

Feel their own inner space in a way that's going to be unique to them and then

2:22:09

it turns out

2:22:11

I ended up feeling my own inner space in a way that was unique to me

2:22:15

And then I had to write about that so I ended up talking about this

2:22:18

This gifted and talented program I was in and um all the receipts I had from

2:22:23

that and what the heck was going on with that

2:22:25

It's funny to me how sometimes I'll swear and sometimes I'll say heck

2:22:29

I don't know why I'm like why like sometimes I'm like what the fuck and

2:22:33

sometimes I'll be like gosh darn it

2:22:35

Don't know what the difference is. Oh, I think about that all the time. Yeah,

2:22:40

but

2:22:41

Anyway, I it's a weird weird book, but what it did was open up

2:22:46

for a lot of people

2:22:49

Who were in these weird gifted and talented programs?

2:22:51

Opened up a lot of memories

2:22:54

And I ended up starting a support group for people who had these experiences

2:22:58

and

2:22:58

kind of

2:23:01

Don't know what to do with them and still feel the surveillance and the sort of

2:23:04

The feeling of being studied throughout your whole life

2:23:08

And not knowing if your your gifts are your own or if they were taught to you

2:23:13

in some kind of way that you've forgotten and

2:23:16

So anyway, I don't know why I brought that up. I guess about the I guess about

2:23:19

the getting out of your own way thing

2:23:20

I had to write all that down. It's the best book i've ever written. I've

2:23:23

written other books

2:23:24

They're good

2:23:26

But this one is everything. I wanted to say nothing. I didn't want to say and I

2:23:29

got it all out there

2:23:30

um

2:23:32

And I have a security clearance that I was afraid

2:23:34

That

2:23:37

It would get taken away from me if I said all these things because you talked

2:23:40

about remote viewing no because I talked about the intelligence community

2:23:44

potentially being involved in

2:23:46

um

2:23:47

gifted programs

2:23:48

Yeah, yeah, well, of course they are I would imagine they are

2:23:51

I would imagine they were trying to get talent in any way they can especially

2:23:55

if they actually invested time and energy

2:23:56

And we know they have and remote viewing and things along those lines. Yeah,

2:24:00

but the problem is

2:24:01

They were doing these I mean, I of course the entire

2:24:04

I'm I'm impressed with and know many good people in the intelligence community

2:24:08

and

2:24:09

At the time that they were doing these programs and giving students these weird

2:24:16

drinks and

2:24:16

Doing some kind of mechanism to remove memory of certain things

2:24:19

They were not asking for parental consent

2:24:22

So yes looking for talent understood yes

2:24:26

Doing trying to look for psychic I mean the intelligence community has always

2:24:30

been interested in psychic capacities

2:24:33

Not asking for parental consent

2:24:35

Bad and so they were giving you guys drinks

2:24:37

Do you know what was in it? No, um, I remember a pink drink that was chalky. It's

2:24:44

the same kind of drink everyone talks about

2:24:45

Um, and then what was the effect of that pink drink? I don't know so here's

2:24:50

here's the here's there's two memory lapses that are very

2:24:53

consistent

2:24:55

One was in seventh grade when I was explicitly told I was in a gifted program

2:24:58

rather than my earlier years when I just kind of had these pull outs and things

2:25:03

So in seventh grade, I'm in what's called the soar program this was in like 80

2:25:06

81

2:25:07

This is before gate gifted and talented education. I think it's just a

2:25:11

predecessor to gate

2:25:12

And I was um

2:25:15

Pulled out

2:25:17

Every week I think about every week to go see a counselor

2:25:20

But the counselor

2:25:23

Was really two people and

2:25:25

Um a man and a woman

2:25:27

Maybe it was sometimes just her but I think it was both of them and

2:25:31

They would see me in the small rooms, but all I remember is walking. I remember

2:25:35

walking down the hallway

2:25:37

To the room dreading that opening the door. I know which door it was I can

2:25:42

picture it

2:25:44

Shutting the door there's stuff over the window

2:25:46

And then I black out like every time and and I don't mean like i'm 57 years old

2:25:53

and I don't remember what happened in the seventh grade

2:25:55

What I mean is um when I would then leave I remember going back to class

2:26:00

And not remembering what happened in the room. Wow

2:26:02

So there's some kind of and this is not I mean

2:26:08

This is not different from what many other people will report who are in that

2:26:12

program so I think some amnesic either

2:26:15

Either the drink was the amnesic or the drink is something else and they did

2:26:19

hypnosis to make us forget or whatever

2:26:21

the other time

2:26:23

was when I was an adult I was

2:26:25

Adult-ish I was 20-ish

2:26:28

And I took some time off of college

2:26:31

To go uh hang out in palo alto because I had a boyfriend out there

2:26:36

I previously had a boyfriend out there and I was kind of

2:26:39

Into the stanford world I wasn't at stanford, but I was just into hanging out

2:26:44

there and I needed a job

2:26:45

um

2:26:48

And so I

2:26:50

It was the time when word processing was like you could get paid to be a word

2:26:53

processor

2:26:54

And I understood computers and I was like i'll be a word processor

2:27:00

So I either got I either saw an ad in the newspaper at lockheed martin or my

2:27:05

dad told me

2:27:06

I know someone you should talk to a lockheed martin for a job

2:27:08

I end up at lockheed martin for an interview in the morning

2:27:12

They hired me on the spot

2:27:14

Then

2:27:15

I remember sitting and talking to the guy during the interview

2:27:19

Uh, just I could see the parking lot behind him. I see the desk behind me. I'm

2:27:24

vaguely

2:27:25

sensing in memory

2:27:26

Some kind of weird equipment, but again no memory of that

2:27:30

Then I remember the end of the day

2:27:32

When I'm typing on a computer

2:27:35

My hands are shaking and i'm crying

2:27:39

and

2:27:41

I don't remember what happened between the morning and the night in that moment.

2:27:44

I don't remember

2:27:45

And I

2:27:47

Feel like i'm typing up a resignation letter

2:27:50

But it but in my memory it could have just been the thing I was typing up like

2:27:55

word processing

2:27:55

but I hand it to the

2:27:57

Boss and I go I can't work here

2:27:59

And he said oh, I thought you would have a great future at lockheed martin

2:28:03

I'm like why would you say that to a 20 year old who you know is going back to

2:28:06

college in like three months?

2:28:07

Um, what a weird thing to say

2:28:09

For to a word processor who you just hired on that day

2:28:15

And then I and then I left

2:28:17

So

2:28:19

um

2:28:20

I don't know what to say about those instances. My memory is usually pretty

2:28:23

photographic and

2:28:23

My auditory memory is excellent. Um

2:28:26

So do you think that the people at lockheed martin somehow or another had

2:28:31

Record of you being a part of this other program. I think that's one of the

2:28:35

reasons why they hired you

2:28:36

I I figure

2:28:39

Or my dad knew that and maybe the memory of him telling me was a real memory

2:28:45

I mean, so he was working for department of energy when I was a kid

2:28:49

And when I recently had a support group meeting like two days ago with with the

2:28:52

folks who were in these programs

2:28:54

and

2:28:56

Someone asked the question who here had parents who worked for either the

2:28:59

public school system or federal government

2:29:01

And everyone raised their hand and then something that I said who here didn't

2:29:04

like let's just make sure and no one didn't and so

2:29:07

Yeah

2:29:11

So the federal government is mining people's children

2:29:14

Seems exceptional so that they can use them for whatever they're trying to

2:29:18

accomplish

2:29:19

Well, or their contractors and maybe it's like

2:29:22

Excuse me

2:29:26

I get burpy when I talk about stuff that's hard

2:29:29

um

2:29:32

You know, maybe

2:29:33

Like I wanted I wanted to work for the federal government and I and I got a job

2:29:37

offer and everything went through the security clearance process and then doge

2:29:40

happened

2:29:40

but

2:29:43

But I was recruited four days after I filed a foia to try to get information

2:29:46

about that program

2:29:48

And then a couple days later

2:29:51

more burpy a couple days later

2:29:54

After I passed the first interview

2:29:58

I got a note from the FOIA people saying are you sure you want us to continue

2:30:03

this FOIA request four days later. I mean

2:30:06

That's not that's fast for FOIA like FOIA is not super rapid

2:30:10

And then I said no, I guess maybe not because I was thinking maybe the um

2:30:15

People who were going to hire me maybe didn't want me to have an outstanding FOIA

2:30:19

request

2:30:19

So I said maybe not and then three minutes later

2:30:21

I got a call from the recruiter saying, um, okay, you've passed to the next

2:30:26

level

2:30:27

Oh, wow

2:30:28

So I think that there's um, I know now so I don't mean to sound so the thing

2:30:34

that I think was wrong

2:30:35

unethical was not

2:30:37

giving students things to

2:30:40

ingest

2:30:42

And doing experiments that removed their memory

2:30:44

Without consent of parents and the students, right?

2:30:47

This is universal amongst all the other students. They all said that they lost

2:30:50

memory

2:30:51

Not universal. Nothing's universal some actually remember horrible

2:30:54

Abuse that I can't repeat here

2:30:58

But many of them don't have amnesiac periods and was the the same

2:31:04

With all of them was it a similar result that they're trying to achieve was it

2:31:10

some sort of exceptional powers that these children had or

2:31:13

exceptional ability exceptional cognitive ability like what was it?

2:31:18

It looks like they were looking for exceptional cognitive ability and

2:31:21

leadership ability creative ability and

2:31:23

psychic ability

2:31:26

Um, but no, so that's so I mean, I just want to say like

2:31:30

That's not nefarious to want those things, but it is from children, right?

2:31:35

And so this is the thing that is just like, okay, you're just taking children

2:31:38

and making doing experiments on them

2:31:40

It's like you're fucking weirding them out

2:31:42

They're supposed to be playing with their friends and having fun and living a

2:31:45

normal life

2:31:46

You've all of a sudden changed all of that by introducing them to scientific

2:31:49

experiments and making them drink

2:31:51

Fucking pepto-bismol or whatever they're giving you some amnesia

2:31:54

Whatever pink or some radioactive thing. I don't know. So I had this dream

2:31:58

Well, so the reason x-men type shit, sorry

2:32:01

Well, right and so the reason I bring that up is I had this so I know already

2:32:07

that i'm gifted at dreaming

2:32:08

telepathically and precognitively, right and

2:32:12

So I know that's true and then I have this um

2:32:14

Dream

2:32:17

After I moved to washington dc and i'm starting to think about working for the

2:32:20

federal government

2:32:21

I have this dream

2:32:23

I don't have a job yet or even a job offer

2:32:25

but

2:32:26

This car is following me in the dream. It's a red convertible

2:32:29

And there's a guy in the convertible and it has a little fbi badge on it on the

2:32:33

car

2:32:34

And i'm like why are you following me? So I just speed up and he keeps

2:32:36

following me. He says hey

2:32:38

We like how spunky you are, but call the office

2:32:41

And I go call the office. I don't have a job

2:32:44

And he goes

2:32:46

Call the office

2:32:47

He's very adamant

2:32:49

And so i'm pissed and I crawl up on the hood of the car and I look at him

2:32:53

You know as he's driving as one does in one's dream

2:32:57

I'm very aggressive and I said give me the phone number

2:33:01

So he gives me the phone number and I immediately wake up I write it down

2:33:05

It's the only time it's ever happened to me in a dream that a phone number

2:33:08

actually corresponds to a phone number of a government agency

2:33:10

So I look it up corresponds to a government agency that monitors radiation

2:33:14

exposure

2:33:14

And the first document I find online is this

2:33:20

Document about these tests of radiation exposure in humans that started in the

2:33:25

70s

2:33:26

And they're like look we can't do these tests on

2:33:29

Animals we have to do them on humans

2:33:31

It didn't say like let's give people radiation

2:33:34

Or it didn't say let's give people things that soak up radiation and help heal

2:33:38

them

2:33:38

It didn't say either of those things it just said we have to do this on humans.

2:33:41

It was from the nuclear defense agency

2:33:42

and so

2:33:45

That made me start asking questions about

2:33:48

Whether this has to do with trying to understand the effect of radioactivity

2:33:51

And so I looked into a bunch of history and I found out that my mom's my mom

2:33:59

grew up really poor

2:34:00

Both her parents worked at a uranium mining facility in denver

2:34:05

And of course her father her mother was a secretary, but her father was a miner

2:34:09

And he would come home with rate, you know uranium dust on his boots

2:34:13

and uh

2:34:16

So there's

2:34:17

There's intergenerational exposure, right?

2:34:20

So if you're if you're a parent if your mother especially because you know that

2:34:23

the eggs are she was like seven or so

2:34:25

But the if the eggs are in you your whole life as a woman, right?

2:34:29

And so if they get mutated

2:34:30

I could see now. Oh, I would potentially be studied and my sister as well

2:34:37

So then I started looking at all these places where these programs developed

2:34:41

the very first

2:34:42

Soar program was in the 70s and started in Aiken, South Carolina

2:34:48

I found a bunch of newspaper articles about it

2:34:51

Soar at the time stood for get this students on active research

2:34:57

Like let's just call it what it is

2:35:00

Out loud publicly crazy. Yeah, so, uh, by the time it got to me up in illinois

2:35:06

It was called scholarly opportunities in the academic realm

2:35:09

Active research is too creepy for people. Yeah, my baby. Yeah, but anyway Aiken,

2:35:15

South Carolina is right next to

2:35:16

The savannah river

2:35:19

nuclear facility that processed plutonium

2:35:21

And so and then there were a bunch of people who were in the sword program in

2:35:26

nevada, which is obviously a nuclear test site

2:35:29

And then I talked to a friend who

2:35:31

Who knows a bunch of special forces guys, but he grew up in a place where they

2:35:35

had these weird

2:35:36

Radioactivity like actual containers like in their school like storage bins in

2:35:42

their school

2:35:43

Which is just weird and he was in one of these programs and his friend was in

2:35:47

one of these programs

2:35:48

And so I think there might be something related to that and I don't know how

2:35:52

all this stuff ties in but the story i'm

2:35:55

Again, this is just speculation and based on

2:35:57

The receipts that I found and putting things together could all be wrong and

2:36:01

some of the my good friends in the intelligence community think it's pretty

2:36:05

nuts

2:36:05

but regardless

2:36:07

I would want to understand the effects of radiation on the human mind

2:36:11

Maybe it could

2:36:14

Make positive things happen like at low level at low levels. Right, right.

2:36:18

Maybe I mean i i'm as a cognitive neuroscientist. I get it

2:36:22

But you just have to ask for consent you have to talk about the risks you have

2:36:26

to be clear about it

2:36:27

And you don't it's clear that there's a file that kind of follows you right

2:36:31

when you're in these programs

2:36:32

Well, it's also very clear that if you look at the history of mk ultra their

2:36:35

whole motive

2:36:36

Operanda was it just do everything you want to do. Don't ask for permission.

2:36:40

Well, yeah

2:36:41

Do it to people operation midnight climax all those crazy things that they were

2:36:44

doing, but they shut it down

2:36:47

They were doing it to a lot of intelligence community officers. They said, okay,

2:36:49

don't do that anymore

2:36:50

So let's do it to prisoners. Okay, don't do that anymore. Let's do it to

2:36:54

children

2:36:54

Who's gonna who's gonna is the 70s who's gonna say anything about foster kids

2:36:59

Well, yeah, and people like me whose families were breaking up and also, you

2:37:02

know

2:37:02

You're in the public school and you're you know, your parents are trying to

2:37:07

hold their shit together

2:37:08

Um, so they don't know what's going on. So

2:37:11

yeah, it's um

2:37:15

It's unethical probably illegal

2:37:17

I and I understand that it may be for good reasons. I mean, I think all those

2:37:21

things are true

2:37:21

And I think it's interesting that if you talk to kids who went to the gifted

2:37:26

programs in the dc area

2:37:28

in that same generation

2:37:30

They say none of this stuff happened to them and which is a red flag

2:37:35

It's like you wouldn't want to do it to the the executives are living in the dc

2:37:39

area, right?

2:37:39

The executives in the intelligence community and in those in those contractors

2:37:44

So you wouldn't want to do it to those kids because those are the kids of the

2:37:47

executives

2:37:48

Oh, I know

2:37:51

Ew, I know

2:37:53

But I mean isn't that always the case like that's also why those are the ones

2:37:58

that don't get drafted

2:37:59

Yeah, no, it's the privilege. Yeah. Yeah

2:38:01

It's creepy. Yeah, I know it can go down a really bad rabbit hole, but I

2:38:06

That's what made me want to all this kind of difficulty in my early childhood

2:38:12

Brought some clarity and also I guess probably my my psychic abilities or my

2:38:19

precognitive abilities

2:38:20

As an adult has brought some clarity around what really matters

2:38:26

And what we can do to make the world a better place and and how we can heal all

2:38:31

that because

2:38:32

Every single person in that equation was doing the best they could

2:38:36

Even if they were making shitty choices

2:38:38

You know like someone I could imagine

2:38:41

The counselor who knows what's going on whatever they're doing to me in that

2:38:44

room

2:38:45

I can imagine she you know felt like okay. I have to do this for

2:38:49

To get the country to find out yeah, we need to do this for the country and we

2:38:53

need to do this for humanity

2:38:54

you know

2:38:56

And so

2:38:57

There's a lot of forgiveness like every once in a while. I'll just send love

2:39:01

back in time

2:39:02

Well, that's a very balanced view now

2:39:04

I understand why what you were talking about like your youthful experience that

2:39:08

you would want to

2:39:09

Live it over again. So you could forgive people and get over the trauma of it.

2:39:13

No, I understand. Yeah

2:39:15

Yeah, yeah, well, that's why i'm wearing this shirt because I started applied

2:39:19

love labs

2:39:20

Yeah, I started that nonprofit in 2019 and what we do is we apply love

2:39:25

weaving it through time

2:39:28

In like technology and events and curricula. So I would love to show off

2:39:34

One of our coolest things. Can you go to time machine dot love?

2:39:37

We built a time machine. Whoa

2:39:41

So we actually use this with um

2:39:45

With some native tribes and with some there it is

2:39:48

Enter your time machine. Yeah, what is this? So this is

2:39:52

it's like a

2:39:55

Journaling an audio journaling app

2:39:57

That essentially prompts you to give messages to yourself and it says it's

2:40:02

going into your time machine and then later

2:40:04

It comes out and you hear yourself and it has a bit in the future

2:40:08

It has a bizarre impact because what happens is

2:40:12

We're not used to here

2:40:14

We're used to getting little messages from ourselves like written

2:40:16

But not your actual self talking to yourself. Yeah, and it changes people and

2:40:21

it seems to be a real favorite of

2:40:23

veterans and

2:40:26

people who've experienced addiction and abuse and any kind of situation where

2:40:30

they could say like i'm going to be here tomorrow and this is

2:40:33

These are the choices i'd like to make, you know

2:40:35

And i'd like to love myself and i'd like to feel love for other people

2:40:38

So we've used it at cook county jail with a group of people there

2:40:43

Who really found it powerful and

2:40:47

With a couple of native tribes

2:40:50

Who would like to change it a little bit and make it fit their culture a little

2:40:53

better, but

2:40:54

still

2:40:57

It looks like unconditional love itself like from the math if you look at the

2:41:01

statistics of the results of this experiment we did

2:41:03

It looks like unconditional love itself

2:41:06

Caused a huge shift

2:41:08

Along with someone's time perspective

2:41:11

In which they started to include more like started to love themselves over time

2:41:16

more like it's like a big bubble that extends over time

2:41:18

That makes sense

2:41:19

Yeah

2:41:21

Yeah, it makes sense. It totally makes sense and it and it's how I handled

2:41:25

I sort of wanted to make that up because that's how I handled my childhood

2:41:30

abuse

2:41:30

Was I can I get your book again?

2:41:33

Yeah, yeah, I feel like we just scratched the surface here. We've already

2:41:36

killed three hours, but I feel like it's been three hours

2:41:38

No close to it. Yeah, um, I feel like you and I could do a bunch of these so

2:41:43

I would love that definitely because I feel like we didn't even talk about

2:41:47

remote viewing

2:41:48

Oh, let's just do a whole show on that because I was a teacher of it

2:41:51

And then i'm an experimenter and then I have a team next time you come in for

2:41:55

sure

2:41:55

Okay, we'll do that. Yeah, thank you very much. This is a lot of fun. I really

2:41:58

enjoyed it joe

2:41:59

Excellent and the book is called have a nice disclosure julia mossbridge phd

2:42:03

right there

2:42:04

Go get it

2:42:06

Did you do audio book? I did did you read it? I gave you a free copy? It's me.

2:42:10

Yes

2:42:10

I don't like audio books where it's not the person. I agree

2:42:13

It's like so stupid and the publishing companies will tell you no

2:42:16

You have to have this actor do it and i'm like no because you can hear when you

2:42:20

listen if that's that person exactly

2:42:23

Yeah, I agree. I'm glad you did it. Yeah

2:42:25

All right

2:42:25

Bye everybody

2:42:29

you