102 views
•
21 days ago
0
0
Share
Save
Audio
3 appearances
Mike Benz is a former official with the U.S. Department of State and current Executive Director of the Foundation For Freedom Online, is a free speech watchdog organization dedicated to restoring the promise of a free and open Internet. www.foundationforfreedomonline.com
Show all
16 views
•
21 days ago
what a day to have you in here buddy kid in a candy shop we hacked the
government we hacked
the government's files evidently i mean this is we have three and a half
million files that it
feels like we should not have it would have been great to have had seven years
ago in 2019 when
this was being litigated but it's an incredible moment of transparency for how
the world works
how governments interact with the private sector and funds and it's just really
cool to be a part
of it what was the hold up what was the because it seemed like there was a lot
of people that did
not want these files released yeah i thought about this a lot what we have
access to now are
internal documents from the justice department and the fbi that are normally
even though they're not
classified they are part of a criminal investigation and so they're not
normally disclosable to the
public um it could be the case that it kind of required a congressional bill to
force this out
like when you if if there's a internal investigation and it's not a part of a
court document that's
entered into evidence you can't just foia the justice department to get dirt on
your political
enemies because you think that they might be involved in something now i don't
know if it could have been
done through an executive order around epstein transparency around the time of
the first binders
certainly it looked like there was friction between the president and thomas
massey over this issue
but i don't i don't know the details of what went down there but the fact is
the bill passed 427 to 1
in the house who's the one
my recollection is that it was randy fine but i might be wrong on that so i don't
want to smear
there was one person or imply anything i didn't want it released because they
thought it would compromise the victims right
um uh at one point in time at least
yeah i
i don't know what the what the rationale you know is and because i don't recall
offhand who the one
is uh i don't want to lean on that too much but uh the fact is is nobody wanted
to be on the other
side of this i can't think of anything that both republicans and democrats
voted on 427 to 1 and
oh i'm sorry clay higgins sorry apologies to randy fine
uh yeah so um there was the
i mean there was obviously friction because this implicates
everybody republicans and democrats uh americans and a dozen different foreign
countries
uh heads of major hedge funds and multinational corporations donors
to all political parties major university and science institutions uh
i mean
almost every major player in world affairs
was
in some way
either either involved in or adjacent to
this network or the network tried to reach out to them because they were
influential
and so
you know there was kind of a mutually assured destruction
around the epstein hot potato
for a decade now
which is that
you know
out of power
the republicans said
oh the democrats are
don't want to disclose this because of the clintons
and then
the trump administration gets into power
and there's
a very slow
you know reaction to
the kind of disclosures
that culminated in what happened this week
and so
you had the democrats saying
oh they're not disclosing it because of
you know
trump world
and his associates
meanwhile
they controlled the justice department
and the fbi
for four years
and didn't release
any
uh so
you know
it it took
in a moment like this
and
what's what's really interesting about it is
this bill
only compelled
the disclosure
this law
that passed in congress
only compelled the disclosure of
justice department
originated files
justice department by extension
fbi is the investigative arm of the justice department
it does not compel
cia originated files
and
one of the
coolest moments of transparency
we had
last year in 2025
was when
tulsi gabbard
as the
you know
odni
is the head of
director of
national intelligence
in charge of the whole intelligence community
spearheaded the
uh
jfk files
release
and we got
basically fully
unredacted
documents
now i know there's
a contest over how complete they are
but the fact is is it was
hundreds of thousands of files
that had never been seen before
or
unredacted versions of documents
that had been
fully or partially redacted for
decades
the only reason that we have
jfk files at all
is because in 1992
congress passed a bill to force the cia
to start turning over documents
the law i believe was called the jfk records collection act
and it forced
by law
the uh
the cia to establish this
independent
presidential
assassination review board
that would review documents
for declassification
and compel
uh
you know
on the basis of that
independent body
given all of the intelligence
intrigue around epstein
and the fact that
it is in my view
physically impossible
over epstein's 40-year career
in intelligence adjacent work
that there was
that there's not epstein files
that are cia originated
and
we actually
you know i i saw this in the files
that were just released
jeffrey epstein himself
twice
foiled
that's the freedom of information act
uh
which which is a law that
i think came around in 1966
which allows any u.s citizen
to
ask
any government agency
for all public records that it has
about anything
there are certain things that get blocked
in that
this is
there were a lot of foia fights about covid
uh
you know
fauci
famously there's this exchange where
um
you know one of the folks in fauci world says that
uh they learned cool tricks from the foia lady about how to
get around
requests but the fact is you can foia the cia
for records
uh because
it
that foia forces the cia to
give you
decl
declassified
or unclassified
records
and if it's classified it'll issue a glomar
uh
we cannot confirm or deny
right
the you know
and the existence or non-existence
of you know classified information
can we
before we get any further
the jfk stuff
i never heard anything about it
i mean i know
the files came out
but there was no big revelations
there was no
was
was there anything that came out of that
that was significant
i thought it was huge
i learned
i guess
people
are looking at the jfk files
most people are looking at it for
clues as to
who killed jfk
right
and i know that there are
many researchers
who specialize
in the jfk assassination
um
that
have sharpened their
theories i suppose
on the basis of it
in a useful way
for for whatever it's worth
uh
for me
i
you know
was never expecting
to see a cia document
saying uh
you know
i
james jesus angleton
authorized
the assassination
of uh
of course
the united states
uh
but
the fact is
is
what it
revealed
were all of these
tangential
and ancillary documents
that showed the structure
of intelligence work
at a very fine
and detailed
level
the kind of revelations
that really only come around
once in a generation
there's a
there's a video
online by
michael parenti
who's a cia whistleblower
around the time of the
iran contra hearings
in the 1980s
and he says
pay attention to these hearings
this
may be
the last time
for another
20
30
40 years
that you ever get
an inside look
at the
at the detailed
minutia
of a covert operation
because all this
was being blasted
on a congressional
jumbotron
with hearings
and
formal congressional
investigations
and public testimony
and
there's
I sort of look
at the JFK files
released like that
we got
a very detailed look
at
everything that was
happening around
effectively
operation mongoose
because
can you refresh my memory
what was a mongoose again
yeah so
so we had
so
there was
operation mongoose
and operation condor
which were
which were related
to the
nominally
what you'll read
is that they were
related to
the attempts
by
the CIA
to
for mongoose
for example
to destabilize
the government
of Cuba
in order to
induce a regime
change
but because
those efforts
proved unsuccessful
they regionalized
the conflict
to
do counter
communism work
effectively
throughout all
of Latin America
the Caribbean
South America
and
operation condor
was effectively
a
kind of
counter
counter insurgency
strategy
to stop
the rise
of
left-wing
Marxist groups
who were trying
to throw off
the yoke of
American imperialism
so to speak
as they put it
and so
you had
a massive CIA
operation
to try to
tilt the internal
politics
of
basically
every country
south of the border
and
we got
incredibly
just
detailed
I'll give you
an example
of one
declassified document
that's really wild
there's one
document that
is a
CIA file
with instructions
to
delete all
physical copies
of the document
at the end
that
describes
how
the agency
had internally
authorized
an attempt
to
assassinate
you know
Castro
by
working
through
the
Meyer-Lansky
syndicate
and hiring
two
hitmen
that
were in
Miami
and then
but had
contacts
with the
Cuban exile
community
liaisons
within Cuba
and
so
this
was a
formal
agency
file
that
described
how
a
CIA
case
officer
made
contact
with
people
from
the mob
organized
crime
with
offers
of payoffs
with very
detailed
logistics
you can
find this
I did
hold video
on it
on my
the
ex-subscriber
thing
I'll
put it
on the top
of my
social media
but
it also
describes
a really
interesting
Jeffrey Epstein
like
figure
Robert
Mayhew
was a
CIA
asset
the
JFK
files
they
describe
how
they
got
they
sponsored
a movie
to
simulate
I believe
it was
the
president
of
Indonesia
having
an affair
with a
blonde
woman
they
filmed
a
basically
like a
porno
that
would
and
to
create
a
tape
and
they
had
very
they
described
how
they
set
up
the
room
to
make
it
look
like
it
was
I
think
in
the
presidential
palace
or
some
hotel
room
that
was
would
have
been
in
in
that
country
in
order
to
create
what's
effectively
a
sexual
blackmail
tape
that
could
then
be
leaked
to
the
press
in
order
to
discredit
the
president
and
you
these
informal
agency
files
and
on
the
one
hand
you
go
okay
that
was
the
1960s
that
was
the
early
1960s
that
was
before
there
was
any
oversight
on
the
CIA
at
all
it
wasn't
until
the
church
committee
hearings
in
1975
1976
that
we
even
had
congressional
oversight
of
the
CIA
there
was
no
senate
intelligence
committee
there
was
no
house
intelligence
committee
at
the
time
and
at
that
point
assassinations
had not
been
outlawed
I mean
the
CIA
was
allowed
to
assassinate
people
there
there's
since
been
a
ban
on
that
so
you
go
okay
that's
60
years
ago
but
the fact
is
they
did
it
the
fact
is
that
is
within
the
array
of
options
that
folks
in
covert
operations
saw
as
on
the
table
working
with
the
mob
now
but
that
goes
back
a
long
time
I
found
it
totally
unsurprising
it's
one
of
these
things
it's
kind
of
the
general
theme
it's
shocked
but
not
surprised
you
know
it's
like
holy
crap
they
they
put
this
in
writing
what
are
we
doing
here
guys
but
you're
like
but
I'm
not
surprised
they
did
it
because
I
know
they
were
doing
all
these
other
things
the
fact
is
the
CIA
was
working
with
the
mob
before
there
was
CIA
before
it
was
done
by
the
CIA
work
with
for
example
the
Italian
mob
was
done
through
the
Department
of
War
in
the
really
starting
in
the
1930s
and
then
especially
in the
1940s
because
they
were
the
central
intelligence
agency
at the
time
it
was
the
OSS
in
the
1940s
but
it
would
become
the
CIA
one
of
their
main
logistical
points
of
contact
and
allies
for
the
resistance
against
Mussolini
in
Italy
Mussolini
was
cracking
down
both
on
the
Vatican
Church
and
on
the
Italian
mafia
and
so
there were
strange
bedfellas
there's
a great
book
on
this
by
Paul
Williams
I think
it was
published
in
2017
it's
called
Operation
Gladio
the
CIA
the
Vatican
and
the
mob
and
it's
I
recommend
this
book
to
everyone
because
it's
a
really
really
detailed
academic
deep
deep
deep
dive
on
this
nexus
between
a
religious
institution
an
intelligence
agency
an
illegal
organized
crime
syndicate
that does
all manner
of
black
ops
and
it
especially
focuses
on the
funding
relationship
in fact
this just
came out
and this
sort of
gets the
utility
of these
documents
there's
an
incredible
document
that just
was released
this week
where Larry
Summers
who was
the
head
of the
U.S.
Treasury
so not only
was he
the head
of Harvard
University
and the
head
of
the
American
money
system
but
he
he
says
to
he's
trying to
explain
to Jeffrey
Epstein
kind of
the
politics
of what's
happening
in the
Vatican
and what
he says
to him
is that
what's
what's
actually
most
important
going
on
right
now
is
what's
happening
with
the
Vatican
Bank
which
is
kind
of
the
deep
politics
of
the
Vatican
and
you know
I saw
this
and I
just
you know
laughed
and did
a little
you know
twirly
thing
in my
in my
chair
because
it's
it's
totally
unsurprising
if you
read
you know
that book
Operation
Gladio
that I
mentioned
it
it
traces
80
years
of this
because
the
Vatican Bank
was the
first
offshore
bank
before
offshore
banking
even
existed
it
was
you
there
was
an
alliance
with
the
Vatican
Bank
during
World War II
itself
with our
Department
of War
and with
organized crime
outfits
at least
according to
the evidence
that I find
persuasive in
this book
and that
appears to be
validated by
Italian court
documents in
the 1990s
when all
of this was
litigated
incidentally
that was
when the
mob was
really
prosecuted
for the
first time
but
effectively
what happened
was is you
had strange
bedfellows
you had the
United States
who wanted
to get rid
of Mussolini
you had the
Vatican
who wanted
to get rid
of Mussolini
and you
had organized
crime
who wanted
to get rid
of Mussolini
and because
organized crime
is very deep
in the logistics
and unions
they control
the ports
they control
the streets
they control
safe houses
and if
they have
allies
in a
bank
they are
able to
launder
money
effectively
in order
to do
black market
you know
type
trade
and if
you have
for example
the support
of the US
government
to facilitate
that
and there's
protection
offered
to those
organized crime
groups
what you end
up having
is effectively
state
sponsored
a state
sponsored
mafia
with an
untouchable
bank
and at the
time
because
and Larry
Summers
explains this
to Jeffrey
Epstein
in very
simple terms
which is
which is
yeah
here you go
the most
important change
in the
Vatican
may not
be Pope
Benedict
son
retirement
but change
in leadership
of the
Institute
for Works
of Religion
the Vatican's
bank
because of
the Vatican's
status as a
sovereign country
it's exempt
from transparency
rules of not
only Italy
but of the
European Union
this status
allows its elite
clients to evade
any scrutiny
in their money
transfers
last May
Vatican Bank
president
was fired
after Italian
authorities
opened an
investigation
into a
far-flung
bribery scheme
and he goes
through this
but
what's
important here
is the
British
when we think
of offshore
banking now
it's usually
associated
with
Cayman Islands
Cayman Islands
you know
Jersey
Man
Panama
you know
but
Panama's
sort of
a different
story
but it's
usually
associated
with these
kind of
small
island
countries
that are
formerly
you know
kind of
their own
territory
their own
sort of
sovereign
territory
you also
see this
within the
United States
in
Indian
Native
American
reservations
with these
kind of
autonomous
zones
that can
be shielded
from certain
kinds of
you know
public
disclosures
that
a typical
finance
institution
that's
going on
with
Native
American
banks
well
yeah
this
this
was
actually
part
of
is that
connected
to the
casinos
because
they have
a lot
of money
from the
casinos
yeah
Super Bowl
60
deserves
a sports
book
built
for the
moment
Draft
King
Sports
Book
an
official
sports
betting
partner
of
Super
Bowl
60
puts
you
right
in
the
center
of
the
biggest
game
of
the
year
anything
can
happen
during
the
Super
Bowl
and
Draft
Kings
has
your
back
with
early
exit
if
your
player
goes
down
in
the
first
half
you
still
get
paid
in
cash
when
your
bet
settles
no
bonus
bets
no
waiting
while
other
sports
books
don't
offer
injury
protection
Draft
Kings
covers
the
entire
first
half
even
the
second
quarter
an
early
exit
new
customers
can
bet
just
five
dollars
to
get
300
in
bonus
bets
if
your
bet
wins
download
the
Draft
Kings
Sportsbook
app
now
and
use
the
code
Rogan
that's
code
Rogan
to
turn
five
bucks
into
300
in
bonus
bets
if
your
bet
wins
in
partnership
with
Draft
Kings
the
crown
is
yours
Gambling
problem
call
1-800-GAMBLER
in New York
call
877-8-HOPE-N-Y
or text
HOPE-N-Y
467-369
in Connecticut
call
888-789-7777
or visit
ccpg.org
on behalf
of
Boothill Casino
and Resort
in Kansas
pass-through
if per
wager tax
may apply
in Illinois
21 and over
age and
eligibility
varies by
jurisdiction
void
in Ontario
restrictions
apply
bet
must win
to receive
bonus bets
which expire
in seven
days
minimum
odds
required
for
additional
terms
and responsible
gaming
resources
cdkng.co
slash audio
limited time
offer
yeah
yeah
in fact
if you watch
the octopus
murders
which I think
was HBO
or Netflix
or one of those
great
I haven't seen it
but yeah
it's awesome
it's fantastic
and you know
it goes through
how this was used
effectively by the NSA
during the
promise software
scandal
and the Iran
Contra scandal
of the 1980s
where
you had
basically the NSA
and then
the US
government
running money
laundering
effectively
through
you know
casinos
on
on Native
American
sovereign
territory
but
the fact
is
in the 1940s
the Vatican
Bank
was really
the only
game in town
this traces
back
at the CIA
level
to a lawyer
named Paul
Hallowell
who was
kind of
the architect
of money
laundering
for the CIA
and it
didn't even
start
really started
with the
the attempt
to try
to stop
Mao
in the
1930s
and 1940s
there was
there were
the opium
wars
in the
1830s
where
effectively
the British
Empire
and you
know
the East
India
Trading
Company
were
making
ungodly
amounts of
money
by
selling
opium
to China
they
would
grow
the
opium
on the
Golden
Crescent
or India
and then
they
would
sell
it
to
China
with
the
huge
customer
base
which
would
bring
in
huge
amounts
of
revenues
to the
British
crown
and then
there
were
two
opium
wars
that
were
fought
in
the
1830s
and
50s
I
believe
around
then
and
the
opium
wars
were
China's
attempt
to
stop
the
import
of
opium
into
China
because
it
had
a
huge
by
that
point
opium
addiction
problem
opium
dens
in
China
were
a
massive
issue
within
the
country
they
tried
to
ban
it
and
the
British
crown
pried
open
the
narcotics
market
through
a
military
conquest
of parts
of China
that's
how
Britain
got
control
of Hong
Kong
which
remains
a
major
narco
trafficking
site
connected
to
Jeffrey
Epstein
in
very
weird
ways
I'll
just
sidebar
that
but
Mao
rose
to
power
to
you know
in the
name
of
his
public
campaign
was about
rejecting
the
century
of
humiliation
between
the
1830s
and
the
1930s
to
support
Chiang
Hai
Shek
and
the
Kuomintang
the
Chinese
nationalists
against
the
Chinese
communists
the
war
department
couldn't
get
enough
congressional
allocations
taxpayer
money to
support
that
so
they
had
to
find
some
way
to
finance
the
forces
that
are
now
effectively
Taiwan
because
when
they
ultimately
lost
they
fled
to
the
island
Formosa
which is
now
Taiwan
but
they
financed
that
initially
the
war
department
the
Chinese
nationalists
through
the
narcotics
trade
through
the
basically
the
narcotics
cultivated
cultivated
in
the
golden
triangle
and
these
operations
continued
in
Cambodia
and
Laos
and
were
a big
part
of
the
JFK
expansion
of
covert
operations
to this
day
in
Fort Bragg
the
you know
the
special
operations
training
center
is
called
the
JFK
this
was a
massive
expansion
of
small
wars
covert
action
instead
of
big
military
action
so
it
was
mostly
spearheaded
by CIA
rather than
DOD
or
Department
of War
but
what
happened
was
is
Paul
Hallowell
in
order
to
be
able
to
traffic
illegal
narcotics
created
a bunch
of
these
CIA
banking
structures
one's
called
Castle
Bank
and
Trust
in
the
Cayman
Islands
another
one
is
Nugan
Hand
in
Australia
and
when
you
have
that
friendly
bank
that's
protected
then
you
can
move
drugs
this
is
this
overworld
underworld
alliance
between
intelligence
and
organized
crime
because
basically
every
intelligence
operation
is
I want
to say
every
but
at the
operational
level
it's
a crime
it's
an act
of
sabotage
it's
an act
of
subversion
it's
an act
of
obstruction
it's
an act
of
illegal
surveillance
so
in
order
to
do
a
illegal
crime
you
don't
want
to
do
it
yourself
because
then
your
fingerprints
are
on
the
gun
but
if
you
know
people
who
do
illegal
crimes
for
a
living
in
an
organized
way
and
have
experience
in
doing
it
that
allows
you
to be
a
very
useful
extension
and
it
gets
justified
in the
name
of
national
security
the
illegal
narcotics
trade
set up
by
Paul
Hallowell
who
would
go
on
to
be
the
main
lawyer
for
Disney
and
set
up
Disney
World
in
Orlando
you
can
look
all
this
up
you
can
pull up
Paul
Hallowell's
Wikipedia
or
you
can
look
at
the
history
of
Disney
or
you
can
pull
up
Castle
Bank
and
trust
you
can
put
any
one
of
these
up
on
screen
this
is
all
fully
declassified
and
so
they
then
took
that
model
to
South
America
and
Latin
America
and
the
Caribbean
during
Operation
Condor
Operation
Mongoose
and
this
is
part
of
what
gave
rise
to
the
Iran
Contra
that
spawned
Jeffrey
Epstein
which
was
the
CIA
got
busted
running
the
same
thing
it
did
in
1940s
China
which
was
a
drugs
for
cash
for
guns
operation
you
cultivate
you
can't
get
enough
money
in
USAID
you
know
in
the
1940s
USAID
didn't
even
exist
you
can't
get
enough
money
from
US
taxpayer
dollars
you
can't
get
enough
money
from
private
donors
who
will
draft
off
of
the
regime
change
for
their
own
profit
so
how
do
you
get
your
resistance
rebels
enough
money
it
that
usually
comes
down
to
black
market
diamonds
in
Africa
whether
that's
illegal
mining
activities
in
South
America
or
whether
that's
narcotics
and
it's
the best
things to
use for
this
kind of
covert
financing
are
small
fungible
physical
materials
that
can
be
converted
into
large
sums
of
cash
for
example
like
a
truck
full
of
cocaine
can
fund
an
army
a
truck
full
of
copper
can't
and
so
you
had
this
state
sanctioned
drug
trade
this
state
sanctioned
illegal
weapons
logistics
apparatus
and the
state
sanctioned
money
laundering
apparatus
that
started
in the
1940s
and was
utilized
throughout
the entirety
of the
Cold War
the
on the
mafia
side
in the
operation
gladio
was this
stay behind
network
is what
they
what they
said
basically
these
were
right wing
groups
many or
some of
which
were
kind of
Nazi
adjacent
who
hated
communism
and so
even
though
we
fought
against
the
Nazis
in
Mussolini
and
Hitler
in
World
War
II
there
was
a
utility
to
preserving
a
certain
homegrown
domestic
network
that
really
hated
communism
to
assist
us
on
the
ground
in
the
war
against
communism
and
what
you
saw
was
in
Operation
Gladio
this
was
a
NATO
wide
covert
network
alignment
alliance
of
networks
and
network
of
networks
that
in
basically
every
one
of
the
NATO
countries
there
was
a
cell
or
a
number
of
cluster
cells
that
were
set
up
in
order
to
covertly
influence
the
domestic
politics
of
the
country
and
if
you
look
at
the
members
of
these
cluster
cells
there
some
of
them
like
Silvio
Berlusconi
was
a
part
of
the
so
called
P2
lounge
that
came up
in the
Operation
Gladio
files
when
the
Italian
government
basically
put
all this
on trial
in the
1990s
and
that
structure
is still
used
by
intelligence
today
if
you
go to
my
X feed
and
you
look
up
for
example
Ann
Applebaum
and the
thread
that I
did
on
the
integrity
initiative
if
you
just
put
integrity
initiative
in
I
can
show
you
what
these
cluster
cells
look
like
and
it's
fascinating
to look
at the
organizational
structure
of it
but I
guess
what I'm
getting to
here
is
with
the
mob
and
the
Vatican
at
that
time
that
was
the
only
game
in
town
for
offshore
banking
if
you
wanted
to
have
a
bank
that
had
no
oversight
whatsoever
when
the
British
lost
the
Suez
Canal
in
1957
and
basically
had to
give up
their
empire
this is
during
decolonialization
the
British
empire
transitioned
from
a
physical
empire
to
a
financial
empire
and
moved
heavily
into
offshore
banking
that's
how
you
got
these
kind
of
you
know
BVI
British
Virgin
Islands
Cayman
Islands
you
know
Jersey
man
all
these
kind
of
British
offshore
banking
hubs
and
with
London
as
the
capital
of
international
finance
you
you
will
the
British
empire
was
effectively
able
to
maintain
a
comparable
level
of
imperial
vassal
state
control
without
having
physical
troops
or
physical
territorial
control
and
so
the
Vatican
bank
has
lost
a lot
of
its
rank
I
would
say
in
the
international
finance
system
since
the
1940s
because
the
market
so
saturated
now
with
offshore
banking
hubs
but
that
explains
what's
happening
in this
Larry
Summers
Jeffrey
Epstein
exchange
one of
the weirder
things
about
these
files
is
there's
some
stuff
in there
that you
go
okay
one thing
that we
know
happens
is when
something
is true
a bunch
stuff
gets attached
gets attached
to it
that's
both
not
true
and
also
preposterous
that
allows
you
to
sort
of
dismiss
all
of
it
together
there's
a lot
of
people
thought
about
that
with
Pizzagate
and
there's
some
stuff
that I
saw
online
that
was
like
George W.
Bush
was
like
involved
in
ritual
sacrifice
or
things
along
those
lines
like
killing
babies
and
eating
people
and
wild
shit
what
do
you
think
that
stuff
is
I
don't
know
I
don't
think
it
really
occurs
what
I'll
say
is
this
is
a
bad
week
to
be
a
total
Pizzagate
denialist
you
would
feel
a lot
more
comfortable
about
it
a week
ago
than
you
would
this
week
I
don't
particularly
focus
or
I don't
want to
say
care
I
don't
I
don't
my
knowledge
set
on
it
is
a
lot
more
limited
on
it
because
I
don't
think
it's
a
central
crux
of
political
influence
I
don't
know
if
it's
kind
of
almost
a
inside
joke
in a
certain
way
Jeffrey
Epstein
himself
in these
emails
is
unbelievably
trolly
you know
he'll
say
things
that
are
the
kind
of
you
know
shit
posts
you
say
to
a
buddy
or
your
brother
or
something
that
you
don't
mean
you
know
it's
kind of
cheek
but
you
if
if you
were a
cynical
out to get
you
person
who somehow
obtained that
text message
you'd say
oh look
he said
it
and so
so there's a lot
of that
going on
but the
fact is
is I
I've seen
some
I've seen
a lot
of
images
shared
around
the time
period
of when
Pizzagate
was popping
off
in 2016
that
all I'll
say is
it doesn't
it doesn't
look good
or easily
explainable
at the same
time
a lot
of those
screenshots
I have
not
you know
for most
of these
for the
things I've
posted
about
or that
I'm
talking
about
here
I've
gone
to the
Justice
Department
file
I've
looked at
the file
number
confirmed
whether or
not
the
screenshot
is
actually
what
it
is
for
those
I have
not
yet
but
I
would
not
I
wouldn't
feel
totally
confident
saying
there's
no
there
there
but
that's
that's
about
as far
as
I
can
go
on
that
when
you
say
images
what
are
you
talking
about
well
there's
a
lot
of
you
know
if
you
look
up
pizza
for
example
it's
just
as a
keyword
search
you'll
see
or
cheese
or
something
it
looks
like
in
the
DOJ
database
for
these
new
files
you'll
see
a lot
of
things
of
people
talking
about
pizza
in a
way
that
it
seems
like
a
code
kind
of
impossible
to
imagine
it's
actually
just
pizza
it's
about
you
know
what
I
mean
but
I
don't
to
me
there's
so
much
real
world
provable
things
in
there
and
also
so
many
kind
of
more
real
world
implications
of
allegations
that are
made
in the
files
that
kind
of
you
know
should
be
explained
like
a
common
mistake
that I
see
going
around
social
media
this
week
is
people
it
kind
of
gets
the
reason
that
the
FBI
and
the
president
was
arguing
that
these
files
shouldn't
be
released
in
the
first
place
which
is
that
people
would
take
things
out
of
context
and
wildly
think
things
are
true
that
are
not
because
they're
baseless
allegations
made
by
some
anonymous
tipster
but
because
it's
in
an
FBI
file
people
will
think
it's
true
now
I
don't
seen
that
phenomenon
run
away
and
some
of
this
I
know
is
kind
of
baseless
in terms
of the
factual
evidence
because
some
of the
people
one
of the
confidential
human
sources
for example
that
is
cited
the
first
day
of
the
drop
there
was
this
kind
of
bombshell
claim
in
the
this
is
probably
the
most
viral
post
the
first
day
of
the
DOJ
release
which
was
a
confidential
human
source
a
CHS
means
of
FBI
informant
who
the
FBI
internal
memo
describes
how this
confidential
human
source
reported
that
Alan
Dershowitz
was
a
Mossad
agent
and after
every
meeting
he
goes
back
and
tells
his
Mossad
handlers
what
they
talked
about
and
you
go
oh
my
god
it's
an
FBI
confidential
human
source
the
FBI
wouldn't
pay
an
informant
unless
they
found
them
credible
for
this
sort
of
thing
on
the
very
next
page
of
the
files
it
says
President
Trump
I'm
paraphrasing
you can
pull this
up
if you
want
President
Trump
is
controlled
by
the
government
of
Israel
and
they
have
I
forget
if he
says
blackmail
or
something
to this
effect
now
I don't
know
whether
either
of those
things
are true
or not
I don't
know
what
you know
any more
than anybody
else
who's done
research
on this
certainly
there's a lot
of overlap
between
Dershowitz
and the
Israeli
government
and high
level
Israeli
officials
so in
that sense
if that
were to
be
reported
I
don't
know
that
it
would
be
the
who
knows
about
whether
that's
true
or not
it's
but it
plays
into a
kind
of
confirmation
bias
that
a lot
of
people
have
and so
when you
see
that
in an
FBI
file
the
first
thing
your
instinct
is
if
you're
you know
if
that's
your
journalism
beat
is to
is to
write
all
about
it
and
get
millions
of
views
and
same
thing
there's
a
civil
war
right
now
that's
happening
over
issues
around
Israel
it's
you know
you say
oh my
god
it's been
proven
the FBI
knows
that
well
Ken
Silva
who's a
journalist
shortly
after that
published
a tweet
containing
a file
that had
much less
engagement
where he
said
actually
I
actually
have a
copy
of this
document
again
I'm
paraphrasing
here
where
it
matches
that
document
file
number
it's
got
the
same
text
and
it
looks
like
the
that
confidential
human
source
is
Chuck
Johnson
now
I
saw
that
and
I
went
oh
my
god
because
one
morning
I
woke
up
to
a
text
from
that
very
person
saying
this
about
two
years
ago
I
never
met
him
never
talked
to
him
don't
have
his
number
somehow
he
got
mine
and
messaged
me
on
signal
to
turn
myself
in
because
I'm
going
to
prison
he
then
proceeded
to
look up
my
ex-wife
and make
allegations
that I
was a
Mossad
agent
because
she
was a
prostitute
prostitute
from a
foreign
country
and
involved
in
all
these
Mossad
black
ops
type
things
now
he
didn't
even
get
the
name
right
he
found
a
different
person
with
a
similar
spelling
that
was
busted
for
prostitution
or
something
and
then
makes
these
giant
claims
on
social
media
that
you
know
I
have
been
like
married
to
a
foreign
spy
prostitute
or
something
and
then
he
goes
on
to
message
someone
he
thinks
is
my
donor
and
threaten
them
to
cut
off
funds
because
if
he
doesn't
then
I've
made
the
intelligence
community
very
angry
and
they
have
deputized
him
to
tell
the
person
he
thought
was
my
donor
that
the
intelligence
services
of the
United
States
of
America
will
crush
the
businesses
of
someone
he
thought
was
my
donor
if
he
doesn't
cut
off
the
funds
he
thought
that
person
was
giving
to
me
okay
this
is
that
confidential
human
source
or at
least
according
to the
reporting
of
Ken
Silva
that
the
level
of
things
that
are
untrue
about
that
combined
with the
fact
that
this
very
person
is
going
around
saying
that
not
he's
not
just
an
FBI
informant
but
that
he
actually
can
direct
the
intelligence
agencies
of the
United
States
to crush
someone's
private
practice
if they
don't
change
the
you know
their
discretionary
donations
to
someone
like
that's
the
person
you're
saying
that
person's
you know
comments
to a
FBI
officer
you know
task
force
prove
these
claims
about
Dershowitz
and
Trump
I mean
that's
that's
ridiculous
I know
firsthand
that there's
zero
credibility
to those
claims
now they
may be
true
or not
but the
fact is
you know
there's
there's a
lot of
context
to
to all
of these
what is
just because
it's said
in an
FBI file
does not
make it
true
we learned
that lesson
in
Russiagate
we learned
that lesson
with the
Steele
dossier
but
you know
that I
think that
same
sort of
caution
and prudence
should be
applied
with these
and I
think
ultimately
the truth
wins out
on these
things
it just
you know
takes longer
than you
might want
to
it's so
tangled
you know
the whole
thing
is just
I think
everybody
who
looks at
it
realizes
this is
a rabbit
hole
that just
goes to
the center
of the
earth
and there's
so many
people
involved
in
what
do
here's
here's
the big
question
that people
ask
if there
was a
Jeffrey
Epstein
and it
seems
like
all
these
things
he
was
involved
in
is
there
a
Jeffrey
Epstein
right
now
that
we
don't
know
about
there's
a million
of them
I mean
this is
why
this is
why
I
I find
the
this
you know
this is
not the
core
of what
I
focus
on
but I
find it
a really
interesting
field of
study
because it
helps
understand
so many
other
US
government
institutions
and the
relationship
between
government
and private
business
Jeffrey
Jeffrey
Epstein
is
part
of a
class
of
what
are
effectively
professional
fixers
and
this
is a
kind
of
class
of
professional
who
sits
not
really
within
a
particular
government
or private
sector
institution
but in
the kind
of sticky
layer
between
them
that
connects
them
all
and
I
would
say
that
for
example
people
like
Mark
Rich
Bruce
Rappaport
and I
can go
through
all these
figures
and who
they are
Robert
Mayhew
and these
types
are
just
good
case
studies
in
how
the
intelligence
world
the business
community
you know
uses
let's
take an
example
of Bruce
Rappaport
and
this is
a
you can
pull up
on screen
if
you want
there's
a great
article
I think
it's
called
I think
it's
from
1988
or 1991
it's
called
Intrigue
in
High
Places
Oil
Pipeline
Iraq
and then
just
Bruce
Rappaport
it's
R-A-P-P
yeah here
you go
Pipeline
Deal
Intrigue
in High
Places
and I'll
describe
what happens
here
in a
second
in fact
there's
a great
YouTube
video
on this
as
well
if
you
look
up
Bruce
just
on
YouTube
Bruce
Rappaport
1988
there's
a great
kind of
couple
minute
summary
of all
this
but
effectively
what
happened
was
and let
me start
this
by
just
Jeffrey
Epstein
got to
Bear
Stearns
in
1966
I'm
sorry
1976
and then
worked there
until
1980
sorry
just
because
you
have
on
screen
maybe
maybe
I'll
go
through
this
first
and
then
I'll
do
the
Jeffrey
Epstein
connections
so what
happened
here
was
you had
the
Iran-Iraq
war
from
1980
to
1988
and
Henry
Kissinger
had a
really great
quote
about this
because
he
asked
what
is
the
US
government
strategy
on
this
because
it's
very
convoluted
and
why
are
we
giving
weapons
to
Iran
when
the
Iranian
revolution
just
happened
in
1979
that
you know
overthrew
what was
a US
government
friendly
government
that was
partially
installed
by the
CIA
in
1953
we've
now
declared
an
international
arms
embargo
on them
you know
we're
basically
at war
with the
Ayatollahs
why
are we
giving
them
weapons
and
helping
them
you know
defeat
Iraq
and
you know
the issue
was
we were
also
in a
kind
of
war
over
regional
hegemony
and oil
with
Iraq
and so
Henry Kissinger's
quote was
my only wish
is that
both sides
could lose
and so
what happened
was
because we
didn't want
Iraq
to take
over
Iran
and become
effectively
bigger than
Saudi Arabia
in the
region
we were
funding
and giving
weapons
to
Iran
to
try
to
fend
off
the
much
bigger
Iraqi
army
and
then
at a
certain
point
in this
we
began
to back
Iraq
we went
back and
forth
supporting
Iran
Iraq
and so
Iraq
because
of the
embargoes
on it
wanted to
build a
pipeline
to get
its
oil
out
and it
was going
to pass
through
Jordan
and it
was going
to abut
against
the border
of Israel
and a
major
CIA
contractor
and CIA
connected
private
business
called
Bechtel
highly
highly
influential
company
there's been
many many
many books
written on
Bechtel
some
and
Bechtel
is alive
and well
today
if there
was a
saga
for example
around the
Stanford
internet
observatory
around the
censorship
industrial
complex
when I
when I
visited
the
Stanford
internet
observatory
and I
went to
the
courtyard
courtyard
is sponsored
by
Bechtel
it's
I think
it's
called
the
Bechtel
courtyard
and
but
but what
happened
was
is
the
Bechtel
was
promised
by Iraq
a billion
dollar
contract
in
1980
you know
80s
money
for
constructing
this
pipeline
and
the
Central
Intelligence
Agency
and the
White House
National
Security
Council
both
for
geostrategic
reasons
wanted
this
pipeline
built
the
problem
was
is
they
were
afraid
the
Israeli
government
was
going
to
sabotage
the
pipeline
because
Iraq
was
very
hostile
to
Israel
and
there
was
a lot
of
tension
between
the
Iraqi
government
and
the
Israeli
government
and
they
were
afraid
that
if
Bechtel
got
this
contract
and
built
this
pipeline
that
Israel
these
pipelines
are
very
fragile
and
because
it
passes
close
to
it
it's
very
possible
that
would
happen
and
destroy
both
the
CIA's
goal
and
the
private
profiteer
Bechtel's
goal
so
so
how
do
solve
that
problem
well
what
what
the
CIA
did
is
what
the
National
Security
Council
which
is
the
interagency
that
the
CIA
reports
do
did
is
they
engaged
a
private
fixer
named
Bruce
Rappaport
who
was
a
Swiss
billionaire
with
close
ties
to
the
Israeli
government
to
back
channel
with
the
Israeli
government
some
sort
of
secret
agreement
that
would
guarantee
that
they
would
not
sabotage
the
pipeline
and
because
the
Attorney
General
of the
United
States
again
think
about
this
as well
as
I'm
saying
this
think
about
Jeffrey
Epstein
and
think
about
the
character
of
Bill
Barr
for
example
who
started
his
career
for
seven
years
at
the
CIA
was
highly
involved
in
the
CIA
Iran
Contra
and
then
was
Attorney
General
both
in
the
1990s
during
the
Epstein
connected
BCCI
scandal
and
the
you know
when
Jeffrey
Epstein
killed
himself
or
whatever
happened
to
him
so
what
what
happens
is
Bruce
Rappaport
does
indeed
use his
contacts
with the
Israeli
government
to
strike
an
agreement
that
then
allows
the
would
allow
the
project
to be
green
lit
but
it
triggers
a
special
prosecutor's
investigation
of the
attorney
general
himself
Ed
Meese
because
he
one of
his
friends
was
alleged
to be
in
on
the
deal
so
they
they
argued
that
effectively
there
were
that
they
that
through
Bruce
Rappaport
the
attorney
general
was
striking
a
secret
agreement
with
Israel
to
profit
himself
a
massive
conflict
of
interest
and
what
ended
up
happening
is
Bruce
Rappaport
stepped
forward
and said
no
no
no
it
wasn't
to
profit
the
terms
weren't
to
profit
the
friend
it
was
the
terms
we
secretly
reached
with
Israel
that
they
were
going
to
get
like
a
30%
cut
on
the
revenue
of
the
pipeline
and
that's
what
secured
the
buy-in
but
the
fact
is
Bruce
Rappaport
was
not
now
the
other
part
of
this
hold
basically
the
overseas
development
arm
of
the
U.S.
government
agency
to
put
American
taxpayer
funds
to help
subsidize
the
pipeline
that
the
Bechtel
pipeline
and
that
government
agency
did not
want
to
put up
something
like
$400
million
of
taxpayer
funds
on
it
because
they
thought
Bruce
Rappaport
was a
very
shady
Epstein
like
figure
who
had
all
sorts
of
sordid
you know
details
about
his
own
past
so
that
government
agency
queried
the
CIA
for
all
records
about
Bruce
Rappaport
and
the
CIA
gave
them
a
limited
hangout
they
said
oh
you
know
we
only
have
a
few
documents
that
are
responsive
to
it
and
no
red
flags
as
it
turned
CIA
on
Bruce
Rappaport
and
if
they
had
given
that
to
the
US
government
agency
there
couldn't
have
been
support
for
the
pipeline
now
after
all
the
scandal
the
pipeline
ended up
not
being
built
but
the
point
is
here
you
have
the
same
type
of
person
as
Jeffrey
Epstein
the
same
regions
and
countries
that
are
you
know
involved
in
a
significant
part
of
the
Epstein
saga
you
have
the
same
community
private
businesses
and
you
know
back
channel
deals
with
government
officials
but
because
there
was
no
201
file
on
Bruce
Rappaport
he
was
not
formerly
a
CIA
asset
he
was
he
was
what
you
know
what's
called
a
liaison
a
contact
a
facilitator
a
friend
of
the
station
doesn't
work
for
the
CIA
he's
got
his
own
hedge
fund
he's
got
his
own
you
know
basically
finance
you
know
he'll
invest
in
commodities
or
foreign
exchange
or
private
portfolio
companies
but
sometimes
he'll
work
with
the
CIA
sometimes
he won't
depends
on whether
it's
good
for
him
and
in
this
case
he
thought
it
was
good
for
him
to
take
this
who
knows
what
cut
he
himself
got
it
on
it
but
the
fact
is
here
you
have
the
same
type
of
you
have
every
layer
of
this
from
the
justice
department
to
the
CIA
to
the
private
financiers
to
the
to
the
private
companies
to
real
world
geopolitical
action
and
this
appears
in
my view
of it
to be
exactly
the
model
that
Jeffrey
Epstein
himself
replicated
and was on
parallel track
with
for his
whole
career
you know
he's
and I
can
get into
that
but
does
that
make
sense
in
terms
of
like
this
type
of
figure
exists
in
basically
in
every
country
in
every
industry
and
you know
they're
not all
as
prominent
as
Epstein
but I
would argue
people like
Mark Rich
and at
the time
Bruce
Rappaport
kind of
were
they don't
all have
you know
these
child
sex
trafficking
type
things
this
the thing
is
like
what
he
was
connected
with
it
makes
me
wonder
like
if
he
didn't
have
that
sick
thing
where
he
liked
underage
girls
like
if
he'd
never
gotten
arrested
which
was
what
2008
or
something
when
did
he
initially
get
arrested
2006
but
he
was
the
plea
deal
was
2008
so
if
that
hadn't
happened
like
if
you
just
got
a
guy
who's
getting
of
age
prostitutes
we
never
hear
about
this
yeah
and
this
episode
is
brought
to
you
by
Squarespace
to
level
up
your
business
you
gotta
level
up
your
website
and
Squarespace
does
the
heavy
lifting
for
you
even
I
use
it
to
power
my
website
Joe
Rogan
dot
com
is
powered
by
Squarespace
Squarespace
gives
you
everything
you
need
to
claim
your
domain
professionally
showcase
your
offerings
grow
your
brand
and
get
paid
all
in
one
place
head
to
Squarespace
dot
com
slash
Rogan
for a
free
trial
and
when
you're
ready
to
launch
use
the
offer
code
Rogan
to
save
10%
off
your
first
purchase
of a
website
or
domain
that
that
that
is
crazy
and
you
can
imagine
very
easily
why
because
Epstein
was
involved
in
fraudulent
financial
activities
his
entire
career
he
was
under
SEC
investigation
at
Bear
Stearns
in
1980
when
he
was
involved
in a
deal
I think
it was
St.
Joe's
Mineral
Company
which
is
owned
by
Seagram's
which
is
owned
by
the
Bronfman
family
he
got in
trouble
with
the
SEC
at
that
time
he
then
as soon
as he
got
in
trouble
he
left
Bear
Stearns
and went
out
on his
own
but
then
worked
effectively
at
Bear
Stearns
off
the
book
for the
next
decade
according
to
his
own
testimony
he
had
a
continuous
relationship
with Bear
Stearns
for
you
know
I
think
he
said
31
years
it
was
basically
from
the
moment
you
know
from
the
1970s
1976
until
2007
2008
when Bear
Stearns
collapsed
while
Jeffrey
Epstein
was in
jail
but
then
Jeffrey
Epstein
in
it
appears
to me
almost
impossible
that Jeffrey
Epstein
was not
working on
BCCI
pipeline
deals
while he
was at
Bear
Stearns
Bear
Stearns
was one
of the
three
biggest
clearing
houses
for
BCCI
transactions
BCCI
is the
Bank of
Credit
Commerce
International
sometimes
people call
it the
Bank of
Crooks
and Criminals
International
it's
an
incredible
saga
of
CIA
banking
gone
wrong
it's
a bank
that was
started
in
Pakistan
in
1972
and
then
grew
to be
the
CIA's
main
way
to
covertly
back
the
Mujahideen
against
the
Russians
during
the
Cold
War
so
we
backed
Osama
Bin
Laden
the
CIA
we
backed
the
Islamic
Mujahideen
the
radicals
who became
Al Qaeda
and ISIS
with
billions
of dollars
of
CIA
and
MI6
and
Israeli
and Saudi
facilitated
co-support
and financial
funds
in order
to
do a
Cold War
operation
just like
we talked
about
with
strange
bedfellows
backing
right-wing
organized
crime
to stop
left-wing
communism
we did
the same
thing
in
Afghanistan
through
you know
these
the
Pakistan
Afghanistan
border
to
run
covertly
run
guns
to the
Mujahideen
in fact
you can
there's a
great
YouTube
video
that
I always
like to
play
so that
you can
see it
for yourself
it's
it's
really
short
you can
look up
1979
a big
new
Brzezinski
dropping
out of
a
helicopter
to
tell
the
Mujahideen
that
both
God
and the
United
States
government
is on
their
side
and
the
reason
this
clip
I
always
think
is so
fun
to play
is
because
this
was
the
very
moment
in
1979
that
Jeffrey
Epstein
appears
to have
been
involved
in the
BCCI
financing
of this
very
operation
so
if
you
turn
the
volume
up
and
you
start
at
the
beginning
U.S.
National
Security
Advisor
Brzezinski
flew to
Pakistan
to set
about
rallying
resistance
he wanted
to arm
the
Mujahideen
without
revealing
America's
role
on the
Afghan
border
near
the
Khyber
Pass
he urged
the
soldiers
of God
to
redouble
their
efforts
we
know
of
their
deep
belief
in
God
and
we
are
confident
that
their
struggle
will
succeed
that
land
over
there
is
yours
you'll
go
back
to
it
one
day
because
your
fight
will
prevail
and
you'll
have
your
homes
and
your
mosques
back
again
because
your
cause
is
right
and
God
is
on
your
side
now
that
is
that
is
the
national
security
advisor
of the
United
States
of
America
the
national
security
advisor
is
the
highest
post
in
the
cabinet
it
is
the
person
the
president
talks
to
every
day
all
intelligence
military
and
state
craft
goes
through
the
national
security
advisor
that
is
the
numero
uno
and
he
personally
in
1979
you know
this
didn't
come out
until
years
later
but
we
were
covertly
doing
this
so
to
do
a
covert
operation
and
this
is
why
I
focus
on
the
money
side
of
Epstein
from
the
1970s
to
present
because
the
money
in
any
covert
operation
is
the
most
essential
part
it's
the
only
thing
that
is
irreplaceable
and that
if you
don't
have it
everything
goes
away
you
lose
one
person
find
another
one
you
you
know
you
lose
one
you
know
logistics
hub
can
create
another
one
with
money
you
lose
money
you
lose
everything
you
lose
your
ability
to
pay
your
informants
you
lose
your
ability
to
bribe
government
officials
you
lose
your
ability
to
you
know
win
the
support
of
local
institutions
you
we
lost
Vietnam
not
really
so
much
because
we
lost
you
know
at
the
kinetic
war
level
but
because
we
lost
the
ability
to
fund
it
because
it
got
defunded
so
we
literally
couldn't
do it
anymore
and
the
there's
another
great
clip
just to
show
how
sophisticated
CI
money
laundering
was
even
by
the
1960s
sorry
I'll
stop
doing
this
after
you
know
running
around
clip
to
clip
after
this
or
I'll
chill
on
it
but
if
you
go
to
my
ex
you
in
the
1960s
it's
called
in
the
pay
I
think
it's
called
in
the
pay
of
the
CIA
or
in
the
it's
but
if
you
type
in
CIA
money
laundering
you'll
see
this
great
clip
about
how
sophisticated
CIA
money
laundering
was
already
by
the
1950s
and
60s
and
the
that
because
everything
the CIA
does
has to
be
laundered
it's
a spy
agency
if
it
writes
a
check
if
it
doesn't
conceal
the
origins
of the
money
gigs
up
so
everything
that is
CIA
has to
move
through
some
sort
of
money
laundering
mechanism
well
you know
to
kind of
I guess
borrow a phrase
from
the president
somebody's
doing the
money laundering
you need
outside
contacts
who do
not work
at the
agency
or necessarily
for the
agency
to facilitate
that money
laundering
and that
was done
through
for example
the Pakistanis
with
BCCI
as well
as contacts
in London
that
is
what
I
believe
Jeffrey
Epstein
was
doing
his
entire
career
after
that
from
Towers
Financial
to
his
tenure
with
Leslie
Wexner
to
kind of
the way
I think
that he
helped
model
the
Clinton
foundation
itself
with the
Clintons
in the
early
2000s
and
and
his
expertise
in
that
I
think
is
is
what
made
him
useful
really
not
well
it's
more
the
connections
of
I guess
donors
and
billionaires
around
him
that
made
him
the
most
useful
but
the
fact
is
he
specialized
when he
went out
on his
own
formerly
he
leaves
Bear
Stearns
in 1981
and starts
a one
man
group
called
Intercontinental
Assets
Group
out of
his
New York
City
apartment
he's
not
even
30
years
old
right
away
he
gets
big
level
clients
like
Adnan
Khashoggi
who
is
the
at
the
time
was
alleged
to be
the
world's
richest
man
he
was
the
Saudi
arms
dealer
and
to
give
an
impression
of how
significant
this
figure
was
in
the
weapons
trade
he
was
he
he
earned
more
in
commissions
from
Lockheed
Martin
Boeing
and
I
think
one
of
the
other
big
military
contractors
than
every
other
commissions
agent
in the
entire
world
combined
that's
why
you know
there were
rumors that
he was
the world's
richest man
he
in fact
we
actually
had
legislation
passed
because of
how
influential
he
was
he
was
the
one
who
in
1983
flew
to the
National Security
Council
to the
White
House
to
orchestrate
the
Iran
Contra
affair
he
was
the
Saudi
middleman
that
was
part of
this
operation
where
the
United
States
used
the
Saudi
middleman
Anand
Khashoggi
to
run
guns
to
Israeli
contacts
to
smuggle
into
Iran
to fight
off the
Iraqis
now
it's a bit
of a
long
sequence
but
effectively
you can
think of
it as
the
United
States
and
Israel
Saudi
Arabia
in
the
middle
now
Adnan
Khashoggi
was
one of
the
major
clients
of
the
CIA's
BCCI
bank
and he
was
the
host
of
the
CIA's
offshore
operation
that was
created
in
1976
called
the
Safari
Club
in
in
1975
1976
when the
CIA
started
getting
handcuffs
put on
it
with
the
church
committee
hearings
Jeffrey
Epstein
starts
his
career
at
Bear
Stearns
in
1976
the
very
moment
of
the
biggest
shakeup
of
the
CIA
and
CIA
history
at
that
moment
the
church
committee
hearings
were
ongoing
and
the
public
was
seeing
Colby
and
Angleton
holding up
a heart
attack
gun
how
the
CIA
can
kill
someone
and
make
it
look
like
they
died
organically
of a
heart
attack
operation
chaos
had just
broke
about
the
CIA
funding
student
groups
on
American
college
campuses
COINTEL
broke
MK
Ultra
broke
it was
one
house
of
horrors
after
another
on
everybody's
TV
that only
had
three
news
stations
and
and
and
so
Democrats
were
completely
fired
up
about
getting
rid
of
the
CIA
or
putting
massive
handcuffs
on
it
which
is
what
they
did
they
created
effectively
what's
now
the
Senate
and
House
Intelligence
Committee
so there's
oversight
of the
CIA
by the
people's
representatives
the
first year
Carter
was in
office
in
1977
went
through
what was
called
the
Halloween
massacre
fired
30%
of
all
CIA
operations
personnel
they
massively
cut
funding
and
so
in
response
to
this
you
had
a
set
of
stakeholders
who
wanted
that
CIA
dirty
work
to
still
be
doable
but
they
didn't
have
the
legal
authorization
to run
it
out
of
the
CIA
so
what
they
did
is
they
took
the
same
group
of
international
partners
that
they
had
been
working
with
that
includes
Saudi
Arabia
Israel
the
UK
France
at
the
time
Iran
because
this
was
before
the
1979
Iranian
revolution
they
were
all
part
of
this
thing
called
the
safari
club
which
got
its
name
from
the
Mount
Safari
it was
basically
a resort
club
in Kenya
which
was the
main
hub
just
like
Colombia
for
example
is
kind
of
the
main
was
the
main
US
government
hub
for
logistics
it
was
kind
of
a
foothold
for
our
ability
to
do
work
or
Brazil
in
Africa
Kenya
was
our
main
stronghold
and
so
but
Adnan
Khashoggi
ran
that
this
was
basically
a
seven
eight
country
joint
covert
operations
intelligence
network
and
it
was
informal
it
wasn't
technically
the
CIA
and
it
was
set
up
you can
pull
the
wikipedia
for
this
actually
it
just
so
you
don't
need
to
take
my
word
for
it
like
literally
the
sanitized
wikipedia
will
tell you
everything
that I'm
saying
here
and
it
ended
up
that
network
ended
up
becoming
one
of
the
main
yeah
so if
you start
at the
top
you'll
see
that
there
it
is
on
the
right
the
safari
club
it
was
a
covert
alliance
of
intelligence
services
formed
in
1976
that ran
clandestine
operations
in
Africa
now what
they're
leaving out
here is
that it
was also
Asia
played a
huge
role
in
Pakistan
and
Afghanistan
and the
like
but
these
were
all
these
different
countries
attempt
to
offset
the
restrictions
that the
Democrats
had put
on the
CIA
when
Reagan
gets
back
to
power
in
1981
you
still
have
these
handcuffs
on
the
CIA
you
still
have
the
Democrats
controlling
the
House
of
Representatives
the
Democrats
did
you know
so there
was an
international
arms
embargo
first of
all in
1979
the Iranian
revolution
happens
and it's
blamed
on the
CIA
being
cut
back
the
CIA
helped
install
the
Shah
in
1953
they
argued
that if
Jimmy Carter
hadn't
destroyed
the CIA
we would
still
have
Iran
as a
friendly
country
we could
have
stopped
this
we
could
have
nipped
it
in
the
bud
we
could
have
had
people
on
the
ground
it's
Jimmy
Carter's
fault
that he
that he
cut
the CIA
that we're
in this
disaster
with the
world's
third largest
reserve
of oil
and gas
and this
hugely
geostrategic
country
now being
an enemy
of America
rather than
a friend
the
the
so an
international
arms
embargo
was put
on Iran
but then
Iraq
threatened
to
invade it
and we
didn't
want
Iraq
to take
it
over
so we
had to
get
we had
to do
something
illegal
if we
wanted
to help
Iran
and it
was against
international law
to give
them weapons
but if we
didn't give
them weapons
it was
perceived
massive
geostrategic
geopolitical
earthquake
that we'd
lived with
for
centuries
so you
had to
do
one
illegal
action
with
the
gun
running
and
then
there
was
an
inter-party
dispute
the
Democrats
at that
time
the
majority
did not
want
to do
intervention
in Nicaragua
there was
an in-party
power
called the
Sandinista
government
and there
was a
rebel
faction
called the
Contras
and Republican
donors and
stakeholders
had
interests
in Nicaragua
and wanted
to help
the
Contras
overthrow
the
Sandinista
government
but there
was a
party
dispute
Democrat
donors
didn't
profit
from that
and they
at the
time
had a
fairly
robust
anti-imperialism
kind of
mindset
and were
sick of
CIA
regime
change
by the
early
1980s
after
everything
that was
disclosed
in just
the
previous
years
so
Republicans
wanted
to overthrow
the Nicaraguan
governments
Democrats
didn't
Democrats
had a
House
majority
and they
passed
something
called
the
Bolin
Amendment
which
forbade
any
U.S.
government
funds
from going
to support
the
Contras
so this
put
the
Republicans
in a
pickle
by the way
this is
what's
happening
kind of
today
around
Ukraine
if you
flip
the
parties
100%
of
Democrats
vote
for
Ukraine
funding
the
Republican
party
is
split
about
it
this
is
the
inverse
of
that
was
happening
in
the
early
1980s
100%
Republicans
wanted
to
fund
the
Contras
against
what
they
called
the
Soviet
aligned
Sandinistas
and the
Democrats
were split
but
but they
successfully
passed
this
Bolin
Amendment
so the
CIA
was in
a pickle
how
how do
you
run
guns
to
Iran
when
it's
against
international
law
and
how
do
you
fund
the
Contras
when
it's
illegal
to
spend
U.S.
government
money
to
fund
them
and
so
what
they
came up
with
is
effectively
the
structure
I
think
it's
the
most
useful
structure
for
understanding
American
statecraft
and
intelligence
activity
to this
day
what
what
they
came up
with
is
what
they
called
a
structure
called
the
enterprise
which
the
CIA
director
Bill
Casey
referred
to
as
a
private
self
sustained
off the
shelf
standalone
entity
that did
not exist
within the
U.S.
government
but
was
instead
it
comprised
the money
came from
outside
fixers
who
would
then
effectively
channel
donor
money
and
black
market
trade
to
fund
the
contras
so
the
money
didn't
come
from
U.S.
taxpayers
it
didn't
come
from
USAID
it
didn't
come
from
an
allocation
from
the
U.S.
Department
of War
or foreign
assistance
from the
Department
of State
as it
turned out
the money
came from
you know
cocaine
and
and a
couple
of other
things
but
you
know
this
was
the
you
know
the
famous
freeway
Ricky
Ross
yeah
Gary
Webb
you know
John
Kerry
and
the
this
was
the
soup
that
Jeffrey
Epstein
was
was
coming
up
in
and
you
know
funny
story
related
to
this
is
that
the
the
main
airline
used
to
transport
the
drugs
and
guns
in
the
drugs
for
cash
for
guns
operation
was
a
CIA
proprietary
airline
called
Southern
Air
Transport
Southern
Air
Transport
was
was
the
proprietary
CIA
airline
meaning
owned
and
operated
exclusively
by the
Central
Intelligence
Agency
and
it
was
the
you know
the
airliner
that
all
these
aircraft
went
moved
through
Iran
Contra
was
basically
the
early
1980s
up
until
like
the
mid
late
1980s
in
19
it
was
it
was
based
in
Miami
in
1994
Southern
Air
Transport
the
CIA
proprietary
airline
which
in the
intervening
time
was spun
out
to not
be
owned
by
the
CIA
but
rather
to be
owned
by
someone
who
had
worked
for
the
CIA
at
the
time
it
was
owned
by
the
CIA
so
you
know
pretty
thin
layer
there
but
it
moved
from
Miami
to
Columbus
Ohio
primarily
to
service
the
limited
oh
I don't
know all
about
this
Joe
I have
a video
on
this
look
over
at
Jamie
because
he's
obsessed
with
Patel
yeah
probably
told you
about
this
five
years
ago
yeah
yeah
okay
well there's
a great
article
I think
spook
air
and
you know
on this
but
how many roads
lead back to
Ohio
most
most if
not
what is
what is
this
connection
with
Ohio
well
Ohio
was
you know
if you
remember
kind of
the origins
of
of
organized
crime
in
the
United
States
really
goes back
to the
prohibition
era
when
you
had
this
Midwestern
mafia
syndicate
around
Cincinnati
and
then
it
moved
into
Dayton
and
Columbus
and
adjacent
to
Chicago
and
this
whole
sort
of
hub
around
prohibition
and
then
prohibition
was
1920
to
1933
when
prohibition
ended
all these
networks
went from
black market
alcohol
to black
market
drugs
because
it was
no longer
black
market
they
no longer
had a
business
smuggling
alcohol
so
they
moved
into
the
narcotics
space
which
ones
which
narcotics
well
it
was
primarily
opium
in the
1930s
this was
part of
opium
really
well
yeah
if you
because
in the
1930s
was when
you had
as you
know
as we
discussed
the
department
of wars
alliance
with
Chiang Kai-shek
and the
and the
Kuomintang
the Chinese
nationalists
the supply
for
you know
the supply
for
heroin
for example
or you
know
opium
it comes
from
Asia
comes
from
the
golden
crescent
the
golden
triangle
and
the
way
this
logistics
chain
moved
was
our
CIA
war
department
backed
rebel
groups
in
Asia
they
sat
territorially
on the
golden
triangle
they
would
cultivate
the
opium
they
would
basically
fly it
out
on
military
aircraft
it
went
to
Europe
for
processing
in
France
that
was
one of
the
main
this
kind
of
French
connection
saga
which
again
Jeffrey
Epstein
is
weirdly
connected
to
and
I
can
tell you
about
that
if
you're
interested
and
then
it
would
go
to
the
basically
Italian
mafia
folks
for
the
transshipment
and
you
had
Italian
mafia
controlled
docks
and
ports
in
the
United
States
and
New
York
and
New
Jersey
and
you
had
you
know
CIA
protected
Italian
mafia
groups
in
southern
Italy
which
at
the
time
were
national
security
protected
because
they
were
our
allies
against
the
communists
and
so
you
had
this
this
drug
trade
to
support
foreign
policy
imperatives
and
you
can
do
that
you
can
run
that
exercise
with
pretty
much
every
drug
on
planet
earth
at
this
point
and
it
makes
it
very
difficult
to
stop
the
drug
trade
because
by
stopping
the
drug
trade
you
are
you're
running
up
against
something
that
your
own
government
considers
a
perhaps
unfortunate
but
necessary
logistics
hub
do you
think
that's
happening
right
now
with
Mexico
yeah
whoa
well
I mean
think
about
this
fast
and
furious
yeah
wasn't
that
long
ago
the
fast
and
furious
story
is
fucking
bananas
tell it to
people
that don't
know
because
just the
idea
that they
proposed
this
and
implemented
it
is so
fucking
crazy
yeah
well
so
this
was
a
scandal
during
the
Obama
administration
Eric
Holder
was the
attorney
general
of the
United
States
he had
to step
down
because
he was
held in
contempt of
Congress
for jumping
on the
grenade
and not
turning over
the Fast
and Furious
files
earth to
Congress
note to
Congress
who wants
to be a
hero
by the
way
you can
do the
same
thing
with the
Epstein
bill
with the
Fast
and Furious
files
I think
everybody
in this
war on
drugs
that
you know
were
so
gung-ho
about
we just
captured
the
president
of
Venezuela
over
drugs
it
would
be
awfully
nice
if you
compelled
the
Justice
Department
and
FBI
to
turn
over
the
Justice
Department
and
FBI
run
Fast
and
Furious
files
but
what
happened
was
is
and
I
believe
this
had
interagency
approval
meaning
the
White
House
signed
off
on
it
the
Central
Intelligence
agency
signed
off
on
it
the
Department
of
Defense
signed
off
on
it
the
FBI
and
ATF
signed
off
on
it
this
was
a
gun
running
operation
to
send
guns
to
the
Sinaloa
cartel
to
to
have
them
be able
to
successfully
win
a
narco
drug
drug
war
against
the
Los
Zetas
cartel
the
Los
Zetas
cartel
was
pilfering
oil
pipelines
remember
Mexico
the
oil
wealth
of the
United
States
is
vastly
disproportionately
concentrated
in Texas
in West
Texas
and Southern
Texas
where it
shares oil
fields
with Mexico
effectively
those oil
fields
go
into Mexico
is replete
with oil
and there
are many
partnerships
between
United States
oil
companies
and
the
Mexican
government
Pemex
and all
the
different
you know
kind of
private
private
lines
and this
is a
big
point
of
geopolitical
contention
but the
fact
is
one
of the
things
that
organized
crime
groups
do
in
order
to
get
money
for
their
own
syndicate
because
they've
got
effectively
military
control
of
a
territory
is
if
a
pipeline
runs
through
that
territory
they
can
simply
cut
open
the
pipeline
and
steal
the
oil
this
was
happening
with
our
CIA
backed
rebel
groups
in
Syria
were
taking
the
oil
I
mean
we
would
literally
you know
our
spunky
moderate
rebels
would
you know
literally
cut open
Syrian
pipelines
and
take
the
oil
and
this
was
one
of
the
ways
to
support
it
you
can
support
it
with
drugs
you
can
support
it
with
black
market
oil
and
by
the
way
while
I'm
on
the
topic
if
you
pull up
and I
type
in
institute
for
peace
drugs
the
U.S.
government
the U.S.
Institute
for
peace
told the
Taliban
not to
shut down
the drug
trade
after they
took
power
in
2022
they
said
it
would
have
a
devastating
negative
impact
on
the
local
economy
if
they
didn't
keep
growing
what
was
then
90
95
percent
of
the
well
yeah
if
you
well
I think
click
the
next
image
wait
next
image
yeah
here
we go
so
this
is
a
we
give
the
U.S.
Institute
of Peace
at the
time
we
gave
them
55
million
dollars
a
year
the
U.S.
Institute
of Peace
was
created
by
active
Congress
this
headline
is
wild
the
Taliban
successful
opium
ban
is
bad
for
Afghans
and
the
world
yes
right
right
so
now
remember
just
about
you
know
the
Taliban
had
just
taken
back
power
that
happened
in the
you know
in the
early
Biden
administration
the
Taliban
if
folks
recall
cut
so
we
the
CIA
was
help
and
and
the
U.S.
military
as well
as
their
allies
and
with
regional
allies
were
cultivating
the
opium
on the
Golden
Crescent
for a
noble
cause
to win
the
Cold
War
against
the
evil
Soviets
this
was a
big
part
of the
funding
for
the
Mujahideen
and
this
was
one
of
the
big
scandals
that
ended
up
enveloping
BCCI
the
CIA's
bank
because
it
was
the
way
because
it
was
non-compliant
with
any
banking
regulations
it
all
moved
offshore
the
drug
money
the
drug
logistics
chain
that
the
CIA
built
for
the
Mujahideen
then
moved
through
the
drugs
money
laundering
chain
at
the
CIA
bank
and
this
apparatus
had
scaled
for
20
years
by
the
late
1990s
when
the
Taliban
like
the
Chinese
wanted
to
shut
it
down
when
the
Taliban
took
power
in
the
1990s
and
they
did
that
they
cut
the
opium
down
to
effectively
zero
in
1999
and
this
is
all
open
source
into
and
then
you
know
we
invade
Afghanistan
and
you
know
2001
2003
it
becomes
a
US
military
occupied
zone
and
it
goes
from
0%
of
the
world's
heroin
to
95%
of
the
world's
heroin
all
under
US
military
occupation
in
fact
we
installed
their
dictator
you
know
who
whose
brother
was
was
the
main
drug
kingpin
of
the
whole
country
it's
and
some
of
this
move
through
some
of
this
move
through
the
cold
war
CIA
backed
Turkish
gray
wolves
outfit
and
there's
a funny
quote
I think
in the
Michael
Hastings
article
on
Stanley
McChrystal
where
Stanley
McChrystal's
team
refers
to
Hamid
Karzai's
funny
little
hat
that he
wore
Hamid
Karzai
was the
CIA
installed
you know
strongman
after we
took over
Afghanistan
he referred
to his
hat as
the
gray
wolves
vagina
I
mean
basically
saying
like
this
is
the
you
know
the
drug
logistics
orifice
but
leaving
that
aside
what
I'm
getting
to
is
you
have
this
banking
network
you
have
all
these
logistics
chains
Jeffrey
Epstein
his
first
10
when
his
come up
is made
through
this
whole
network
it
turns
out
that
Bear
Stearns
opened
a
trading
desk
with
to
clear
BCCI
transactions
in
1978
1978
Jeffrey
Epstein's
mentor
the person
who
actually
recruited
him
to
apply to
Bear
Stearns
was a guy
named
Ace Greenberg
Ace Greenberg
then was a senior executive at the time
and then
I think in 1978
or 1979
he becomes
CEO
so the head of Bear
Stearns
so Jeff
and he sets
Jeffrey Epstein up
with his daughter
so Jeffrey Epstein
is a
young kid
people wonder
how did
Jeffrey Epstein
make partner
at Bear
Stearns
so fast
well there's a couple
explanations
one is
the guy who brought him
into the firm
quickly became CEO
thereafter
and Jeffrey Epstein
was dating his daughter
the New York Times
actually reported this
about a month and a half ago
by getting the
insider testimony
of a dozen people
who worked at
Bear Stearns
at the time
and
so you know
he's dating the boss's
daughter
but also
Ace Greenberg
is the CEO
would have to approve
all of these
transactions
and it looks like
was involved in
you know
these clearinghouse
activities
what happened was
is
Bear Stearns
cleared
about
13 billion dollars
worth of
BCCI
transactions
and it looks like
these transactions
were involved
in the very same
Adnan Khashoggi
Society
and Doug Lease
who was a
British arms dealer
that Jeffrey Epstein
was flying
to London
to meet with
and working
with all those
years
and
Bear Stearns
was doing it
through this
entity called
Capcom
which was
what the
Senate
report
on the
BCCI
scandal
referred to
as the
bank
within the
bank
of BCCI
so kind
of the
inner sanctum
now that
Capcom
was owned
by
Kamal
Adam
who was
the
head
of
he was
the chief
spy for
Saudi Arabia
so he
was
so
Bear
Stearns
the New York
Times
reports based on
a dozen of
these
insider
testimonies
they got
like three
of Epstein's
bosses
on the record
to talk about
what he was
doing there
amazingly
the New York
Times does not
mention a
single deal
name
in the
entire
20,000
word report
why do you
think that
is
it might
not be
news fit
to print
also
they just
I can be
charitable
and say
they
might
they just
might not
know
they might
think that
you know
I don't
think that
the New York
Times
has
a pinky
of the
specialization
in Jeffrey
Epstein
cinematic
universe
knowledge
that
your
random
anonymous
egg
account
on X
has
so they
might not
know
about
Bear
Stearns
doing
BCCI
transactions
they might
not know
what
you know
if you don't
know the
material you
don't necessarily
know what
to ask
that's me
being
charitable
also
that you
know some
of the
witnesses
may have
said
that they
don't want
to talk
about
specific
deal
names
because
that
would
tarnish
you know
the folks
involved in
that deal
for association
with Jeffrey
Epstein
there could
be a lot
of reasons
I'm trying
to be
charitable
here
but
but the
fact is
is
they all
said
Jeffrey
Epstein
moved up
so fast
because he
was dating
the boss's
daughter
and he
was put
on the
biggest
and most
lucrative
deals
very quickly
within the
firm
and
given
the
incredible
volume
that
Bear
Stearns
appears
to have
been
moving
through
BCCI
and
BCCI
being
you know
the hottest
ticket in
town then
in the
late 1970s
it was
literally
the main
vehicle
for the
U.S.
government
to covertly
launder
funds
Capcom
according to
the Senate
intelligence report
and
the
Justice
Department
investigations
was the
main
vehicle
for
funding
the
Mujahideen
50%
of those
trades
and they
laundered it
illegally
which
requires
a
brokerage
you know
a clearinghouse
to prove it
you know
the way
this is set
up is
you have
a bank
you've
got a
money
launder
and you've
got a
clearinghouse
the bank
was the
CIA
bank
BCCI
the money
launder
was
the CIA's
literal
direct
partner
in this
the Saudis
Capcom
was run
by the
chief
Saudi
spymaster
and then
in 1982
Jeffrey Epstein
obtained
a fake
Saudi
passport
sorry
it was a
fake
Austrian
passport
because
that was
a big
loophole
passport
during the
Cold War
for spies
but said
his residence
was Saudi
Arabia
we didn't
find this
out until
2019
when his
safe
was raided
but that
exact
time
Jeffrey
Epstein
has this
fake
Saudi
passport
and
it's
being done
to support
the CIA
backed
rebel group
the Mujahideen
in Afghanistan
but that
requires
a clearinghouse
to clear
those
money laundering
trades
they were
using these
mirrored
commodities
trades
which is
this
technique
of basically
selling to
yourself
to make
money look
clean
so that
it looks
like
you know
profit
and
it looks
like
you
won
or
lost
it
in a
market
trade
rather
than
through
drug
money
and
then
they
were
then
sending
that
on
you know
to
Mujahideen
but the
fact is
at the
same time
that that
was
happening
Anand
Khashoggi
who would
become
Jeffrey Epstein's
client in
the 1980s
when he went
on his own
was
was the
one
facilitating
the
weapons
you have
this
drugs
for
cash
for
guns
the
person
so the
so the
bank
that's
moving
the
that's
turning
the drugs
into
clean
cash
that
the head
of the
you know
Saudi
spymaster
is running
that part
of the
you know
banking
side
and then
you've got
the Saudi
arms dealer
who is
moving it
illegally
into
Iran
working
hand in
glove
with the
CIA
and the
National
Security
Council
the whole
time
you have
a
you have
a
illegal
financial
enterprise
protected
at the
highest
level
by the
United
States
government
the
US
intelligence
services
and by
proxy
the
Justice
Department
itself
can you
imagine
the
Justice
Department
prosecuting
it
while
that
operation
was
ongoing
any
defendant
you know
here's
you asked
what are
the great
reveals
in the
JFK
files
and
I'd be
remiss if I
didn't bring
up the
case of
Rolando
Masfer
there's an
incredible
document
in the
JFK
files
that
Tulsi
Gabbard
released
last year
which is
a CIA
document
that
describes
I think
the quote
is
massive
damage
if
the
Justice
Department
pursues
a
criminal
case
against
a
guy
named
Rolando
Masfer
if you
just type
in
Rolando
Masfer
JFK
files
2025
release
or like
massive
damage
or something
like that
you'll
you'll
see
this
it's
an
unbelievably
incredible
document
what it
documents
is that
there was
a dispute
between the
CIA and
the State
Department
the State
Department
sets
foreign
policy
the CIA
is not
is supposed
to serve
covertly
the State
Department
the CIA
is the
junior
seat at
the table
nobody
ever goes
from being
head of the
State Department
to head of the
CIA
that's a
that's a
demotion
the CIA
is supposed
to be
kind of
the
I use
like the
Sopranos
reference
silvio
and
you know
shakes
down
the
hairdresser
shop
or whatever
for the
money
it owes
the
family
if
you are
that
hairdresser
it's
easy to
think
that
silvio
runs
the
mafia
because
he's
the one
who shows
up at
your house
breaks
your
windows
breaks
your
knuckles
and takes
your money
but
silvio
is not
doing that
because he
runs it
he's
doing it
because the
person setting
the policy
of the
enterprise
Tony
is the
boss of it
the way
it's supposed
to work
is the
State Department
sets policy
and the
CIA
does
or
organizes
the
plausibly
deniable
dirty work
to achieve
it
if that
is
necessary
to achieve
that
foreign
policy
this
is why
there was
a lot
of debate
in 1948
about whether
the CIA
should even
take on
this role
this is
this great
1948
George Kennan
memo
that says
maybe we
should
have an
office
within the
State Department
called the
Bureau of
Organized
Political
Warfare
and then
two months
later
they decided
the CIA
would
take that
but
the fact
is
it's
basically
a State
Department
function
but
CIA
is
supposed
to
defer
to
state
but
what
happened
was
is
there
was
a
factional
dispute
between
state
and
CIA
over
Cuba
policy
the
State
Department
wanted
thought
that
the
CIA
backed
rebel
groups
in
Miami
were
being
too
aggressive
and
too
provocative
too
hot-headed
you know
doing
acts of
terrorism
and sorts
of things
that
looked
bad
to
the
international
community
JFK
was
trying
to
rein
them
in
but
the
CIA
the
careers
and
folks
there
wanted
to
take
a
more
aggressive
posture
and
so
one
of
the
CIA's
key
assets
and ring
leaders
had a
logistics
hub
with a
massive
CIA-backed
Cuban
exile
community
network
at that
time in
the early
1960s
in Miami
wanted
wanted
thought that
JFK
was being
too
impatient
too
cautious
they
wanted
to
invade
basically
a section
of
Haiti
departing
from
Miami
to
use
that
as
a
base
to
then
do
kinetic
attacks
against
Cuba
the
state
department
learned
that
this
CIA-backed
network
led
by
Orlando
Massford
was going
to do
this
and
stopped
it
where
they
had
a
customs
and
border
agent
basically
who
was
like
manning
the
docks
and
caught
them
as
like
300
of
them
were
departing
to try
to
take
over
a part
of
of
Haiti
to do
this
and
then
the
state
department
directed
the
justice
department
to
pursue
criminal
charges
against
Orlando
Massford
in
steps
the
CIA
and
you
know
if
you
can
find
this
memo
you
know
it's
M-A-S
you know
for
I think
it's
F-E-R-R-U-R
Orlando
Massford
it's
if
you
if
the
the
title
of it
is
is
like
massive
damage
that would
that would
accrue
you can
probably also
just find
massive
damage
there
we go
estimate
of
damage
which
could
accrue
to
CIA
Miami
through
prosecution
of the
Orlando
Massford
Haitian
invasion
group
again
we
just
learned
the
existence
of
this
document
last
year
this
is
from
the
1960s
now
it
says
the
decision
by the
justice
department
to
seek
a
grand
jury
indictment
against
Orlando
Massford
and
certain
of
his
associates
is
a
potentially
explosive
matter
which
could
result
in
extensive
damage
to CIA
activities
recent
adverse
publicity
on the
national
scene
and in
the
Miami
area
have
added
substantially
to the
already
sizable
embarrassment
potential
can you
imagine
what these
memos look
like for
Jeffrey
Epstein
some of
the main
sectors
of danger
to CIA
equities
are described
below
basic
national
publicity
regarding
student
and
foundation
topics
have
already
attracted
attention
of the
local
press
to the
CIA
in
general
usually
any
reference
to CIA
covert
activities
leads
press
to check
files
for
references
of any
such
activities
locally
however
before
this
action
can be
taken
the
story
regarding
and then
he goes
over
the
Pan Am
Foundation
the
University
of
Miami
which
was
what
hosted
JM
Wave
the
University
of
Miami
then
the
CIA's
largest
station
house
in the
world
it was
called
JM
Wave
was
hosted
in a
facility
off of
the
University
of
Miami
campus
again
the
biggest
CIA
station
house
in the
entire
world
the
CIA
so
it
goes
on
to
say
the
top
paragraph
is
saying
we're
under
a lot
of
pressure
Justice
Department
the
public
is
already
losing
support
for
the
CIA
because
of
all
these
other
disclosures
and
it
will
be
disastrous
if
you
pursue
the
prosecution
of
him
because
Rolando
Masser
is going
to
squeal
so
I
think
if
you
go
down
to
the
next
page
he
says
as
has
been
the
case
for
the
past
six
years
and
he
says
basically
the
CIA
has
been
working
with
the
head
of
the
president
and
treasurer
of
the
University
of
Miami
they're
extending
the
cooperation
and all
this
so
basically
all
these
touch
points
that
Rolando
Masser's
network
connects
to
will
be
exposed
and
they
go
over
all
these
what
were
previously
redacted
CIA
cutouts
in the
area
and
then
the
memo
says
even
if
the
above
circumstances
do not
exist
we
would
remain
concerned
regarding
the
possible
effects
of
the
prosecution
of
the
Masser
group
although
no
station
agents
or
persons
with
whom
the
Miami
station
has
contractual
arrangements
are
among
the
persons
arrested
or
those
who
will
be
prosecuted
it
will
be
very
easy
for
the
defense
to
drag
CIA
Miami
into
the
case
the
defense
has
only
to
obtain
testimony
true
or
perjured
they
can
seem
be
true
from
one
of
the
defendants
or
summon
as
defense
witnesses
one
or
more
disaffected
former
agents
of
the
CIA
station
in
order
to
begin
a
chain
reaction
surfacing
such
detail
and rumor
concerning
CIA
operations
against
the
Cuban
target
given
the
sizable
reduction
of
infiltration
and
a general
feeling
of frustration
and lack
of support
for Cuban
freedom
attributed
to passive
U.S.
policy
basically
saying
it would
undermine
our
you know
entire
operation
against
Cuba
and
the
American
people
support
for
it
if
the
Justice
Department
indicts
these
people
who
just
committed
this
crime
because
they
can
very
the
whole
network
is
CIA
and
they
can
just
call
to
the
stand
that
their
friends
and
associates
had
been
talking
with
the
CIA
about
this
well
before
they
had
done
it
and
that
would
be
a
massive
scandal
now
that's
just
one
example
here
what
goes
on
to
happen
is
there's
a
negotiation
between
the
State
Department
CIA
about
whether
to
bring
the
case
how
to
bring
the
case
how
to
shape
there's
a
follow-up
memo
on this
which
is
totally
incredible
that
I
think
is
more
the
logistics
on
this
the
agreement
they
reach
is
that
the
State
Department
wins
nominally
they
do
bring
the
prosecution
but
they
bring
it
in
a
highly
limited
and
tepid
way
and
they
agree
to
the
CIA's
demands
to
limit
lines
of
inquiry
to
to
file
motions
against
entering
anything
into
discovery
that
might
basically
reveal
the CIA
networks
in
this
and
they
agree
to
have
CIA
general
counsel
person
on
the
prosecution
team
in
order
to
personally
make
sure
that
the
Justice
Department
stays
in
line
and
if
something
looks
like
if
the
judge
grants
discovery
for
something
that
might
reveal
the
CIA's
role
in
it
drop
that
line
of
prosecution
so
that
it
can't
be
entered
into
evidence
and
this
is
what
you
see
time
and
again
is
how
these
networks
get
protected
whether
it's
drug
cases
whether
it's
foreign
policy
scandal
cases
whether
it's
money
laundering
cases
I believe
in the
Mark
Rich
case
part
of
I
think
his
lawyer
cited
at
one
point
or
maybe
it
was
in
his
pardon
application
the
work
that
he
had
done
for
US
intelligence
services
as part
of
the
reason
that
he
should
be
granted
leniency
but
the
point
I'm
getting
to
here
is
given
Jeffrey
Epstein's
involvement
in
the
BCCI
network
given
Jeffrey's
involvement
in
the
1990s
with
all
the
foreign
policy
activities
happening
in
the
Middle
East
at
that
time
given
Jeffrey
Epstein's
involvement
through
the
early
2000s
Clinton
era
and
everything
given
his
involvement
in
everything
from
Israeli
to
Saudi
to
British
to
French
high
level
government
officials
can
you
Jeffrey
Epstein
was
investigated
by the
SEC
in
the
1980s
he
was
one
of
the
two
people
who
ran
the
biggest
Ponzi
scheme
in
history
at
the
time
in
the
United
States
the
Towers
financial
collapse
Epstein's
business
partner
goes
to
jail
for
like
30
years
or
20
years
or
whatever
but
Epstein
skates
completely
free
Epstein
gets
involved
in
this
huge
fraud
in
the
U.S.
Virgin
Islands
with
this
billion
dollar
fraud
case
in
the
U.S.
Virgin
Islands
never
prosecuted
for
any
of
it
why
is
that
well
one
is
you
know
he
may
have
caught
we
know
in
the
U.S.
Virgin
Islands
case
he
was
sponsoring
the
campaigns
basically
the
politicians
there
the
prosecutors
answer
to
the
politicians
could
be
that
but
I
would
be
shocked
if
they're
in
40
years
of
this
where's
Waldo
Forrest
Gump
he's
always
in
the
room
in
40
years
of
American
foreign
policy
and
intelligence
activity
you know
money
sourcing
for
that
for
all
the
crimes
that
Epstein
committed
the
concern
was
the
same
one
they
had
with
Rolando
Mass
for
don't
bring
the
case
and
if
you
do
bring
it
in
a
highly
limited
way
and
that's
exactly
what
happened
in
2006
the
first
time
he
was
indicted
everybody
was
up in
arms
that it
was a
sweetheart
plea
deal
it
limited
it
gave
protection
to
all
co-conspirators
known
and unknown
and
and
and
it
was
swooped
in
quickly
before
you know
there
was
a
trial
in
full
so
that
lines
of
evidence
couldn't
be
opened
about
the
network
it's
just
crazy
that
statutory
rape
is
what
took
it
all
down
right
because
it's
it's
underaged
handjobs
right
that's
what
took
it
all
down
yeah
I mean
I
well
it seems
to be
what took
Jeffrey
Epstein
down
kind
of
crazy
even
that
is
has
a
really
interesting
geopolitical
history
there
was
a
similar
scandal
in
the
early
2000s
with
a
private
military
contractor
called
DynCorp
which again
runs
through
this
Adnan
Khashoggi
kind
of
Middle
Eastern
network
DynCorp
got in
trouble
for
trafficking
facilitating
the traffic
it was a
you know
major
US military
and CIA
contractor
for
logistics
and
you know
institutional
support
and
military
assistance
on the
ground
for the
US
military
all over
the world
they got
in
trouble
moving
basically
trafficking
underage
kids
to
Middle
Eastern
shakes
and I
believe
in the
early
2000s
and I
believe
the
reason
that was
alleged
by
Congress
that they
did that
was to
juice the
deals
with them
that basically
you know
these
people who
were critical
it's
you know
if you're
operating
on the
ground
in
Kuwait
or
you know
pick your
Middle Eastern
you know
country
in order
to
serve
your
purpose
for the
US
government
to be
this
outside
plausibly
deniable
but
extensively
infrastructured
professional
support
outfit
on the
ground
you need
the
support
of the
local
government
you need
the support
of the
local
high
level
officials
they need
to be
happy
and
there's
several
currencies
for that
there's
financial
payoffs
and
there's
other
things
they
might
like
like
parties
and
young
women
you know
especially
in places
where
you know
being
with
the
very
young
female
is
not
illegal
and
so
what
DineCorp
I believe
got busted
doing
and
you can
look up
the DineCorp
scandal
here
was
was
doing
this
and
I
believe
their
argument
was
well
you
wanted
us
to
do
this
thing
on
the
ground
you
wanted
us
to
help
the
US
military
and
you
know
kind
of
covert
support
nodes
that
were
that
were
happening
here
we
had
to
do
it
somehow
you
know
this
is
part
of
what
helped
us
do
that
I
would
not
be
surprised
if
the
Epstein
trafficking
apparatus
started
with
with
similar
motivations
not
you
know
that
it's
not
for
necessarily
for
blackmail
but
because
it
makes
clients
or
customers
or
you
know
VIP
people
happy
it
makes
them
owe
you
something
it
makes
them
want
to
get
involved
in
a
deal
you
do
even
if
the
deal
is
not
one
they
would
ordinarily
do
because
they
just
want
to
stay
close
to
you
because
you're
their
supplier
of
their
vice
of
the
thing
that
they
want
but
can't
get
if
you're
a
70
year
old
billionaire
you
can't
walk
into
a
bar
and
leave
aside
the
underage
thing
you
can't
walk
into
a
bar
and
meet
an
18
year
old
I presume
these
things
are
facilitated
at
private
parties
and
for a
lot
of
these
guys
it
has
to
be
discreet
you
know
they've
got
wives
they've
got
reputations
and
you know
there's an
aspect of
this
that plays
out at
every
institution
I worked
at a
New York
law firm
and
you know
there's
you know
there's
there's ways
that you
can make
partner
you know
at least
this was
kind of
the vibe
that
I felt
like
some
people
make
partner
because
they're
really
good
technically
what
they do
they're
just
amazing
they're
just
technical
whizzes
on the
minutia
of how to
structure
a merger
or acquisition
they're just
really great
at structuring
an offshore
banking transaction
or they're
really
they just know
absolutely everything
about tax law
there's some people
who move up
because of nepotism
you know
they're the
brother and
the son-in-law
of a major
partner
there's some
people who
make partner
because
they know
one
they brought
in one
client
who's just
a really big
rainmaker
and there's
some people
who move up
because
they open
doors
to partners
while they're
associates
they introduce
them to
someone
they host
events
they've got
you know
tickets to
exclusive things
and the partners
just like being
around that
person
because they
get access
to that
person
in a
currency
that they
can't get
on their
own
and
that includes
hosting
you know
cool
exotic
parties
having
you know
attractive
women
I
I've never
been convinced
that the
central role
of
the Epstein
young girl
in my view
sidebar
of the Epstein
money laundering
story
is
is that
it was for
blackmail
I
and
part of this
is because
the moment
Jeffrey Epstein
formally
officially
threatened
somebody
with
blackmail
and that
person
tells his
wife
and that
wife
tells her
friends
and that
gets out
to somebody
else
that knows
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein's
access
goes away
overnight
that's the
sort of thing
that
even a rumor
of that
spreading
and nobody
else is going
to want to
do business
with them
so you think
people just
assume
it's blackmail
because that
is how you
would blackmail
someone
especially
underage
girls
I think
it is
very possible
that there
could have
been
indirect
blackmail
meaning
Epstein
passes it
on
to
an
intelligence
service
to
you know
to a
corporate
espionage
client
or something
and they
use that
for
their own
purposes
but even
then
I mean
imagine
for example
if
you know
like
on the
Bill Gates
thing
like
there
was
an
you know
Bill Gates
gets an
I have
a video
of you
sleeping
with this
person
and
you know
or somebody
much lower
level
the moment
they send
that to
the press
if
you know
in order
to
they figure
they have
nothing
to lose
I mean
there's
not been
anybody
in the
seven years
that's
transpired
who said
I've been
I was
personally
blackmailed
by Jeffrey
I think
because the
moment you
do that
nobody
comes to
your parties
anymore
nobody
you lose
all the
access
you lose
all the
deal flow
you lose
all the
goodwill
that you've
generated
because this
rumor
people are
very risk
averse
especially
at that
level
right
but just
to have
it over
their head
and never
use it
though
right
well
I think
I think
that what
you could
have
is
because
he does
his own
nefarious
stuff
he could
compile it
so that
if they
ever
go out
if they
ever
threaten
him
with
something
he's
now
got
something
on
them
and
I've
seen
some
correspondence
that
you know
in the
files
that
that
that
looks
like
that
might
not
be
an
impossible
scenario
do you
think
that's
how
Jeffrey
Epstein
got in
that
position
in
the
first
place
that
they
knew
he
had
this
kink
no
not
at
all
I
mean
Adnan
Khashoggi
had the
same
thing
Adnan
Khashoggi
was
running
around
with
dozens
of
young
and
you know
apparently
underage
girls
you know
the whole
time
I think
that
Jeffrey
Epstein
probably
learned
you know
how powerful
that can be
through
through that
network
seeing
that
that's
that's
what
powerful
people
do
that
gives
them
something
that
gets
them a lot
of local
influence
and gets
wins them
a lot
of favor
that's
a very
specific
illicit
desire
to want
underage
people
well
how do
you even
find out
that someone's
into that
well
I don't
think that
the
majority
or anything
close to
it
of the
women
were
technically
I think
it was
largely
young
very young
you know
barely legal
so to speak
but
and I know
that there
were cases
of underage
but
I
you know
I think
most of it
was just
most of it
was just
very very
young
but not
not like
like 20
year old
not like 13
year old
type thing
and then
yeah
remember
because this
is an
international
enterprise
and many
of the
clients
are like
you know
in countries
that don't
necessarily
have the same
norms about
that
that we
do
you can
very easily
see someone
getting involved
in that
just because
girls juice
deals
and
so I
don't
think
that
Epstein
I've not
seen
evidence
and
in my
view
you don't
need
any of
that
to
understand
the
core
part
of the
Epstein
story
that is
relevance
to your
life
today
in terms
of your
own
government
and
the
workings
of power
and corporate
finance
and the
like
but
I
do
think
that
girls
juice
deals
and
the
fact
that
he
had
the
coolest
parties
on a
private
island
with the
hottest
girls
is something
that
brought in
a lot
of
intellectuals
stimulating
conversations
scientists
all these
very
interesting
people
so that
was
part
of
the
thing
right
that
was
the
draw
try
hosting
a
cool
party
as a
guy
with
that
with
with a
bad
ratio
so to
speak
with a
sausage
party
and
when you
develop a
reputation
for having
attractive
women
at the
parties
you
host
you
become
an
important
person
to know
in the
network
because
basically
every
male
has
that
has
a
desire
for
attractive
women
not
saying
underage
obviously
but
that
is
like
a
universal
biological
desire
for men
to
want to
be around
attractive
women
and
what
do
they
do
for
gay
guys
i
have
no
idea
is
that
a
part
of
the
file
or
the
lore
i've
not
seen
evidence
of
it
or
if
i
have
i
can't
recall
it
offhand
but
again
the whole
point
is
he's
throwing
these
very
attractive
cool
parties
to
get
all
these
people
together
but
that's
what
juices
deals
right
if
you
take
this
scenario
um
epstein's
running
a fund
um
a
a donor
a colleague
someone
that he'd
like to
do a
favor
for
or an
intelligence
service
says
hey
um
we're
trying to
get a
pipeline
built
in the
middle
east
um
we
we need
a
you know
a
facilitator
to
help
arrange
private
outside
funding
for it
so this
thing
can be
constructed
and it
doesn't look
like it's
coming from
the u.s
government
or just
but you
know
we'll
the u.s
government
will provide
some sort
of loan
guarantee
or something
on it
but we
can't raise
enough money
to do
this
it needs
to come
from the
outside
but it
would really
help
american
national
security
and there's
probably
something in
it for
you
if you
can get
this
done
epstein
then goes
out and
says to
then puts
out basically
tries to
make contact
with people
in his
network
who might
be interested
in that
deal
and then
goes
and
that
he goes
out to
five people
two of
them are
in the
space
locally
the deal
terms look
good
they want
to do
it
100%
no hesitation
and then
two people
say
well listen
it's a good
idea in
concept
but I
don't know
the risk
profile on
it looks
a little
high
this normally
is not
would not
be something
that my
team would
clear
we
you know
it's
interesting
but
you know
I
it's
just
it's a
little
rich
for my
blood
in terms
of the
risk
profile
but
Jeffrey
Epstein
asked them
to do
it
and
Jeffrey
Epstein
you know
for the
past
three years
of their
lives
has been
the best
weekend
they've
ever had
has
you know
has
made them
feel alive
again
in their
you know
mid 50s
or 60s
has
you know
has opened
all sorts
of other
deals
for you
for them
and
this deal
might work
out
so
if
I'm afraid
that if
I say
no
to Jeffrey
Epstein
on this
deal
I'm not
going to
get an
invite
to the
next
party
I'm not
going to
be able
to get
laid
again
with
like
you know
a girl
that I
with
you know
women I
find
attractive
or that
you know
yada yada
and Epstein
hooks those
up
I will
do
I'll get
in on
this deal
just because
I want to
be in the
good graces
of Jeffrey
Epstein
not
you know
because
the deal
as a
standalone
thing
it's
because
it's
juiced
by
the girls
the parties
the lifestyle
that Epstein
allows you to
have access to
but in the
public eye
the narrative
is underage
girls
and this is
the thing
that makes
it so
disgusting
when people
talk about
it
everyone says
fuck kids
on the
island
this is
the
big conspiracy
about it
and this is
the reason
why people
are so
outraged
about it
my concern
with the
runaway
train
on that
is that
it's a
massive
manhunt
for something
that
it may be
true
to me
it's a
it's an
it's a
needle
in the
haystack
it might
be true
good luck
looking for
it
and
when
I think
about it
logically
with the
role that
Epstein
played
between
BCCI
Iran
Contra
Latin
American
politics
African
politics
Asian
politics
major
world
foundations
you don't
need
it would
seem
ludicrous
to me
that
Epstein
doesn't
mean
it's
impossible
but
logistically
if
Epstein
ever
directly
threatened
someone
proactively
that is
if the
person
tries to
blackmail
Epstein
Epstein
could
you know
reactively
say well
I've got
I've got
shit on
you too
but
proactively
and really
really do
someone in
like that
and word
gets around
that that
happens
everything
everything
he built
goes
the whole
Rolodex
finds out
and then
even if
the rumor
is not
even if
that rumor
isn't
even if
he didn't
if that rumor
existed
people aren't
going to want
to go to
the parties
because
now
that's not
like an
unfettered
good time
that is
like oh
he did
this to
this guy
I know
right
and
so
in the
fact that
you know
these sorts
of things
they have
a value
way beyond
blackmail
they have
a value
in terms
of
bringing
people
in network
and keeping
clients and
customers happy
and providing
access
and I
think
I think
that the
focus on
that
listen
if there
were
any sort
of receipts
whatsoever
on that
after
all these
years
if there
was like
something
really good
to chew
on
on that
on that
thread
I'm
I'm
very
I'm open
minded
about it
but
my concern
is
the fixation
on this
you think
about the
sort of
pie chart
of
what
the Epstein
cinematic
universe
can tell
you about
the world
even if
it's
true
it's
a
very
very
very
small
fraction
of
that
and
this
gets
back
to
in
1999
I
mentioned
Jeffrey
Epstein
FOIA'd
the Central
Intelligence
Agency
in 1999
for all
records
about
himself
and
then he
did it
again
in 2011
now Jeffrey
Epstein
was not
a public
figure
at all
in
1999
he
didn't
come
into
public
awareness
public
attention
until
2001
2002
when he
started
flying
when he
flew
Bill
Clinton
around
post
presidency
Bill
Clinton
around
on his
Africa
tour
around the
time of the
start of the
Clinton
Foundation
and everyone
was wondering
whoa
who's
who's
this
eccentric
billionaire
who
is
personally
flying around
on his
private jet
the president
of the United
States
for the past
eight years
and that's
when
you know
the Jeffrey
Epstein
celebrity
story
started
but he
was a
he was
a private
figure
in 1999
when he
FOIA'd
the Central
Intelligence
Agency
for records
and we
just learned
this in the
files this
week
the
response
we don't
actually have
the underlying
what's
what's in
the files
is a
2011
FOIA
response
to Jeffrey
Epstein's
lawyer
Jeffrey
Epstein
did this
through his
lawyer
using the
Privacy
Act
this is a
way to
basically
kind of
anonymously
FOIA
the CIA
to
basically
keep
communications
between the
CIA and
your lawyer
for information
you're entitled
to under
the Privacy
Act
about
yourself
and
we don't
have the
underlying
letter
in the
files
tragically
and for
whatever
reason
but
what we
do
have
because
I would
expect
that to
be an
enclosure
to the
CIA
response
but the
fact is
is anybody
who wants
to be a
hero
right now
and I
have it up
on my
on my
X
account
I have
in the
thread
that I
did on
this
the
reference
the file
reference
numbers
these
are not
classified
documents
FOIA
responses
are not
classified
so
anybody
right now
can
FOIA
the Central
Intelligence
Agency
for all
records
and
communications
related
to the
CIA's
written
communications
with
Jeffrey Epstein
via his
lawyer
both in
1999
2011
but the
2011
what it
says is
we have
received your
request for
your client
Jeffrey Epstein's
records search
under the
Freedom of
Information Act
we have
granted the
request to
search for
all open
and acknowledged
agency
affiliations
between
Jeffrey Epstein
and the
CIA
we have
run that
search
and the
answer is
no documents
are responsive
to the
request
and that
says in
the next
paragraph
with respect
to your
request
that touches
on
classified
classified
documents
we can
neither
confirm
nor deny
the
existence
or
non
existence
of
any
such
documents
so you
can
consider
this
a
partial
denial
of
your
FOIA
request
now what's
so
interesting
about that
is
you may
think if
you read
that
that
Jeffrey
Epstein
just
requested
any
public
facing
links
between
him
and
the
CIA
or
what
just a
general
what do
you have
on me
that the
public
can
search
just to
see
first of
the fact
they did
that
alone
twice
in
1999
2011
says
something
but the
you might
think okay
well he just
wants to know
if other
people might
think that
he's
CIA
you know
he's
he's moving
up in the
world in
1999
he's about
to be a
massive
public
figure
he wants
to know
if other
people
FOIA
the CIA
for records
on him
what they
will see
and
but that
it turns
out
that
response
to a
FOIA
partial
granting
of the
FOIA
to look
for open
and
acknowledged
agency
links
and
partial
GLOMAR
can neither
confirm nor
deny
existence
non-existence
is a
stock
CIA
FOIA
response
whenever
you
FOIA
the
CIA
for
someone's
personnel
files
which
leads
to the
question
because
the fact
that the
CIA
says
we
we
are
consider
this
a
denial
of
your
request
for
classified
for
things
that
touch
on
classified
matters
means
that
he
asked
he
he
didn't
just
ask
for
all
open
and
acknowledged
links
between
the
CIA
and
himself
he
asked
for
something
and
whatever
that
thing
was
it
touched
on
something
classified
there
would
have
been
no
GLOMAR
if
there
would
have
been
nothing
to
deny
about
the
request
if
it
had
only
been
limited
to
open
and
acknowledged
links
to me
this is
a bombshell
and should
prompt
Ro Khanna
and Thomas
Massey
and the
427
members of
the House
of Representatives
and 100%
of the U.S.
Senate
to pass
the same
bill
that the
United States
Congress
did in
1992
for
the JFK
records
collection
act
when
the
CIA
was
forced
by
law
to
stand
up
an
independent
auditing
body
to
review
all
classified
records
relating
to the
JFK
assassination
for the
first time
ever
and then
declassify
them
over months
and years
through
the work
of that
independent
board
of the
existence
of this
correspondence
we just
learned about
this week
alone
should
prompt
a
427
to
1
and
100%
Senate
to
do
the
same
thing
they
just
did
with
DOJ
files
for CIA
originated
files
that's
actionable
immediately
who's going to want to be on the other side of that in Congress
know the CIA's records about Jeffrey Epstein prolific child sex trap
however you want you know whatever you see in the Rorschach inkblot test
of the Epstein universe I think it'd be very hard to be if that bill gets
introduced for a sitting member of Congress to be on the other side of it I
think it would pass
and it would legally compel the CIA to turn over what I think are quite
possibly arguably very likely 40 years of CIA documents referencing Epstein the
CIA would not be doing its job if it didn't have records about Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein was a counterintelligence threat with all the foreign countries
that he was dealing with if he had been a double agent sort of thing the CIA
would not be doing its job
it was not keeping to see Epstein's network was a key financial logistics hubs
in highly geopolitical sensitive areas of operation of the CIA
the economics division of the CIA let alone you know the operations division is
going to have to you know keep analysts informed about money flows in those
countries and when you add and then you add in the fact that he represented Anand
Khashoggi's money who was the CIA's main point
for 10 years the literal central linchpin and his money is being handled there's
no way and you would now have a legal mechanism to enforce CID classification
if Congress forces it now the other part of it is okay why hasn't the CIA
turned this over before you could argue it's a Orlando Massford case it would
embarrass the agency it would mean in Congress their funding is going to get
decimated because they're toxic
you can argue it's foreign governments you can argue it's foreign governments
that don't want that but part of it is the CIA is not allowed to do this unless
the Congress forces them these are classified documents I mean it could
you can't you know charitably volunteer to ODNI by conducting you know an
internal task force that voluntarily you know ask Tulsi Gabbard to declassify
these I wouldn't hold your breath on that but this is immediately actionable
and it would solve the mystery all we need is one brave member of Congress to
get the ball rolling and
stand up that bill and you can just copy paste the 1992 JFK records collection
act and just substitute JFK for Jeffrey Epstein what's your take on the
circumstances around his death
I don't know I don't know I it's weird that they took a guy who is one of the
most high profile defendants ever and you put him in jail with a mass murder
yeah
yeah kind of crazy you put him in jail with a cop who'd killed drug dealers a
juiced up gigantic cop
yeah who was obviously a psychopath and then 18 days before he died he
complained that that guy tried to kill him
yeah
uh
I mean it it it doesn't look good
it's just crazy that this guy wasn't in protective custody
it's crazy that the cameras go down
it's crazy that the footage that they released is weird because it's missing
it's missing time
and it's crazy that it happened under the watch
of an attorney general who himself was so deeply embedded in the Epstein
network his whole life
I mean from the weird kind of coincidence of
Bill Barr's father Donald Barr and Jeffrey Epstein's
Dalton school to the fact that Bill Barr
started his career in the CIA
during the Iran Contra operation that Jeffrey Epstein was
appears to have been doing the covert money laundering for
I mean Jeffrey Bill Barr was
like seven years
he went to Knight Law School
trained to be a lawyer while he was at the CIA
and then his
you know
main job was being the CIA's blocker and tackler to
obstruct
he was the he was the CIA's point of contact to Congress during the Iran Contra
scandal that Jeffrey Epstein was so deeply involved in
uh and was blamed in the press at the time for being the
person at CIA blocking Congress from seeing
the CIA scan documents
that were so central to the scandal
then he becomes the attorney general of the United States and he writes the pardons
of the BCCI
officials
who was co-leading that investigation Robert Mueller at the time this is in the
early 1990s
the first time Bill Barr so so you have the BCCI Bear Stearns
multi-billion dollar operation
that appears to me that Jeffrey Epstein
was working on and then got took the clients from that deal as his own personal
clients when he went private on his own
and Bill Barr is who lets the people from the crooked CIA bank
off the hook and then he becomes attorney general again
uh
you know and in 2019 it's
he's the one in charge of the FBI
the FBI answers to the Justice Department
the FBI is the same relationship with with justice that the CIA has with state
you know they're the investigative arm
of the Justice Department
so you know I think if
I think it's hard to trust anyone on this
and
I don't know you know what kind of file set
the Trump FBI
inherited
after
after all this time
uh
it's hard to make heads or tails of it
to me
I think getting answers on the things that are immediately actionable
getting the CIA's direct correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein
you know that I mentioned
uh
a congressional bill that forces that
because if it comes out
that there are
effectively
in it
an entire avalanche
of classified Epstein files
uh
dating back 40 years
and then you've got the CIA attorney
it puts these things in a very different light
depending on whether
the thing that has generated so much smoke this whole time
uh
the allegation of protection
by
US
government intelligence
and
however many others
uh
to know that
on physical paper
like we know
that the CIA
interfered in the Rolando-Massford trial
like we know
that the CIA
contracted out to Mafia Hitman
in an attempt to kill a foreign president
like we
know
that
MKUltro actually
was real
I mean
these things
you can't scale
you know
I think of things like
like a Jenga tower
if
if
if a foundational piece
is not solid
you can scale
a whole architecture
of BS
on top of it
and if that assumption
falls away
this majestic looking
you know
tapestry
of just
years and years
of effort
collapses
because the thing you
assumed to be true
because
it looked
like there was so much smoke
to
to know it to be true
that that is a solid
piece
that you can put the next piece
on top of
you know
it's um
there's that quote
99% is a bitch
100% is a breeze
what does that mean
it means
when you're only 99%
sure of something
you
you always
have to agonize
well
what
if it's not true
and it
and
I
think it is
and I build all this
stuff on top of it
the 1% chance
that
that's not true
means
uh
it would be a real
bitch for this
me to spend years
of effort on this thing
for me to spend
thousands
you know
millions of dollars
you know
on this thing
when it's based on
assumption that
it was only 99%
likely to be true
but
1%
it may have been
structured some way
different
there might be
something I missed
in this
whereas 100%
is a breeze
okay
it's automatic
you can
and
things like
this is why
document drops
like this
are so vital
not even
necessarily
because they have
some single
smoking gun
that tells you
who killed
JFK
or
you know
uh
what
client
Jeffrey Epstein
trafficked women
to
but because
it allows you
to put
down
real Jenga
pieces
about what
actually happened
and that process
itself
allows you to
ask the questions
that might get
you to those
answers
that makes a lot
of sense
um
is there anything
else you want
to add to this
I mean
we could kind of
go on for days
yeah
yeah
I mean
you spend so much
time on this stuff
how do you have
that kind of an
attention span
it's kind of nuts
I mean
I follow some of
your live streams
I'm like
first of all
your recall
is insane
you know
I heard something
once
which I think
is really helpful
I don't think
I'm special
in any way
like this
I think
literally
anyone can do
this
if you just
kind of
apply this
kind of trick
I heard this
once
which is that
if you read
a history book
don't just
read it
agnostically
have a
theory
in mind
about
what you
think
this is
and how it
worked
even if
you are
wrong
about that
theory
what you
will find
is that
names
dates
locations
your brain
will remember
them
forever
because
they're not
you know
if
if I'm
thinking about
something that
happened in
you know
I don't know
like
November
11th
1983
okay
if I see
like that
date
on a
driver's
license
card
or something
and I have
no theory
of mind
when I see
that
I'm not
going to
remember
that five
minutes
from then
it's
going to be
like
remembering
trying to
remember
an 11
string
you know
number
or like
someone's
cell phone
or something
when you
don't really
know the
person
or you
haven't
dialed in
a million
times
but if
you have
a theory
of mind
that you
are indexing
those things
in relation
to
what you
find is
that your
your brain
keeps those
in that
index
so like
I've
joked
like
because
you know
we've talked
about this
Iran-Contra
affair
which was
really the
creation
of this
apparatus
that we
live under
today
where
because the
CIA got
handcuffs
put on it
everything
had to
become CIA
to get
around those
handcuffs
the
universities
had to
be
the
foundations
the
private
philanthropic
donors
you know
and this
is what
happened
in the
censorship
industrial
complex
it was
all wrapped
around
this
but
what you
find
is like
those
dates
mean
something
to you
because
they're
they're
placed
in relation
to something
else
that
happens
you know
I joke
that like
I index
things by
you know
Iran-Contra
often
like for
example
if
there's
when I
was
you know
studying
about
BCCI
and I
learned okay
this
happened
in 1984
I don't
just think
about
1984
as a
an
abstract
thing
I think
okay
well
that
means
it
happened
after
the
meeting
between
Robert
McFarlane
and
Anand
Khashoggi
but before
the
you know
the oil
pipeline
scandal
of Ed
Meese
and then
so
I
remember
that
this
thing
happened
on
this
date
because
I
place
it
in
the
index
and
anyone
I
think
it's
it's
a
I
think
it's
something
that
anyone
you know
I
think
people
organically
do it
when they're
really
passionate
about
something
and
you know
this is an easy
thing to be
passionate about
because
it gets to
the heart
of networks
that
are the
determining
power
structures
of
your life
when you
look up
and then
you look
up at
the thing
that you're
looking up
at
and you
look
up
at
the
thing
above
that
this
this is
the
network
you
see
whether
it's
an
intelligence
military
statecraft
high
finance
private
philanthropies
universities
labor
unions
scientific
research
doesn't
mean
it's
you know
the
Epstein
network
so to
speak
but
it's
it's
this
this
layer
of
interconnected
human
networks
and
I
think
it's
an
important
history
for
the
American
people
to
have
access
to
so
that
they
can
make
informed
decisions
about
how
they
want
to
change
that
world
how
they
can
make
informed
decisions
about
what
to
vote
for
they
can
make
informed
decisions
about
what
kind
of
you
know
industries
that
they're
participating
in
that
they
might
want
to
see
reformed
and
it's
so
it
makes
it
easy
to
be
passionate
about
because
if
we
can
if
we
can
get
a
win
here
it
will
really
change
the
world
well
I
think
you
do
a
great
service
and
I
think
your
abilities
are
exceptional
I
think
you're
selling
yourself
short
a
little
bit
you're
being
a
little
self
deprecating
because
it's
very
unusual
what
you're
able
to
do
and
I
think
just
the
sheer
amount
of
time
that
you've
invested
in
this
stuff
is
kind
of
mind
boggling
well
what
would
you
like
to
see
in
this
like
if
you
had
a
wish
list
what
are
the
things
that
are
open
threads
or
well
the
real
concern
with
me
is
that
it's
unfixable
and
that
this
is
just
a
standard
way
that
our
government
has
operated
since
the
1950s
or
whenever
and
it
can't
be
fixed
and
that
they'll
just
gloss
over
it
a
new
person
will
get
into
office
and
promise
that
they're
going
to
implement
some
reform
and
it
never
happens
and
that
we
just
accept
that
over
and
over
and
over
again
that's
the
real
fear
the
real
fear
is
that
there's
a
slow
capture
of
our
democracy
to the
point
where
it's
just
a
mere
illusion
that's
the
real
fear
and
I
think
a
lot
of
people
think
that
we've
already
passed
the
point
of
like
particularly
England
which
is
just
rampant
crackdown
on
free
speech
and
what
the
arrests
from
people
that
are
posting
things
on
social
media
sites
and
the
implementations
of
there's
a
new
thing
that
they
tried
to
do
or
I
think
they
are
doing
this
concept
of
having
a
limited
amount
of
time
so you
can
drive
outside
of
a
zone
and
after
that
you
have
to
pay
for
it
that's
a
new
thing
right
yeah
I can
send
this
to
you
Jamie
because
I
just
sent
it
to
Constantine
because
it
appears
to be
real
and
it's
terrifying
your
carbon
budget
yeah
that's
nuts
well
look at
what
California
is
doing
right
now
what
California
is
doing
is
they
are
taking
or
they're
moving
forward
with
this
the
idea
that
you
have
a
attack
tax
on
the
amount
of
miles
that
you
drive
now
so
instead
of
just
taxing
gas
like
they've
always
done
now
they're
taxing
you
on
the
amount
of
miles
that
you
drive
well
you're
already
getting
taxed
on
that
if
you're
driving
more
miles
you're
spending
more
money
on
gas
so
you're
spending
more
money
on
tax
but
now
they're
taxing
on
top
of
that
which
is
essentially
they're
stealing
money
yeah
why can't
I find
it
forward
here
here
you go
hold on
a second
Jamie
you're on
you're on
signal
right
it is
really
interesting
how that
whole
thing
I sent
it to
your
amount
signal
but
it's
crazy
that
the
California
thing
is
bananas
it just
says
wow
that's
it
oh
it
doesn't
have
the
link
okay
hold on
sorry
huh
oh
maybe
this
is it
hold on
a second
I
think
there's
a really
interesting
underdeveloped
history
around
the
origins
of
the
climate
the
2006
2005
2006
2007
really
global
warming
climate
kind of
policy
push
from
the
US
government
that
became
a runaway
train
as
investor
money
rushed
in
it's
my
it's
my
opinion
and
I'm
open
minded
about
it
but
it
appears
to be
the
case
in
my
view
after
a
study
of
this
that
the
US
government
together
with
foreign
allies
pursued
this
kind
of
you
know
demonization
of
carbon
at a
real
policy
level
hydrocarbon
based
fuels
as
a
geopolitical
battering
ram
against
newly
resurgent
Russia
in the
mid
2000s
as
Putin
was
getting
power
back
over
a
bunch
of
post
post
Soviet
eastern
satellite
countries
through
basically
pipeline
exploiting
his
leverage
around
pipelines
and the
fact
that
you
know
this is
like
the
John
McCain
type
quote
right
that
Russia
is
a
gas
station
with
the
military
right
you
hear
that
a
lot
you
know
Gazprom
the
state
sponsored
oil
company
was
like
effectively
the
biggest
oil
company
in
well
Gazprom
was
for
gas
but
Rosneft
and
Russia
had
at one
point
the
largest
oil
you
know
exports
in the
world
it was
it was
the
motor
engine
of
their
economy
oil
and
gas
and
the
relationship
between
Russian
oligarchs
and
businessmen
and
Eastern
European
Russian
oligarchs
and
businessmen
allowed
that
hydrocarbon
based
dependency
and financial
opportunity
to let
Putin
reassert
Russian
control
over
Central
and
Eastern
European
countries
that
NATO
was trying
to
turn
into
Western
vassal
states
essentially
so you
had this
in the
1990s
this wasn't
an issue
because
Boris Yeltsin
was the
president
and he
was
effectively
an
adjunct
of
the
US
government
incidentally
through
Larry
Summers
and
the
Jeffrey
Epstein
Harvard
network
but
so there
became
this push
after
you know
Russia's
interventions
in Georgia
and the
like
and a
big
attack
on
a lot
of
you know
high
level
Republican
well
basically
I think
this push
to try
to create
a
shift
in
the types
of energy
the world
uses
was a way
to kneecap
Russia's
main source
of revenue
to ensure
that
the
the
Eurasia
the plan
to seize
political or
vassal state
control over
Eurasia
would continue
against
Putin's
new
nationalist
and global
resurgence
and this
includes a bunch
of crap
that in
2003-2004
but effectively
then you start
to see the
US government
champion these
hydrocarbon
policies
and you started
to see all
of these
international
forums
journals
regulators
openly talking
in this
mid-oughts
period
as Russia
was starting
to reclaim
political
influence
that
these
climate
policies
would be
a way
to stop
Russian
power and
influence
because it
would cripple
them
economically
they'd have
there'd be
nothing
there'd be
no business
you know
between
oligarchs
in the
different
countries
for them
to even
leverage
it would
effectively
allow us
to continue
the golden
age of
the uniparty
1990s
moment
and then
you saw
all these
government
subsidies
to it
you know
tax
benefits
like you
know
free money
basically
and then
it became
a runaway
as the
market
saw that
this was
a highly
protected
incentivized
space by
the US
government
they all
flooded
into
now they've
got a
sunk cost
if those
policies
change
you've
got
trillions
of dollars
in climate
finance
globally
right
and then
these
started
becoming
part of
like IMF
loan
you know
requirements
and
but now
it's like
even if
the science
is completely
wrong
what started
arguably
as a
kind of
you know
national
security
based
way
to force
energy
diversification
this is
what we
we put
Europe
through
the United
States
with the
sanctions
against
Russia
we force
them to
you know
divest
of oil and
gas
and invest
in a
basket
of
you know
alternative
energy
cleaner
energy
supplies
but now
it's
and they
and that
could be
justified
at the
national
security
level
with the
science
of this
actually
being the
case
so you
could sell
it to the
whole world
even if
even if you
prove that
false
at this point
there's
there's so much
infrastructure
built up
that
you know
you have
this network
you have
hedge funds
you know
you got
I mean
Bill Gates
has a
climate
fund
Al Gore
is a
billionaire
from
this one
Tom
Steyer
one of the
biggest
investors
in DNC
the climate
impact
fund
Michael
Bills
who
funded
the CIA
governor
of Virginia
Abigail
Spanberg
and
and
then the
momentum
of the
it's
sort of
an
unstoppable
social
narrative
now
right
well
and
it's
and
the
thing
that's
terrifying
about
it
is
that
it
has
conjoined
the
diplomatic
muscle
of
the
American
government
and
whatever
allies
abroad
with
private
finance
like
for
example
like
we
overthrew
the
government
of
Bangladesh
in
2024
the
Biden
administration
did
they ran
this
whole
coup
they did
it
through
the
National
Endowment
for
Democracy
CIA
cut out
and a
million
other
orgs
on
the
ground
it
was
a
color
revolution
street
protest
you
know
I
think
we
may
have
talked
about
this
last
time
where
literally
the
CIA
sock
puppet
National
Endowment
for
Democracy
sponsored
like
rap
music
videos
and
produced
them
and put
them
on
YouTube
and
then
worked
with
the
unions
set
up
like
transgender
dance
festivals
to try
to get
the LGBT
community
on board
against
the
government
and
then
giant
riots
they
install
it's
effectively
a
but
part
of the
thing
that
they
leaned
on
in
the
post
transition
government
is
to
agree
to
these
basically
like
climate
finance
reforms
and
you
can
just
like
the
CIA
and
the
oil
industry
became
completely
inseparable
completely
inseparable
I mean
George Bush
for example
Zapata Energy
Offshore
and the
whole
Texas
oil
thing
to then
becoming
the
Central
Intelligence
Agency
I mean
Trump's
first
Secretary
of State
was Rex Tillerson
Rex Tillerson
never worked
in government
the Secretary
of State
oversees
the CIA
he's got
the whole
CIA portfolio
how does
you know
well
he was the
chairman
and CEO
of Exxon
Mobile
you can't
the CIA
and the
US military
creates the
market
for oil
companies
you can't
get access
to the
oil
unless
you
either
overthrow
a government
or support
against
an insurgency
political movement
one that will
guarantee you
favorable terms
you know
access
yada yada
the whole market
and then
the CIA
and DOD
people will
rotate into
board seats
on those
oil companies
and so
it becomes
inseparable
and my fear
about this
is that
over the past
10 years
the same
thing has
started to
happen
with the
client
the sort
of you know
clean energy
side
of the
you know
of big
energy companies
like in
big oil
and CIA
big oil
and CIA
for a
century
now you
have like
big climate
and CIA
because there's
so much
money
it's
energy
it's
the master
resource
and so
now you've
got
you know
what appears
to me
CIA
intervention
in part
like some
of these
things you
have to
wonder
why did
the
Biden
CIA
try to
overthrow
the Bolsonaro
government
in Brazil
this was a
pro-U.S.
political
party
it was a
the
the person
you know
Lula
was
tied at the
hip with
China
divested
from all
these
U.S.
contracts
you know
massively
reduced
the
you know
the
footprint
of
U.S.
aligned
policies
in the
second biggest
country
country
in our
hemisphere
and well
you know
Brazil just
announced
like this
1.3
trillion
dollar
climate
finance
initiative
and you
know
all of
these
people
are
all
these
New York
hedge
funds
and
London
banks
who've
skated
towards
this
are
in
on
that
you
have
I mean
this is
a crazy
case
you know
one of
the biggest
beneficiaries
of
the post
coup
Lula's
government
in Brazil
were all
of the
clean
ethanol
George Soros
is longest
standing
equity
investment
at that
point
was a
company
called
Ataco
Agra
which
did
clean
ethanol
fuel
alternatives
the
problem
is
it's
part
of
its
business
part
of
it
is
it's
not
competitive
on
price
with
diesel
based
fuels
so
the only
way
to
compete
and win
that market
and make
millions
of dollars
is if
the government
imposes
a mandate
a quota
that forces
people to buy
your product
well
George Soros
co-sponsored
those
CIA adjacent
national down
for democracy
operations
all over
Brazil
well
he's
you know
holding
an equity
interest
in the
thing
that
day
one
there's
an
imposed
mandate
to use
those
climate
products
it's the
same
thing
in
Africa
you have
like
CIA
regime
change
to force
clean
energy
companies
so that
the people
who
sponsor
the
donors
who
sponsor
the
politicians
who
pick
the
staff
of
the
CIA
enact
policies
that makes
money
for those
hedge funds
invested
in
climate
finance
so
fucked
up
I think
that's
what's
happening
in
California
without
the
regime
change
element
I think
you have
investors
who
profit
from this
and the
only way
those
investments
can be
profitable
is if
government
imposes
mandates
quotas
and bans
on the
alternatives
to that
product
I mean
that's
kind of
the way
the
vaccine
market
works
do you
get that
link
yeah
should we
play it
yeah
just play
it
they just
set up
their little
15 minute
city
and they
are now
charging people
for leaving
the city
you get
100 free
days
they call it
a free
day
you get
a free
pass
to leave
the 15
minute
city
and if
you exceed
your 100
free
days
you have
to pay
the US
dollar
equivalent
of $93
per day
and if
you live
outside
of the
15 minute
city
you want
to travel
into
the 15
minute
city
you get
25
free
passes
free
move
oh
the government
is giving
you free
movement
capability
you get
25
free
passes
and if
you exceed
those
25
days
it's
$93
a day
and how
are they
tracking
all this
oh
there's
not
a man
at the
gate
they're
not
writing
up
tickets
or having
police
officers
oh no
they are
monitoring
you
with
digital
AI
surveillance
and cameras
and then
they're
automatically
finding you
this is why
we have
to be
against
the
flock
cameras
in the
United
States
they're
not
just
speed
trap
cameras
this is
why we
have
to be
against
the
Palantir
whole of
government
database
this is
why we
have
to
stand
up
and
raise
awareness
and bring
attention
to
these
matters
instead
of
arguing
with
each
other
and
NPCs
on
the
internet
over
left
right
now
divide
and
conquer
we are
in the
division
part
of the
divide
and
conquer
agenda
conquer
is
next
you
think
it's
bad
now
wait
till
you
have
to
pay
a hundred
dollars
a day
to leave
your
15-minute
city
conspiracy
right
so
only
rich
people
are
going
to
be
able
to
afford
that
it's
just
like
the
meat
thing
right
it's
like
you
know
the
the
irony
of
you
know
Australia
being
a prison
colony
and now
you've
got
now
it's
like
the
homeland
in
the
UK
but
I
mean
look
the
UK
just
got
rid
of
jury
trials
for
a
lot
of
cases
and
yeah
you
know
as
12,000
speech
arrests
a
year
and
some
people
arrested
for
what
seems
like
even
holding
up
their
own
country's
flag
at
an
opportune
moment
or
silently
praying
and
you
know
we
need
to
liberate
the
British
people
I
mean
it's
it's
it's
unbelievable
that
I
mean
they
call it
perfidious
Albion
right
British
statecraft
has been
so
pernicious
to the
American
people
in the
past
decade
it
was
Russiagate
the
entire
three
year
special
prosecutor
saga
was
because
of a
British
spy
Christopher
Steele
and
and
an
Iran
Contra
veteran
Stephen
Halper
residing
abroad
at Cambridge
to kick
that off
and then
the
British
government
conspired
with
with
with
the
Biden
administration
to
create
to
conjoin
the
US
UK
censorship
industrial
complex
America
First
Legal
Stephen
Miller
and
Gene
Hamilton's
non
nonprofit
law firm
they started
obtained
these
incredible
documents
that
showed
a
planning
meeting
between
the
British
government
and the
Biden
administration
attended
by
the
CIA
the
National
Security
Council
USAID
hosted
the
White
House
and
it
was
the
British
UK
Digital
Commission
they brought
a huge
slide deck
of all
the ways
that their
new
censorship
law
what's
today
called
the
Online
Safety
Act
the
USA
would
effectively
help
throttle
misinformation
in the
United
States
like
basically
it
was
like
you
scratch
your
back
our
back
we'll
scratch
yours
and
it
was
this
you
know
US
Democrat
party
UK
labor
party
alliance
meanwhile
the
Biden
government
was
paying
British
censors
they
the
global
disinformation
index
which
you
know
killed
like
the
ad
you
know
revenue
for
like
they
went
after
Daily Wire
Federalist
a million
conservative
news sites
and social
media
accounts
you
went
after
the
social
media
platforms
in
the
United
States
they're
British
black
ops
by their
own
language
well
CCDH
but
they were
funded by
our
government
to censor
our voices
but laundered
out to
the UK
and I
think we
need to
fundamentally
restructure
that special
relationship
we've had
that relationship
for a long
time
totally
unquestioned
and I
we can't
farm that
out
and if
that's not
addressed
and we
don't
fix that
relationship
I think
you can't
really fix
our own
system
unless we
you know
cut out
some of the
poison
that we
inject
from the
outside
Mike
we
gave
people
a lot
to go
over
almost
too
much
but
you
if
anybody
wants
more
your
X
account
is
amazing
you're
you're
tireless
I don't
know how
you do
it
but
thank you
for doing
it
I really
appreciate
you
and appreciate
you coming
on here
thanks so
much for
having me
nothing but
fun from
here
I mean
look
it's
fun
I mean
guys
the world
is opening
up
and we
are seeing
behind a
looking glass
where there
has been
a veil
of secrecy
for 60
years about
some of
these things
for 10
years about
some of
these things
so don't
get too
blackpilled
this is
something
has happened
that has
never happened
before
and you
are alive
to experience
it
so
you know
try and
enjoy the
ride
bye everyone