#2416 - Dan Farah

15 views

3 months ago

0

Save

Audio

Dan Farah

1 appearance

Dan Farah is the director and producer of "The Age of Disclosure," a documentary revealing a 80-year global cover-up of the existence of non-human intelligent life, and a secret war among major nations to reverse-engineer advanced technology of non-human origin. See it now in select theaters and streaming on Amazon Prime Video.  www.theageofdisclosure.com www.youtube.com/@TheAgeOfDisclosure

ChatJRE - Chat with the JRE chatbot

Timestamps

0:09The Age of Disclosure: alleged UAP legacy programs, secrecy incentives, and credibility of whistleblowers
9:59Vandenberg UFO incidents, classified evidence, and alleged crash-retrieval/reverse-engineering programs
19:55China, nuclear tests, and UAP crash-retrieval/reverse-engineering (incl. underwater UAP and the Tic Tac)

Show all

Comments

Write a comment...

Transcript

0:00

Joe Rogan Podcast, check it out!

0:03

The Joe Rogan Experience.

0:05

Train by day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day!

0:09

What's up, Dan? How are you? Good to see you.

0:15

Good, good to see you, man.

0:16

Good to see you again.

0:17

First time I saw you was the first time I saw your documentary, which is

0:20

fucking excellent.

0:21

Thank you, bro.

0:21

The Age of Disclosure, really good. Can't recommend it enough.

0:25

If you're a UFO dork like myself, and you're in and out, sometimes you're like,

0:30

this is bullshit.

0:30

Maybe it's real. This is bullshit. Maybe I'm wasting my time.

0:34

Maybe it's real. Maybe it's... Go see the Age of Disclosure.

0:37

And then you'll be fully in the I don't fucking know, but something's going on.

0:42

That's where I am right now. I don't know, but something's going on.

0:45

Definitely something's going on. It's a real situation.

0:47

Yeah, it's a real weird one.

0:49

When you see all these high-level government employees talking about secret

0:54

access programs

0:55

and back-engineering programs that have been going on for decades and decades

1:00

in secrecy,

1:00

and you're like...

1:02

Your documentary did a fantastic job of highlighting a couple of reasons why I

1:07

always...

1:08

When people are skeptical, and they go, okay, if there was a program like this,

1:11

why wouldn't they just tell us?

1:12

You have to really understand the consequences of what they've done.

1:17

Because what they've done is lie to Congress for a long time.

1:20

It's misappropriation of funds, clear felonies.

1:24

Lie to the public, lie to Congress, lie to sitting presidents.

1:27

Just the money stuff.

1:28

And also, let's just be really...

1:32

Let's be just honest about human nature.

1:34

If you have complete access to enormous amounts of money that's not under any

1:40

oversight at all,

1:42

for sure, some of it went in the pockets of people that probably shouldn't have

1:47

got it.

1:48

100%.

1:49

I think it's safe to say.

1:50

100%.

1:51

It has to.

1:52

Everyone I've talked to who's aware of the details of the Deeply Hidden Legacy

1:55

program

1:55

says that it's at least over a trillion dollars spent since the 40s.

1:59

Oh, my God.

2:00

It's an enormous amount of money.

2:01

Oh, my God.

2:02

And it's a much bigger program than people would suspect.

2:05

You're talking thousands of people, full-time jobs, then going home to their

2:09

families,

2:09

the guy sitting next to your kid's Little League Baseball game,

2:11

and normal people on the outside are involved in this Deeply Hidden program.

2:16

It's bonkers.

2:17

And the idea...

2:18

This is another thing that drives me nuts.

2:19

The idea that people can't keep secrets...

2:22

Shut the fuck up.

2:23

No.

2:23

Yes, they can.

2:24

If you're told your reputation...

2:25

Some people, some people can't keep secrets, but by the time you get to be a

2:29

high-level operative

2:30

in the United States government, I'm guessing you can keep a fucking secret.

2:34

Yeah.

2:35

And if you're told, hey, you can just disappear one day, or you can have your

2:39

reputation ruined,

2:40

you're going to get blackmailed about this or that, you're just going to keep

2:43

quiet.

2:44

Yeah, people can keep secrets.

2:45

And by the way, not everybody does.

2:47

No.

2:48

The Bob Lazar story, to this day, is like...

2:51

That documentary by Jeremy Corbell was the reason why I went all the way back

2:56

in with

2:56

UFOs.

2:57

I'm like, all right, goddammit, I believe Bob.

2:59

It's a great talk.

3:00

It's a great talk.

3:01

It's a great talk.

3:01

And that one's available.

3:02

It's Area 50, Bob Lazar, Area 51, and Flying Saucers.

3:06

Is that the name of it?

3:07

The title of it?

3:08

Something along those lines?

3:09

Fantastic documentary.

3:10

For me, like, look, my childhood was the 80s and early 90s.

3:13

I grew up on movies like E.T. and Close Encounters and TV shows like X-Files

3:17

and movies like

3:18

Fire in the Sky.

3:18

I remember that movie.

3:19

Oh, yeah.

3:19

I had Travis in here.

3:21

Yeah, you did.

3:21

I loved that interview.

3:22

Fantastic.

3:23

That movie gave me nightmares.

3:24

Crazy.

3:25

Kept me up as a kid.

3:26

A couple of those guys on that crew hated him.

3:29

Like, one of them he got in a fist fight with that day.

3:31

Yeah.

3:32

And that guy had the exact same story that everybody else had.

3:34

He got hit by a beam of light.

3:35

They went back to get him.

3:37

He was gone.

3:38

Then five days later, he shows up.

3:41

Yeah.

3:41

He's not malnourished.

3:42

He's not, like, he hasn't been sleeping in the woods.

3:45

It's crazy.

3:46

And he's got this fucking insane story about being repaired on a UFO.

3:49

Yeah.

3:50

And all those guys passed lie detector.

3:51

Yes.

3:52

All of them did.

3:53

The, you know, like, movies like that, I'm sure for millions of people around

3:56

the

3:56

world, same thing.

3:57

It just made me curious about this, you know?

3:58

Yeah.

3:59

My whole life, I'm like, are we alone in the universe?

4:02

Does the U.S. government know more about this than we do, right?

4:05

And I always wish that there was a documentary that only interviewed people who

4:09

have direct

4:10

knowledge of the topic as a result of work from the government.

4:12

And that was the real drive of making this film.

4:14

Everybody fits that criteria.

4:16

Here's the fear that everyone has, including myself.

4:18

And it is the way, this is the main fear that I have whenever I sit down with

4:22

any whistleblower.

4:23

How many of them are on purpose that their directive, that their objective is

4:32

to spread misinformation

4:33

on purpose, on behalf of the government?

4:35

That they're there to just bullshit you?

4:38

Yeah, and of course I had that thought.

4:40

But for me, I stopped worrying about that when I met one intelligence official,

4:48

government

4:49

official, military official after another, who had completely different

4:53

ideological views,

4:54

different political beliefs.

4:55

They weren't associated with each other, and they were all saying the same

4:57

thing.

4:58

And so I just don't, the alternative to everything these people are saying in

5:03

my film being true

5:04

is that 34 people of different political parties, different government groups,

5:10

with different

5:11

aspirations, all got together four years ago and decided to tell this elaborate

5:16

lie, randomly

5:17

with me, in a movie, and for what end?

5:21

It doesn't make any sense.

5:22

There is a couple ends, right?

5:24

One of them could be they're being told to do this because this is a real thing,

5:30

but it's

5:31

different than what they're saying, and they're trying to get one narrative out

5:34

there.

5:34

Well, right, let's imagine that there's a current coordinated effort with the

5:41

United States

5:42

government and some sort of alien intelligence.

5:45

Wouldn't it behoove you to make it more of a mystery?

5:50

Like, we've been trying, we've been, we have found things, but we don't know

5:53

what they are,

5:54

and we're back engineering, but we don't know much.

5:56

Meanwhile, they know way more.

5:58

Well, yeah, look.

5:59

Like, that's just one scenario.

6:00

That could be a scenario, but in this case, you have people who, like Rubio,

6:04

who found out

6:05

what's going on.

6:06

Right.

6:06

Who think it is very urgent that the public get caught up and find out the base

6:11

facts.

6:12

His biggest fear, clearly, is we are in a high stakes technology race, a Cold

6:18

War race

6:19

with adversarial nations like China to reverse engineer technology of non-human

6:22

origin.

6:23

And his fear, he literally says in the film, is that if we don't get our act

6:27

together and

6:28

take this more seriously as a country, we're going to wake up one day, we're

6:30

going to find

6:30

out the hard way that China got there.

6:32

We won't know when or how, but to quote him, we will be screwed.

6:35

And you could feel it.

6:36

Like, I did all the interviews myself.

6:38

I'm, like, this close to him.

6:39

His chin buckled when he said it.

6:41

He was dead serious, and he was super concerned, and you could feel it.

6:44

And that was the vibe with Senator Rounds, Senator Gillibrand, Jim Clapper.

6:49

The guy's never talked about this topic in his life.

6:51

He's in his 80s.

6:52

He was the head of Air Force Intelligence.

6:53

He was the director of national intelligence.

6:55

Never publicly spoken about UAP.

6:57

He goes on, he comes out and does the interview, and he told me, excuse me, he

7:02

told me that he

7:04

was doing it because it was important to do and that the people needed to know.

7:07

And he drops the bomb in the film that UAP activity over Area 51 is real.

7:11

It's, in fact, real.

7:12

And he goes on the record saying that the Air Force has had a program to

7:16

investigate this

7:17

stuff, whereas the Air Force is saying they haven't had a program since Project

7:20

Blue Book.

7:20

So I think the people that I interviewed really felt like a weight on their

7:25

shoulders to get

7:27

this off their chest.

7:27

And to give you more context on Clapper, the poor guy's wife was in the

7:30

hospital dying.

7:32

He left the hospital to come do the interview.

7:34

And I actually said to him, I was like, are you sure you want to do this today?

7:37

And he's like, no, I want to do it.

7:38

It's important.

7:38

Wow.

7:39

So, like, I think I really felt it.

7:42

These people all felt like the public needed to know the base facts that they

7:46

could lawfully

7:47

disclose.

7:47

And to me, the more wild thing is if what they reveal in this film, the fact

7:51

that there's

7:52

been an 80-year cover-up of Non-Human Intelligent Life, that we're in a secret

7:55

high-stakes

7:55

race with adversarial nations, if that's what they can lawfully disclose, dude,

8:00

what's on the

8:00

other side of that line, what's the stuff they can't disclose, you know?

8:04

Yeah.

8:04

When you're talking to these people, how many of them have had personal

8:11

experiences that they

8:13

either can or cannot talk about?

8:15

Or how many of them, has anyone had some sort of personal experience with

8:19

either a craft

8:20

or seen something?

8:22

Yeah.

8:22

Yeah.

8:23

So...

8:24

That they couldn't talk about?

8:25

That they...

8:26

There were some scenarios that they couldn't talk about, and then there were

8:29

some scenarios

8:29

they could talk about.

8:30

But yes, Jay Stratton, for example, who ran the U.S. government's UEP task

8:37

force, he was

8:38

the director of the UEP task force.

8:39

He co-founded OSAP with Jim McCaskey, which grew into AATIP.

8:44

He has seen with his own eyes non-human craft and non-human beings.

8:49

Some situations that he can't talk about, some situations that he can.

8:56

And I know he intends to talk about those in the very near future.

8:59

Yeah, I've talked to him.

9:04

So, is that the only one that saw a non-human being that you talked to?

9:09

No.

9:10

I've talked to a couple people who have.

9:12

And were they similar stories?

9:15

They were similar stories.

9:16

They described the beings looking...

9:22

The reference point they gave me was very similar to the beings depicted in

9:27

Close Encounters.

9:28

That is the description they used.

9:32

In terms of the crafts, one of the interviews in the film that I'm really proud

9:40

of, an Air

9:42

Force security guard who worked at Vanderburgh Air Force Base, who's never gone

9:46

public, witnessed

9:49

with his own eyes, along with five other security forces members, a giant UAP

9:53

the size of a football

9:54

field that came over Vanderburgh Air Force Base, hovered over them, and then

9:59

shot off at thousands

10:00

of miles an hour.

10:01

And he went on the record on camera.

10:04

He's never talked about it publicly.

10:06

He's never pursued press or, you know, tried to do anything with this

10:09

experience.

10:10

Right.

10:10

And he broke his silence in this film because he thought it was really

10:13

important that the

10:14

world know the truth.

10:14

Did you ask him if there's any footage?

10:16

I would imagine Vanderburgh has some pretty tight security.

10:19

Yeah, he thinks that there is security camera footage of this.

10:23

But he's never seen it.

10:25

He's never seen it, no.

10:25

Good Lord, people.

10:26

Him and five other guys saw it with their own eyes.

10:29

They all reported it.

10:30

There's official Air Force police blogger reports of it.

10:34

I got a hold of the police report.

10:36

We put it on screen in the film.

10:38

That's what drives me crazy.

10:39

All this could be cleared up if they released the whatever high resolution

10:43

security camera

10:44

footage they have.

10:44

I would imagine they have top notch security camera footage around major

10:49

military facilities.

10:51

Yeah.

10:51

Right.

10:51

So that's one of the hurdles we have to get past.

10:53

We have to.

10:54

These motherfuckers are holding on.

10:55

Start declassifying.

10:55

They've got to fucking.

10:56

It's just like that shouldn't be yours.

10:59

Like that should be the United States government has an obligation to give that

11:04

to the people

11:05

of the world.

11:05

That's what that should be.

11:06

If you have footage of a fucking UFO or a real one.

11:09

Yeah.

11:10

And you really have a video of it going thousands of miles an hour just

11:12

disappearing into the sky.

11:14

Yeah.

11:14

100%.

11:15

I mean I don't think any government or organization or religion anyone should

11:20

be able to gatekeep

11:21

these fundamental facts you know.

11:22

I know.

11:23

But the problem is until you see it it's just talk.

11:25

You know.

11:26

If you saw it and you know that you know the like the chain of command like

11:30

where it came

11:31

from or a chain of custody rather where it came from it hasn't been molested

11:35

have analysts

11:36

tested.

11:36

It's not AI.

11:37

It's not bullshit.

11:38

It's not edited.

11:39

Okay.

11:39

What is it.

11:40

Yeah.

11:40

And then we can talk.

11:41

But until then like what do we have.

11:43

We have the go fast footage.

11:44

We have the gimbal footage.

11:46

And we have the very kind of grainy weird tick tock footage.

11:50

It's hard to tell what it is because you're looking at it from the instrumentation

11:54

of the

11:54

fighter jets.

11:55

Yeah.

11:55

But there is also other there is also other data on the tick tock incident that's

12:01

classified

12:02

that shows this is a real object that was really there.

12:05

Jamie show me something.

12:07

What are you showing me Jimmy.

12:07

This is Ryan Graves talking about the big red UFO that hovered over Vandenberg

12:12

in 2003.

12:14

Yeah.

12:14

So that happened in the afternoon.

12:16

And then that night this giant craft came over the base that is revealed in my

12:21

film.

12:22

It was a second event.

12:23

It says right here the executive director of the Graves who's been on the

12:27

podcast for

12:27

an awesome guy.

12:28

Ryan Graves is awesome.

12:28

A sighting occurred around 8.45 a.m. followed by a second sighting only hours

12:33

later.

12:34

He said witnesses provided him with information about the mysterious incidents

12:37

as they held

12:38

onto official documentation and records from the event over the years.

12:41

Yeah.

12:42

And so later that night later in the evening post sunset the reports of other

12:46

sightings

12:47

on base including some aggressive behaviors.

12:49

These objects were approaching some of the security guards at rapid speeds

12:53

before darting

12:54

off like close encounters like literally like the movie.

12:59

Yeah.

13:00

I just wonder how much Steven Spielberg.

13:02

I love to talk to him about that.

13:03

How much he dove into it before he made that film because you know he had the

13:07

Jacques Vallée

13:08

character that French scientist.

13:09

I think he learned a lot in the 70s.

13:11

People forget he also wrote Poltergeist.

13:13

Right.

13:13

Yeah.

13:14

This guy knew what was going on early on.

13:17

But put yourself in the shoes of those security guards at Vanderberg.

13:21

Can you imagine just being a normal guy?

13:23

You work in your security shift.

13:24

You look up and there's something the size of a football field over you.

13:26

Hovering.

13:27

Silently.

13:28

No windows.

13:28

It's fucking terrifying.

13:30

And it's crazy.

13:31

And he says we did a New York City premiere a couple nights ago Tuesday night.

13:36

We did it on the Intrepid Aircraft Carrier.

13:38

Oh wow.

13:38

It was awesome.

13:39

And Fravor and Graves can was great to be on an aircraft carrier.

13:41

With Fravor and Graves.

13:42

That's awesome.

13:43

Fravor loved it.

13:45

He's like I'm back on a carrier baby.

13:47

It was classic.

13:49

But the witness from Vanderberg came.

13:52

And we did a little talk after for the audience.

13:55

And he said it changed his life.

13:56

He just completely looks at everything differently.

13:58

Oh how could it not?

13:59

Yeah.

14:00

How could it not?

14:01

Yeah.

14:01

I mean if you see something like that.

14:02

Totally humbling and also eye-opening.

14:06

There's several people in the film, military guys, who talk about what they

14:12

experienced and saw on military bases.

14:15

Especially nuclear bases.

14:16

Which goes back to one of the biggest concerns the leaders in my film have.

14:23

Almost all the activities over our nuclear weapon sites and military bases.

14:29

Our defense capabilities and our nuclear progress essentially are being

14:34

monitored.

14:36

And why is that?

14:36

Because it's dangerous as fuck.

14:39

Yeah.

14:39

Because as Terrence McKinnon described us, we're territorial apes with thermonuclear

14:44

weapons.

14:45

Yeah.

14:45

It's a ridiculous position.

14:47

Yeah.

14:47

And so that's clear to me too.

14:49

And then you think about, okay, well where does all this go?

14:52

Like it comes to a crossroads, right?

14:54

Like they've been here a long time.

14:57

They've been monitoring us a long time.

14:58

But now we've evolved to be dangerous.

15:00

And we're either at, through secret programs, their level, or we're about to be.

15:05

And then that's when you get to a crossroad.

15:07

So I think that's one of the things driving officials like Rubio and Rounds and

15:12

Gillibrand and Jay Stratton to come out and say what they legally can.

15:18

Because it's a set of circumstances that the human population really needs to

15:21

know about.

15:21

And then it's become a humanitarian issue.

15:23

How do we deal with this?

15:24

Right.

15:25

And what is it?

15:26

Right.

15:26

What is their purpose?

15:27

If they are real, are they here to help us?

15:30

Are they monitoring us?

15:31

One of the creepiest things that Bob Lazar said is that they look at us like

15:35

containers.

15:36

Yeah, I mean.

15:38

And I was like, what does that mean?

15:39

Like containers of souls is what I interpreted from it.

15:44

But that's just me.

15:44

But like what does that mean?

15:46

Containers.

15:47

Like it seems like human beings have an insatiable desire to innovate and

15:53

create better technology.

15:57

And that seems to be leading us into AI and seems to be leading us into

16:01

probably what connects us with the rest of the universe, the rest of the

16:05

intelligence of the universe.

16:07

But the stuff that got us here is being these territorial apes, you know, that's

16:12

why we developed cities and that's why we developed agriculture.

16:17

That's why we had enough free time to innovate.

16:20

We had enough free time to invent things and change things.

16:23

But our nature is really what holds us back because we're still constantly warring.

16:28

Like it hasn't changed at all.

16:30

No, it's crazy that we're still threatening nuclear war 80 years after, you

16:32

know, dropping the bomb on Japan.

16:34

We're still invading sovereign nations.

16:36

We're involved in a proxy war.

16:37

We're, you know, we're helping Israel.

16:39

It's like there's so much chaos and death going on in the world because of

16:43

human beings and the decisions that they're making that if I was an intelligent

16:46

life species from somewhere else, I'd be very concerned.

16:50

Yeah, I'd be like, here's this group of monkeys on a, you know, trajectory.

16:53

About to make a digital god.

16:55

They're real close to having super intelligence in digital form.

17:00

And these idiots are still blowing themselves up from the sky.

17:03

Yeah, which also is why one of the current dilemmas exists, right?

17:07

So this technology exists.

17:10

Private defense contractors have this technology.

17:12

Elements of the government have this technology.

17:14

You're convinced.

17:15

Beyond convinced.

17:16

And what do you think that technology consists of?

17:19

I have been completely convinced by multiple members of the intelligence

17:24

community, the military, senior leaders in government, people who are running

17:28

the Senate Armed Services Committee.

17:30

The Senate 해서 committee, someone who sits on the White House, National

17:35

Security Council, that our country has recovered dozens, dozens of crashed

17:39

craft of non-human origin and done so since the 40s.

17:43

And there has been success for reverse engineering elements of this technology.

17:48

And the same thing has been happening in China and Russia.

17:51

And it's a very real situation.

17:53

It's a high-stakes situation.

17:54

It is referred to as the atomic race on steroids.

17:58

And I am completely convinced of that.

18:01

And the contractors that – the defense contractors that people like Jay Stratton

18:05

and Lou Elzondo and people on the Senate Intel Committee have told me are

18:08

involved are Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Battelle, big

18:13

companies that have a lot of resources and are advancing this technology.

18:22

And the fear that if this technology got out, it would be used by bad actors to

18:28

create weapons of mass destruction has sort of prevented the scientific

18:34

progress that could be better for mankind, that could be good for mankind.

18:42

This technology, to quote Hal Pudoff in the film, he says, this is the key to

18:46

interstellar travel.

18:48

This is the key to exploring the galaxy.

18:50

This is the key to things that sound like science fiction, like teleportation.

18:55

All these things that could just revolutionize humanity and, like, the

19:00

trajectory of our species are being held back out of the fear that the

19:04

technology will be used for evil, right?

19:07

And so, you know, I love Hal Pudoff.

19:10

I got very close with him and, you know, he makes a really –

19:13

Fascinating guy.

19:13

Fascinating guy.

19:14

He's the most interesting person I've ever met in my life.

19:17

He makes a great point in the film of saying he believes, despite the risks

19:22

this technology could be used for bad, he believes we should make it known and

19:27

make it a humanitarian issue of how we all collectively go about safely using

19:32

this technology to change the world for the better and avoid destruction.

19:37

And we've done that.

19:38

We have a blueprint for that with nuclear technology, right?

19:41

Like, there are nuclear weapons.

19:42

That stuff's classified.

19:43

We wish they didn't exist, but it does exist.

19:46

And then we also use nuclear energy for good.

19:48

Yeah.

19:50

The question would be, if we're holding back because we're worried that bad

19:55

actors are going to get it, is China taking the same approach?

20:00

Because I would imagine they're not.

20:01

They're not.

20:01

I would imagine they're full bore, full steam ahead.

20:04

Yeah.

20:05

And that's one of the problems.

20:06

That's the same thing with a lot of other technology, right?

20:09

Oh, yeah.

20:09

Yeah.

20:09

Rubio and Rounds and Gillibrand, three of the most senior leaders in our

20:14

government,

20:15

talk very openly about their concern about China and them getting ahead of us

20:20

on reverse entering this technology.

20:24

Rubio says it keeps them up at night.

20:25

Rounds very animatedly says in the film,

20:29

Do you think for one second that they wouldn't use this technology for their

20:34

domination if they didn't think we had access to the same technology?

20:40

How is everybody getting these crashed UFOs?

20:43

What's the story behind that?

20:44

So here's an interesting thing.

20:46

One of the unexpected things I learned in talking to sources, like real

20:51

credible people,

20:53

is that some of the crashes were actual crashes, where just, you know, crashes

21:00

happen.

21:01

Just like they do for, you know, you can drive as safe as possible, fly as safe

21:03

as possible, crashes are going to happen.

21:05

But some of them were actually caused by elements of our military intelligence

21:10

community and elements of foreign military intelligence community people.

21:16

So, like, one of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon test, nuclear

21:22

weapon testing, atomic weapon testing has a ripple effect that can down these

21:28

things.

21:30

Especially high-altitude nuclear testing, which is one of the things that they

21:33

did in the 1950s in particular.

21:35

Yeah, and so they started doing it.

21:37

Yeah.

21:37

To, like, shoot fish in a barrel, basically.

21:38

They did it on purpose?

21:39

Yeah.

21:40

That's why they were doing it?

21:41

Yeah, and then Russia started doing it.

21:44

No.

21:44

Yeah.

21:44

It's like throwing dynamite into the river.

21:48

It's like fishing with dynamite, yeah.

21:49

Yeah, fishing with dynamite.

21:51

Oh, my God, that's so crazy.

21:52

Which is crazy on multiple levels.

21:54

A, you could accidentally provoke a nuclear conflict with another party that

21:57

doesn't know what you're doing.

21:59

B, you're, you know, you're picking a fight with a more intelligent, superior

22:06

species, right?

22:07

Which is probably not going to work out great for anybody.

22:11

They probably couldn't believe we were using nukes in the sky.

22:14

These fucking idiots nuked some of our spaceships.

22:17

And the ocean.

22:18

Yeah, we nuked the ocean a ton of times, right?

22:20

Yeah, and there's a ton of UA-pectivity in the ocean.

22:22

Right.

22:22

That's something that Tim Burchett recently talked about.

22:25

Did you see that?

22:26

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

22:27

I mean, I've talked off the record with admirals and subcommanders and been

22:32

told that these giant football-sized crafts that were seen over Vandenberg, for

22:37

example, have been seen under the ocean.

22:39

Whoa.

22:40

Moving at crazy speeds, tracked by our subs.

22:42

Yeah, they said there was one story of one that was the size of a football

22:46

field that was going 500 knots.

22:48

Yeah.

22:49

Underwater with no ripples.

22:50

Yeah.

22:50

So it starts to make you think, like, not only was Spielberg tipped off early

22:54

on, but maybe James Cameron was, too.

22:56

Maybe the abyss is a lot closer to reality than we ever thought.

22:59

Well, there was always stories about things coming from the ocean.

23:02

And there was always stories of people that lived in, like, the Pacific, like,

23:05

on the coast, of seeing things come out of the ocean.

23:08

Particularly somewhere around San Diego, there's always stories around San

23:11

Diego.

23:11

There's a hot spot there, yeah.

23:12

Congressman Carson, Andre Carson, who's on the House Intelligence Committee and

23:17

on the House Committee for the CIA, he goes on the record in the film saying

23:22

that these UAP that come out of the ocean are otherworldly things.

23:27

He says they are not man-made aircraft.

23:29

They are not rockets.

23:31

These are otherworldly things, he says.

23:34

And that's a significant – that was a significant moment for me when he went

23:36

on the record and said that.

23:38

And I think it's – going back to the nuclear stuff, it's scary to think that

23:44

anyone thought it was a good idea to intentionally take down the aircraft of a

23:50

more intelligent species.

23:52

It seems like a very foolish decision.

23:55

Well, if that's true.

23:57

Yeah.

23:57

I know that there was a lot of high-altitude nuclear bomb testing for whatever

24:01

reason.

24:02

There was that Operation Midnight Prime.

24:04

Is that what it was?

24:05

No.

24:06

Starfish Prime, where they were blowing holes through the Van Allen radiation

24:11

belts.

24:11

They were just launching nuclear bombs into space.

24:14

Well, I'll tell you something that I don't think people know about, but the UAP

24:18

Task Force, which Jay Stratton ran, they put in place – based on that data of

24:24

the connection with nukes –

24:27

They put together a plan to lure in UAP with nuclear elements, so nuclear

24:34

aircraft carrier with some nuclear weapons on it.

24:38

And they had all these data collection systems in place, and it worked.

24:43

Whoa.

24:44

So they, like, put out bait.

24:46

Yeah, without causing – without doing a test.

24:49

Just the fact that they had nuclear weapons.

24:52

Just the fact that it existed and was being put into place, it attracted, and

24:56

they caught a lot of data on it.

24:58

Whoa.

24:58

And, you know, we shouldn't think that that was the only time they did that.

25:02

Well, I would imagine, you know, they probably saw the testing, the stupid shit

25:06

we did in the ocean.

25:07

The fact that, like, we were talking about this last night.

25:10

John Wayne did a terrible movie called Genghis Khan.

25:15

I don't know if you ever saw it.

25:15

Yeah, yeah, I saw it.

25:16

It's one of the worst movies of all time.

25:17

And that's what killed him.

25:19

That movie killed him.

25:20

He got cancer from that movie.

25:21

And so did almost, like, I think it was, like, close to 100 people on the set.

25:25

Some very large number of people on the set got cancer.

25:28

Because they did this all downwind from where the government was detonating

25:32

nuclear bombs.

25:33

Horrible.

25:33

They filmed it all in Nevada in the desert.

25:35

Horrible.

25:36

Horrible.

25:36

So, like, they blew up.

25:38

I'm sure you've seen the video of the – where it shows, like, a time lapse of

25:42

all the nuclear tests over the years.

25:44

And you just go, yo, what are you doing?

25:47

What are you doing in Nevada?

25:49

Nevada just boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.

25:52

And if I was from another planet, I'd be like, that's when I would start going,

25:56

oh, my God, these idiots, not only do they have it, but they're just blowing

26:00

them up in the ocean.

26:01

No consideration for the fish, the whales, the dolphins, whatever the fuck

26:05

happens to be there when they drop that thing down.

26:08

Like, they're clearly irresponsible.

26:10

Yeah.

26:11

Yeah.

26:11

No, it's concerning.

26:12

An analogy that multiple people actually use with me.

26:15

They said, put yourself in the shoes of advanced non-human intelligence species.

26:19

Here's the analogy.

26:20

Imagine you're a zookeeper, and you see this gorilla in a cage, and you love

26:25

this gorilla.

26:26

It's sweet.

26:27

You watch it evolve over the years.

26:29

You see it communicate.

26:30

It waves to you, you know.

26:31

You have no issue with this gorilla.

26:33

You don't wish it any harm.

26:34

But what happens if one day you come in, and the other security guards say, hey,

26:38

last night the gorilla got out of his cage, walked around the park, was playing

26:42

with the gun cabinet, and then he went back in his cage?

26:44

You're like, all right, that's concerning.

26:46

Let me keep an eye on this, right?

26:48

And then what happens if, you know, a month later you come in, and they're like,

26:52

hey, the gorilla, this time he got in the gun cage, he was playing with the gun,

26:56

and then he went back in his cage with the gun.

26:59

What do we do here, right?

27:00

Well, it's even worse than that.

27:02

So it's like, we'll take the gun out of his hand, we'll put it back, we'll

27:04

change the locking and stuff, right?

27:06

But then what happens if it evolves to a place where sometime later you come

27:09

out of your house on a Sunday, you're not even going to work, you got your

27:11

daughter's hand in your hand, and the gorilla is standing on your front lawn

27:14

with a shotgun.

27:15

Then you've got to make a choice really quick, right?

27:17

Like, do I just take this thing out, or do I try to communicate with it and

27:20

risk my daughter getting shot?

27:23

And this analogy has been used with me multiple times to describe the dynamic

27:26

we have with non-human intelligent life and the situation we're barreling

27:29

towards.

27:30

Yeah.

27:31

It would almost be like you went to the cage and the gorilla was welding.

27:33

And the gorilla's got gums on, he's making a bore, he's putting together a

27:38

shotgun, he's figuring out dynamite on his own.

27:42

Yeah, that would be the real issue, like, oh my God, they figured out guns.

27:45

Because the thing is, we figured it out.

27:47

It's not like somebody gave it to us.

27:49

You know, look, a couple of people in the film reveal that some of the UAP

27:53

activity we see is non-human intelligent life, but some of it is reverse-engineered

27:57

craft from our program, the legacy program, and some from adversaries.

28:01

So I personally think we have cracked this technology a lot more than people

28:07

realize.

28:08

I don't think you spend over a trillion dollars and have thousands of people

28:12

working on a Deeply Hidden program every year for 80 years and not make

28:15

progress.

28:16

Yeah, God, I would love to know what it is that they've done and whether the Tic

28:22

Tac is one of ours.

28:23

I don't think it is.

28:25

No?

28:25

No.

28:25

I talked to everybody who actually ran the investigation of the Tic Tac from

28:29

various agencies and to the pilots.

28:31

No one thinks it's man-made.

28:34

And also, if it was man-made, that would mean that someone cracked a new energy

28:39

source that far back, which is like, what, 20 years at this point?

28:44

Mm-hmm.

28:44

And has never used it to benefit our country or another country to solve the

28:51

energy crisis, to make a superior craft that we've seen used.

28:57

It's just hard to believe that no one would use that to, like, fuel their

29:00

economy.

29:01

I mean, it'd be like a total, you know, restart of everything if you had that

29:05

technology.

29:06

Right.

29:07

Yeah, that's interesting, right?

29:09

I mean, the craft, that Tic Tac was going from sea level to 80,000 feet, which

29:16

is space, and hovering in space, going back down, hovering at sea level, and

29:22

doing this for hours.

29:23

We don't have anything.

29:24

One of the scientists who was involved in one of the UAP programs for the

29:29

government in my film does the math and says the energy required to do that is

29:34

the electrical output of the entire United States for, you said, a week?

29:39

Some stupid amount of energy required?

29:41

I think it's even more than a week.

29:42

But, yeah, I remember him saying that.

29:44

It's bonkers.

29:45

And that's just the trip up.

29:47

Yeah, and they were doing that all day.

29:50

All day.

29:50

Yeah, it's crazy.

29:51

It's crazy.

29:52

Right, if they had that in 2004, which is the Tic Tac incident, you would think

29:56

there would be some just insane progress.

29:58

Yeah, yeah.

30:00

So if it's not ours, what is the predominant theory of what they are?

30:08

The predominant theory is that they is multiple species, and there's no one

30:13

answer.

30:14

Everyone I talk to who has real visibility to the crash retrieval program says

30:17

the non-human bodies that have been recovered in some of these crafts all look

30:21

different.

30:22

There are multiple species.

30:24

The universe is full of life.

30:26

How many different species?

30:27

I've heard of at least four body types that were recovered.

30:30

So all I've heard of is the grays, which is like the close encounters of the

30:34

third kind ones.

30:35

The nordics, which is also known as like the tall whites, right?

30:40

The same thing?

30:41

I've heard people say, yeah.

30:41

And then there is the reptilians.

30:44

People talk about reptilians being the scariest one.

30:47

No one's ever used that word with me, to be honest.

30:48

Really?

30:48

Yeah.

30:49

And then there's mantis.

30:50

There's ones that are like insect-like.

30:53

I've heard people say that, yeah.

30:55

I haven't heard of any more than that.

30:56

Yeah.

30:57

Well, I've also heard multiple military people talk about little beings that

31:04

almost look like E.T., little bots that don't seem sentient, that seem like

31:12

they're almost like-

31:15

Like a robot?

31:16

Yeah, like a robot almost, yeah.

31:17

Some artificial creation?

31:19

Maybe.

31:19

Yeah.

31:20

Maybe.

31:21

You would imagine if you get to genetic engineering and when there's cyborgs

31:26

and you integrate technology with this genetic engineering, you're going to be

31:30

able to create like workers.

31:31

Yeah.

31:32

Like little, that's what many people have thought the grays are.

31:35

Like there's small grays that are, they're more in like a workforce capacity.

31:40

I've heard that.

31:40

They just do the bidding of the taller grays, which seem to be more intelligent.

31:43

I've heard that.

31:45

You know, one of the really interesting things is that there's no one answer,

31:50

right?

31:50

Right.

31:51

Some non-human intelligent life that's here might have benign intentions and

31:56

some might have bad intentions.

31:58

Right.

31:58

We don't know.

31:59

The other reason I am extremely convinced that this situation is entirely real

32:06

is the access I got when making the film was really at an unprecedented level.

32:12

Like I, I got very close with the leadership of the Senate Intelligence

32:15

Committee and the Senate Armed Services Committee.

32:18

They were introducing me to people.

32:20

They were opening doors for me.

32:22

And some of the people that I met through them were actually involved in

32:26

recovery programs and were going to do interviews and then ultimately decided

32:32

not to and that they thought, they thought it would cost them their lives.

32:38

Two people used the same words with me, actually.

32:40

It was very interesting.

32:41

Two people used the words, after careful consideration, I've decided I would be

32:46

forfeiting my life if I participated on camera in your film.

32:51

The word forfeiting, which I had never heard anyone use in that kind of a

32:54

context, right?

32:55

So put yourself in my shoes.

32:56

Like, I'm a normal guy from Jersey making a movie about something I'm

32:59

interested in.

33:00

The last thing I want to hear is something like that, you know?

33:02

That's the most sure way to get people to keep secrets.

33:06

Oh, yeah.

33:07

So I, of course, was like, that's shocking and disappointing to hear.

33:11

Obviously, we should stop talking.

33:13

I don't want you in this movie.

33:16

Don't die.

33:16

I do not want that on my conscience.

33:18

But it also was another sign of how real all this is.

33:24

Without naming any names, is there anything that you couldn't talk about in the

33:28

film that you could tell us?

33:30

Without, like, quoting anybody or pinning it on anybody?

33:33

Yeah, I mean, there's a lot of stuff I learned off the record.

33:37

Hopefully, it all comes out and people can legally talk about it at some point.

33:43

Can you talk about it without?

33:45

I know there's been multiple contact events.

33:47

Coordinated contact events?

33:49

Yeah, like straight-up contact events.

33:50

One of them is revealed in the film, actually, but there are more.

33:53

There was this—several of the people in my film talk about an event that

33:57

happened at Hellerman Air Force Base where two non-human crafts approached the

34:02

base.

34:02

One landed, one landed, beings walked out and interacted with Air Force

34:06

officials and CIA officials.

34:07

And a couple people go on the record talking about that in the film.

34:09

But there have been other events I've been told.

34:12

How were those beings described?

34:14

They were described as tall, slender, humanoid.

34:17

And another thing that I heard that gave me chills was that someone involved

34:26

with a recovery interacted with a non-human being that was dying.

34:35

And heard thoughts in his head that said, you humans don't know your full

34:42

potential.

34:44

And that was said to me by a very senior, older guy from the intelligence

34:48

community.

34:49

And I thought that was pretty incredible.

34:55

Also, just the extent to which the legacy program is real.

34:58

It's not—this isn't like 50 guys, you know, sitting in a quiet, dark room.

35:02

You're talking about a massive program with thousands of people going to work

35:06

every day and dealing with this.

35:08

And to me, that is mind-blowing, you know?

35:11

Yeah.

35:12

You know, the guy next to you at the pizza place, you know, on a Saturday night

35:15

might be working on this during the day, you know?

35:18

Right.

35:18

The guy who, you know, the other father at your kid's, like, you know,

35:21

literally a game.

35:22

Yeah.

35:23

This is what he deals with, right?

35:24

The fact that that is a thing and, you know, we had a similar dynamic for the

35:28

Manhattan Project.

35:29

There were all these people working on it, and they kept it secret, right?

35:32

And their neighbors and friends didn't know.

35:34

But this is that on steroids.

35:35

So, you know, after the Manhattan Project, which had a budget in the billions,

35:39

this situation arose, and it had to be even more secret than the Manhattan

35:43

Project.

35:43

Because the Manhattan Project, we found out in hindsight, leaked, right?

35:45

There were moles.

35:46

Right.

35:47

So we needed to make this even more secret and give it more money and more

35:50

resources and more, you know, counterintel.

35:54

And more threats.

35:55

Which is counterintel, yeah.

35:56

Yeah, I mean, threats if you reveal those secrets.

35:59

But it's like more – the more this stuff gets discussed, the more I go back

36:05

to what Lazar said.

36:07

Because what Lazar is describing from the 1980s is exactly what these people

36:13

are saying now.

36:14

They've had these things.

36:16

They've been trying to figure them out.

36:17

They've been working on them.

36:18

At least in the 1980s, they hadn't totally cracked it yet.

36:21

But they did know how to operate them and that they would do these tests.

36:25

But everything was so compartmentalized.

36:27

He said he wasn't allowed to talk to the metallurgist.

36:30

He was – there was different people that were assigned to it.

36:35

Yeah.

36:35

What they were assigned to do was to try to figure out how the propulsion

36:39

system worked.

36:39

Yeah.

36:40

And then there was other people that were assigned to try to figure out how the

36:44

metallurgy was formed.

36:45

Yeah.

36:45

Because whatever it was seemed like it was 3D printed.

36:47

It didn't have any seams.

36:48

Yeah.

36:49

And when he talks about it, it sounds exactly like what people are talking

36:54

about today, which is really bananas.

36:57

Yeah.

36:58

Because this is late 1980s and he's the first guy to crack through with this

37:02

stuff.

37:02

Everything is so – in that secret program, everything is so siloed out where

37:06

you could have one team of defense contractors working on one thing.

37:10

They're not even told it's from an alien spacecraft.

37:12

They're just told, here's the thing.

37:13

It might be Russia.

37:14

It might be China.

37:14

Tell us how it works.

37:15

Right.

37:16

And they're just kept in a little bubble.

37:19

And one of the issues now is that everything has become so overclassified and

37:24

so siloed that it's actually hurting progress.

37:28

And that's – a lot of the scientists in my film are voicing that.

37:33

And one of the other things I learned recently that isn't in the film, Jay Stratton,

37:38

who ran the UAP Task Force, he told me that during that time,

37:44

he had started a talk with one of the senior scientists at Lockheed who was

37:49

frustrated by how overclassified everything was.

37:53

It made them – it even made it hard for the defense contractors to get the

37:58

right manpower and brains on it because not everyone can be cleared to do the

38:04

work.

38:04

Right.

38:05

There's all these like red tape hurdles to progress, right?

38:07

Right.

38:07

And so they had made a plan to move one of the crafts that had been recovered

38:12

that was in Lockheed's possession into the possession of the UAP Task Force.

38:16

And then the task force was going to be able to put more brainpower towards it.

38:20

And then the head of science and technology at the CIA shut it down in the

38:25

middle of the transfer.

38:27

They had actually secured a hangar on a military base and prepped it to be a

38:31

classified hangar that would hold this craft and they were stopped.

38:36

So the issue of overclassification –

38:38

Did they know what happened after that?

38:40

Yeah, the CIA just shut – the CIA shut the whole transaction down and the

38:44

craft stayed in Lockheed's possession.

38:46

And then that particular leader within Lockheed died about two years later.

38:52

So the effort kind of stopped.

38:54

Did cancer.

38:55

The overclassification is definitely a hurdle for this.

39:01

And our competitors don't necessarily have that.

39:04

Like she – you know, there's no free will in China.

39:06

She can just be like, hey, you're the smartest guy graduating your class.

39:10

You're going to go work for the nation on this, you know.

39:11

Right, period.

39:12

And here the problem is no one knows it's real.

39:15

One of the things I hope the film changes is it makes the scientific community

39:18

know that this is a valid area of inquiry.

39:20

This is real.

39:21

It's a real situation.

39:22

And there's a ton of problems for the next generation of engineers and

39:28

scientists to solve, you know.

39:30

And so hopefully it inspires them and helps us make progress because there's a

39:34

lot of progress that could be made here.

39:37

Well, it certainly seems like it.

39:39

But it's like how – one of the things that you guys propose in the film that

39:43

I think may be the only way forward is some sort of a mass amnesty to all these

39:47

people that did lie to Congress and probably misappropriated funds and maybe

39:51

stolen a little bit here and there.

39:54

Like if that doesn't happen, no one is going to push to make this public.

39:59

No one is going to push for like actual full disclosure because it leaves them

40:04

too exposed.

40:05

And if they do have the kind of power that they must have to be running an

40:08

organization of thousands of people working on something with unbelievable

40:11

amounts of money being transferred to these programs, they don't want to let

40:15

that go.

40:16

Like this is – like it's a honeypot that they're drawing from, right?

40:20

And they're probably still taking too much or there's no oversight.

40:25

You're still lying to Congress.

40:27

You'd have to have some national security amnesty program saying, look, in the

40:33

interest of national security, it's critically important that we get all of our

40:38

best people working on this.

40:40

The only way we're ever going to really do that is to completely reveal that

40:46

this is actually really happening.

40:49

This is real crafts from somewhere or something.

40:53

We have them.

40:54

We'll tell you where we have them.

40:56

And let's – I think right now people wouldn't even freak out because I would

41:00

think that people would freak out if there was some sort of official narrative

41:05

of disclosure.

41:06

But that's sort of been breached, right?

41:08

The New York Times breached that in 2017.

41:10

I think this film is that.

41:11

I mean this is 34 incredible people putting their reputation and name on the

41:15

line, which I honestly – Joe, I think it's more – it's stronger evidence

41:19

than any video or photo.

41:20

These days, you could put a 4K video of a giant craft over Vandenberg and half

41:24

the human population will say it's AI or creating some visual effects program.

41:29

But someone of note, putting their reputation on the line, their career on the

41:34

line, the rest of their lives on the line to say this is what I know to be true.

41:40

To me, that's the greatest evidence that exists.

41:42

But I do think, to your point, amnesty is something that's going to have to be

41:48

figured out because while it's hard for anyone to accept letting people off the

41:53

hook for wrongdoings, right?

41:56

It is – it does seem like it's in the best interest of the bigger picture.

42:00

100%.

42:01

Because these people just aren't – they have no incentive to come forward

42:05

with what they've learned.

42:06

And so to quote Rubio in the film, he says, look, this is not an endeavor to go

42:10

and punish anyone, but we need to know what they learned.

42:13

Right.

42:14

And I think he's totally dead on.

42:15

And, you know –

42:17

Is he in favor of some sort of an amnesty program as well?

42:19

Yeah.

42:20

He says on camera in the film, he's like, I'm not trying to punish anyone.

42:24

I need to know what they learned because taxpayers paid for this and it's in

42:28

our interest to know what's going on.

42:31

But the other thing that's needed is real whistleblower protection, not the

42:36

whistleblower protection that's been passed so far, like much stronger legal

42:41

protection so that people like, you know, like the folks I talked to, the

42:46

special forces guys I talked to were going to come forward and then decided

42:49

they thought to be forfeiting their lives.

42:51

You've got to change that set of circumstances.

42:53

You've got to make those people feel like that's not going to happen to them.

42:57

Right.

42:58

And what I think ultimately is going to have to happen, and I wouldn't be

43:01

surprised, man, if it happens soon after the film comes out, I think a sitting

43:04

president has to step to the microphone and say definitively, humanity is not

43:08

alone in the universe.

43:10

We have recovered technology of non-human origin.

43:13

So have other nations.

43:14

There is a high-stakes secret Cold War race to reverse engine this technology.

43:18

We need to win this race, and the U.S. intends to lead in this new chapter.

43:22

I think that needs to happen, like a level set of basic facts, and I really do

43:26

think it will happen.

43:28

Well, if that is going to happen, I think Trump might be the only guy that's

43:31

willing to do something that crazy.

43:33

I think it's very likely that he does that.

43:36

I know that he is aware of the film.

43:39

I know he's aware of what people in his administration say.

43:42

Has he watched it?

43:43

Do you know that?

43:43

He has not watched the film.

43:45

But I know he's very aware of it.

43:47

And I know that they are discussing internally how they're going to react to

43:53

the film publicly.

43:54

And I also know that he has recently, very recently, tasked Tulsi Gabbard with

44:01

getting to the bottom of the situation and finding out for him what he needs to

44:05

know that he doesn't know.

44:06

Really?

44:07

Yeah, and as Rubio said in the film, Rubio says on camera, on the record, on

44:11

the film, that this has been kept from sitting presidents.

44:15

And he goes into detail on how that's been done and how it's the career bureaucrats

44:20

in certain elements of the government that control this information and just

44:24

wait presidents out and don't feel like they have a need to know.

44:28

Right.

44:29

Well, there were some people that tried to find information out in the

44:32

beginning of the Trump administration.

44:33

Who was it?

44:35

There was someone that talked about it on record and said he was told at every

44:38

turn that you don't have the clearance.

44:40

Yeah, yeah.

44:41

But here's the thing.

44:42

Trump actually found out about the base facts in his last presidency and was

44:48

contemplating stepping to the microphone then.

44:52

What base facts?

44:53

So, Jay Stratton, who ran the task force, he says on camera in my film that he

45:01

briefed, that Mnuchin, the Secretary of Treasury, asked for a briefing on the

45:07

lay of the land because Trump asked him to get the briefing.

45:12

And Trump had already known that the base facts, that we're not alone in the

45:17

universe, that there's been recovery of crash craft, right?

45:21

He knew those base facts.

45:23

And he told Mnuchin that he was thinking about going public.

45:26

And so Mnuchin reached out to Stratton to get a briefing.

45:28

And he told Stratton that the reason he wanted the briefing is because he

45:32

needed to be able to evaluate what the impact would be to the economy if the

45:35

president decided to step to the mic and tell the world we're not alone.

45:39

Stratton tells a story on camera in the film, and I've heard a lot more about

45:43

it off camera.

45:43

So we know Trump contemplated doing this already.

45:47

Now I think the release of this film and Rubio's involvement puts enough on the

45:53

table that it makes it easier for him to do.

45:57

I think they would have to have some sort of a plan in place if they were going

46:01

to say that, right?

46:02

Like the amnesty plan, the idea behind it would have to be in place.

46:06

Or at least grab control of the situation and say that this is real and the U.S.

46:10

intends to lead the way.

46:11

Because the other factor that the White House has to keep in mind is you don't

46:15

want Xi or Putin being the guy to do that.

46:17

Right.

46:18

You don't want them to have that moment, right?

46:21

Right.

46:23

You know, something I always think about with regards to that moment of a

46:26

president stepping to the mic, when we entered the space race, Kennedy gave

46:29

that big famous speech, right?

46:30

He was like, we're going to lead in space technology, like, you know, space

46:35

technology, like nuclear technology has no conscious of its own.

46:39

It's up to man to use it for good or bad.

46:41

And we're going to make sure it's used for the betterment of all mankind, and

46:44

we're going to lead the way.

46:45

That was his whole rallying speech, right?

46:47

And it made the whole scientific community be like, we're going to help the U.S.

46:50

win, like, you know, rah, rah, rah, right?

46:53

I think that's needed in this race.

46:56

Like, we need all the support of the scientific community, of academia, the

47:01

kids coming out of MIT.

47:03

We need them putting their brainpower towards this.

47:04

And I think the White House knows that.

47:07

And it's also the greatest – that's the greatest TV moment a leader could

47:11

have in the history of humanity.

47:13

Step into the microphone.

47:14

How much do you think Elon knows?

47:16

Look, I've seen him obviously talk to you about it.

47:19

I think he knows a lot.

47:20

Yeah, me too.

47:22

I don't think you get the contracts and the clearances you need to operate in

47:26

space without some horse trading.

47:28

Yeah, when I went to SpaceX, I'm like, motherfucker, you know everything.

47:32

There's no way you're launching these fucking things into space without them keying

47:38

you in on exactly what's going on.

47:41

He's just sly about it.

47:42

Well, I did it.

47:43

He goes, well, if they're all aliens, they're certainly all subtle.

47:45

That's what he says.

47:46

Like, are they really?

47:48

I don't know, man.

47:49

I think it's impossible to operate in space like he does and not be aware of

47:53

everything and also at the level he operates clearance-wise.

47:57

I held a secret screening at the National Space Symposium earlier this year,

48:01

which is the Super Bowl of the space industry.

48:04

It's like 60 people, heavy hitters from the space industry.

48:06

We didn't promote it or publicize it at all.

48:08

But there were a dozen guys from SpaceX there, and they all seem very aware of

48:13

everything revealed in the film.

48:16

Yeah.

48:16

I'm positive.

48:18

Yeah.

48:18

He's my friend, and he won't tell me.

48:21

He's a legend.

48:22

He keeps a lid on it.

48:23

He's a legend.

48:24

But how would he not know if it is?

48:26

And, you know, some people have told me he knows, that no, he knows some things.

48:31

So whatever.

48:32

But the point is, people are good at keeping secrets.

48:35

Yeah.

48:36

That's real.

48:37

100%.

48:38

Even people that aren't notoriously good at keeping secrets are good at keeping

48:41

secrets when they have to be.

48:42

Do you think, if you put yourself, you've interviewed Trump, do you see him

48:47

doing that?

48:48

Stepping to the mic and telling us the truth?

48:50

Someone talks to him about it and convinces him it's a great idea.

48:55

Like, if I had an hour with him.

48:57

I mean, it's literally the single, in my opinion, the single greatest moment a

49:01

leader could have.

49:02

Well.

49:03

In the history of the world.

49:04

If he could be the guy that blows the lid off of it, that would definitely help

49:08

with his legacy, too, which I think would be a good way to convince him.

49:11

You know?

49:12

And also that the people would be excited about it.

49:14

Yeah.

49:15

You know, it's just, I think there's probably a lot of forces that we're not

49:19

totally aware of that would fight very hard to keep this from being revealed.

49:25

You know, there's a lot of people whose reputations would probably be in

49:28

jeopardy.

49:29

A lot of people that may never get trusted again, even if they get amnesty.

49:33

If there's any evidence of impropriety, any evidence of embezzlement, which I

49:39

can't imagine there's not some fucking funny money flying around here and there.

49:45

It's just no oversight.

49:47

Come on, guys.

49:48

Like, oh, you're above board totally with no oversight at all?

49:52

And a trillion dollars?

49:54

Fuck off.

49:55

Yeah.

49:55

Yeah.

49:56

I mean, I do think I've come to understand that he is borderline enraged at how

50:03

much has been hidden from the White House.

50:07

So that alone might motivate him to just step up and say the truth.

50:12

It's also the most bipartisan issue of our time.

50:14

I'll talk to him about it.

50:15

Have support.

50:16

Yeah, you can make a big difference.

50:17

I'll give it a crack.

50:17

I'll talk to him about it.

50:18

Change the world.

50:19

There's just so many other things to talk about.

50:21

You get a Nobel Peace Prize for that, Joe.

50:22

No, I don't want one of those.

50:23

I'll never show up.

50:24

Give it to me.

50:25

You can have an empty stage.

50:27

You know, I think I really I'm excited to see what happens on the other side of

50:31

this release because I think it's going to I think it's going to awaken the

50:34

public.

50:35

I do think they're going to make a ton of demand on on elected leaders and

50:38

representatives to go take this more seriously.

50:40

And it's going to put pressure on the White House.

50:42

People have never seen someone like Rubio step up and say what he says in the

50:46

film.

50:46

You know, the other thing about Rubio, you remember, he's also the national

50:49

security advisor.

50:50

And that's never happened in the history of the United States other than Henry

50:52

Kissinger for two years.

50:54

This guy's in a very powerful position, very influential position and aware of

50:58

a lot more than he was even when he was on the Senate Talents Committee as a

51:01

senator.

51:02

Interesting.

51:03

And also motivated and fascinated by it.

51:06

Yeah.

51:07

He's engaged in the information.

51:09

Totally.

51:10

Oh, it's what?

51:12

What do you find?

51:14

Like, what do you think?

51:15

If you could choose what happens after a movie like this comes out, what would

51:19

you like to say?

51:20

Some mass congressional hearings and a real conversation about amnesty because

51:26

I think it's the only way to get to the bottom of things.

51:30

Because otherwise, I think you're going to have every fucking possible legal

51:34

and hierarchical, hierarchical, whatever the word is, hurdle.

51:39

Like, at every step, everyone's going to block your access to information.

51:43

They're going to lie.

51:44

They're going to burn records.

51:45

They're going to hide things.

51:46

They're not going to tell you where anything is.

51:48

People will get assassinated.

51:50

There'll be whistleblowers.

51:51

There'll be in grave danger.

51:52

I think there's too much money involved.

51:55

And you've got to think about it like a criminal organization because if you

51:58

turn them into criminals, they're going to act like criminals.

52:01

If you say, hey, you might go to jail for the rest of your fucking life because

52:05

you lied to Congress and now we know you did.

52:08

And, you know, there's $250 million that your company got and $300 million this

52:12

company got over the course of X amount of years.

52:14

And we know.

52:15

We know that you got – you're in trouble.

52:18

Like, we're going to put you in jail.

52:19

And then if that – if you make them criminals, they're going to act like

52:23

criminals.

52:24

I think you're dealing with people that have enormous amounts of money and

52:28

probably – they make weapons.

52:29

They're probably not have the most respect for life.

52:31

It's – you know, if there's a real discussion where it makes it look like it's

52:38

their idea as well.

52:40

Yeah.

52:40

That they have this obligation to the American people.

52:43

They were held under secrecy for so long.

52:46

But now through this administration and through this openness that we've all

52:49

decided through the scientific community, we're going to release this shit.

52:53

Yeah.

52:53

No, I think I agree with you.

52:54

And that could change the world.

52:55

The other thing to remember is these aren't villains.

52:58

They're not like – this isn't some like dark group of evil people.

53:02

They're normal people that were given a job to do and then did it, right?

53:06

And they weren't the decision makers.

53:08

And they're navigating a situation that is unprecedented and there's no playbook

53:13

for, right?

53:14

So they think they're doing the right thing.

53:16

Right.

53:16

And I think that's important to remember, you know?

53:20

Do you know the put-off thing?

53:23

It's in your documentary.

53:24

The Bush story.

53:26

Bush Sr.

53:27

He talked about it on the podcast.

53:28

Yeah.

53:28

That is such a fascinating story.

53:30

It's amazing.

53:30

Back then, early – right after 9-11.

53:32

Yeah.

53:32

Herbert Walker Bush.

53:34

No, it was Herbert Walker.

53:35

I believe.

53:37

No, the panel was – the panel was –

53:39

It was George Bush Jr.

53:40

It was W?

53:41

Yeah.

53:41

Oh, I thought it was Bush Sr.

53:43

Yeah.

53:43

No, it was right after – it was right after 9-11.

53:45

Oh, okay.

53:45

So during that time – so – I'm confused.

53:48

So – but imagine – so let's imagine 2001.

53:51

Where would we be 24 years later if we had real disclosure from the White House?

53:55

So for people that didn't see the documentary yet or watch the podcast with me

53:59

and Hal Puthoff,

54:00

what he said was it was him and a bunch of other thought leaders and they were

54:04

all brought

54:05

together with a numerical value for pros and cons related to disclosure.

54:11

So basically they said to them, we have acquired crafts that are not of this

54:17

world and we have

54:18

biological entities that are not of this world.

54:21

These are real.

54:22

We want to know if we disclose to the general public that alien life is real,

54:28

what would

54:29

be the negative impacts on our society, on our government, on our religion, on

54:33

54:33

Economy, every element of society.

54:35

Yeah, everything.

54:36

And they put a numerical value to everything and overwhelmingly all the people

54:40

asked had

54:41

way more con than pro.

54:42

Yeah, they determined it was a bad idea.

54:44

Yeah, which is so wild.

54:46

Well, there was this think tank over a couple days where a bunch of people got

54:50

together and

54:51

decided the fate of humanity.

54:52

Isn't that fascinating?

54:54

It's crazy.

54:54

It was the fate – well, at least – I don't think really the fate.

54:57

I think what it did was just retard everything.

55:00

It just slowed the growth of access to this.

55:03

And I really give the New York Times a lot of credit because I think publishing

55:08

in 2017 that

55:10

piece that they did on the front page was so huge because the New York Times is

55:16

arguably

55:16

the most respected newspaper in the world.

55:18

And for them to address it like it's a real issue and that these pilots are

55:22

seeing these

55:23

things.

55:23

They're behaving in ways that don't make any sense with propulsion that we do

55:28

not understand.

55:29

And these are real.

55:30

Yeah.

55:30

And this is New York Times.

55:31

Like that was – so many people texted me after that and called me after that

55:36

because

55:37

they know that I'm a UFO nut.

55:38

Yeah.

55:38

And they're like, hey, man, this might be real.

55:40

Like serious people that I'm friends with.

55:42

Yeah.

55:42

And I'm like, I think it's real.

55:44

Yeah.

55:45

I think there's something there.

55:46

Yeah.

55:46

And it's helped us get us where we are now.

55:48

Yes.

55:49

I mean, I don't think – the mainstream media support I'm getting for this

55:54

film right

55:54

now, I don't think it would have happened if it wasn't for that.

55:56

No.

55:57

I think the Times article was the – that burst the membrane.

56:01

And allowed more data to come.

56:03

It's just more rational discourse about it because I think before then it was

56:07

just so

56:07

dismissed and so ridiculed.

56:10

And you just didn't want to be attached to it because you were a fool.

56:13

You'd have to be a fool to be considering it.

56:15

Yeah.

56:15

But the Times still is one of those legacy media outlets that still hedges

56:19

their bets.

56:20

Like that article, you know, the original headline I think was, we're not alone

56:24

in the universe.

56:24

And they changed it to, you know, I think it was like Black Projects and Hidden

56:29

Money or something

56:30

like that.

56:30

Yeah.

56:30

You know, they had to dial it down.

56:33

Well, because they don't know, right?

56:34

We might not be alone in the universe.

56:36

These things might be China's.

56:38

It's not likely.

56:40

Well, that's the only thing.

56:40

If it – if we open ourselves to the possibility that these advanced aircraft

56:46

penetrating our

56:47

nuclear weapons sites and our military bases are China, that's fucking

56:50

terrifying.

56:51

And that should be the biggest issue of our time, hands down, because we know

56:56

the intention

56:57

of the Chinese Communist Party.

56:58

It's not good, right?

56:59

They're not our friends.

57:00

They're adversaries.

57:01

And, you know, Xi has made public statements about wanting to replace the

57:06

United States at

57:07

the top of the world order.

57:08

Like, it's a stated goal, right?

57:10

So, if it is China, even the possibility that they have some of these crafts

57:14

alongside non-human

57:15

crafts existing, right?

57:17

Yes.

57:18

Even that possibility, it requires the U.S. government to take this so much

57:23

more serious.

57:23

Here's an analogy that General Jim Clapper made to me.

57:27

You know, he was the director of national intelligence.

57:28

He's in the film.

57:29

He's like, before 9-11, we didn't put the right amount of money towards counterterrorism.

57:33

And we weren't properly sharing information in the intelligence community.

57:38

Then this horrible thing happened.

57:40

And the public was outraged and said, we got to throw money and resources at

57:43

counterterrorism.

57:44

Every elected representative was beating that drum.

57:48

We started the director of national intelligence position so that the agencies

57:50

would all share

57:51

information and you would minimize the chance of intelligence gaps, right?

57:55

And we threw tons of appropriated funds towards counterterrorism.

57:58

We now spend more money on counterterrorism than we even need to.

58:02

And his point was, he hopes it doesn't take something bad happening on this

58:06

front, like China cracking this technology in a way we haven't and then using

58:12

it against us or non-human intelligent life taking an action that isn't

58:18

favorable to us before we then throw resources towards it.

58:21

And it's essentially the same thing Rubio said.

58:24

They think we need to get ahead of this problem, not wait for it to happen and

58:27

then react to it.

58:28

Well, of course.

58:29

I mean, it would be a horrible loss, both in terms of our national pride of

58:38

being the innovators and being at the head of technology.

58:42

If China came out and said, we've cracked this, we have UFOs that we've back

58:47

engineered and now we can fly them around and we can go visit other solar

58:50

systems.

58:50

And we've created a new energy source.

58:52

We're going to save the planet.

58:53

Yeah.

58:53

We would look like fools.

58:55

We'd also be set back.

58:57

Yeah, and if we realized that there would have been a bunch of people that were

59:01

working on this stuff the whole time, but they had been handcuffed by all the

59:05

secrecy and that this had all been done with defense contractors and lying to

59:09

Congress, it'd be a fucking national disaster.

59:12

We would look completely incompetent.

59:14

I really legitimately think a lot of the people in my film stepped up because

59:17

they don't want to be a left hole in the bag and have people saying, why didn't

59:21

you say something sooner?

59:22

Right.

59:22

I really think this is cover your butt because it's that close.

59:26

So when people talk about the successful back engineering of these things, what

59:32

are they saying?

59:34

Are they saying that they can fly around Earth?

59:37

Are they saying they can go outside of Earth's atmosphere and go into deep

59:42

space with these things?

59:43

What have they said we are currently able to do with these back engineered

59:47

crafts that we've supposedly made ourselves?

59:50

People that I can't attribute the statement to that were very credible sources

59:55

told me that

59:56

some of the UAP activity in space specifically is reverse engineered technology.

1:00:03

Okay.

1:00:04

Does that mean in space in low Earth orbit or does that mean traveling through

1:00:09

the solar system?

1:00:11

What was implied to me was traveling through the solar system.

1:00:15

Jeez.

1:00:16

Yeah.

1:00:17

So are these-

1:00:19

Here's another thing someone, that same person said to me, by the way.

1:00:22

Before I forget, that their belief is that the technology we have would not be

1:00:30

pulled out even to stop a world war.

1:00:34

It would not, those cards would not be shown until moments before like a

1:00:40

nuclear war situation.

1:00:44

So they wouldn't pull it out to stop like any of the wars we've experienced in

1:00:47

the last, you know, since World War II.

1:00:48

They wouldn't, you know, regardless of how many-

1:00:51

It has to get to nine.

1:00:52

It has to get to a level where there's no-

1:00:55

Yeah.

1:00:55

There's no other option.

1:00:56

Wow.

1:00:57

Because it's show your cards.

1:00:59

Now, when they say that they've traveled through the solar system, is this

1:01:04

biological human beings or are these drone crafts?

1:01:07

Like, what are they saying?

1:01:08

I never got any of that.

1:01:09

I never got any of that.

1:01:11

All I was told is there's some of the UAPs that are seen, that have been seen

1:01:15

by our astronauts on space missions, are non-human intelligent life.

1:01:19

And some are reverse engineered craft.

1:01:22

That's what I was told.

1:01:23

But we don't know whether there's a person inside of them.

1:01:26

I don't.

1:01:27

If they are reverse engineered and they are ours, and we figured out how to

1:01:30

make our own.

1:01:31

That I don't know.

1:01:32

Yeah, I need to know that.

1:01:33

Yeah.

1:01:34

That's kind of important.

1:01:36

Yeah, there's a lot.

1:01:36

Is there fucking some dude named Bob flying through space?

1:01:39

Some Top Gun guy that they've given the task of-

1:01:43

Wouldn't surprise me.

1:01:43

Traveling to Venus real quick?

1:01:45

Wouldn't surprise me.

1:01:46

You know, one of the other things that, you know, we were talking about Clapper

1:01:49

and Ruby and what they said about China.

1:01:51

Something else that they both said, despite these guys being completely ideologically

1:01:55

opposed, right?

1:01:56

Like, they have nothing else in common.

1:01:57

They both spoke to how we as a species, not just our country, but an entire

1:02:04

human species, is held back by this.

1:02:07

There's something in the fact that there's something in the human psyche that

1:02:10

says, I can't prepare for or wrap my head around something I haven't

1:02:13

experienced yet.

1:02:15

And how that leads to strategic surprise because you're not preparing for

1:02:18

something that can ultimately end up happening.

1:02:21

And Rubio makes great examples.

1:02:22

He says, you know, we didn't think the Japanese could torpedo us at Pearl

1:02:25

Harbor until they figured it out.

1:02:27

And they did, right?

1:02:28

We didn't think that terrorists were going to come here and learn how to fly

1:02:30

commercial airplanes and use them in a terror attack until they did.

1:02:34

And with this, he's like, we don't want strategic surprise to lead to a

1:02:38

disaster on this front.

1:02:40

We need to be ahead of it.

1:02:40

And he very powerfully says, you know, often strategic surprise changes the

1:02:44

course of human history.

1:02:46

So this is the question.

1:02:47

If we have craft that we can travel through the source, we meaning someone in

1:02:52

the United States of America, does China, do they have the same ability right

1:02:57

now?

1:02:57

Is there an understanding of where they're at in the race versus us?

1:03:02

Everyone who talked about the race with China was extremely concerned about how

1:03:08

close they were.

1:03:11

And multiple people talked about how these incursions over our sensitive bases

1:03:15

and nukes could, in fact, be reverse-engineered Chinese craft.

1:03:18

So it is a scary situation.

1:03:21

I mean, look, you can ask the average person a common-sense question.

1:03:23

Knowing what you know about the dynamic between China and the United States,

1:03:26

would you be okay if they were the only country that had a nuclear weapon?

1:03:30

The answer is no, right?

1:03:32

Right.

1:03:33

So would you want them to be the only country that has technology more powerful

1:03:37

than a nuclear weapon,

1:03:38

that could be weaponized in a way that's more destructive than a nuclear weapon?

1:03:41

No.

1:03:42

But what technology do they have, other than the ability to travel, what other

1:03:47

observed technology do they have?

1:03:49

Well, if you weaponize this technology, like, let's just take something like

1:03:52

the Tic Tac.

1:03:53

Imagine you could take something like that and put a nuclear weapon in there.

1:04:00

Right.

1:04:00

You would have a nuclear weapon that goes off in less than a second on the

1:04:04

other side of the world.

1:04:05

It's completely undetectable to any sensor system.

1:04:07

You can't react to it.

1:04:09

Yeah.

1:04:09

You know, bad news.

1:04:11

Also, these vehicles display the ability to be transmedium.

1:04:16

So you could put a nuke through any environment.

1:04:19

It's very scary.

1:04:21

Well, so transmedium, does that mean, I know that it can go in the air and in

1:04:26

the water,

1:04:27

but does that mean it can go through actual physical objects?

1:04:29

So this is one of the things, and one of the crazier Jacques Vallée stories

1:04:33

that I've read a few of his books,

1:04:35

and one of the more bizarre ones, this woman found this object on her property,

1:04:42

some large property.

1:04:43

Oh, I want to say it's Nevada.

1:04:45

I forget where it was.

1:04:46

California, Nevada.

1:04:47

But anyway, this egg-shaped, large object, and that as it took off, it flew

1:04:54

through the trees.

1:04:56

She said it didn't disturb the trees, it just went right through them.

1:04:59

Yeah.

1:04:59

So that's, I mean, look, one of those, if you remember in the film, there's

1:05:02

this great scene where Hal Pudoff and Eric Davis,

1:05:04

who are two of the senior scientists involved with the government UAP programs,

1:05:07

they break down how they figured out how these craft work and how they are warping

1:05:12

space-time in a localized area,

1:05:14

and they're basically creating a bubble that the craft operates in, and the

1:05:18

bubble separates the craft from the environment around it.

1:05:21

The environment becomes irrelevant.

1:05:24

So it could move through physical space, could move from air to space to the

1:05:28

water, frictionless, there's no splash.

1:05:31

Like, the environment outside the bubble is irrelevant.

1:05:34

They're creating their own space-time, essentially.

1:05:37

They're warping space-time and creating a bubble around the craft.

1:05:39

And when you start to think about how that could be weaponized, it's really

1:05:43

terrifying.

1:05:45

And what is he saying that they're using?

1:05:47

Like, how are they...

1:05:49

He's saying that they're creating an immense amount of energy in this localized

1:05:51

area to create the bubble.

1:05:52

And there's two prevailing thoughts on how that energy is created.

1:05:55

One is they're tapping into so-called zero-point energy, which has only been

1:05:59

theorized at this point by humans, right?

1:06:02

Or they're using quantum entanglement to pull energy from a far-off source to

1:06:08

the local area, the bubble.

1:06:10

And that's what they figured out.

1:06:14

And do they have any knowledge of these generators or how they're acquiring

1:06:18

this amount of power, what they're using to...

1:06:21

How are they harnessing zero-point energy?

1:06:23

No.

1:06:23

No.

1:06:24

No.

1:06:25

But if we've got one and we've back-engineered it successfully, clearly someone

1:06:29

must know.

1:06:30

Yeah.

1:06:30

So someone knows.

1:06:31

Look, Hal and Eric got very close with the scientists in the legacy program and

1:06:37

were sharing information and that got shut down by the CIA.

1:06:43

So before it got shut down, they learned a lot about what we've been doing

1:06:47

secretly and what we've been figuring out.

1:06:51

Jeez.

1:06:51

So it's the fucking CIA.

1:06:53

Well, look, the film reveals that the legacy program, the craft retrieval

1:06:57

reverse engineering program, it has several elements.

1:07:01

It's elements of the Air Force.

1:07:02

It's elements of the Department of Energy.

1:07:04

It's elements of the CIA and its defense contractors.

1:07:08

And the CIA is the quarterback of the whole thing.

1:07:10

The Air Force is used for recovery, like field work, essentially.

1:07:16

They have teams that can react fast and go to a site and collect materials and

1:07:22

classify it.

1:07:23

And they have the aircraft to bring it back to a base.

1:07:26

The defense contractors have the technology, know-how, and the engineering

1:07:29

skills to do the reverse engineering.

1:07:30

The Department of Energy has laws that can be used to classify the material

1:07:35

outside of the president's reach and Congress's reach.

1:07:39

They also have, you know, people who are experts at anything that gives off a

1:07:43

lot of radiation and energy.

1:07:46

And then the CIA quarterbacks, the whole thing, think of them as like

1:07:51

operational control.

1:07:53

And this is revealed by a number of people in the film and every single source

1:07:58

I talked to.

1:07:59

There were a lot of people, Joe, that I talked to in very senior positions that

1:08:02

thought the film was important and the only way to bring the truth out to the

1:08:06

public.

1:08:07

But they couldn't be on camera, and they guided me, you know, filled in gaps

1:08:11

for me, helped me understand the lay of the land.

1:08:13

There were some people that told me not to interview.

1:08:15

There was a couple people that were sent to me.

1:08:18

People wanted to trick me into including them in the film because they were

1:08:21

crazy people.

1:08:22

And I didn't include them.

1:08:25

I got tipped off by people.

1:08:26

Don't stay clear of that.

1:08:27

That's someone's agenda, trying to sink your ship.

1:08:29

But, yeah, I had a lot of folks helping.

1:08:33

The Senate Intelligence Committee and the Senate Armed Services Committee were

1:08:36

extremely supportive.

1:08:37

And, you know, I really don't think I would have been able to pull off making

1:08:43

the film I did if not for their help.

1:08:46

And Rubio, when I started my process, was the vice chairman of the Senate

1:08:49

Intelligence Committee.

1:08:50

And he had already learned a lot about what has been hidden from Congress and

1:08:54

thought that what I was doing was really the only way to bring it out.

1:08:58

Because none of these people on their own would go out on a limb by themselves

1:09:03

and become subject to ridicule.

1:09:05

They didn't want to be the one guy out there saying all this extraordinary

1:09:07

stuff, right?

1:09:08

Not only because there's this antiquated cultural stigma where they can be made

1:09:11

fun of or their reputation can be damaged, but there's also this security

1:09:14

system around the deeply hidden crash or shield program that, for years, has

1:09:19

just targeted anyone who speaks up.

1:09:21

And so what I basically put together was a way for them to safely do it and

1:09:26

have strength in numbers and be arm in arm with, you know, several dozen other

1:09:30

people.

1:09:32

And once Rubio leaned into that, I just started getting tremendous support from

1:09:35

the Armed Service Committee and the Intelligence Committee.

1:09:38

And then Senator Rounds became very helpful behind the scenes.

1:09:42

Intelligence officials who worked this topic, like Jay Stratton and Lou Elizondo

1:09:48

and Hal Pudoff, were extremely helpful behind the scenes, opening doors,

1:09:53

introducing me to people.

1:09:56

And, yeah, I think this is really the only way we were going to get this level

1:10:01

of information out by giving people that safety in numbers.

1:10:06

And then after this, it's going to require the kind of amnesty we talked about

1:10:09

because this is only what they can lawfully disclose.

1:10:12

There's so much more.

1:10:15

So when it comes to underground or, excuse me, underwater stuff, this is what

1:10:20

Tim Burchette was talking about when that person was famously interviewing him.

1:10:26

And everybody was like, what?

1:10:27

You're just walking across the street casually talking about bases?

1:10:30

Yeah.

1:10:30

Where they're coming out of the ocean?

1:10:32

Yeah.

1:10:32

It's crazy.

1:10:33

What do they think that is?

1:10:35

Is that different from what's going on in the sky?

1:10:39

No, they think it's the same.

1:10:40

They think it's the same crafts.

1:10:41

So they have a base?

1:10:44

More simply put, if you were here with advanced aircraft and you wanted to hide

1:10:48

from humanity, the most logical place is the ocean.

1:10:51

It's the majority of our planet.

1:10:53

We've barely studied it.

1:10:56

We've barely – one of the admirals in my film says we've scanned the surface

1:11:00

of the moon in more detail than we have the bottom of our oceans.

1:11:04

It's crazy how much is unexplored, right?

1:11:07

Right.

1:11:07

And so it's the most obvious place to hide.

1:11:10

There's a lot of activity that happens in the oceans.

1:11:13

One of the people I talked to who thought they would be in the film and then

1:11:18

decided it was too risky for them was a special forces guy who was involved in

1:11:23

a recovery of a craft that was in the ocean.

1:11:28

And when they were recovering it, a giant craft came up next to them, like a

1:11:32

functioning craft.

1:11:34

And the helicopter pulled out and they dropped the line and the helicopter took

1:11:38

off and the seal was in the water and watched this thing take off and then he

1:11:41

had to be recovered out of the water.

1:11:44

That's crazy.

1:11:45

And the craft that they were trying to recover went down?

1:11:49

Yeah, it went down.

1:11:49

And did the big ship take it or anything or –

1:11:53

They said actually – they actually literally said that.

1:11:55

They said it took it and went back down.

1:11:56

Yo.

1:11:58

Yeah.

1:11:58

How big was the big one?

1:11:59

They said it was big.

1:12:00

Just big.

1:12:02

That's the only word they used to be honest.

1:12:03

Yeah.

1:12:04

And the guy was rattled because the guy was –

1:12:05

That's the guy that was in the water.

1:12:06

The seal was in the water hooking a line to this craft.

1:12:09

And then when the helicopter pulled out, he said he was in the water just shitting

1:12:13

his pants and taking in this extraordinary experience.

1:12:16

And then –

1:12:18

Was he wearing a vest?

1:12:19

I'm sure he was wearing.

1:12:22

He's like frogman outfit.

1:12:23

Or he was just fucking doggy paddling.

1:12:24

I was just going to leave him there in the fucking water.

1:12:28

These guys panic and pull out.

1:12:30

Maybe the UFO would have let you take it.

1:12:32

All these situations are really bonkers.

1:12:34

I wonder what would have happened if they were like, fuck you.

1:12:37

We're taking it.

1:12:37

You know?

1:12:39

What I often wonder is if any of the guys on that shopper snap video of this

1:12:45

thing.

1:12:46

There's a lot of video that exists that is either classified at a crazy high

1:12:52

level or people are just terrified to share.

1:12:57

And that's one of the other things.

1:12:59

Like once – we need a declassification process that's real and sincere and

1:13:04

rigorously goes through what's there and what can be showed that won't hurt our

1:13:09

national security, right?

1:13:11

Right.

1:13:11

And just start being transparent with the public.

1:13:15

This encounter of the SEAL reminded me of another thing that I think is really

1:13:18

important and speaks to the accountability issue.

1:13:20

There's a number of military personnel and scientists that have worked for

1:13:27

defense contractors who have had – and intelligence officials – who have

1:13:33

had encounters and then end up with biological effects.

1:13:36

Like real issues, like real issues, cancer, autoimmune issues.

1:13:43

A number of people have died of cancer after being around these things.

1:13:49

And that's a whole other level of accountability, you know?

1:13:52

There's people whose medical bills should have been paid for.

1:13:55

They shouldn't have been put in those situations.

1:13:56

You know?

1:13:57

There's families growing up without a dad because dad encountered a UFO on

1:14:01

behalf of the U.S. government and died.

1:14:03

Jesus.

1:14:04

So that's a whole other side of this.

1:14:06

So is this them getting cancer from being around the object or being around biologics

1:14:11

or both?

1:14:12

The object.

1:14:12

The object.

1:14:13

Because once you understand that these craft are warping space-time in a

1:14:17

localized area and creating an immense amount of energy, getting close to it is

1:14:22

like getting close to a huge electrical system or – it's bad.

1:14:26

Right.

1:14:27

You know?

1:14:28

That's the Travis Walton story.

1:14:29

It's a lot of stories.

1:14:31

Yeah, but Travis Walton in particular, that's what, you know, he said happened.

1:14:35

He got close to the object and something zapped him.

1:14:38

And, you know, whether it was an actual, like, targeted attack or whether it

1:14:43

was just something, a reaction to him being so close to this energy that he was

1:14:47

thrown back, knocked unconscious, gravely hurt, and that they took off.

1:14:51

Yeah.

1:14:52

I've spoken off the record to some intelligence officials who have managed to

1:14:57

actually get the government to take accountability.

1:15:01

And give them anonymous health injury status, AHI status, which has only gone

1:15:06

to victims of, quote, unquote, Havana syndrome.

1:15:11

And it's a real situation.

1:15:13

But not everyone has the relationships or the ability to get escalated to the

1:15:16

Secretary of Defense and get that AHI status.

1:15:19

The Secretary of Defense has to give you the AHI status.

1:15:21

This is going to sound crazy, but is there a particular protocol for dealing

1:15:25

with the kind of cancer that you get from getting in contact with a UFO?

1:15:29

The only thing that I know of, I wouldn't call it a protocol, but I do know

1:15:34

that there is a couple specific people, doctors, who have become a part of the

1:15:40

intelligence communities looking into this.

1:15:44

And they've become the go-to doctors for people having biological effects.

1:15:49

And if you have a relationship with them, if you can get to them, they show up

1:15:54

pretty quickly and do the appropriate tests and documentation of it and have

1:15:59

the right doctors to send you to.

1:16:01

Gary Nolan, who you interviewed, is one of those people.

1:16:07

Yeah, Gary Nolan, who's done some groundbreaking research on cancer.

1:16:11

Yeah.

1:16:11

Gary also-

1:16:13

The other guy, I shouldn't say his name, but he used to work for one of the big

1:16:19

intelligence agencies that's deeply involved in this.

1:16:25

The other thing that Gary has that's really fascinating is the research on

1:16:31

materials.

1:16:33

Like some of the allegedly retrieved materials from crash sites and how bizarre

1:16:40

they are.

1:16:42

Yeah.

1:16:42

From studying the isotopes.

1:16:43

The stuff that Gary's gotten into that I find the most mind-blowing is he has

1:16:49

real classified documentation of encounters that military and intelligence

1:16:54

officials have had with UAP and biological effects it's caused.

1:16:59

And some of them are crazy, like a Department of Defense official who had a UAP

1:17:05

above his house and went out in his backyard and looked up at it.

1:17:09

And then the thing zapped him with the directed energy weapon.

1:17:12

And he has all of the medical signs of a directed energy attack.

1:17:16

And this is a super senior, credible guy who had recently been made aware of

1:17:20

the UAP issue.

1:17:21

And then he has this experience.

1:17:23

Wow.

1:17:24

Yeah.

1:17:24

It's pretty wild.

1:17:25

So what are the effects of a direct energy weapon?

1:17:30

Like what's the, what are the consequences?

1:17:33

Cancer.

1:17:34

That's what he's getting?

1:17:35

Cancer.

1:17:35

Yeah.

1:17:35

Wow.

1:17:37

Yeah.

1:17:37

Do you know about the Varginia Brazil story?

1:17:40

Do you know about the James Fox documentary?

1:17:41

Yeah, yeah.

1:17:42

And James, I'm excited to see James's follow-up.

1:17:44

Yeah, he's got a new one.

1:17:45

Yeah.

1:17:45

Yeah, he's got a follow-up with, I think it's the actual doctor that worked

1:17:50

with the patient.

1:17:52

So he was at the hospital that night and interacted with, with the being.

1:17:55

Yeah.

1:17:55

I'm excited to see that.

1:17:56

So the story is that this police officer, that they found this crash and the

1:18:03

documentary is excellent.

1:18:05

If you haven't seen that, folks, it's called Moment of Contact.

1:18:07

It's really good.

1:18:08

And one of the things that's really good about it is the eyewitnesses.

1:18:11

When the eyewitnesses returned to the scene of the crime, I'm like, or excuse

1:18:14

me, the scene of the crash, I was like, either that guy is an amazing actor.

1:18:18

No, it's great.

1:18:19

Or he's really crying because he's remembering this insane moment in his life.

1:18:23

Yeah.

1:18:24

And there was eyewitnesses that saw a live one of these things.

1:18:27

And this police officer found one that was injured, carried it, put it in the

1:18:33

car, physically carried it.

1:18:35

They brought it to a hospital.

1:18:36

That hospital told them, we don't know what to do with this.

1:18:38

You got to take it somewhere else.

1:18:39

They took it to a second hospital and the second hospital, this is the doctor

1:18:42

allegedly that examined it.

1:18:43

Yeah.

1:18:44

That police officer had a horrific bacterial infection that they could not cure

1:18:49

and he died within weeks.

1:18:51

It's horrible.

1:18:52

Yeah.

1:18:52

It's horrible.

1:18:53

There's so many examples of these interactions going bad.

1:18:57

But it's also like, you know, imagine you didn't know what a fighter jet was

1:19:01

and there was this giant flame coming out of the back of it and you walk behind

1:19:05

it, you're going to be toast.

1:19:08

You know, it's not, I don't think it's an intentional thing.

1:19:10

I think it's, we're interacting with a technology we don't understand.

1:19:14

And you're getting too close to it.

1:19:15

Yeah, we're getting too close to it.

1:19:16

Don't go walk up to it.

1:19:17

Yeah.

1:19:17

If it's floating in the air.

1:19:19

Totally.

1:19:19

That means it's got an insane amount of power that's carrying this fucking 2000

1:19:24

ton thing.

1:19:25

The other crazy story that was in, so James Fox's movie, The Phenomenon, which,

1:19:29

you know, he directed it.

1:19:31

Yeah.

1:19:31

He's totally responsible for making that movie.

1:19:33

I was a producer on it with him, but it's all James.

1:19:36

James 100% made that movie.

1:19:39

One of the coolest stories in that film was the aerial school phenomenon story

1:19:44

at the end.

1:19:45

These kids in Zimbabwe at a school in like, I think it was 89 or 90, 91,

1:19:50

something like that.

1:19:51

Maybe it was 94.

1:19:53

Around that time, these kids, like between the ages of like 7 and 13 or

1:19:57

something like that, they all saw this craft come down during their recess, and

1:20:04

they all say they experienced the same thing.

1:20:06

They all saw these beings that looked like they were moving in slow motion

1:20:11

around the craft, and they saw this craft take off at thousands of miles an

1:20:16

hour after.

1:20:17

Years later, they're all saying the same thing.

1:20:20

The stories didn't change.

1:20:21

They didn't try to, like, you know, make money off this at all.

1:20:24

It's a wild story.

1:20:26

But now when you look back at that story through what guys like Cal and Eric

1:20:29

are revealing about the warp bubble, do you know what would make someone look

1:20:34

like they're moving slow?

1:20:36

If they were inside of a warp bubble next to the craft where time and space is

1:20:40

moving differently than outside the craft.

1:20:43

That's literally what it would do for the same reasons why the craft in the

1:20:46

bubble could just be cruising along, but to us it looks like it's going at

1:20:49

these impossible speeds.

1:20:51

You're in a different space-time environment.

1:20:53

So all these things that people saw at Ariel, you know, in Brazil, they get

1:20:59

explained by these reveals that are starting to come out now.

1:21:04

And that's, to me, that's wild seeing how these things all connect, you know?

1:21:07

Yeah, it is crazy.

1:21:08

And it's essentially this description of the way these propulsion systems work

1:21:13

is essentially the exact same way Lazar was describing it.

1:21:17

Yeah.

1:21:18

Which is really nuts.

1:21:19

That in 1989, he was proposing that there's some sort of a gravity-defying

1:21:24

device.

1:21:24

Yeah.

1:21:25

And that it was using element 115, and then it was radiated, and somehow or

1:21:29

another is creating this gravity drive that just sends it to wherever it wants

1:21:34

to be rather than propels it.

1:21:36

Yeah.

1:21:36

That it – the way he described it is like if you took a bowling ball and you

1:21:40

put it in a very soft cushion, it would just push through, and then that's what

1:21:44

these things do.

1:21:45

It just pushes through to wherever it's supposed to be.

1:21:47

Yeah.

1:21:47

Similar – the other explanation is like a ball rolling downhill, like a surfboard

1:21:55

pointed down, riding a wave.

1:21:58

When did they first start to become aware of underwater activity, and when did

1:22:02

they first start to suspect that these things were, in fact, having at least

1:22:06

some sort of a base underneath the oceans?

1:22:09

I don't know the exact first, but I do know from people I've talked to that as

1:22:14

far back as the 80s.

1:22:16

Wow.

1:22:17

Yeah.

1:22:17

Which is incredible.

1:22:19

Well, the crazy thing is that they've really been studying this stuff and

1:22:23

retrieving things, like back from Roswell, which was 47.

1:22:26

They've really been doing this stuff for that long.

1:22:28

It's kind of crazy that they were able to actually keep a lid on it for so long.

1:22:36

I mean it's not that crazy when your life is being threatened.

1:22:39

Right.

1:22:40

Like –

1:22:42

And it's kind of got a lid on it, right?

1:22:45

Yeah.

1:22:45

Kind of, but not really.

1:22:46

I mean there's been people –

1:22:47

Because we all know about Roswell.

1:22:48

Yeah.

1:22:49

There's been people leaking over the years information, but I think now we're

1:22:52

at a tipping point where –

1:22:54

like I really believe the release of this film is the singular tipping point

1:22:59

where you have this many credible high-level people saying, yes, this is real.

1:23:03

I mean even Clapper going on the record saying that UAP activity over Area 51

1:23:08

is real.

1:23:09

The biggest conspiracy globally that there's UFOs over Area 51 that 90% of

1:23:13

humanity has written off as bullshit, right?

1:23:15

Right.

1:23:16

Here's the guy who was director of national intelligence and head of air force

1:23:18

intelligence saying, no, that's real.

1:23:19

Like it's like –

1:23:21

So I think this tipping point –

1:23:23

And Rubio going on the record, second most powerful guy in the world arguably,

1:23:26

saying that the presidents are kept out of the loop on this and that defense

1:23:29

contractors have taken this over.

1:23:31

And that even – he even says that every now and then advancements made get

1:23:35

slipped into commercialized product that some defense contractors make a bunch

1:23:38

of money on for their own best interest, not for the benefit of the nation and

1:23:42

national security.

1:23:42

Like these are bombs dropped at the most credible level possible.

1:23:46

And I think that because we've had all the leaks over the years, it's going to

1:23:50

resonate with people.

1:23:52

People are like, oh, shit.

1:23:54

All those things that have been slipping out over the years, it's real.

1:23:56

And these guys are validating it.

1:23:58

And it will be really interesting to see what's on the other side of that.

1:24:01

And the other wild thing, Joe, is when you go down the rabbit hole of the UAP

1:24:03

topic with people in the intelligence community military, you start learning

1:24:07

about adjacent things that are equally bonkers, like remote viewing, which you've

1:24:12

talked a lot about, right?

1:24:15

I mean, I don't think it's a coincidence that Hal Pudoff was the guy who

1:24:19

created Stargate and ran Stargate, backed by the DOD and the CIA, and also was

1:24:24

deeply involved in the UAP topic for decades.

1:24:27

There's a lot of overlap.

1:24:30

And the remote viewing topic is fascinating.

1:24:33

It's another one of those things where even more you learn about it and you're

1:24:35

like, there is a there there.

1:24:36

It's a real situation.

1:24:37

And it's extraordinary.

1:24:38

It makes you think how much more is hidden from us that we have.

1:24:42

I definitely want to talk about that, but I want to ask you, were there

1:24:45

specifics when they talk about technology that was acquired that was then

1:24:49

rolled into?

1:24:50

No.

1:24:52

No one said it on the record.

1:24:53

I was shocked when Rubio said that on camera when he went there, like clearly

1:24:59

stating that, I mean, I think word for word, I think he says, and every now and

1:25:05

then an advancement gets made and gets commercialized.

1:25:08

And some companies making a ton of money on it for their own interest.

1:25:10

But is there any suspicions when you...

1:25:13

Yeah, no, I've heard suspicions.

1:25:15

Like what?

1:25:15

Like, you know, how it has impacted hypersonic missiles.

1:25:20

I've heard things about, you know, early days of fiber optics.

1:25:24

I've heard things about night vision.

1:25:25

But, you know, no one would go on the record and say something definitive.

1:25:32

The thing people were comfortable saying and Rubio said is that defense

1:25:36

contractors have been in control of this over the decades.

1:25:39

Congressional oversight has...

1:25:42

Congress has lost congressional oversight.

1:25:43

And essentially, these programs are just moving along and keeping it to

1:25:47

themselves.

1:25:48

And when you're keeping something to yourself, it's easy to slip a win into

1:25:51

your commercialized side of your business, you know?

1:25:54

Right.

1:25:55

I would like to know what that is, though.

1:25:56

Me too.

1:25:57

That would be really interesting.

1:25:57

Do you know the...

1:25:58

And who knows, by the way, if it's even public.

1:26:00

It might be something that they made...

1:26:02

Right.

1:26:02

...that isn't public, that they're using to get bigger contracts...

1:26:07

Right, right.

1:26:08

...in exchange for shutting up about it.

1:26:10

Ah, right, of course.

1:26:12

Why wouldn't you?

1:26:12

Let's go deep.

1:26:13

Put that fucking chinfoil hat on securely.

1:26:17

Do you know about the conspiracy about Bell Laboratory in New Jersey?

1:26:21

Yeah, I've heard a lot about that.

1:26:24

The tinfoil hat thing is a good reminder.

1:26:27

That has been...

1:26:28

One of the things I learned is that the stigma around this was created by the

1:26:32

people covering this up.

1:26:34

So...

1:26:35

Oh, yeah.

1:26:35

In the early 50s, late 40s, the CIA, when they took control of this, they were

1:26:39

like,

1:26:39

we got to make sure people don't ask about this.

1:26:41

How do we do that?

1:26:42

It's just a psychological operation.

1:26:44

Like, make people think they're crazy.

1:26:45

Make people think they're wacko.

1:26:46

Make tinfoil hat jokes.

1:26:47

And then that gets, you know, built into our culture, and different generations

1:26:51

grow up thinking,

1:26:52

oh, you're a nut if you talk about this.

1:26:55

It'd be embarrassing.

1:26:55

You're going to have your career ruined.

1:26:57

Yeah.

1:26:57

And now here we are where, like, you know, people giggle when you bring up this

1:27:01

serious issue, right?

1:27:02

Still.

1:27:03

Yeah, and it's been used against people inside a government.

1:27:06

So here's a good story.

1:27:09

This is, yeah, I'll just tell you.

1:27:12

So Jay Stratton told me about an event that happened on the military base that

1:27:16

is Top Gun,

1:27:17

the Top Gun base, where a craft came down.

1:27:21

I don't know exactly how high it was, whether it was in the air or in space,

1:27:25

but came down from very high, dropped to above the tarmac in front of the base

1:27:30

commander and his number two.

1:27:32

And they documented it with video recording.

1:27:35

And this was when Jay was running the UEP task force.

1:27:37

And they reached out to him saying they wanted to report this.

1:27:40

And Jay went and talked to them in person.

1:27:43

And they were going to do an official, these were super senior guys that were

1:27:47

going to do an official on-the-record testimony about what they saw with their

1:27:51

own eyes.

1:27:53

And Jay told a senior guy in Naval Intelligence, who he thought was on the

1:27:57

right side of history.

1:28:00

And before these guys could come in and testify, the Naval Intelligence

1:28:04

official, who was actually part of the cover-up,

1:28:07

sent these guys tinfoil hats and told them that's what they'd be wearing the

1:28:11

rest of their lives if they spoke up.

1:28:13

Wow.

1:28:14

And the guys reached out to Jay and said, we're not providing the evidence.

1:28:19

We're not going to talk about this.

1:28:20

Let's pretend it never happened.

1:28:21

So, you know, that kind of stuff really holds back because it's very easy to

1:28:27

deter a military.

1:28:29

Somebody's devoted their whole life to climbing the ladder in the military.

1:28:33

Yeah.

1:28:33

And you're going to tell them that you could just end their career path in an

1:28:37

instant?

1:28:38

Why would they keep going forward?

1:28:40

Yeah.

1:28:40

Why would they?

1:28:41

Makes no sense.

1:28:42

I wouldn't.

1:28:43

I'd shut my fucking mouth and maybe tell Jesse Michaels 10 years later.

1:28:46

That's what a lot of these guys wind up doing.

1:28:50

They retire and then they start talking.

1:28:53

I do think that we're going to see more people come out.

1:28:55

I really – I've already started – I've started receiving – since the

1:28:59

trailers have been out there,

1:29:00

I've started receiving incoming DMs on social media sites from super senior

1:29:06

people where, like, I look up who they are and I'm like, holy shit, you know?

1:29:09

And they're like, hey, we should talk in person sometime.

1:29:11

There's some things I want to share.

1:29:13

And I don't know what's going to come out of that.

1:29:15

I haven't done those meetings yet.

1:29:18

But I imagine people are going to come out of the woodwork because this stuff

1:29:21

is real and it's been hidden so much.

1:29:24

And I know there's some big people coming out next year.

1:29:26

Stratton's book is going to be a big thing too.

1:29:29

I've actually – I've been working with him on it, developing his book, and it's

1:29:33

going to come out in the spring.

1:29:34

Harper Collins is publishing it.

1:29:37

And it's – it's fucking bombshell.

1:29:39

It's bonkers.

1:29:40

Wow.

1:29:40

So much detail.

1:29:41

One of the other things that I didn't include in the film, Joe, that's – I

1:29:46

mean, it's bonkers to think about.

1:29:50

All of the intelligence officials who actually investigated this for the

1:29:54

government, like the people involved in OSAP and AATIP and UAP task force, they

1:29:59

all started having activity at their homes when they were investigating non-human

1:30:04

intelligent life.

1:30:06

What kind of activity?

1:30:07

Orbs in their houses, orbs interacting with their family, causing medical

1:30:11

issues for family members, ending up in the – family members ending up in the

1:30:15

hospital due to orb activity.

1:30:17

What issues due to orb activity?

1:30:20

One of the senior intelligence officials that I spoke to, and I'll let him tell

1:30:25

his own story when he's ready, but his son got extremely impacted by an orb,

1:30:31

black and blue over his whole body.

1:30:34

Had to go to the hospital, looked like someone took a bat to his chest.

1:30:37

I didn't include this in the film, this section, because I feel like when you

1:30:43

get into the stuff happening in people's houses, I think it's a bridge too far

1:30:49

for a lot of people.

1:30:51

And you got to, like, set the table with the base facts first, which is what my

1:30:54

film does.

1:30:55

And then they can open their minds to these other things.

1:30:57

But what I found really interesting is when I would do these interviews with

1:31:01

people and they would all talk about this activity,

1:31:03

they started having at their houses that in some cases caused medical issues.

1:31:06

It was all after they started looking into non-human intelligent life.

1:31:11

And their takeaway was that non-human intelligent life was looking into them

1:31:14

because they were looking into non-human intelligent life.

1:31:17

And they made the analogy of if a Russian spy comes to D.C. to spy on Congress,

1:31:20

our intelligence community spies on the Russian spy.

1:31:24

And so that was their outlook.

1:31:25

And I thought that was really interesting and almost implies, like, a human

1:31:32

level of thinking, you know?

1:31:35

Or maybe some attempt to make contact.

1:31:37

Yeah.

1:31:38

Maybe.

1:31:39

There was a guy that I interviewed at Skinwalker Ranch who lived outside of the

1:31:43

ranch who had an orb experience.

1:31:46

And I talked to a few people there that were clearly out of their fucking mind

1:31:50

and maybe on meth.

1:31:51

But a few people that seemed pretty credible.

1:31:54

And this guy was the most.

1:31:56

Just a regular guy with a regular job.

1:31:58

Interesting guy.

1:32:00

Cool to talk to.

1:32:02

He said that he's had a few weird sightings.

1:32:05

But the weirdest one was one day in his home, this orb that was, like, larger

1:32:11

than a softball, he said, came flying into his house and was in the living room

1:32:18

with him.

1:32:19

And it was interacting with him.

1:32:20

And then it flew down the hallway and flew right through the walls.

1:32:24

Yeah.

1:32:25

It disappeared.

1:32:25

But he said it interacted with him.

1:32:27

Yeah.

1:32:27

Like, it was in front of him, like, letting him know that it's there.

1:32:31

Some people say it almost in a playful way.

1:32:33

Yeah.

1:32:33

And I've heard about this orb activity in intelligence officials' houses, like,

1:32:39

more times than I can remember.

1:32:42

Countless times.

1:32:42

And the journey of this movie, I not only got to know a lot of these

1:32:45

intelligence officials very well, but, like, went and spent time with their

1:32:48

wives, with their kids, with them together.

1:32:50

And when you see, like, a wife completing a husband's sentence, like, they're

1:32:54

telling you what they experienced together, it's bonkers, man.

1:32:57

It's wild.

1:32:57

It's like, holy shit, this happened, you know?

1:32:59

Yeah.

1:32:59

And then when you hear their kids talk about it separately, and you're like,

1:33:02

that's literally word for word.

1:33:04

What, like, you guys are all, you experience the same thing, you have these

1:33:06

different POVs.

1:33:07

It's not like the family got together with a coordinated lie.

1:33:09

It doesn't feel like that.

1:33:10

You tricked the kids into doing it.

1:33:11

That seems.

1:33:12

A little, that seems a little over the top, because, like, to what end, right?

1:33:15

I didn't even, it's not like I put it in the movie, you know?

1:33:16

Yeah.

1:33:19

But it's really fascinating, and the orb activity, who knows what it is, man?

1:33:27

It could be another form of the warping of space time in a localized area.

1:33:32

Like, once you do that, time and space is different in that bubble.

1:33:37

So that could be a much bigger craft inside of an energy ball that we see.

1:33:42

We might just, this might be what we see is the orb, right?

1:33:44

It might be a transportation device.

1:33:46

There might be a being in there.

1:33:47

And this is just what we're seeing is what's on the outside of this warping of

1:33:50

space time.

1:33:51

Well, that's another thing that one of the eyewitnesses described that was very

1:33:55

weird was a craft that was small, but then when they got inside of it, it was

1:34:00

the size of a football field.

1:34:01

Yeah, so that also goes with the warping of space time.

1:34:04

So Hal says in the film, this was something I was shocked that Hal said.

1:34:08

I was really shocked.

1:34:09

He says, the warping of space time in the bubble explains a lot of things that,

1:34:14

at this point, haven't made sense to us.

1:34:18

And he says, like, for example, when a military serviceman goes onto a craft

1:34:23

that looks like it's, you know, 40 feet, and then when he goes inside, it looks

1:34:27

like it's the size of a football field.

1:34:30

That makes sense now because from outside the bubble, it's one thing, and

1:34:33

inside the bubble, it's something else.

1:34:35

Right.

1:34:35

And that's wild.

1:34:38

Yeah, and I've heard that story a number of times from people who have never

1:34:41

talked to each other.

1:34:42

Yeah, it's like we have this very simple understanding of objects and of space

1:34:48

and the ability to move around in them.

1:34:52

And this kind of spectacular technology, I think we kind of have to think about

1:34:57

it just like all other spectacular technology.

1:35:00

Like, if you were around in the 1400s, you couldn't possibly imagine the

1:35:04

concept of a nuclear bomb.

1:35:06

It would be impossible.

1:35:07

Or nuclear energy.

1:35:08

Or even a cell phone.

1:35:09

Yeah.

1:35:10

Now, imagine new breakthroughs happen, and now this bubble gets created, and we

1:35:16

start to figure out how to send things to places through these bubbles.

1:35:21

And then we realize that what's happening in these bubbles is not what you see

1:35:25

on the outside, that it's completely warping, which is also one of the weird

1:35:30

questions.

1:35:31

It's like, why are UFOs so blurry?

1:35:32

That answers that question because, you know, Hal says it, and I loved when he

1:35:36

revealed this because, like, oh, that just checks the box.

1:35:39

It makes sense.

1:35:40

People have trouble taking photos of UAP because they're literally taking a

1:35:44

photo through a space-time bubble, basically, the warping of space-time.

1:35:48

So the analogy would be, like, you know, if you go under the ocean, you take a

1:35:52

picture of a fish, you're going to get better visibility.

1:35:55

You're in their domain, right?

1:35:56

You're in their environment, right?

1:35:57

But if you go above the ocean, right, you're now in a different environment,

1:36:02

and you try taking a photo from above the water, it's going to be all distorted

1:36:06

and wacky-looking because you're taking a photo through a barrier, another

1:36:11

environment, right?

1:36:13

It's the same basic logic.

1:36:14

Like, try taking a picture of koi fish from above the water.

1:36:17

You can't do it, right?

1:36:18

And so that's just the simplest answer.

1:36:22

Like, that's what they're doing.

1:36:23

They are warping space-time in a localized area.

1:36:25

They're creating a barrier between our environment and their environment, and

1:36:27

when you try to take a photo through it, it's not great.

1:36:29

It's also the reason why radar has trouble getting these things because the

1:36:33

radar detector – a radar detector, the way it works is radar is emitted

1:36:37

towards an object.

1:36:39

It bounces back to the radar detector, and that's how you track where it is,

1:36:41

right?

1:36:42

But the radar is just going around the bubble, and it's not going back to the

1:36:47

radar detector because it's just going around the bubble.

1:36:53

It's a different environment, right?

1:36:54

And supposedly we can do that now?

1:36:56

Well, the interview subjects clearly imply that some of the – not imply.

1:37:02

They state that some of the UAP we're seeing might be our reverse-engineer

1:37:06

technology.

1:37:07

Might be.

1:37:08

And is there any theories about other potential methods of propulsion rather

1:37:14

than just this bubble?

1:37:16

Is anything done in a more traditional way?

1:37:19

Like, is there levels of these things, like when it comes to the technological

1:37:24

abilities?

1:37:25

Not that I've heard.

1:37:26

Everyone I interviewed that was willing to talk about the technology was

1:37:29

convinced this is what they were doing.

1:37:31

That they're all doing a very similar thing.

1:37:33

And it was a unifying theory.

1:37:34

It explains everything we've ever observed.

1:37:36

Like, all the performance characteristics we've observed UAP displaying.

1:37:43

And so the theory is that all of these advanced beings from wherever they're

1:37:48

from, the various different species of them, that all of them have this

1:37:52

particular type of technology.

1:37:55

Yeah.

1:37:55

Huh.

1:37:57

Which if it's the key to interstellar travel, then –

1:38:00

It kind of makes sense.

1:38:01

But it's like, are they all figuring out – are they getting it from each

1:38:04

other?

1:38:05

Like, is this just a natural pathway to curious, intelligent, innovative

1:38:09

creatures that they ultimately eventually stumble upon this technology?

1:38:13

Well, one of the things shared that I found fascinating was this idea that some

1:38:18

of the craft that we've recovered and adversarial nations have recovered weren't

1:38:23

crash crafts and weren't crafts that they caused to crash.

1:38:27

They were crafts that just appeared outside a military base.

1:38:30

Almost like a gift.

1:38:32

Yeah.

1:38:32

Diana Pasolka discusses them as donations.

1:38:35

So gifts, donations.

1:38:36

Yeah.

1:38:37

The thought – okay, so if you try to explain that, why would anyone do that?

1:38:41

Maybe some more advanced species is trying to help advance us and try to, like,

1:38:45

put a carrot on a stick.

1:38:46

Yeah.

1:38:47

Maybe it's, you know, survival of the fittest for the nations of Earth.

1:38:51

You know, maybe it's a big IQ test.

1:38:53

Who knows what it is?

1:38:53

But that's an interesting scenario and seems intentional from whoever put it

1:38:58

there.

1:38:59

Well, it would make sense if they were trying to help that that would be, like,

1:39:03

the least intrusive way.

1:39:05

Instead of, like, coming down, hello, let me show you how to do this.

1:39:08

Instead of doing that, just, like, hey, figure this out, stupid.

1:39:10

Get all your brightest people.

1:39:12

And at the very least, you'll figure something out.

1:39:14

Yeah.

1:39:15

And maybe that's what they're saying, that these things have gone into some

1:39:17

sort of a commercial application.

1:39:19

I just want to know what those things are.

1:39:22

Yeah.

1:39:22

Because this was the thing that I was getting at with Bell Laboratory.

1:39:26

So Bell Labs was—this is the—the conspiracy theory is that some of the

1:39:34

material that was retrieved from Roswell was then transported to Bell Labs for

1:39:38

some sort of a back engineering program.

1:39:40

And that there was a reason why there was a military base right outside of Bell

1:39:44

Labs.

1:39:44

And the idea was that military base was supposed to be guarding New York City.

1:39:47

But the New York City was, like, kind of far away.

1:39:49

Like, you'd want to be a little closer if you're guarding New York City.

1:39:52

And it's much more likely that it was actually just guarding this laboratory.

1:39:56

And that there was a company called the American Computer Company.

1:39:59

And the American Computer Company—are they still around?

1:40:02

Let's see if they still have this page.

1:40:06

It's a very wacky page.

1:40:07

So they would just—they made made-to-order computers.

1:40:13

Like, you would call it up.

1:40:14

I want a, you know, whatever, 5 gigahertz Intel processor, blah, blah, blah.

1:40:20

And they would do it all for you.

1:40:21

I want a 2-terabyte hard drive.

1:40:23

They would set it all up for you and send it to you.

1:40:25

And then they had a whole section of their website that was dedicated to back

1:40:29

engineering technology from Bell Labs and how it all happened.

1:40:33

And they were talking about the invention of fiber optics and also the

1:40:39

transistor,

1:40:40

that these things had come specifically from the discoveries that they had made

1:40:45

from the back engineering of a craft that was down at Roswell.

1:40:48

Yeah.

1:40:50

Which was also, by the way, Roswell was a site of a lot of nuclear testing.

1:40:54

Yeah.

1:40:54

I was told that, you know, people say in the film that Roswell did in fact

1:40:59

happen.

1:41:00

There was a crash.

1:41:01

Four non-human bodies were in the craft and recovered.

1:41:04

And the technology, the craft materials, and the bodies were sent to Wright Pat

1:41:09

Air Force Base in Ohio, which is very close to Battelle, right?

1:41:15

And then maybe that's the reason why Bell Labs is near a military base.

1:41:22

Maybe it's more about proximity to a base that can have recovery teams quickly

1:41:27

deployed, come back with materials,

1:41:30

and then get them to a facility close by without the need for, you know, moving

1:41:34

them across the country.

1:41:35

And that would also, if it was true, would also be one of the first examples of

1:41:40

this coordination between government and defense contractors,

1:41:43

government and scientists that were commercially working.

1:41:47

Yeah.

1:41:47

And that they somehow or another arranged to get these brightest minds to, hey,

1:41:53

what's this?

1:41:54

How's this work?

1:41:55

Is that computer company still around?

1:41:58

I don't think so, but I just stumbled across something.

1:42:01

I was reading that.

1:42:01

Another story about the Bell Labs story?

1:42:05

No, it's like a letter from the guy that says he's the head of American

1:42:07

Computer Company.

1:42:08

What is he saying?

1:42:10

I just found it as you asked the question, trying to see why this was relevant.

1:42:15

This was like back, I want to say it might have been like the 90s, late 90s or

1:42:21

early 2000s when I first started going online.

1:42:24

And I found out about him because, you know, I used to make my own computers

1:42:28

back then.

1:42:28

So I'd go and get a motherboard and hard drive and do a lot of stuff.

1:42:31

That's cool.

1:42:32

It was fun.

1:42:33

For gaming, it was really fun because you could like set it up with like

1:42:36

powerful video cards and everything like that.

1:42:37

But there was a bunch of companies that would sell like really high end, put

1:42:41

together computers so you didn't have to go through all that work.

1:42:44

And so I was just looking at companies that made computers, made to order

1:42:48

Windows computers.

1:42:49

And I found them and I was like, what?

1:42:51

What the fuck is this?

1:42:55

Do they still have that up?

1:42:56

That's wild.

1:42:56

That I don't know.

1:42:58

I started to try to find it.

1:43:00

I thought I found it.

1:43:01

What about the Wayback Machine?

1:43:03

Well, this article that I found, it says it's extracted from Nexus Magazine,

1:43:09

1999.

1:43:10

You know, the thing about when you think about what could be a reverse engineer.

1:43:14

Hold on.

1:43:15

What is it?

1:43:15

It says everything you talked about.

1:43:16

Yeah?

1:43:17

I'll show up.

1:43:17

Can you see it?

1:43:18

It's very long.

1:43:20

It's super long.

1:43:21

It's all written, but it talks about their alien craft.

1:43:24

Yeah.

1:43:25

Okay.

1:43:26

So it said, so now not only do we have a picture of the alleged alien craft on

1:43:29

our website talking

1:43:30

about alien technologies being transferred to AT&T, but we're also in

1:43:35

possession of a very

1:43:36

high level, level five, top secret security clearance military faxes describing

1:43:42

something

1:43:42

called Sky Station.

1:43:44

What?

1:43:46

Here it says, like, we try to be cute.

1:43:47

We try to put up a picture.

1:43:48

If you go to our website, it's still there.

1:43:49

Here's our website.

1:43:50

Bottom of the page is a nav bar pointer.

1:43:53

Is that website still up?

1:43:55

I'll click on it.

1:43:55

Click on it.

1:43:56

Let's see what we got here.

1:43:57

Just in case I'm weird.

1:44:00

Nope.

1:44:01

That's always not the exact same thing.

1:44:03

That's gone, son.

1:44:04

It's a website.

1:44:06

Yeah, but that's a bullshit website.

1:44:07

That's not the American Computer Company website, is it?

1:44:11

No.

1:44:11

No.

1:44:12

That's just, like, American priority payment systems?

1:44:15

What is this?

1:44:16

Who bought them?

1:44:17

Do you know?

1:44:17

I don't know.

1:44:18

Probably the fucking government, man.

1:44:20

But this is talking about everything you just said, although that's why I was

1:44:24

trying to figure

1:44:25

out where, what this is.

1:44:27

It's websites, I don't know, reverse engineering, Roswell UFO technology.

1:44:32

Look at this.

1:44:34

It says here, the symbol for the transistor is made up of three pieces,

1:44:37

positive, positive,

1:44:38

and negative, or negative, negative, and positive.

1:44:41

Silicon dioxide doped with arsenic and boron in 1947.

1:44:46

Now, 1947, doping things with boron was not easy.

1:44:49

It required the sort of equipment that even Bell Labs in 1946 did not possess.

1:44:54

They had this type of equipment at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories, but it would

1:45:00

have taken thousands

1:45:01

and thousands and thousands of man hours to invent the transistor.

1:45:05

If you look back at it historically, what AT&T was claiming was that one day,

1:45:09

this genius,

1:45:10

William Shockley, working with a rectifier, he looked at it and noticed that it

1:45:18

had unusual

1:45:20

propensities, and there, bingo, he invented the transistor.

1:45:24

He figured it out right there.

1:45:25

And to verify that, the two other geniuses that they got to help work with him

1:45:29

on the

1:45:29

transistor, Dr. Barden and Dr. Brattain, both said, oh yeah, I remember the guy

1:45:37

by his name,

1:45:38

by the name of the case, was allegedly talking about transistors in 1931, and I

1:45:44

knew back then

1:45:45

we were going to have them.

1:45:46

He said, that is the history of the transistor at AT&T prior to 1948, other

1:45:52

than claiming

1:45:53

it was invented in December of 1947 by Dr. Shockley.

1:45:57

Anybody believe that story?

1:45:58

Me neither.

1:45:59

And I knew because the administrative head of the transistor project was Jack

1:46:04

Morton, the

1:46:05

man at whose house I was staying to go to school and whose sons I was friends

1:46:10

with.

1:46:11

And he often commented on the fact that it was really a shame that those three

1:46:15

idiots got

1:46:16

responsibility for the transistor, and he didn't.

1:46:19

And I always wondered, because he too didn't possess the scientific ability to

1:46:23

develop the

1:46:24

transistor.

1:46:25

He was a brilliant man who had invented the radio broadcast vacuum tube, the

1:46:31

closed space

1:46:33

triode, but it appeared that he was brought in to head up the project to try to

1:46:37

draw back

1:46:38

the transistor in time to radio tubes, and the image that Shockley talked about,

1:46:45

and it was

1:46:46

as if the whole thing was just a ploy, and he might as easily have been given

1:46:51

responsibility

1:46:53

and gotten the Nobel Prize as Bill Shockley.

1:46:56

Professional jealousy, it says, question mark.

1:46:58

Wow.

1:46:59

Yeah, so there's questions about the invention of the transistor according to

1:47:03

these guys.

1:47:04

Yeah.

1:47:05

But it's also fiber optics, and it's the things that, what they're saying is

1:47:08

that these things

1:47:09

kind of came out of nowhere.

1:47:10

Came out of nowhere, yeah.

1:47:10

Yeah.

1:47:11

Yeah.

1:47:11

It's hard not to line it up, you know?

1:47:14

Yeah.

1:47:14

Well, it certainly lines up time-wise.

1:47:16

Yeah.

1:47:17

With the Roswell crash.

1:47:18

And, you know, the labs working on these things being close proximity to bases.

1:47:24

Yeah.

1:47:25

They're known for recoveries and reverse engineering.

1:47:28

Around Roswell, the engineers, the Army Air Corps engineers that were based at

1:47:32

Wright-Patt were

1:47:33

literally the expert reverse engineers of the Army Air Corps.

1:47:37

Jesus.

1:47:37

Like, that's who was based there.

1:47:38

That's so crazy.

1:47:40

Yeah.

1:47:40

And people forget, at the time, it was the Army Air Corps at Roswell, you know?

1:47:43

Yeah.

1:47:43

And the, yeah, I mean, the dots all line up, you know?

1:47:48

The other thing to think about with what technology has been cracked is, just

1:47:51

because we haven't

1:47:52

seen it yet, doesn't mean they didn't crack it.

1:47:54

Like, typically, you know, if you just look at, like, you know, aerospace, like

1:47:57

fighters

1:47:57

and stuff, our black projects are, like, 30 years out.

1:48:01

Mm-hmm.

1:48:02

You know?

1:48:02

Right, right.

1:48:03

So.

1:48:03

Right.

1:48:04

They might have come up with something truly extraordinary.

1:48:07

Is it 30 years out?

1:48:09

That 10 people know about.

1:48:10

Thinking about it in, like, 1990 and 2,000 times?

1:48:13

Or is it 30 years out now?

1:48:14

Because technology is obviously moving at an exponential pace.

1:48:19

I mean.

1:48:19

Is it really still?

1:48:21

Because 30 years from now, I feel like we have a digital god.

1:48:23

Yeah, no, it's.

1:48:24

So, like, I can't believe that they're 30 years out.

1:48:26

It's 30, for sure.

1:48:28

Really?

1:48:29

Yeah.

1:48:29

And multiple intelligence officials have told me.

1:48:31

Even the people who are not dealing with UAP, they're just working at, like,

1:48:33

defense

1:48:34

intelligence agency.

1:48:34

They're, like, aerospace experts.

1:48:36

They're looking at our, they have to be aware of our black projects that are 30

1:48:41

years

1:48:41

out and adversaries projects that are 30 years out.

1:48:44

And, I mean, that stuff's wild.

1:48:47

I talked to a very senior intelligence official who is in his 80s, who in the

1:48:52

70s, mid-70s,

1:48:54

was working on quantum entanglement for the CIA.

1:48:57

What?

1:48:59

Yeah.

1:48:59

So, how was.

1:49:02

I've heard about quantum entanglement, I think, until, like, 15 years ago.

1:49:04

Yeah.

1:49:04

So, how was he working on quantum entanglement?

1:49:06

Didn't get in, didn't get into the details.

1:49:08

That was, that was the headline I got.

1:49:10

And it's a super serious guy.

1:49:11

But that was the headline I got.

1:49:13

He was doing, he was doing fringe, fringe science work dealing with quantum entanglement

1:49:18

for the CIA and the DOD in the mid-70s.

1:49:21

And quantum entanglement as, for what, under what end?

1:49:25

As a method of distribution of information?

1:49:27

Unclear.

1:49:28

Unclear.

1:49:28

I wouldn't want to, you know, wouldn't want to assume.

1:49:31

But just, that was the headline.

1:49:33

And that's the, it was said to me in the context of when the public hears about

1:49:39

something existing,

1:49:41

it's, it's long after it's existed in terms of black project science, you know?

1:49:45

And, and so it just makes you think, like, you know, if, if things have come

1:49:50

off the back of this technology

1:49:51

and some of it has been commercialized, actually, like, put into, like, hypersonic

1:49:55

missiles

1:49:55

or whatever it is, transistor radio, whatever, what hasn't?

1:49:58

You know, what's just been kept in a, in a box, you know?

1:50:00

It's pretty wild to think about.

1:50:03

But the reality is, I, I mean, all of that leads me to just, I really feel like

1:50:07

if we get into this era of transparency

1:50:09

and everyone knows it's real and all scientists know it's a valid area of

1:50:13

inquiry

1:50:14

and all the bright young minds out there that are in high school or college

1:50:16

right now

1:50:16

know this is something they can put their brain power towards,

1:50:18

dude, so much amazing stuff could come out of it.

1:50:20

Yeah.

1:50:21

Like, think about the space race.

1:50:22

35,000 inventions, they say, came out of the space race, like Velcro and a

1:50:25

bunch of other stuff.

1:50:26

Right, right.

1:50:27

I think the fear would be that the openness would also lead to espionage, you

1:50:32

know,

1:50:33

because we already have a problem with that.

1:50:35

We already have a problem with agents of the CCP that infiltrate technology

1:50:39

companies and get busted.

1:50:41

And it happens at universities.

1:50:43

It's an issue, you know?

1:50:46

And if it was open transparency and they were just bringing in all the

1:50:48

brightest minds, like, you know?

1:50:51

Maybe, but maybe it's like the amnesty thing.

1:50:53

Maybe it just needs to happen for the, for the greater good.

1:50:56

Yeah.

1:50:57

That's the question.

1:50:58

Like, if they're both, if both the United States and China are literally on the

1:51:01

brink,

1:51:01

maybe it's a conversation that needs to be had for the greater good of humanity.

1:51:04

Yeah.

1:51:05

You know, that this, this notion that we are the only intelligent life that we've

1:51:11

so far observed in the universe is a lie.

1:51:13

Yeah.

1:51:14

And that whether, where they come from, whether they're interdimensional or

1:51:17

whether interstellar or whatever they are,

1:51:20

there's something other than us that's more advanced than us that can do things

1:51:24

that we can't do and that we've learned from them.

1:51:27

Yeah.

1:51:28

And despite our differences, we have a lot in common in the situation and that

1:51:31

we're all in it together.

1:51:32

That's the Reagan speech.

1:51:34

Yeah.

1:51:34

Yeah.

1:51:35

That famous Reagan speech at the UN.

1:51:36

The two famous president speeches that I now look through, you know, I look at

1:51:40

it in completely different ways.

1:51:41

Reagan's speech at the United Nations where he says, I often think, you know,

1:51:44

despite our differences, what will unite us is a threat from outside this

1:51:48

planet.

1:51:49

Yeah.

1:51:50

You know, that brought us all together and remind us of our common bonds as

1:51:52

humans, you know.

1:51:53

But the other speech, well, first of all, that one, why do you often think that,

1:51:56

Ronald Reagan?

1:51:57

Right.

1:51:57

Why is Reagan saying that?

1:51:59

You're the president.

1:51:59

Why are you often thinking this?

1:52:00

Gave so many people hope.

1:52:01

So many dorks like me.

1:52:03

Like, yeah, maybe really.

1:52:04

Well, the other one is the Eisenhower speech about the military industrial

1:52:07

complex.

1:52:08

Yes.

1:52:08

Where he warned us and he warned us at a time where we now know the legacy

1:52:13

program was already getting very powerful and empowering defense contractors to

1:52:18

reverse engine this technology.

1:52:20

And he warns, he says very, very, very clearly that the ability exists and will

1:52:27

persist for unchecked power that would threaten our democratic process and get

1:52:33

us.

1:52:34

Basically, he's saying, well, get us a place for the contractors are going to

1:52:36

have more power than Congress.

1:52:37

And here we are in 2025 with leaders in Congress and our secretary of state

1:52:41

saying that's literally what happened.

1:52:43

That's literally the situation right now.

1:52:45

The president is out of the mix.

1:52:47

Congress is out of the mix.

1:52:48

The people are the mix.

1:52:48

And military contractors, the military industrial complex, is in control, has

1:52:53

unchecked power, and just waits out sitting presidents.

1:52:57

Yeah.

1:52:57

It's wild to listen to his full speech through that context and know that that's

1:53:00

what he was talking about.

1:53:01

And it came to fruit.

1:53:03

Yeah.

1:53:03

Yeah.

1:53:03

And it's 80 years later.

1:53:05

We're like, oh, he was right.

1:53:06

And the thing is, that speech was, he did that live on the air to the world.

1:53:12

And people didn't really get a chance to watch it until the internet.

1:53:16

Because most people, you'd have to read about it or you'd have to go somewhere

1:53:21

and find some 35 millimeter footage and strap it onto a projector and go watch

1:53:27

him say that.

1:53:28

Most people never saw it.

1:53:29

But you didn't see it until the internet came around and then people had encoded

1:53:32

it and turned it into YouTube videos.

1:53:34

Super powerful speech.

1:53:36

There's a third one that I looked through a different lens now, which is not

1:53:40

long before he was killed, Kennedy gave a speech about how secrecy is repundent.

1:53:46

Yeah, secret societies, yes.

1:53:48

And he said, are repundent in a free society and they challenge our democratic

1:53:52

way of life and we shouldn't allow it.

1:53:54

Yeah.

1:53:55

You know?

1:53:56

Look where that got him.

1:53:57

Exactly.

1:53:59

Exactly.

1:53:59

Yeah.

1:54:00

He was literally taking on secret societies.

1:54:02

Yeah.

1:54:03

I mean, he wanted to disband the CIA.

1:54:04

He wanted, he had a lot of ideas.

1:54:07

Yeah.

1:54:07

Yeah.

1:54:08

Look, I hope that people involved in this at like the CIA or at these defense

1:54:13

contractors realize, like you said, they have a moment here to be the heroes of

1:54:17

the story.

1:54:18

Yes.

1:54:18

And to spin it and just say, hey, we were taking on a job that no one else knew

1:54:22

existed.

1:54:23

We were doing the best we could.

1:54:24

We thought we made good decisions.

1:54:27

Like any war, there's casualties of war, right?

1:54:30

But our intention was to do the best for the United States.

1:54:34

And we want to come out and tell everyone what we've learned in a safe way

1:54:37

where we can share some information, educate the base, you know, the public

1:54:41

with the base facts and then keep the rest classified for national security

1:54:44

reasons.

1:54:45

They would, these people would all just be, you know.

1:54:48

Heroes.

1:54:48

Heroes.

1:54:49

They go down in history.

1:54:50

We would be stunned though.

1:54:52

I mean, the United States, I think if the full extent, if these people are

1:54:55

telling the truth,

1:54:56

the full extent of this coverup was ever revealed, we would probably be baffled.

1:55:00

Like, wow.

1:55:01

Like they lied for so long.

1:55:04

They covered up so much.

1:55:05

And then there would be the anger at the misappropriation of funds and a lot of

1:55:09

finger pointing.

1:55:11

And then there would be the very real problem of defense contractors getting

1:55:15

access to back engineered equipment where other defense contractors were not.

1:55:20

So they would have an unfair advantage competitively.

1:55:23

Yeah.

1:55:24

I mean, look, a bunch of defense contractors went out of business over the

1:55:27

years.

1:55:27

You'd also have to, you know, look back at some of the older defense

1:55:32

contractors that were given materials in the 40s and 50s and then got acquired

1:55:36

by a Lockheed or a Northrop.

1:55:37

You know, Lockheed and Northrop bought all of the smaller defense contractors

1:55:41

that have been involved with this over the years.

1:55:43

Really?

1:55:44

Yeah.

1:55:44

Yeah.

1:55:45

A bunch of them.

1:55:46

So those are the big ones.

1:55:47

Yeah.

1:55:47

Lockheed and Northrop.

1:55:49

Northrop.

1:55:49

Raytheon.

1:55:51

And, um...

1:55:52

So do you think they all have access?

1:55:54

Yeah.

1:55:55

Elements of them.

1:55:56

I mean, you can't look at...

1:55:57

Just like you can't look at the government as all one big entity.

1:55:59

You can't look at like...

1:55:59

It's not like everybody at Lockheed Martin knows about non-human technology.

1:56:02

Right.

1:56:03

Um, um, but there are people that are in control of that situation.

1:56:07

And this comes from multiple people I interviewed in my film.

1:56:12

They all said the exact same names.

1:56:15

Jeez.

1:56:16

Yeah.

1:56:17

No, it's fascinating.

1:56:18

The, um, how much...

1:56:20

Did you ever go down...

1:56:20

How much of a rabbit hole have you gone down on the remote viewing stuff?

1:56:23

I've gone down a few rabbit holes.

1:56:26

Yeah.

1:56:26

It's fascinating what they have actually been able to do with it.

1:56:30

Um, the Hal put off story about the crashed, uh, Soviet craft that they found,

1:56:34

that this

1:56:35

remote viewer guy found, like, within a three-mile radius, located it exactly.

1:56:39

Jimmy Carter put a statement out about it.

1:56:41

Yeah.

1:56:42

There's audio of Jimmy Carter telling that story.

1:56:44

See if we can find that.

1:56:45

It's wild, man.

1:56:46

Yeah.

1:56:47

We'll try to find that, because that is pretty crazy.

1:56:49

The other...

1:56:50

The thing that I find the most fascinating about it, aside from just, like, it's

1:56:54

real,

1:56:54

uh, is the connection with UAP.

1:56:58

And there are people who have had UAP encounters and then end up with these

1:57:03

abilities for remote

1:57:04

view.

1:57:05

And, and that is, that is wild.

1:57:07

Like, so it's a, a biological effect of, of an encounter.

1:57:11

Hmm.

1:57:11

Yeah.

1:57:12

There's a big book that, uh, um, I've been a part of developing that's going to

1:57:15

come out

1:57:16

next year.

1:57:16

Um, it's a memoir.

1:57:18

It's been publicized a little bit under a pseudonym.

1:57:21

It's, uh, Scott Andrews is the name, but that's not his real name.

1:57:24

Um, he was a, uh, intelligence official who, um, as a kid had a UAP encounter.

1:57:30

And then, um, late in life, um, had a, had a, uh, had a, had a, had a medical

1:57:37

issue that

1:57:38

no one could explain.

1:57:39

And then they found that he had these like amoebas in his body that should have

1:57:42

killed

1:57:43

him.

1:57:44

Like there was no reason why he should be alive.

1:57:46

And he had an immediate brain surgery.

1:57:47

And after he had the brain surgery, when he was healing, certain memories

1:57:50

started to come

1:57:50

back.

1:57:51

And all of a sudden he was able to remote view and he didn't understand what he

1:57:55

was doing.

1:57:56

He talked to some other intelligence officials who told him what you're doing

1:57:58

is called remote

1:57:59

viewing.

1:57:59

People are trained to do that, but he was doing it like he had done it before.

1:58:02

Like Jason Bourne, like, you know, these skills are coming back.

1:58:05

Right.

1:58:06

And, um, around that time he found, uh, when he was healing, he's out of the

1:58:10

hospital, he

1:58:12

found, uh, a locked file cabinet in his father's office.

1:58:15

His father passed away in the cabinet was a bunch of files about his life

1:58:18

organized by

1:58:19

the year.

1:58:20

And amongst the files were his enlistment paperwork in the U S air force as a

1:58:25

child, like 12 or 13

1:58:26

years old, which is not legal.

1:58:28

Yeah.

1:58:28

And then his honorable discharge at 18 and the service code was space

1:58:33

intelligence communications

1:58:35

and the base was the old space force base, like straight up real documents.

1:58:39

And then he went to his mother who was still alive and said, do you know

1:58:42

anything about

1:58:43

this?

1:58:44

And she said, I don't know anything about it, but she's like, do you remember

1:58:47

when you were

1:58:47

a kid and you saw that UFO?

1:58:48

And he, he didn't really remember if she starts jogging his memory, she said,

1:58:51

you saw this

1:58:52

UFO come out of this, this lake, I don't know the lake or a pond.

1:58:55

And, um, he's like, I do now I do remember.

1:58:58

She's remember you ran home and you told me and dad and, and, and she said, all

1:59:02

I know

1:59:02

is the next day, like those men from the air force came to talk.

1:59:05

To you with your dad.

1:59:05

And then I never heard anything else about it.

1:59:07

And so where the story goes is unpacking this connection between UAP encounters.

1:59:15

And, you know, while there's some biological effects that are bad, there are

1:59:18

some that

1:59:18

are also like, uh, if you call it a gift, I don't know if you'd call it a gift

1:59:21

or, or

1:59:22

curse, but like unlocking a potential, unlocking potential is a great way to

1:59:24

put it.

1:59:25

Yeah.

1:59:25

And, um, and then the air force being the story also unveils how in on top of

1:59:30

it, the air

1:59:31

force is.

1:59:31

So they went and recruited this young kid and his father to become part of a

1:59:35

secret

1:59:36

program where we still don't know exactly what he did, but he was used for this

1:59:41

ability.

1:59:42

And the service code was space intelligence communications.

1:59:45

And it's a wild story.

1:59:47

There's a lot more to it.

1:59:47

I could talk to you about it for like four hours, but it's one of the most mind

1:59:50

blowing

1:59:51

stories ever.

1:59:52

This specific person is extremely high ranking.

1:59:56

Like his resume reads like a movie character.

1:59:58

It's like, it's, it's bonkers.

2:00:01

He's like, you know, at one point he was running like, uh, I don't remember the

2:00:07

exact title,

2:00:08

but essentially he was like running counterterrorism for North America.

2:00:10

It's like a really high level dude.

2:00:12

And, um, he ended up getting, because of his stature in the intelligence

2:00:20

community, he ended

2:00:21

up getting help from people in the department of defense to piece together this

2:00:26

hidden past

2:00:26

he has.

2:00:27

And he actually is in the process of getting approved for anonymous health

2:00:30

injury status

2:00:31

from the secretary of defense.

2:00:32

So this program that he was involved in as a child, does he have any recollection?

2:00:38

No recollection.

2:00:39

His, his wife is, was like a gumshoe detective about it.

2:00:43

She starts calling, um, they see in the, in the files, there was, um, records

2:00:47

of days of

2:00:48

school he missed, excused absences for huge periods of time.

2:00:52

I don't remember exactly whether it was weeks or months, but it was huge

2:00:55

periods of time.

2:00:56

So his wife calls the school and starts digging and asks, um, you know, what

2:01:00

was your policy

2:01:01

back then?

2:01:02

Like, would someone have had to repeat a grade if they missed this much time?

2:01:05

And they said, absolutely.

2:01:06

Unless you had, um, a really good reason or some sort of like med, like serious

2:01:11

medical

2:01:11

excuse, like you would have been held back.

2:01:13

He was never held back.

2:01:14

He has no memory of missing all these days of school.

2:01:17

His friends that he grew up with don't remember it, but there's all this

2:01:20

documentation.

2:01:21

His friends don't remember him not being in school.

2:01:23

No, they inquired.

2:01:24

Yeah.

2:01:24

Totally weird.

2:01:25

Totally weird.

2:01:26

Totally weird.

2:01:26

Um, so has he undergone hypnotic regression?

2:01:32

He hasn't done that.

2:01:33

He's been dealing with a lot of serious medical issues, like very serious, like

2:01:37

almost, almost

2:01:38

dying multiple times from a lot of these, um, um, the correct word by the way

2:01:44

is parasites.

2:01:46

I think I said amoebas.

2:01:47

Parasites.

2:01:48

He has, he had parasites in his body that almost killed him multiple times.

2:01:51

What kind of parasites?

2:01:52

Um, there was seven different parasites that he and his doctor said, his doctor

2:01:57

told him

2:01:58

would have killed him within a month.

2:01:59

I don't remember the exact names.

2:02:00

I wouldn't pretend to be a, you know, medical scientist or anything like that.

2:02:03

Does he have any suspicions as to how he acquired these parasites?

2:02:06

Yeah.

2:02:07

He thinks that whatever program he was involved with did, did bizarre

2:02:11

experiments.

2:02:12

That's what he thinks.

2:02:13

And he thinks that he was supposed to not remember any of this.

2:02:17

And when the parasite issues caused brain surgery, the memories came back.

2:02:22

Yeah.

2:02:24

And he ended up, there's, there's a lot more to the story after he, after he

2:02:27

started socializing

2:02:28

what he was experiencing.

2:02:28

Um, there were multiple attempts on his life that have been documented and

2:02:34

investigated by

2:02:35

real intelligence agencies.

2:02:36

And he's like a serious dude and he's, he's doing his tell all memoir.

2:02:40

Um, it's a, it's a really great book.

2:02:45

It's almost done and Simon Schuster is going to publish it next year.

2:02:47

So there's multiple attempts on his life because of which ask, does he have an

2:02:52

understanding?

2:02:53

Like, was he threatened?

2:02:54

He thinks it's because what he was involved with was supposed to stay in the

2:02:58

past.

2:02:58

He wasn't supposed to remember it.

2:02:59

When he was a child.

2:03:00

Yeah.

2:03:00

No one was.

2:03:01

And so they want to kill him?

2:03:02

Essentially.

2:03:03

Wouldn't that make it even more suspicious?

2:03:04

Well, it depends on how you're, yeah.

2:03:06

No, probably not.

2:03:07

Probably not because they could just get away with it.

2:03:09

Yeah.

2:03:09

What kind of attempts on his life?

2:03:11

Um, directed energy weapons.

2:03:13

What?

2:03:14

Yeah.

2:03:15

Yeah.

2:03:16

Like how?

2:03:17

The guy was having the actual symptoms of a directed energy weapon attack and

2:03:24

he knew

2:03:24

what those circumstances were from his, you know, from his career.

2:03:27

He knew these were symptoms of that and they, a proper investigation was done

2:03:32

by real authorities

2:03:33

and they found evidence of it, like etching in the windows and.

2:03:36

Etching in the windows.

2:03:38

If a directed energy weapon goes through glass, it causes etching in the

2:03:41

windows.

2:03:43

So they were literally physically targeting him with something from a drone,

2:03:47

from space?

2:03:47

Who knows?

2:03:48

Who knows?

2:03:48

I mean, that's, these are like the list of questions that this story.

2:03:50

So the idea is like, let's just give this guy cancer or just nuke him and take

2:03:55

him out.

2:03:56

That's what it seems.

2:03:57

Yeah.

2:03:58

Because he's talking too much about this program.

2:04:00

That's what it seems.

2:04:00

And then if it comes out, we're fucked.

2:04:02

Yeah.

2:04:03

That's what it seems.

2:04:03

Because probably what they did is highly illegal, especially if they did it to

2:04:06

a child.

2:04:07

Well, I don't think you can legally enlist in the military when you're, you

2:04:11

know, 13.

2:04:12

Also, he probably wasn't the only one.

2:04:14

Yeah.

2:04:15

Yeah.

2:04:15

And so if they do have some sort of an ability to erase memory.

2:04:20

That's what it would seem.

2:04:22

Which also lines up with, you know, I talked to, one of the stories I left out

2:04:25

of the film,

2:04:26

I talked to the base commander from Rendlesham, the US, joint US-UK base in the

2:04:33

UK, where

2:04:34

there was a huge UAP event in the 80s, and the base commander told me on the

2:04:38

record, on

2:04:39

camera, that the day after the event, an airplane landed, people from the CIA

2:04:45

and Air Force

2:04:46

Intelligence showed up with authority and demanded to speak to the witnesses,

2:04:51

and the base commander

2:04:52

was told to leave the room.

2:04:53

He didn't know until years later that all those servicemen that experienced

2:04:58

this, they were

2:04:59

all told to share the details, and they were given a drug, I think it was

2:05:03

called, is this

2:05:04

correct?

2:05:05

Sodium pentheol?

2:05:05

Is that how you say it?

2:05:06

Pentethol?

2:05:07

Yeah.

2:05:07

That's the truth serum, right?

2:05:09

Yeah.

2:05:10

Yeah.

2:05:10

Yeah.

2:05:10

And they were given that to share what they experienced, and then they were all

2:05:16

asked if

2:05:17

they had ever been hypnotized, and someone was there who hypnotized them.

2:05:20

As crazy as that sounds.

2:05:22

Wow.

2:05:26

This is the base commander telling me this on camera.

2:05:29

To my face.

2:05:29

He also said they took away something in crates the next day on this airplane,

2:05:36

and he never

2:05:36

got clarity on what it was.

2:05:38

And the third thing that he revealed that I don't think anyone's ever talked

2:05:41

about with

2:05:41

Randlesham is he revealed that the day after the event, he went and talked to

2:05:45

the people

2:05:46

in the communications room, you know, the old school, like, wires in the mall

2:05:48

and stuff,

2:05:49

and the head of the communications on the base told him that the entire night

2:05:53

of the event,

2:05:54

while he was out in the woods dealing with the event, the whole base was on

2:05:59

communication

2:06:00

lockdown.

2:06:00

All lines were shut down except the direct line between the base and the White

2:06:04

House, which

2:06:06

it's called, I believe, I believe, I don't want to mess this up, but I believe

2:06:08

it's called

2:06:08

flash override, which is only used for nuclear war or imminent threat of

2:06:14

nuclear war.

2:06:16

So, like, the most extreme circumstances where you need a direct line between

2:06:19

the base and

2:06:20

the president.

2:06:20

Whoa.

2:06:21

Yeah.

2:06:22

So one of the unfortunate things I had to cut for time, hardest thing about

2:06:25

making this

2:06:26

movie, man, was my director's cut was, like, four hours, and I had to get this

2:06:30

down to something

2:06:30

that was, like, consumable.

2:06:31

Did you ever think about making it like a Netflix thing or multi-piece?

2:06:35

I did.

2:06:36

I did think about it.

2:06:37

What about a director's cut?

2:06:38

Would you ever do that?

2:06:39

Probably, I'll think about doing that.

2:06:40

Or maybe let's do a sequel.

2:06:41

Maybe let's do a follow-up and put some of the stuff that, like, is, like, a

2:06:44

bridge too

2:06:45

far into the next thing once the table's been set.

2:06:47

That sounds good.

2:06:48

You know?

2:06:48

This was the question I was going to get to with that.

2:06:50

Now, you've worked on legitimate films.

2:06:52

Yeah.

2:06:52

Like, not that this isn't legitimate, but you've worked on some, like, big

2:06:55

blockbuster Hollywood

2:06:56

films.

2:06:57

Yeah, man.

2:06:57

Ready Player One.

2:06:58

Ready Player One.

2:06:58

Amazing film.

2:06:59

I love that movie.

2:07:00

Thank you.

2:07:00

Are you locked into this kind of shit now?

2:07:03

Because here's the problem that happens.

2:07:05

When people start going down this rabbit hole, it kind of consumes them.

2:07:09

Look, it's definitely been a consuming endeavor, this movie.

2:07:12

I mean, this thing has consumed my life for four years.

2:07:14

And I had to, you know, it's a whole nother conversation, but I had to make

2:07:17

this movie in

2:07:17

secrecy because at the offset, when I started getting real intelligence

2:07:20

officials to lean

2:07:21

in, they told me to my face.

2:07:23

They were like, it's not in your best interest to promote the fact you're doing

2:07:27

this.

2:07:27

Don't announce people doing it.

2:07:28

Don't let the world know about it until you put a trailer out.

2:07:31

There's going to be people who are going to try to cause problems for you.

2:07:33

So I had to make this in secrecy.

2:07:35

I ended up doing posts out of my house.

2:07:36

Really?

2:07:37

Really?

2:07:38

My fiance is a saint.

2:07:39

Allie Feinstein is a saint for putting up with that.

2:07:42

Did you have a crew at your house doing all the posts?

2:07:46

Yeah, man.

2:07:46

Wow.

2:07:46

So you had to do it on the sneak?

2:07:48

All consuming.

2:07:49

Wow.

2:07:50

And yes, this topic is a rabbit hole you become consumed with.

2:07:53

Look, I'm still going to do movies and TV shows that have nothing to do with UAP,

2:07:58

for sure.

2:07:59

And I'm developing some.

2:08:00

And I think I'll probably make some next year.

2:08:03

But at the same time, I want to do more in this space and these adjacent spaces.

2:08:08

Like I mentioned Jay Stratton's book I'm working really hard on.

2:08:12

I'm also going to develop a series based on Jay Stratton's life, which is this

2:08:16

remarkable 16-year rabbit hole of investigating non-human intelligent life and

2:08:20

UAP for the U.S. government.

2:08:22

I'm working with some other people that are in my film on their life stories.

2:08:26

And then the book I just told you about, that crazy remote viewing story.

2:08:30

Yeah.

2:08:31

I'm developing a movie about that.

2:08:33

Oh, like a fiction, like a dramatization?

2:08:36

Yeah.

2:08:36

Like picture like the vibe of The Insider, the Russell Crowe Al Pacino movie.

2:08:40

Oh.

2:08:40

But with that story.

2:08:42

Oh.

2:08:42

Like that kind of vibe, right?

2:08:43

Who do you want to play that guy?

2:08:44

Do you got someone in mind?

2:08:45

I have a few people in mind.

2:08:47

Don't want to say too soon.

2:08:48

There's a few people in mind.

2:08:50

What about Russell Crowe?

2:08:50

Russell Crowe would be amazing for it.

2:08:52

And he's really into the topic.

2:08:53

Oh, yeah.

2:08:54

He would love it.

2:08:55

He would love it.

2:08:56

And he's only interested in doing interesting things now.

2:08:59

Yeah.

2:09:00

You know?

2:09:00

Yeah.

2:09:00

He's got all the money in the world.

2:09:01

Yeah.

2:09:02

He'd be amazing for it.

2:09:04

There's a lot of good ideas for that one.

2:09:06

But I do want to still do stuff outside this topic for sure.

2:09:10

I'm really fascinated with the remote viewing topic.

2:09:13

I think I have a desire to do, in the same way that the age disclosure is the

2:09:18

definitive doc on what we now know that can be lawfully disclosed about UAP and

2:09:22

non-human intelligence life, I really want to try to endeavor to do that

2:09:26

version of the remote viewing story.

2:09:28

That would be amazing.

2:09:29

Like the super credible, non-sensational.

2:09:32

I mean, it's got the coolest setup.

2:09:34

Here's the setup for this thing.

2:09:36

So Hal Pudoff's working for the CIA and the DOD in the mid-70s.

2:09:41

He's doing some spooky stuff, fringe science work.

2:09:44

His CIA handler, who's his best friend and was in his wedding party, comes into

2:09:50

his office, knocks on the door, and says, we've got a problem we need your help

2:09:55

with.

2:09:55

He says, what is it?

2:09:57

He says, our operatives have found out that the Russians have a program that

2:10:01

they're 10 years into where they have rounded up the best psychics in Russia,

2:10:05

and they've trained them to use their psychic abilities to spy on American

2:10:10

bases and our most secure facilities, and they're getting actionable intel.

2:10:16

Hal's, of course, like, holy shit.

2:10:17

That's the craziest thing I've ever heard, right?

2:10:19

And the CIA guy says, yes, you've got a blank checkbook from the CIA and the DOD.

2:10:24

You've got X amount of time to catch up on their 10-year program.

2:10:28

We've got to beat them.

2:10:29

He then has to figure out, like, how to go about finding people who have these

2:10:32

abilities, because it's not like Russia where you just go round up a bunch of

2:10:35

people and say, you're going to do this, right?

2:10:37

So he comes up with a clever system to bake into Army basic training, testing,

2:10:42

that can identify people with these skill sets, and then you can pluck them up

2:10:46

and have them come work for this program.

2:10:49

You can help them sharpen their skill sets, and you can train them to become

2:10:51

remote viewers.

2:10:52

To me, that scene, it's like the Indiana Jones scene where the CIA comes in to

2:10:56

Indiana Jones and says, you know, what do you know about the Ark of the Covenant?

2:11:00

Oh, my God.

2:11:02

And we've got this situation we need your help with, you know?

2:11:05

It's wild, man.

2:11:06

It's like the craziest setup of all time, and it's fascinating.

2:11:09

And then the fact that they started getting real actionable intelligence that

2:11:13

they were acting on.

2:11:14

Like, the CIA was running missions based on his intel.

2:11:16

One day when I shot – I did so many interviews with Hal, but one day when we

2:11:21

finished talking about the UAP topic, I had intentionally scheduled a few extra

2:11:26

hours, and I was like, all right, Hal, let's talk about Stargate.

2:11:28

And I grabbed, like, three hours of the entire Stargate story, and it's fucking

2:11:33

mind-blowing.

2:11:34

And all the specific, like, little stories of action that were taken based on

2:11:39

their intel, it is so wild and so compelling.

2:11:42

And then when Stargate – at the time, Stargate was a deeply hidden program,

2:11:46

extremely secret, highly classified.

2:11:49

There was some leak, I think, that happened in the 90s where people heard about

2:11:51

it.

2:11:52

And then, essentially, the government said, oh, it's not real.

2:11:55

It didn't work.

2:11:56

It was this thing we tried, you know?

2:11:57

And all they did is they just moved it to another agency.

2:12:00

As far as – I've had so many people tell me of their awareness of active

2:12:05

remote viewing programs.

2:12:07

Wow.

2:12:08

Yeah.

2:12:08

Have you tried to do it?

2:12:10

I have not tried to do it.

2:12:11

But what I did try was someone remote viewing me in a specific place where I

2:12:19

was, and they sent me a picture that they sketched out that gave me fucking

2:12:25

chills because they described exactly where I was standing when I was talking

2:12:28

to them.

2:12:29

And I don't think they had cameras in my house, which is the obvious question,

2:12:32

right?

2:12:33

Pretty wild.

2:12:34

And there's other stories that I've heard from intelligence officials that I've

2:12:39

gotten close with because of the UAP topic, people who became aware of the

2:12:44

remote viewing situation and would tell me these just like little digital

2:12:48

stories like there was a – here's like a specific – there was a pen drive,

2:12:53

like a little drive with some data on it that had some UAP data on it.

2:12:57

That intelligence official literally dropped while hiking out of their pocket.

2:13:02

It was in their pocket, and they dropped it, and they used a remote viewer to

2:13:05

help them find it, told them exactly where it was, and they went and found it.

2:13:08

It's crazy.

2:13:10

It's crazy.

2:13:11

It's crazy.

2:13:12

It's crazy.

2:13:12

But then you go and you listen to this clip of Jimmy Carter talking about how

2:13:15

remote viewers were used to find this down airplane, and you're like, this guy

2:13:18

was president of the United States.

2:13:20

I definitely found a transcript in an article, but I think this is audio, and I

2:13:23

haven't been able to check it yet.

2:13:24

There is a documentary.

2:13:26

I tried to find a documentary.

2:13:28

There's a documentary called Third Eye Spy that has it as the opening scene.

2:13:31

They described it differently than you.

2:13:32

Change and inexplicable event that has been discussed publicly is that one time

2:13:38

we had a small plane go down somewhere in Africa.

2:13:43

We needed very much to find out where that plane had crashed, and we were not

2:13:48

able to find it by surveillance from our satellites.

2:13:54

So the director of the CIA, he was also director of all the intelligence

2:14:00

agencies, heard about a woman in California that was a medium.

2:14:06

And he contacted her, and she gave him the latitude and longitude of the plane's

2:14:15

whereabouts.

2:14:17

And the next time one of our space satellites went over that area, we located

2:14:22

the plane where she said it was.

2:14:25

By the way, that's not even the one I was thinking of.

2:14:28

He says it about a different thing, about a plane that went down, and I think

2:14:30

it was Russia.

2:14:30

And he specifically says, we went to the remote viewing program for one of the

2:14:33

best remote viewers, and they found it.

2:14:35

But that's crazy.

2:14:36

That's a sitting president.

2:14:37

Oh, right.

2:14:37

It's fucking Jimmy Carter talking about a psychic being used to buy it.

2:14:40

Yeah.

2:14:42

Do you think that that is an aspect of human consciousness that we used to be

2:14:48

able to do?

2:14:49

I do.

2:14:49

And that we've lost it somehow?

2:14:51

Yeah.

2:14:52

Yeah.

2:14:53

I think there's just things we've evolved out of and things we've evolved into.

2:14:57

And I think that that's, you know—

2:14:59

Is that what they think as well?

2:15:01

Yeah, yeah.

2:15:01

Someone very involved in that topic for the government now told me the analogy

2:15:06

they would make is it's like if you saw a basketball on the ground, anybody can

2:15:11

pick the basketball up.

2:15:12

If there's a hoop there, they can throw it at it, right?

2:15:14

Right.

2:15:14

If you sat back and watched a line of 100 people do it, someone would look like

2:15:18

clowns, someone would be like, oh, this guy has a sign of potential.

2:15:21

And then, you know, one out of every however many, like a thousand or whatever,

2:15:24

would be a Michael Jordan who's just like, boom, swish.

2:15:26

This guy's a fucking natural, right?

2:15:28

He's got this instinct.

2:15:29

So everyone can do it.

2:15:29

Everyone can pick up the ball and throw it at the hoop.

2:15:32

And some people have a natural instinct to do it better.

2:15:34

And that's what they were trying to identify, and that's what they do try to

2:15:38

identify.

2:15:38

And the weird one is that people who have had encounters—

2:15:42

Yeah, so that to me is like—

2:15:45

Like it breaks through some barrier that you have in your consciousness.

2:15:48

When they communicate with you, all of a sudden now you have this wall that has

2:15:53

been downed that allows you to have access to this forgotten aspect of human

2:15:57

consciousness.

2:15:58

Or it somehow heightens it, you know?

2:15:59

Yeah.

2:16:00

The biological effects are real, so we don't—you know, we know about the bad

2:16:03

ones like cancer, but maybe one of the other ones is it heightens this ability

2:16:08

somehow.

2:16:09

Have you ever taken any time into consideration of the possibility that human

2:16:14

beings were a product of genetic engineering?

2:16:17

I mean, it's kind of impossible to be out in this rabbit hole and not have the

2:16:21

thought of, are we just all a big—is this a big experiment?

2:16:24

Right.

2:16:25

You know, and one day the experiment will end.

2:16:26

Or not even just an experiment, but an aiding in a process.

2:16:31

Like they recognize a process where there's bipedal hominids of various

2:16:36

intelligence and they accentuate that.

2:16:39

Yeah.

2:16:40

And multiple different—probably multiple different attempts.

2:16:43

Yeah.

2:16:44

I mean, I've definitely thought about it.

2:16:47

And it would explain a lot, you know?

2:16:49

There's all these missing gaps in our history.

2:16:51

Well, that's also the weirdness of the Book of Enoch.

2:16:54

Yeah.

2:16:54

The Book of Enoch is essentially describing watchers who come down from the sky

2:17:00

and mate with women.

2:17:01

Yeah.

2:17:02

Well, that—if you told that story for a thousand years and the real story was

2:17:08

they came down, they got a hold of human babies and human mothers and

2:17:14

introduced genetics that were alien into these children, that would be like

2:17:20

they mated with women.

2:17:21

Yeah.

2:17:21

It would be kind of the same thing.

2:17:23

Yeah.

2:17:23

You know, and created—well, they talk about the Nephilim giants who destroyed

2:17:27

everything, but that's kind of us.

2:17:29

Well, the other thing that makes me think of is a number of the people who have

2:17:33

seen crafts, and it's—Jay Stratton and Luelo Zondo say it in the film, that

2:17:37

the craft at Roswell had hieroglyphics on it, some kind of ancient writing.

2:17:43

And they actually—I didn't put it in the film, but they talked about how when

2:17:48

they learned that to be a fact, they spent a ton of time researching ancient

2:17:53

texts and trying to find a match, and they couldn't find it.

2:17:58

And the closest thing they could find was some old biblical text.

2:18:02

But whose hieroglyphics were these?

2:18:06

What was that from?

2:18:06

Yeah.

2:18:07

It's wild, man.

2:18:09

Well, how much would you give to see one?

2:18:11

To like, please, I'll stop making documentaries.

2:18:14

I won't talk to nobody.

2:18:16

I know.

2:18:16

Just show me.

2:18:17

Just take me into the hangar and show me this fucking thing.

2:18:21

That's what Spielberg says.

2:18:22

That's what Spielberg says, you know, all these years, the guy made Close Encounters,

2:18:24

he made E.T., you know, War of the Worlds, TV shows.

2:18:28

But, um, about it, and never seen one, and, you know.

2:18:32

Have you had anything that you've ever seen that you thought was weird?

2:18:37

Yeah.

2:18:38

Yeah, I have.

2:18:39

I, um—actually, out in Ojai.

2:18:41

Out in Ojai.

2:18:43

My, uh, my fiancé and I were laying on a blanket while I was making this movie,

2:18:48

um, looking at stars and saw what looked like a satellite.

2:18:52

At first, I thought it was going slow.

2:18:53

And then this thing just fucking rocketed off.

2:18:55

Way up there.

2:18:57

All it looked like was a star.

2:18:58

But it was not a star.

2:18:59

It was not a satellite because it moved super fast and just darted across the

2:19:03

sky.

2:19:03

Out of nowhere.

2:19:04

Yeah, up right above the Topo Topo Mountains in Ojai.

2:19:06

And then I—and then I actually, the next day, we said to the staff—we were

2:19:10

on those little golf carts getting—drove across this hotel property.

2:19:13

And we told him we saw.

2:19:14

And the guy goes, yeah, not gonna lie.

2:19:16

We see that stuff a lot out here.

2:19:18

I was like, wow.

2:19:19

Whoa.

2:19:19

Fascinating.

2:19:20

Yeah.

2:19:20

But that's the only thing I ever saw.

2:19:21

Other stuff where I'm, like, witnessing firsthand the craziness of this cover-up.

2:19:26

One of the interview subjects I had at my house in Los Angeles prepping for an

2:19:30

interview, we're in the middle of—we're sitting in my living room.

2:19:33

I live in the suburbs of Los Angeles.

2:19:37

And what happened is not normal.

2:19:39

Heard a very loud helicopter.

2:19:40

Ran outside.

2:19:42

Had my phone on me.

2:19:43

Look up, and there's a black helicopter right above my house.

2:19:46

And the guy comes out of the house and looks up, and then without missing a

2:19:51

beat—I always remember this—he's like, yeah, that'll happen.

2:19:55

I'm like, what?

2:19:56

What the hell did I just get into, you know?

2:19:59

So they're essentially letting you know that they know?

2:20:01

Yeah.

2:20:02

There's been a bunch of moments like that.

2:20:03

Like, yeah.

2:20:04

Letting you know.

2:20:06

That's the message.

2:20:07

I immediately asked people on the Senate Intelligence Committee and Senate

2:20:09

Armed Services Committee about that, if I should be worried.

2:20:12

They were basically like, they're just letting you know that they're aware of

2:20:15

what you're doing.

2:20:16

It's them sending a message.

2:20:18

They're watching you.

2:20:19

Try not to cross any lines.

2:20:20

They're like, that happens to everybody on the Intelligence Committee.

2:20:23

I would imagine that those people, though, kind of want you to succeed.

2:20:28

In a weird way, I think they want you to succeed in a way where you're not

2:20:31

crossing any lines.

2:20:32

And look, I went to great lengths.

2:20:33

No one says anything classified on camera for me.

2:20:36

There's none of that.

2:20:37

I don't want to be on any part of that, right?

2:20:39

Right.

2:20:39

They only share what they lawfully can.

2:20:41

And I think that, you know, I assumed after that that every phone call and

2:20:47

every email was being observed.

2:20:49

Oh, yeah.

2:20:49

And not only did I assume that, but I was told to assume that.

2:20:52

Yeah, I'm sure.

2:20:54

Yeah.

2:20:54

The people on the – so there's a guy I'll give him a shout out, John Estrich,

2:20:57

who was on the Senate Intelligence Committee staff.

2:20:59

He was the senior staffer for Rubio.

2:21:01

He was the guy who really led the charge on looking into this topic for Rubio

2:21:04

and Warner on the Senate Intelligence Committee staff.

2:21:08

He was extremely supportive to me behind the scenes, helped vet people for me,

2:21:13

helped send introductions my way, helped validate me with Rubio and rounds.

2:21:18

Extremely helpful.

2:21:22

He often had that same kind of activity at his house every time he'd have an

2:21:24

important meeting.

2:21:25

Yeah.

2:21:27

Yeah.

2:21:28

And –

2:21:30

Oh, God.

2:21:31

Yeah.

2:21:32

That'll fucking put some holes in your sails.

2:21:34

Yeah.

2:21:35

You know?

2:21:36

Like, slow down.

2:21:37

But at the same time –

2:21:38

Maybe I need to go back to Ready Player Two.

2:21:40

It's like, fuck this.

2:21:44

You're going to go develop an Ocean's Eleven type movie.

2:21:46

Yeah.

2:21:46

I'm not interested in fucking helicopters being over my house.

2:21:49

No, there's been – look, there's a lot of people – I don't want to go too

2:21:54

into it, but as you can imagine, there's a lot of people that wish this movie

2:21:58

didn't exist.

2:21:59

I'm sure, yeah.

2:22:00

That wish I never made it.

2:22:00

Of course.

2:22:01

That tried to prevent it from getting released and went out of their way to

2:22:04

cause problems.

2:22:04

There's a lot of people that fit that description.

2:22:06

And I became aware of a lot of them.

2:22:09

I became aware of a lot of those concerns.

2:22:11

And I just kind of like – I just kind of put blinders on and like, you know,

2:22:16

had tunnel vision.

2:22:17

I was like, all right, I'm not doing anything illegal.

2:22:20

I'm not going to do anything that's bad for the United States.

2:22:22

I'm not –

2:22:23

I think it's good for the United States.

2:22:25

Yeah, me too.

2:22:25

I really do.

2:22:25

I think that film is good for just human beings overall.

2:22:30

It's really important, man, and I'm glad you did it.

2:22:32

It was really excellent.

2:22:33

Thank you.

2:22:34

I'm glad I got to see it at South by Southwest.

2:22:36

And I was like, man, this has got to get distributed.

2:22:38

Like, how does this get out there?

2:22:40

Yeah.

2:22:40

You know, despite South by, we did two screenings, 1,100 seats at the Paramount

2:22:44

Theater, standing

2:22:45

ovations, lines around the block.

2:22:47

The trailer I put out in January quickly got like 20 million views.

2:22:51

Despite that, all the major distributors and major streamers, they watched it.

2:22:57

They loved it.

2:22:57

They said all these great things.

2:22:58

But then they didn't end up – they didn't end up moving forward.

2:23:02

And, you know, I don't think it's naive to think that other parties, you know,

2:23:09

might have

2:23:10

discouraged people.

2:23:11

Yes, I would imagine that.

2:23:12

How can people watch it?

2:23:14

So, on Friday the 21st –

2:23:17

Which is tomorrow.

2:23:18

Which is tomorrow, or today, depending on when this drops.

2:23:20

It'll drop today.

2:23:22

Today.

2:23:22

So, it's today for people listening and watching.

2:23:24

Today, February 21st – Jesus, February.

2:23:26

Today, November 21st –

2:23:28

They've got an amoeba in your brain, bro.

2:23:31

Today, November 21st, worldwide on Prime Video.

2:23:35

You can rent it.

2:23:37

You can buy it.

2:23:38

I made subtitles for every single major language.

2:23:42

It's available in every single country around the world where Prime Video is

2:23:44

available.

2:23:45

And you can also see it in the movie theater in New York, Los Angeles, and D.C.

2:23:49

And I really encourage everyone in the world to watch this thing and make it a

2:23:53

conversation

2:23:54

with their friends and family.

2:23:55

I think it's the most interesting conversation you can have around Thanksgiving

2:23:57

dinner next

2:23:57

week, you know?

2:23:58

It is really good, man.

2:23:59

And you should be very proud of it.

2:24:01

And I hope it gets distributed even wider after the success of the Amazon Prime

2:24:06

thing

2:24:06

because I think it's going to take off.

2:24:07

Thank you.

2:24:08

Yeah, I hope that's the case.

2:24:09

And then, yeah, I do think there'll be a follow-up.

2:24:12

Well, do have follow-up, baby.

2:24:14

Come back.

2:24:14

And definitely if you do a remote viewing one, too.

2:24:17

I want to hear about more.

2:24:17

Hell yeah.

2:24:18

Hell yeah.

2:24:18

Hell yeah.

2:24:19

Thank you very much for being here, man.

2:24:20

It was awesome.

2:24:21

Thank you for having me.

2:24:21

And your documentary is really, really excellent.

2:24:22

Thank you very much.

2:24:23

I appreciate it.

2:24:24

Bye, everybody.

2:24:24

Bye.

2:24:25

Bye.