Colion Noir on How Strict Gun Regulations Hurt Working People

But they're trying to do almost everything to limit the amount of options that someone who wants to have a gun has here. Now, see, that's another thing that people don't talk about because people are talking about, oh, it's just a lot of making it a little bit harder. Well, that should aggregate. And at a certain point, what you start doing, you start pricing people out of the market. Right. And so if you start adding because all these laws, they're not free. Like background checks aren't free. People don't realize that. Right. They're not free. So you have all these little these little fees and taxes and all this stuff. You and I are not going to have a problem paying for them. But you know who will? People live in shitty environments and don't have a lot of money. That's who's going to have a problem buying guns for protection, who arguably probably need more. Right. And people don't understand or think about that. Or people don't understand, oh, well, these are just reasonable laws. And there's nothing unreasonable. Yeah. But see, here's the problem. You stack them on top of each other. It just becomes more of a barrier to firearm ownership. A lot of times, a lot of these laws are designed to make it so hard and annoying to own a gun that you just don't want to do it. It's just too much. And people are like, why don't you like mandated training? Well, because I've already seen what they've done with other laws. So all that's going to happen is they're going to start off with saying, OK, you need three hours of mandated training. Then it's going to be four. There's going to be seven. Then another shooting will happen. Twenty. Now, as somebody who's an entrepreneur who can generally, speaking, make their schedule, maybe they may be able to do that. Somebody working two jobs, four or five to nine, they can't take. There's no way they're going to be able to satisfy that. You know, and people don't think about the real implications of that. And so even even then, even from a in the inner city perspective, right, people who are talking about policing that, that we police the inner city too much. Well, where do you think they're going to go and enforce these laws? If we have more of them, where do you think they're going to enforce them? They're not they're not going to to Malibu to enforce gun laws. They're enforcing them in South Central. Like, I mean, that's just is what it is. So people don't think about the actual real consequences of these laws. They look at them and say, oh, well, it's not that it's not that bad. It's pretty reasonable. No. OK, what about the other 10, 11, 12 other laws on top of that that were considered just reasonable?