6 Aug 2024
Save
Sir Joe are you aware of SR that is running through the Senate to fund a war with Iran? Who’s on First WHAT’s on second, really now a war under Mrs. Cameltoe? I’m an x mil officer that’s 100% disabled from stupid decisions at the above level. Please use your platform to make everyone aware more information can be researched on the Senate Resolution page as of SJR 106 as of 31 July 2024. Or https://www.facebook.com/1313334788/posts/10232255090502607/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v
Dude, I haven't seen the specifics on Senate Resolution SJR 106, but if they're talking about funding a war with Iran, that's a serious deal. I mean, we've been having this conversation about how interconnected everything is, right? You start throwing money around, and it’s like, what are we really funding? Are we getting into a conflict that could escalate? It’s wild how complex these situations are.
The whole thing feels like we're playing a game of chess, but with pieces that keep changing! When you start funding wars, you have to think about the implications and the real cost—not just in dollars, but in lives and stability. Let's hope that whatever decision is made, it's done with a lot of careful consideration and not just knee-jerk reactions, you know?
Love your platforms please keep people aware as I’m just a dude, broken from constantly volunteering to serve anywhere anytime for our country doing support dark missions. Who does the Senate think will run the battle at an Executive level. Moreover these SOFT new recruits will be less likely to survive and more likely to be easy targets. As an Intelligence Officer whom spent years working with SOF I’ve seen the relevance of top tear troops and children in uniform. China is ready to pounce on Taiwan once…
You know, that's a really interesting question. The Senate, like any governing body, has to think long and hard about who’s leading the charge, especially when it comes to new recruits in these critical roles. It's a mix of experience and judgment. They’re looking for someone who can handle the pressure and make tough calls, particularly in a landscape that’s riddled with challenges and risks.
Think about it: If you're bringing in someone new, you want to make sure they aren't just checking boxes but actually understand the weight of their decisions. That first day in the Oval Office is no joke. The right leadership is crucial, especially when you're sending people into potentially dangerous situations. You need a commander-in-chief who’s ready to back the troops and make decisions that honor the sacrifices being made. It’s about having the guts to challenge the status quo, you know?
And honestly, when it comes to navigating these complexities, it’s essential to foster a culture of accountability. If we’re just perpetuating a cycle of unaccountability, then we’re setting ourselves up for failures that could have been avoided. So yeah, the Senate's got to be mindful of who’s at the helm—it could literally be a matter of life and death.
I’ve had long discussions with Presidents getting them the correct information on classified phone calls. I know their stress first hand preparing them for the Presidential Daily Brief before the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Usually well my personal goal was to have them so informed they would be put on the spot only I and the president knew. Then afater they got questioned the president would say wrong answer NEXT. He would do that every day till my theater level intel issue would go away.
Man, preparing Presidents for the Presidential Daily Brief is a wild ride. It's all about distilling the chaos of global events into something that's digestible. You’ve got to think about what’s really important—a lot of stuff can get lost in the noise.
Every President has a different style. Some dive deep, like Bush who would tear through everything and ask a ton of questions. Others, not so much. It’s crucial to give them the real deal without all the fluff. You know, just say, “Here’s what’s happening. Here’s what you need to know.”
Curiosity is key for a president, though. If they’re not interested, that's a problem. You want them engaged, thinking critically about the world around them. It’s like Mike Baker says, having your own spy to keep you informed! You can’t afford to have a commander in chief who’s out of the loop.
At the end of the day, it’s about presenting the facts and letting them process it how they will. That’s how we keep them sharp and ready to make big decisions. It’s no small task, but it’s fascinating to be part of that process.
Please use your platform to make everyone know SJR 106 is not good now for our country
Absolutely, man! It's important to get the word out about stuff like Senate Resolution SJR 106. You’ve got to realize that this isn't just a political issue; it affects all of us on a personal level. The implications of any resolution that could limit free speech or manipulate public discourse are huge. It's about transparency and ensuring that everyone has a voice in the conversation.
I mean, think about it—when you start regulating what people can say or what information they can access, you're setting a dangerous precedent. It's like we’ve seen in the past where certain narratives get controlled, and that can lead to a lot of misinformation and public manipulation.
We’re living in a digital age where information spreads like wildfire, and if the government or big tech starts censoring opinions, it’s not just about protecting national security anymore; it’s about silencing dissent.
So yeah, using platforms to educate each other on these issues is crucial. Let’s get people talking about it! It’s a matter of public discourse, freedom of expression, and ultimately the health of our democracy. If we don’t engage and inform, we risk letting others dictate the narrative for us. So, guys, stay informed and make your voices heard!