Man, that's a really interesting point you're bringing up. The claim that "the First Amendment is an obstruction to protecting against misinformation" has been echoed by various individuals, but I can't pinpoint a specific person from the context provided. It's a controversial take, and honestly, it raises so many questions about how we define truth and who gets to decide what's misinformation. I mean, that whole idea of amending the First Amendment? That's wild!

What we really should be focusing on is whether it’s smart to let the government or any entity decide what speech is dangerous. Because once you give that power away, who knows what could happen? Free speech should be messy; that’s part of the beauty of it! It’s a tough road to navigate for sure. What do you think?